Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Common sequence variants in the LOXL1gene in pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma

  • Emiliano Giardina1, 2,
  • Francesco Oddone3,
  • Tiziana Lepre1,
  • Marco Centofanti3, 4,
  • Cristina Peconi1,
  • Lucia Tanga3Email author,
  • Luciano Quaranta5,
  • Paolo Frezzotti6,
  • Giuseppe Novelli1 and
  • Gianluca Manni4
BMC Ophthalmology201414:52

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-52

Received: 18 July 2013

Accepted: 26 March 2014

Published: 16 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the LOXL1 gene are associated with pseudoesfoliation syndrome and pseudoesfoliation glaucoma. The aim of our study is to investigate a potential involvement of LOXL1 gene in the pathogenesis of pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) and pigmentary glaucoma (PG).

Methods

A cohort of Caucasian origin of 84 unrelated and clinically well-characterised patients with PDS/PG and 200 control subjects were included in the study. Genomic DNA from whole blood was extracted and the coding and regulatory regions of LOXL1 gene were risequenced in both patients and controls to identify unknown sequence variations. Genotype and haplotype analysis were performed with UNPHASED software. The expression levels of LOXL1 were determined on c-DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

Results

A significant allele association was detected for SNP rs2304722 within the fifth intron of LOXL1 (Odds ratio (OR = 2.43, p-value = 3,05e-2). Haplotype analysis revealed the existence of risk and protective haplotypes associated with PG-PDS (OR = 3.35; p-value = 1.00e-5 and OR = 3.35; p-value = 1.00e-4, respectively). Expression analysis suggests that associated haplotypes can regulate the expression level LOXL1.

Conclusions

Haplotypes of LOXL1 are associated with PG-PDS independently from rs1048661, leading to a differential expression of the transcript.

Keywords

Pigment dispersion syndrome Pigmentary glaucoma Genetics LOXL1

Background

Glaucoma, the leading global cause of irreversible visual impairment and blindness, is a group of chronic, progressive optic neuropathies that have in common characteristic morphological changes at the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fibre layer [1]. The cause of glaucomatous neuropathy is unknown; previous studies have suggested that multiple factors, including multiple genetic factors, might be responsible for this condition. Pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) and pigmentary glaucoma (PG) are the most common non-traumatic causes of glaucoma in young adults and are characterised by disruption of the iris pigment epithelium and deposition of abnormal pigment granules throughout the anterior segment, which results in aqueous outflow obstruction [2].

Like the majority of human diseases PG and PDS show a familial aggregation that does not usually follow Mendelian family patterns but is caused by an unknown number of multiple genes, usually interacting with various environmental factors. A single susceptibility locus to PDS has been mapped on chromosome 7q35-q36 but the candidate gene is yet to be identified [3].

Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEXS) is the most common identifiable cause of open-angle glaucoma, accounting for approximately 25% of all open-angle glaucoma worldwide [4]. It is an age-related systemic disease of the extracellular matrix characterized by the multifocal production and progressive accumulation of a fibrillar extracellular material in intra and extra-ocular tissues that is either the result of an excessive production or insufficient breakdown or both [5].

Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEXS) is the most common identifiable cause of openangle glaucoma, accounting for approximately 25% of all open-angle glaucoma worldwide [4]. It is an age-related systemic disease of the extracellular matrix characterised by the multifocal production and progressive accumulation of a fibrillar extracellular material in intra- and extraocular tissues, which is either the result of excessive production, insufficient breakdown or both [5]. PEXS and PDS are two disorders that can produce secondary glaucoma through trabecular blockage [2, 6] Secondary open-angle glaucoma because of PEXS (PEXG) develops from the deposition of exfoliation material in the trabecular meshwork, leading to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and consequently glaucomatous optic neuropathy [7].

Recently, a genome-wide association study demonstrated that one intronic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs2165241) and two non-synonymous coding SNPs (rs1048661 (R141L) and rs3825942 (G153D)), located in the first exon of the LOXL1 gene (15q24-q25), confer risk to PEXG through PEXS in the Icelandic and Swedish populations [8]. Several following studies replicated the association of these two nonsynonymous SNPs with exfoliation syndrome (XFS) in different populations [7, 914].

The aim of our study was the mutational analysis of the coding and regulatory regions of LOXL1 to disclose unknown variants and/or haplotypes associated with the development of pigment PDS and PG.

Methods

Study subjects

Unrelated Italian patients with clinically well-characterised PDS/PG and healthy control subjects were recruited at the moment of referral at the glaucoma unit of the Bietti Eye Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy and the ophthalmology clinic of the University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethics Committee of the University of Tor Vergata, R. S. 91.10, 24/09/2010) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and local law.

Written informed consent was obtained before enrolment from all subjects. After the collection of demographic and historical data, all enrolled subjects underwent a complete detailed ophthalmological examination including (i) corrected visual acuity (ETDRS), (ii) slit lamp biomicroscopy examination of the anterior segment, (iii) gonioscopic evaluation of the anterior chamber angle using a one mirror high magnification gonio lens (MagnaView Gonio laser lens), (iv) measurement of IOP using Goldmann applanation tonometry and (v) indirect ophthalmoscopy using a 90D Volk’s lens. Moreover, the visual field (VF) was tested in all subjects using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 test pattern and SITA standard threshold strategy.

Subjects with PDS were defined as those with an open angle at gonioscopy, trabecular meshwork pigmentation, the presence of a Krukenberg spindle and midperipheral iris transillumination. Subjects with PG were defined as those with a documented history of IOP > 24 mmHg, optic disc and confirmed VF damage (defined as a glaucoma hemifield test result outside normal limits, MD and PSD outside 95% confidence limits and a cluster of at least three points with P < 0.05 in the pattern deviation plot, with one of each with P < 0.01 affecting the same hemifield).

Common exclusion criteria for PDS/PG were a history of ocular surgery or traumas, any active ocular pathology different from glaucoma, PEXS or PEXG, other causes of secondary glaucoma or a history of long-term use of topical or systemic steroids.

Healthy subjects with no history of IOP > 22 mmHg in both eyes, open angle at gonioscopy, normal anterior segment, normal appearance of optic disc and normal VF were recruited as controls.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral white blood cells of all subjects using the QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (Qiagen Ltd, Valencia, CA, USA). The coding and regulatory regions of LOXL1 were resequenced in both patients (n = 84) and healthy controls (n = 100) using sequence specific primers (Table 1). PCR products were purified using an ultraclean PCR purification kit (DyeEx Kits, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced in an ABI 3130 × l sequencer using a Big Dye 3.1 terminator ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). DNA sequences were analysed using the sequencing analysis 3.0 software package (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). The genotyping of rs1048661, rs3825942 and rs2304722 was performed in an extended control cohort (n = 100) by TaqMan assays. Reactions were run in an AB7500 (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) and interpreted using Sequence Detection System (SDS) 2.1 software.
Table 1

Self-designed primers used for LOXL1 resequencing

 

Forward 5′-3′

Reverse 5′-3′

Amplicons size (bp)

Exon 1

GCAGGTGTACAGCTTGCTCA

ACACGAAACCCTGGTCGTG

420

Intron 1

GCAGAAGGGCGATTATAGC

CATGTGAGTACACAGCTTG

392

Exon 2

CTGATGCTCTCAATGCATGC

CTTGCAGACAGCCTAGCTG

228

Exon 3

CATGCTGGGTTCTGGTGTCA

CTAATCCAGTATCTGTCTC

258

Exon 4

GACTAGGCCCTCTTCTTTCTC

CGCTCTTTGCCTCCCCAAC

224

Exon 5

CAGAAACTCCTGAAGGTGGG

GCTGAAGCTTCTTTCAGGAAC

240

Exon 6

CTCTCTGTCTGTCTGTCTGC

CTGCGTTCGGCCATCAAGG

304

Exon 7

GAAATGTAGGCCCATGCTG

GAAGGATGATGCCTAAGGAC

486

Real-time PCR

The generation of first-strand cDNA was performed using a high capacity DNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the reverse transcriptase reaction products were used for quantitative real-time PCR, which was run in an AB7500 (Applied Biosystems) using TaqMan predesigned probes (Hs00935937_m1).

The amount of mRNA for LOXL1 in each sample was normalised to the amount of mRNA of the beta 2-tubulin reference gene in the same sample. Relative mRNA expression levels of all examined genes were measured using the comparative 2 ΔΔCT Ct method. Each plate contained three positive controls (samples previously confirmed by direct sequencing as both heterozygous and homozygous) and two negative controls.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using a standard 2 × 2 table and Fisher’s exact tests. Allele and genotype frequencies of each sequence variant were compared between patients and healthy controls. Haplotype analysis in unrelated samples was performed using the software UNPHASED, available at https://sites.google.com/site/fdudbridge/software/unphased-3-1. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the online software “calculator for confidence intervals of OR in an unmatched case control study” available at http://www.hutchon.net/ConfidOR.htm. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was evaluated by LD plotter available at http://www.pharmgat.org.

RNA preparation

Total RNA was extracted from lymphocyte cells with an RNAeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was then eluted in 30 μl of RNase-free water and stored at –80°C.

Results

Altogether, 84 PDS/PG patients (mean age 48.0 ± 4.9 years, 40 females and 44 males), and 200 healthy control subjects (mean age 46.7 ± 5.2 years, 97 males and103 females) were enrolled in this study.

The regulatory and coding regions of LOXL1 were resequenced in all enrolled PG/PDS control subjects to identify sequence variants. Table 2 reports a list of identified sequence variants and allele and genotype frequency in our cohort of patients and controls. No departure from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was detected for all SNPs identified. Allele frequencies of SNPs rs1048661 and rs3825942, associated to pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma [8], showed weak differences between cases and controls, although they didnot reach significance (Table 2). We failed to reveal differences in allele and genotype frequency for rs2165241. Notably, a significant association for rs2304722 (intron 5) was detected in PG/PDS patients (Table 2) with the T allele showing a frequency of 0.90 in PG/PDS patients and 0.80 in control subjects (OR = 2.43, pvalue = 3.05e-2).
Table 2

Location and allele frequencies of sequence variation identified in PDS/PG cases and controls

Position

SNP

Variation

PDS*/PG

Controls

P

Exon 1

rs1048661

G/T

G = 0.66

G = 0.71

NS

T = 0.34

T = 0.29

Exon 1

rs3825942

G/A

G = 0.84

G = 0.8

NS

A = 0.16

A = 0.2

Exon 1

rs2165241

C/T

C = 0.51

C = 0.50

NS

T = 0.49

T = 0.50

Intron 5

rs2304722

C/T

C = 0.09

C = 0.21

1.62e-4

T = 0.91

T = 0.79

Exon 7

rs8818

G/C

G = 0.69

G = 0.68

NS

C = 0.31

C = 0.32

Exon 7

rs3522

C/T

T = 0.44

T = 0.45

NS

   

C = 0.56

C = 0.55

 

*Pigmentary Dispersion Syndrome; Pigmentary Glaucoma; Not significant.

Pairwise LD analysis for all identified SNPs revealed differences in LD patterns between cases and controls (Figure 1). LD patterns suggested the existence of a conserved block between markers rs1048661 and rs2165241 associated with the disease. The extent of LD was different between the case and control groups, confirming the region between rs1048661 and rs2304722 as a locus of putative association.
Figure 1

Linkage Disequilibrium patterns in both cases (left) and controls (right). The extent of LD is higher in cases chromosomes than in control chromosomes. Cases: rs1048661-rs3825942 D’ = 1; rs3825942- rs2304722 D’ = 1; rs1048661-rs2304722 D’ = 1. Controls: rs1048661-rs3825942 D’ = 0.73; rs3825942- rs2304722 D’ = 0.51; rs1048661-rs2304722 D’ = 0.96.

Afterwards, a fine mapping of specific haplotype subsets within the block was performed to narrow the minimal associated chromosomal region. As expected, haplotype analysis confirmed the LD findings revealing a highly associated haplotype for markers rs1048661, rs3825942 and rs2304722. Haplotype harbouring of the T allele of rs1048661, G allele of rs3825942 and T allele of rs2304722 was significantly over-represented only in PG/PDS cases (OR = 3.35; p-value = 1.0e-5) (Table 3). Conversely, haplotype harbouring of the T allele of rs1048661, G allele of rs3825942 and C allele of rs2304722 was significantly under-represented in PG/PDS chromosomes (OR = 3.35; p-value = 1.0e-4). The further dissection of haplotype distribution in case and control chromosomes revealed that risk and protective haplotypes shared the same alleles at loci rs1048661 and rs3825942, suggesting a role for rs2304722. By contrast, haplotypes GGT and GAT, harbouring the T allele of rs2304722, were unassociated in our cohort, ruling out a direct functional role for this allele.
Table 3

LOXL1 Haplotypes in PDS/PG cases and controls

Haplotype*

No. (%) of PDS/PG patients

No. (%) of control subjects

OR (95% CI)

P

GGT

0.50

0.51

0.96 (0.66-1.40)

NS

GAT

0.16

0.20

0.79 (0.48-1.31)

NS

TGC

0.09

0.20

0.41 (0.23-0.76)

1e-4

TGT

0.25

0.09

3.35 (2.02-5.58)

1e-5

*Haplotypes are from rs1048661-rs3825942-rs2304722.

Previous data on adipose tissues have shown that the expression of LOXL1 is decreased by 7.7% per risk allele of SNP rs1048661 (R141L) in PEXS and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma [8]. To verify if the associated haplotypes could affect the expression levels of LOXL1, independently from the rs1048661 genotype, we compared the lymphocyte expression patterns of LOXL1 between patients homozygous for risk, protective and neutral haplotype. We performed a quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) assay on lymphocyte cells from nine healthy samples. Three samples were homozygous for the neutral haplotype, three samples were homozygous for the protective haplotype and three samples were homozygous for the risk haplotype.

Expression analysis revealed that samples harbouring the risk haplotype showed a decrease of expression levels of LOXL1 (9%) with respect to the neutral (unassociated) haplotype. Interestingly, expression levels of LOXL1 increased in the sample homozygous for the protective haplotype (26%) with respect to the samples harbouring neutral haplotypes (Figure 2).
Figure 2

LOXL1 mRNA expression in lymphocytes of samples homozygous for risk haplotype (TGC), neutral haplotype (GGT) and protective haplotype (TGT). LOXL1 mRNA expression in “at risk individuals” and “protective individuals” was respectively lower 0.91 (95% C.I. 0,85-0,98) C.I. and higher 1,26 (95% C.I. 1,08-1,49) than that in individuals harbouring neutral (non associated) haplotype 1,00 (95% C.I. 0,94-1,05). Beta 2-tubulin was used to normalize for any differences in mRNA.

Discussion

We found that common sequence variants of LOXL1 gene are associated with an increased risk of PDS/PG. Our results are in accord with the findings of Rao and colleagues [15] in that there is no significant association for the LOXL1 SNPs (rs1048661 and rs3825942) with PEXG in PG/PDS only [8].

In our study, the full sequencing of the LOXL1 gene allowed us to identify that a different sequence variation, rs2304722, is strongly associated with PDS/PG.

Markers rs1048661 and rs3825942 are statistically associated with the disease only when combined with rs2304722. Allele and haplotype associations were also supported by expression analysis, revealing the existence of a differential regulation of LOXL1 mRNA in samples harbouring the risk or protective haplotypes. These data suggest that the downregulation of LOXL1 is independent from the rs1048661 genotype and is associated with the susceptibility to PG/PDS. It should also be outlined that the association of rs2304722 might reflect the presence of a genuine association owing to LD with another, putatively causal polymorphism in the adjacent LOXL1 gene region. The genetic association of LOXL1 SNPs and the expression analysis in PDS/PG support our hypothesis of a functional role of the product of the LOXL1 gene in the pathogenesis of pigmentary disorders. The expression levels of LOXL1 were determined on c-DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes by quantitative real-time RT-PCR, since it is difficult to obtain tissue from eye tissues.

The LOXL1 gene, a member of the lysyl oxidase family, consists of seven exons, five of which (exon 2–exon 6) are of similar size and encode proteins with 76% amino acid identity. 16 Exon 1 codes for a signal peptide, a putative pro-enzyme region, and the beginning of a mature enzyme [16]. Lysyl oxidases are extracellular copperrequiring enzymes that catalyse the cross-linking of collagen and elastin through the oxidative deamination of a lysine or hydrolysine side chain, with the consequential formation of elastin polymer fibres [16, 17]. The elastic fibres are components of the extracellular matrix and confer resilience [16].

Liu et al. showed that mice lacking LOXL1 do not deposit normal elastic fibres in the uterine tract postpartum and develop pelvic organ prolapse, enlarged airspaces of the lung and loose skin and vascular abnormalities with concomitant tropoelastin accumulation [18].

Conclusion

The pathogenesis of PG has not yet been characterised, and it has been hypothesised that a major role is exerted by the presence of iris concavity, which leads to iridozonular friction and iris pigmented epithelium disruption. The findings of our study support the hypothesis of the presence of defects in the stromal iris elastic fibres linking to the mutation of the LOXL1 gene that could justify the presence of the increased iris concavity frequently presented in PDS/PG. The results of this work, which need to be confirmed by independent studies, suggest new insights on the molecular basis of iris pigment dispersion and related glaucoma, with presumed benefits for the screening and management of diseases.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, School of Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” and Fondazione PTV “Policlinico Tor Vergata”
(2)
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics UILDM, Fondazione Santa Lucia
(3)
Fondazione G.B. Bietti-IRCCS
(4)
DSCMT, University of Tor Vergata
(5)
Glaucoma Unit, University of Brescia
(6)
Department of Surgery, University of Siena

References

  1. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, Menage MJ: Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992, 99: 1499-1504. 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31774-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell DG: Pigmentary dispersion and glaucoma: a new theory. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979, 97: 1667-1672. 10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020235011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen JS, Pralea AM, del Bono EA, Haines JL, Gorin MB, Schuman JS, Mattox CG, Wiggs JL: A gene responsible for the pigment dispersion syndrome maps to 7q35-q36. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997, 115: 384-388. 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150386012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ritch R: Exfoliation syndrome: the most common identifiable cause of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994, 3: 176-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ritch R, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U: Exfoliation (pseudoexfoliation) syndrome: toward a new understanding: proceedings of the First International Think Tank. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001, 79 (2): 213-217. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079002213.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ritch R, Mudumbai R, Liebmann JM: Combined exfoliation and pigment dispersion: paradigm of an overlap syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2000, 107: 1004-1008. 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00058-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mossböck G, Renner W, Faschinger C, Schmut O, Wedrich A, Weger M: Lysyl oxidase-like protein 1 (LOXL1) gene polymorphisms and exfoliation glaucoma in a Central European population. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 857-861.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Thorleifsson G, Magnussom KP, Sulem P, Walters GB, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson H, Jonsson T, Jonasdottir A, Stefansdottir G, Masson G, Hardarson GA, Petursson H, Arnarsson A, Motallebipour M, Wallerman O, Wadelius C, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Jonasson F, Stefansson K: Common sequence variants in the LOXL1 gene confer susceptibility to exfoliation glaucoma. Science. 2007, 317: 1397-1400. 10.1126/science.1146554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Challa P, Schmidt S, Liu Y, Qin X, Vann RR, Gonzalez P, Allingham RR, Hauser MA: Analysis of LOXL1 polymorphisms in a United States population with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 146-149.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pasutto F, Krumbiegel M, Mardin CY, Paoli D, Lämmer R, Weber BH, Kruse FE, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Reis A: Association of LOXL1 common sequence variants in German and Italian patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008, 49 (4): 1459-1463. 10.1167/iovs.07-1449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ozaki M, Lee KY, Vithana EN, Yong VH, Thalamuthu A, Mizoguchi T, Venkatraman A, Aung T: Association of LOXL1 gene polymorphisms with pseudoexfoliation in the Japanese. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008, 49 (9): 3976-10.1167/iovs.08-1805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mori K, Imai K, Matsuda A, Ikeda Y, Naruse S, Hitora-Takeshita H, Nakano M, Taniguchi T, Omi N, Tashiro K, Kinoshita S: LOXL1 genetic polymorphisms are associated with exfoliation glaucoma in the Japanese population. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 1037-1040.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang X, Zabriskie NA, Hau VS, Chen H, Tong Z, Gibbs D, Farhi P, Katz BJ, Luo L, Pearson E, Goldsmith J, Ma X, Kaminoh Y, Chen Y, Yu B, Zeng J, Zhang K, Yang Z: Genetic association of LOXL1 gene variants and exfoliation glaucoma in a Utah cohort. Cell Cycle. 2008, 7 (4): 521-524. 10.4161/cc.7.4.5388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramprasad VL, George R, Soumittra N, Sharmila F, Vijaya L, Kumaramanickavel G: Association of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in the LOXL1 gene with pseudoexfoliation syndrome in India. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 318-322.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Rao KN, Ritch R, Dorairaj SK, Kaur I, Liebmann JM, Thomas R, Chakrabarti S: Exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma-associated LOXL1 variations are not involved in pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 1254-1262.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomassin L, Werneck CC, Broekelmann TJ, Gleyzal C, Hornstra IK, Mecham RP, Sommer P: The pro-regions of lysyl oxidase and lysyl oxidase-like 1 are required for deposition onto elastic fibres. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (52): 42848-42855. 10.1074/jbc.M506832200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Csiszar K: Lysyl oxidases: a novel multifunctional amine oxidase family. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2001, 70: 1-32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu X, Zhao Y, Gao J, Pawlyk B, Starcher B, Spencer JA, Yanagisawa H, Zuo J, Li T: Elastic fibre homeostasis requires lysyl oxidaselike 1 protein. Nat Genet. 2004, 36: 178-182. 10.1038/ng1297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/14/52/prepub

Copyright

© Giardina et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement