An ERM arises secondary to the proliferation of cells along the ILM on the retinal surface. ERMs have been well characterized in adults: they are mostly idiopathic, associated with PVD and a defective ILM, and are found mainly in the elderly [1]. They are rare in adolescents and even rarer in children, as PVD is not likely to occur in these populations. The estimated incidence of ERM is 0.54 per 100,000 patients aged < 19 years [4]. The most commonly reported aetiologies are trauma (39%), uveitis (20%) and rare causes such as combined hamartoma of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium (11%); 30% of cases are idiopathic [4]. Other causes such as ocular toxocariasis, retinopathy of prematurity and Coats’ disease can also lead to secondary ERM in children [2]. However, none of these conditions were found in the case presented here.
In adult patients, ERMs generally have a cellophane-like appearance. In the present case, the fibrotic membrane was white, thick, and opaque enough to obscure the underlying retina. Preoperative OCT images depicted the membrane as a smooth hyper-reflective band located just above the RNFL, without severe involvement of the inner retinal layers, which is different to the appearance of the ERMs commonly seen in elderly patients. The widely-accepted theory of ERM formation is related to cellular proliferation and phenotypic transition on remnants of the vitreous cortex after anomalous PVD [5,6,7]. However, in this 4-year-old patient, the retinal surface was almost continuous and PVD was not identified. Furthermore, the membrane was located between the relatively intact ILM and the rest of the retina. As a result of this unexpected finding, we analysed the structure and composition of the membrane using scanning electron microscopy, a powerful magnification tool that revealed abundant hemosiderin deposits within the membrane. Hemosiderin is an iron-storage complex found most often in macrophages after phagocytosis of red blood cells and is especially abundant following haemorrhage [8]. Hemosiderin is hardly observed in idiopathic ERMs; previous histological studies on surgically excised ERMs have revealed the main components to be retinal glial or myoblastic retinal pigment epithelial cells [9]. Although some fibrovascular ERMs present in eyes with extensive retinal ischemia may have a primarily vascular composition, such as blood vessels with hemocytes lined by endothelial cells [10], the unremarkable retinal vasculature and medical history of this patient’s vascular disease make this case very unlikely. Taken together, it is speculated that the membrane developed after retinal sub-ILM haemorrhage and the gradual absorption and organization of the haemorrhage.
The possible causes of sub-ILM haemorrhage in children are Terson’s syndrome, shaken-baby syndrome, Valsalva maculopathy and birth-canal compression [11, 12]. However, the patient’s parents reported no history of baby-shaking, Valsalva maneuver or birth-canal compression. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility of trauma due to an accidental craniocerebral injury that could have occurred without the parents noticing. The retinal vessels of babies are not fully developed, and a surge in pressure in the intraocular veins, secondary to increased intracranial pressure during a craniocerebral injury, can cause spontaneous rupture of retinal capillaries [13]. This also partially explains the location of the membrane adjacent to the retinal vessels.
Conservative management with observation may be suitable for young patients with idiopathic ERMs, while surgical treatment may be indicated for eyes with symptomatic vision disturbances or significant anatomical changes on OCT [14, 15]. In our case, pars plana vitrectomy was performed without any complications. The BCVA, although not progressive, remained stable at 1 year postoperatively. The patient is still undergoing visual training, and the final results will be revealed at future follow-ups.