Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The effect of fenofibrate on early retinal nerve fiber layer loss in type 2 diabetic patients: a case-control study

BMC Ophthalmology volume 18, Article number: 100 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous studies suggested that use of fenofibrate could significantly reduce the rate of progression into diabetic retinopathy (DR), and that retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss, which has been considered an important indicator for retinal neurodegeneration, might precede microvascular changes. The aim of this study was to assess the effect(s) of fenofibrate on RNFL thickness at early stage of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

In this retrospective matched case-control study we included a cohort of 89 patients with type 2 DM, aged 40 or above, between Jan 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017. Among the subjects, 48 patients received fenofibrate therapy and the other 41 patients did not receive fenofibrate treatment. We defined use of fenofibrate as the presence of any prescription for fenofibrate within 1 year before or any time after the diagnosis of DM, and all the patients had either no DR or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). The fibrate users were well matched with non-fenofibrate users for gender, age and axial length. The RNFL thickness in all quadrants of both eyes was examined with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the association of RNFL thickness with potential risk factors of DR other than fenofibrate use.

Results

The non-fenofibrate users had significantly reduced RNFL thickness of the superior quadrant of the right eye compared to the fenofibrate users (t = 2.384, P = 0.019). On the contrary, BMI (p = 0.034) and ACR (p = 0.024) were both negatively correlated to the RNFL thickness of the right eye.

Conclusion

Oral administration of fenofibrate was suggestively associated with thicker RNFL in superior quadrant of the right eye of patents with early DR.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and considered as a microvascular retinal disease [1]. Previous studies have reported that increased serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were associated with the development and severity of DR [2, 3]. Fibrates are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) agonists, which have been reported to effectively delay the progression of DR [4,5,6]. However, this benefit did not persist [7], and the potential mechanism of early DR remains unclear.

The most up-to-date studies have indicated that retinal neurodegeneration preceded microangiopathy of the retina and occurred at the earliest stage of DR [8,9,10]. Neuronal apoptosis and reduction in thickness of the inner retinal layers have been considered to cause defects in dark adaptation and contrast sensitivity, disturbances in color vision and abnormal microperimetry [11]. Topical administration of statins, the most widely used type of lipid-lowering reagents, has been proven to have a potent effect on preventing retinal neurodegeneration induced by DM [12]. The effect(s) of fibrates, another type of commonly used lipid-lowering drugs, on early retinal neurodegeneration still need further investigation.

The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has provided a useful tool for performing high-resolution imaging of the retina and subsequently measuring the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). The decreased RNFL thickness has been considered an important indicator for retinal neurodegeneration [13]. By using OCT several research groups have found that retinal thickness was decreased in diabetic patients without DR or with minimal DR compared to normal controls [14,15,16,17], and this decrease was associated with some risk factors, such as glycemic variability and vitamin D deficiency [13, 18]. However, the exact role(s) of these systemic risk factors in the development of retinal neurodegenerative lesions in DR remains largely unknown due to limited data. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effect of fenofibrate on RNFL loss at early stage of DR and to explore the possible mechanism(s).

Methods

Participants and grouping

A total of 89 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at age 40 or above were recruited from the Department of Endocrinology at Shaanxi provincial peoples’ hospital between Jan 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017, among whom were 48 fibrate users and 41 non-fibrate users. Use of fibrates was defined as regular or intermittent administration of fenofibrate for at least 1 year at any dosage. We also retrieved their medication history of taking sulfonylurea and insulin. We included patients who used fenofibrate before or after their diagnosis of diabetes; they either did not have DR or just had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), but none of them had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The fenofibrate users were well-matched with those who did not use fenofibrate for gender, age and axial length. We excluded patients younger than 40 years because they were unlikely to receive lipid-lowering reagents [19]. We also excluded patients who had one of the following situation: glaucoma, a positive family history of glaucoma, a refractive error of more than SE + 5 or SE − 3 diopters [13], AL > 25 mm in at least one eye [20], previous refractive surgeries, intraocular surgery, significant media opacity, a history of uveitis or retinal disease and neuro-ophthalmic disease. The patients who had received statins or any other type of lipid-lowering agents regularly were also excluded.

Ophthalmological examinations

We identified all patients with careful examinations of both eyes by ophthalmologists. A detailed review of medical and ocular histories was also carried out for each patient. The fundus was examined with a handheld lens (90D Volk Optical) before the slit-lamp test. DR was graded blindly based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). Peripapillary RNFL (pRNFL) thickness was measured with 3D scan OCT imaging (6.0 × 6.0 mm, 512 × 128, 3D OCT-1, ver.8.30, Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after pupillary dilation. Only the well-focused and well-centered images with quality strength of 25 or more and without eye movement were analyzed. The superior, inferior, nasal, temporal and average RNFL thickness was measured and then subjected to further analysis. The axial length was measured for three times with Zeiss IOLMaster 500 (Germany). The intraocular pressure (IOP) of all participants was measured with a non-contact tonometer (Tomey FT1000, Japan) for three times. Before each use, the tonometer was calibrated in accordance to the user’s manual and only the measurements with errors < 5% were used for data analysis.

Laboratory tests

All included participants were diagnosed with type 2 DM according to the following criteria: a fasting plasma glucose level of 7.0 mmol/L or above or symptoms of diabetes plus a casual blood glucose level of 11.1 mmol/L or above [21]. Oral fenofibrate dosage and duration were collected from both medical records and questionnaires performed by ophthalmologists to ensure the accuracy of data. We defined regular fenofibrate use as a prescription obtained within 1 year after the date of diagnosis. Irregular use was any other use of fenofibrate for at least 1 year. The serum lipid profiles, including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) were collected from patients’ medical records.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA) and SPSS for Windows version 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of each group. The independent-sample t-test was carried out to compare the means of two groups. The multiple linear regressions analysis was performed to identify factors potentially related to the RNFL loss; in this assay the RNFL thickness in superior quadrant of the right eye was the dependent variable, and the independent variables included age, gender, DR status, diabetes duration, serum lipids, ACR, AL, IOP and the duration of fenofibrate use. A p value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Basic characteristics of the subjects

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 89 participants (178 eyes) with type 2 DM, aged 40 or above, were included in this study, among whom were 48 fibrate users and 41 non-fibrate users. At baseline, compared to the non-fibrate users, patients who had received fenofibrate treatment had a longer diabetic duration, higher BMI, increased blood TC and TG and lower HDL levels. No significant differences were discovered between the two groups in term of age, gender, AL, IOP, DR status, ACR and medication for DM treatment. The basic clinical and laboratory characteristics of all participants were summarized in (Table 1).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the participants
Full size table

The RNFL thickness

The RNFL thickness of the superior quadrant of the right retina of the non-fibrate users was significantly thinner (t = − 2.384, P = 0.019) than that of the fenofibrate users, which can be seen in the pictures of SD-OCT (Fig. 1a and b). However, no significant differences were discovered in the RNFL thickness of the superior quadrant of the left eye and in the average, inferior, temporal and nasal RNFL thickness of both eyes between the two groups (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a and b. Representative images of the OCT test for both eyes in two matched patients. (a) The OCT image of a patient who use fenofibrate regularly. (b) The OCT image of a matched non-fenofibrate user. In both images, green, yellow and red colors represented within normal range, threshold thickness and occurrence of RNFL thinning, respectively

Full size image
Table 2 The peripapillary RNFL thickness of fibrate user and non-fibrate user
Full size table

The potential risk factors for loss of RNFL thickness

To determine whether other risk factors, in particular blood lipids levels, were involved in the thinning of the right eye RNFL, a multiple linear regression analysis was employed and the results were shown in Table 3. Fenofibrate use was positively associated with the RNFL thickness of the superior quadrant of the right eye (p = 0.042). On the contrary, BMI (p = 0.034) and ACR (p = 0.024) were both found negatively correlated with the RNFL thickness of the right eye. However, no relationship between blood lipids levels and RNFL thickness was established in the analysis.

Table 3 Association between fenofibrate use and the RNFL thickness of the right eye in patients with type 2 diabetes
Full size table

Discussion

The present study investigated the thickness of RNFL at early stage of DR in diabetic patients whom were treated with or without fenofibrate. The results demonstrated that patients who did not use fenofibrate had a thinner superior quadrant RNFL thickness than fenofibrate user, when the results were adjusted for age, gender, AL, IOP, DR status, ACR and medication for DM treatment. Regarding the potential risk factors for RNFL loss, we found that the effect of fenofibrate on RNFL loss was not likely related to its lipid-lowering effect, but might be associated with its ability to regulate vascular endothelial function. This notion, however, needs to be examined by further studies.

DR is considered to be manifested by neurodegenerative changes at early stage before vascular abnormality occurs. Accumulating clinical and experimental studies have shown that neuronal abnormalities and apoptosis of different types of neuronal cells appeared in all retinal layers at early stages of DR [22, 23], and RNFL thinning was considered to be an important changes in diabetic retinal neurodegeneration and related to the severity of DR [24] . Early intervention was the only effective way to delay irreversible vision loss [25]. As one type of the most widely used lipid-lowering agents, fibrates have been reported to prevent DR progression and to reduce the need for laser treatment [4, 6] [26,27,28,29]. However, the correlation between fenofibrate use and retinal neurodegeneration in diabetic patients has not been reported yet. The present study therefore investigated the relationship between use of fenofibrate and the reduction in risk for RNFL loss at early stage of type 2 DM. We found that oral administration of fenofibrate could prevent RNFL loss in the superior quadrant of the right eye in diabetic patients without DR or with NPDR. Patients who never used fibrates had reduced RNFL thickness than those who were administrated with fenofibrate. Choi et al. [30] reported that RNFL defects in type 2 DM occurred more frequently on the superior side of retina (75.6% and 71.0% in right and left eyes, respectively). Lopes et al. [31] also reported that RNFL thickness of the superior segment became significantly thinner in patients with type 1 diabetes without DR than in normal population. Therefore, the superior quadrant of RNFL might represent the earliest and most significantly affected region in the retina; decrease in thickness of this area could be detected with SD-OCT and be used as an important indicator for assessing the effects of fenofibrate.

Fibrates are orally administered fibric acid derivatives that are conventionally used alone or as an adjunct to statins in treating dyslipidemia [32]. To assess whether the effect of fenofibrate on RNFL loss was related to its lipid-lowering effect, we performed a linear regressions analysis for the association between RNFL thickness and blood lipids levels. However, no significant difference was found between the level of any type of blood lipid and the superior quadrant RNFL thickness of the right eye. The results suggested that lowering the serum lipids levels might not represent the mechanism accounting for fenofibrate’s effect on RNFL loss. On the contrary, BMI was found negatively correlated with the superior RNFL thickness of the right eye, therefore, we suggested that restrict control of body weight might be another protective factor for delaying diabetic retinal neurodegeneration in DM patients.

Concerning other factors that might have an effect on RNFL thickness and were not well-matched between two groups, we found that ACR was negatively related to the superior RNFL thickness. ACR was regarded as an indirect indicator of endothelial function [33,34,35]. Some researchers considered that diabetic retinal neurodegeneration was partially associated with endothelial dysfunction by decreasing blood supply to the optic nerve head [30] [36]. A vascular insufficient optic nerve head might result in RNFL thinning in the optic disc on the superior side because of the gravitational influence. Therefore, vascular endothelial dysfunction represented the main pathophysiology of diabetes and was closely related to the severity of DR and retinal neurodegeneration [37]. We presumed that the effect of fenofibrate on RNFL loss might be partially related to endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 DM. However, the specific mechanism still need further study with animal experiments.

Several studies have shown that fibrates could affect signaling pathways involved in inflammation [38], angiogenesis [39] and cell survival [40], such as AMPK pathway [41] that plays important roles in diabetic vascular dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Therefore, we hypothesized that oral administration of fenofibrate might prevent RNFL loss through adjusting the endothelial dysfunction in retina; this could improve blood flow in vessels and reduce vascular leakage [42], and therefore increase the blood supply of the optic disc to avoid cell death. In addition, we also hypothesized that fibrates might delay neuron death and glial cell reactivation through its anti-inflammation and anti-apoptosis properties [43], which needs to be proved by further clinical and experimental studies. However, due to the limitations of observational study, we couldn’t assess the direct relationship between fenofibrate administration and ACR fluctuation, which might be completed by a well-matched prospective cohort study in future.

There were several limitations in the present study. Firstly, this was a case-control study, which mainly explored the association between use of fibrates and diabetic RNFL loss but did not take into account the dose of fibrates. Secondly, we didn’t perform subgroup analyses to compare the patients who used fibrates regularly and irregularly. Thirdly, we couldn’t collect the multifocal electroretinogram data of all the subjects, which was considered another effective method to assess neurodegeneration in retina [44], because patients at early stage of DR were not requested to do this examination.

Conclusions

Oral administration of fenofibrate was suggestively associated with thicker RNFL in superior quadrant of the right eye of patents with early DR.

Abbreviations

AL:

Axial length

BMI:

body mass index

DM:

Diabetic mellitus

DR:

diabetic retinopathy

DR:

Diabetic retinopathy

HbA1c:

Glycated hemoglobin

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

IOP:

Intraocular pressure

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

RNFL:

Retinal nerve fiber layer

References

  1. Cheung AK, Fung MK, Lo AC, Lam TT, So KF, Chung SS, Chung SK. Aldose reductase deficiency prevents diabetes-induced blood-retinal barrier breakdown, apoptosis, and glial reactivation in the retina of db/db mice. Diabetes. 2005;54(11):3119–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chew EY, Klein ML, Ferris FR, Remaley NA, Murphy RP, Chantry K, Hoogwerf BJ, Miller D. Association of elevated serum lipid levels with retinal hard exudate in diabetic retinopathy. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) report 22. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(9):1079–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis MD, Fisher MR, Gangnon RE, Barton F, Aiello LM, Chew EY, Ferris FR, Knatterud GL. Risk factors for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and severe visual loss: early treatment diabetic retinopathy study report #18. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(2):233–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chew EY, Ambrosius WT, Davis MD, Danis RP, Gangaputra S, Greven CM, Hubbard L, Esser BA, Lovato JF, Perdue LH, et al. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(3):233–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Firth J. Fenofibrate and diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2008;371(9614):722, 722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keech AC, Mitchell P, Summanen PA, O'Day J, Davis TM, Moffitt MS, Taskinen MR, Simes RJ, Tse D, Williamson E, et al. Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9600):1687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Persistent Effects of Intensive Glycemic Control on Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Follow-On Study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):1089–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chihara E, Matsuoka T, Ogura Y, Matsumura M. Retinal nerve fiber layer defect as an early manifestation of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(8):1147–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sohn EH, van Dijk HW, Jiao C, Kok PH, Jeong W, Demirkaya N, Garmager A, Wit F, Kucukevcilioglu M, van Velthoven ME, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration may precede microvascular changes characteristic of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes mellitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(19):E2655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jindal V. Neurodegeneration as a primary change and role of neuroprotection in diabetic retinopathy. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;51(3):878–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Moraes G, Layton CJ. Therapeutic targeting of diabetic retinal neuropathy as a strategy in preventing diabetic retinopathy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(9):838–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernandez C, Garcia-Ramirez M, Corraliza L, Fernandez-Carneado J, Farrera-Sinfreu J, Ponsati B, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Valverde AM, Simo R. Topical administration of somatostatin prevents retinal neurodegeneration in experimental diabetes. Diabetes. 2013;62(7):2569–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gungor A, Ates O, Bilen H, Kocer I. Retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness in early-stage diabetic retinopathy with vitamin D deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6433–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizutani T, Fowler BJ, Kim Y, Yasuma R, Krueger LA, Gelfand BD, Ambati J. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors suppress laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(12):7122–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Biallosterski C, van Velthoven ME, Michels RP, Schlingemann RO, DeVries JH, Verbraak FD. Decreased optical coherence tomography-measured pericentral retinal thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 with minimal diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(9):1135–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsson M, von Wendt G, Wanger P, Martin L. Early detection of macular changes in patients with diabetes using rarebit fovea test and optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(12):1596–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Toprak I, Yildirim C, Yaylali V. Optic disc topographic analysis in diabetic patients. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32(6):559–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Picconi F, Parravano M, Ylli D, Pasqualetti P, Coluzzi S, Giordani I, Malandrucco I, Lauro D, Scarinci F, Giorno P, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the role of glycemic variability. Acta Diabetol. 2017;

  19. Sugai T, Suzuki Y, Yamazaki M, Shimoda K, Mori T, Ozeki Y, Matsuda H, Sugawara N, Yasui-Furukori N, Minami Y, et al. High prevalence of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus in Japanese outpatients with schizophrenia: a Nationwide survey. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e166429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng PH, Hsu SY, Wang WS, Ko ML. Age and axial length on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in nonglaucomatous Taiwanese participants. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e179320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Basevi V, Di Mario S, Morciano C, Nonino F, Magrini N. Comment on: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011. Diabetes care 2011;34(Suppl. 1):S11-S61. DIABETES CARE. 2011;34(5):e53–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Abu-El-Asrar AM, Dralands L, Missotten L, Al-Jadaan IA, Geboes K. Expression of apoptosis markers in the retinas of human subjects with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(8):2760–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Curtis TM, Hamilton R, Yong PH, McVicar CM, Berner A, Pringle R, Uchida K, Nagai R, Brockbank S, Stitt AW. Muller glial dysfunction during diabetic retinopathy in rats is linked to accumulation of advanced glycation end-products and advanced lipoxidation end-products. Diabetologia. 2011;54(3):690–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takahashi H, Goto T, Shoji T, Tanito M, Park M, Chihara E. Diabetes-associated retinal nerve fiber damage evaluated with scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(1):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stitt AW, Curtis TM, Chen M, Medina RJ, McKay GJ, Jenkins A, Gardiner TA, Lyons TJ, Hammes HP, Simo R, et al. The progress in understanding and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;51:156–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sacks FM. After the Fenofibrate intervention and event lowering in diabetes (FIELD) study: implications for fenofibrate. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(12A):34L–40L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Massin P, Peto T, Ansquer JC, Aubonnet P, MacuFEN SIF. Effects of fenofibric acid on diabetic macular edema: the MacuFen study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014;21(5):307–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chew EY, Davis MD, Danis RP, Lovato JF, Perdue LH, Greven C, Genuth S, Goff DC, Leiter LA, Ismail-Beigi F, et al. The effects of medical management on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes: the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) eye study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2443–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bogdanov P, Hernandez C, Corraliza L, Carvalho AR, Simo R. Effect of fenofibrate on retinal neurodegeneration in an experimental model of type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52(1):113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi JA, Ko SH, Park YR, Jee DH, Ko SH, Park CK. Retinal nerve fiber layer loss is associated with urinary albumin excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):976–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lopes DFJ, Russ H, Costa VP. Retinal nerve fibre layer loss in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(7):725–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma N, Ooi JL, Ong J, Newman D. The use of fenofibrate in the management of patients with diabetic retinopathy: an evidence-based review. Aust Fam Physician. 2015;44(6):367–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobsen LM, Winsvold BS, Romundstad S, Pripp AH, Holmen J, Zwart JA. Urinary albumin excretion as a marker of endothelial dysfunction in migraine sufferers: the HUNT study, Norway. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8)

  34. Vlachou E, Gosling P, Moiemen NS. Microalbuminuria: a marker of endothelial dysfunction in thermal injury. Burns. 2006;32(8):1009–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan Y, Chang Q, Li Q, Li L, Wang S, Du R, Hu X. Identification of plasma vascular endothelia-cadherin as a biomarker for coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(10):19466–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozdek S, Lonneville YH, Onol M, Yetkin I, Hasanreisoglu BB. Assessment of nerve fiber layer in diabetic patients with scanning laser polarimetry. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(6):761–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mazereeuw G, Herrmann N, Bennett SA, Swardfager W, Xu H, Valenzuela N, Fai S, Lanctot KL. Platelet activating factors in depression and coronary artery disease: a potential biomarker related to inflammatory mechanisms and neurodegeneration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(8):1611–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Hu Y, Lin M, Jenkins AJ, Keech AC, Mott R, Lyons TJ, Ma JX. Therapeutic effects of PPARalpha agonists on diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes models. Diabetes. 2013;62(1):261–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Panigrahy D, Kaipainen A, Huang S, Butterfield CE, Barnes CM, Fannon M, Laforme AM, Chaponis DM, Folkman J, Kieran MW. PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate suppresses tumor growth through direct and indirect angiogenesis inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(3):985–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Tomizawa A, Hattori Y, Inoue T, Hattori S, Kasai K. Fenofibrate suppresses microvascular inflammation and apoptosis through adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activation. Metabolism. 2011;60(4):513–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim J, Ahn JH, Kim JH, Yu YS, Kim HS, Ha J, Shinn SH, Oh YS. Fenofibrate regulates retinal endothelial cell survival through the AMPK signal transduction pathway. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84(5):886–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hu Y, Chen Y, Ding L, He X, Takahashi Y, Gao Y, Shen W, Cheng R, Chen Q, Qi X, et al. Pathogenic role of diabetes-induced PPAR-alpha down-regulation in microvascular dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(38):15401–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ouk T, Amr G, Azzaoui R, Delassus L, Fossaert E, Tailleux A, Bordet R, Modine T. Lipid-lowering drugs prevent neurovascular and cognitive consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass. Vasc Pharmacol. 2016;80:59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Raz-Prag D, Grimes WN, Fariss RN, Vijayasarathy C, Campos MM, Bush RA, Diamond JS, Sieving PA. Probing potassium channel function in vivo by intracellular delivery of antibodies in a rat model of retinal neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(28):12710–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients and their families for kindly participating in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant Science & Technology project for Social development of Shaanxi Province in China (No. 2017SF-249) to Rui Shi. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

To protect privacy, we did not upload the datasets which contain names and other private information of the patients. However, the datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author at vivianlio@163.com upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

SR designed the study, collected clinical data and performed the analyses; QY operated OCT. SR and ZL drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, No.256 Youyi west Road, Xi’an, 710068, Shaanxi Province, China

    Rui Shi

  2. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    Lei Zhao

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China

    Yun Qi

Authors
  1. Rui Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yun Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case-control study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shaanxi provincial peoples’ hospital. All participants gave written informed consent, and the study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, R., Zhao, L. & Qi, Y. The effect of fenofibrate on early retinal nerve fiber layer loss in type 2 diabetic patients: a case-control study. BMC Ophthalmol 18, 100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0769-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0769-3

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us