Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Transscleral tunnel incision related arterial hemorrhage in 23-gauge Vitrectomy: case report

BMC OphthalmologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0677-6

  • Received: 6 December 2016
  • Accepted: 11 January 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Transscleral tunnel incisions are commonly made to avoid postoperative leakage in small gauge sutureless vitrectomy. We present an unreported intraoperative complication, tunnel incision related arterial hemorrhage from sclerotomy, in 23-gauge (23G) vitrectomy.

Case presentation

Two cases of intraocular arterial hemorrhage from superonasal sclerotomy were observed at the beginning of vitrectomy. The bleeding filled the vitreous cavity quickly and gushed out from the incision port after the involved supronasal cannula was removed. The active bleeding seemed not to stop spontaneously. We controlled the active bleeding by relocating the involved cannula, elevating the intraocular pressure and compressing the sclera wound. Post-operative intraocular hemorrhage from the sclerotomy was not found in any of the two cases.

Conclusions

We suggest that the bleeding was from injured ciliary artery when the incision crossed 3 or 9 o’clock accidently. Surgeons might avoid this complication by locating the superior incisions away from the horizontal axis, and should be aware the proper management.

Keywords

  • Small gauge vitrectomy
  • Tunnel incision related complication, arterial bleeding
  • Ciliary artery
  • Case report

Background

Sutureless is an important aspect of small gauge vitrectomy [13]. Oblique or biplanar incisions are recommended by many surgeons in order to create a watertight sclera tunnel, thus reducing the risk of postoperative hypotony associated complications [16].

Case presentation

We made tunnel sclerotomies with trocar blades (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., TX, USA) using a biplanar technique for 23G vitrectomy. We present two cases of intraocular arterial hemorrhage through superonasal incision port at the beginning of vitrectomy (Fig. 1a). Neither of the two patients showed blood coagulation dysfunction in preoperative blood test.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Transscleral tunnel incision related arterial hemorrhage. a Arterial hemorrhage from the superonasal incision observed through a wide angle viewing lens. b Blood gushed out through the transscleral incision after the cannula was removed

Case 1

A 52 year old Chinese male patient had a macular hole, confirmed by optical coherence tomography, in his left eye, lasting for 6 months. No systemic disease was recorded. His preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.1. Three port 23G vitrectomy was performed. We tried to insert the superior cannulars at about 2 and 10 o’clock, but actually the superonasal cannular seemed to be placed from 10 to 9 o’clock, crossing the horizontal axis. There was no prominent hemorrhage in the conjunctiva or episclera at incision sites after placing the trocars. A metal ring was then sutured at the limbus followed by placing a glass lens. At the beginning of vitrectomy, small volume of hemorrhage was observed, and soon the bleeding was found active and filled the vitreous cavity. Elevating the perfusion pressure could not stop the increase of vitreous hemorrhage. Considering that the bleeding was from ciliary artery, we relocated the superonasal cannula and observed blood gushed out from the initial incision wound. Compressing the sclera wound site and elevating the intraocular pressure for about 10 min stopped the bleeding finally. The vitreous hemorrhage was cleared. The internal limiting membrane was peeled and C3F8 (12%) tamponade was performed (Additional file 1). No further intraocular hemorrhage was observed postoperatively. Post-operative BCVA was 0.25 at three-months.

Case 2

A 43-year-old male Chinese patient had proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diagnosed by history of diabetic disease and fundus imaging, in his right eye, lasting for 2 months. His visual acuity was finger counting at 1 m. Intravitreous injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent (ranibizumab, 0.5 mg) was performed 1 week prior to 23G vitrectomy. At the beginning of vitrectomy, active hemorrhage was observed from the superonasal incision site through non-contacting viewing lens (Fig. 1a). We removed the superonasal trocar (possibly crossing the horizontal axis) and observed blood gushed out from the incision wound (Fig. 1b). Compressing the sclera wound site and elevating the intraocular pressure for about 5 min stopped the bleeding. The cannula was reinserted with a trocar at adjacent site, and the vitreous hemorrhage was cleared. The fibrous membrane was removed and laser photocoagulation was performed. Mild vitreous cloudy was observed on the second day after surgery. No active hemorrhage was found through the scleral incision wounds. The visual acuity was 0.1 at 3 months.

Discussion and conclusions

In general, longer sclera tunnels are associated with better wound closure, and less post-operative leakage. We made sclera incisions parallel to limbus using a biplanar technique, with sclera tunnels estimated at about 1.5–2 mm long.

Apart from the stepped incision technique, there is another difference between 20-gauge (20G) and small gauge vitrectomy: the conjunctiva is usually not opened in microincision vitrectomy surgery. Tiny bleeding from the cut edge of sclera incisions is common, both in 20G and small gauge vitrectomy, but arterial hemorrhage has never been observed in thousands cases of 20G vitrectomy performed by the same surgeon. We thought the bleeding was not likely from conjunctival or episcleral vessels because 1) the intraocular hemorrhage was observed first; 2) sub-conjunctival bleeding was not found upon incision, but observed soon after the incision cannular was removed; 3) bleeding from conjunctiva or episclera might not be pulsating; 4) bleeding from conjunctiva or episclera could be stopped spontaneously or by simple compression; 5) the bleeding volume from conjunctiva or episclera would be much smaller.

We deduced that the tunnel incision caused active hemorrhage was from long posterior ciliary artery or anterior ciliary artery, because 1) the superonasal incision seemed crossing 9 o’clock in case 1, and 3 o’clock in case 2, the insertion needle would accidentally injury ciliary artery; 2) the fact that it occurs in the superonasal rather than in the superotemporal quadrant seems like an extra argument. 3) the bleeding could not stop spontaneously, it supports the opinion that the hemorrhage at incision position was from injured artery; 4) moving the cannula by cutter during surgery was associated with more severe bleeding.

The posterior long ciliary artery or anterior ciliary artery might be the source of bleeding in our cases. The posterior long ciliary arteries pass through the sclera nasal and termporal to the optic nerve and run horizontally at first in scleral tunnel, and then in suprachoroidal space, as far forward as the posterior part of ciliary body. The anterior ciliary arteries pierce the sclera just in front of the insertions of the rectus muscles in a slightly oblique direction from posterior to anterior. Each rectus muscle has two anterior ciliary arteries, except the lateral rectus muscle, which has only one [7].

Placing cannula crossing or near the 3/9 o clock might happen in such situations: inserting cannula close to horizontal axis with a long scleral tunnel; the eyeball being rotated unintentionally before inserting the superior cannulas. It must be strongly stressed that inserting the needle at 3/9 o’clock should be prohibited during vitrectomy to avoid ciliary artery injury.

The active bleeding in our cases gained rapid control by relocating the involved cannula, elevating intraocular pressure and compressing the incision wound. The realization and proper treatment of such complication should be kept in mind in small gauge vitrectomy.

Abbreviations

20G: 

20-gauge

23G: 

23-gauge

BCVA: 

Best corrected visual acuity

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Wenjun Guo and Mrs. Xiaoyan Deng for assistant in video recording.

Funding

This study was supported by Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (3030901006039), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570862), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030313197). The funding body had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

The first two authors contributed equally. LL conceived of the study. All authors analyzed the cases; BL and YL drafted the manuscript. LL, TL, and YL critically revised manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written consent for publication was obtained from the two patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

References

  1. Fabian ID, Moisseiev J. Sutureless vitrectomy: evolution and current practices. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(3):318–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Thompson JT. Advantages and limitations of small gauge vitrectomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(2):162–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Recchia FM, Scott IU, Brown GC, Brown MM, Ho AC, Ip MS. Small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(9):1851–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Woo SJ, Park KH, Hwang JM, Kim JH, Yu YS, Chung H. Risk factors associated with sclerotomy leakage and postoperative hypotony after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina. 2009;29(4):456–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Inoue M, Shinoda K, Shinoda H, Kawamura R, Suzuki K, Ishida S. Two-step oblique incision during 25-gauge vitrectomy reduces incidence of postoperative hypotony. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35(8):693–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lin AL, Ghate DA, Robertson ZM, O'Sullivan PS, May WL, Chen CJ. Factors affecting wound leakage in 23-gauge sutureless pars plana vitrectomy. Retina. 2011;31(6):1101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lutty GA, Bhutto I, McLeod DS. Anatomy of the ocular vasculatures. In: Schmetterer L, Kiel JW, editors. Ocular blood flow. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 3–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement