Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Assessment of meibomian glands using a custom–made meibographer in dry eye patients in Ghana

BMC Ophthalmology volume 18, Article number: 201 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of evaporative Dry Eye Disease (DED). This makes non-invasive meibography an important procedure in the clinical evaluation of DED patients. Our purpose was to conduct a lead-off investigation focused on the practicality of performing meibography in a developing country, with limited access to complex ophthalmic imaging systems, using a custom meibographer, as a step to future comparative studies on meibomian glands and DED in Africa.

Methods

Meibomian glands(MG) in 76 upper eyelids (UL) and 49 lower eyelids (LL) in 1 eye each of 125 patients randomly selected from a patient population presenting with subjective DED symptoms at a clinic were photographed using a custom meibographer. Single frames were captured, and the MG area determined by intensity threshold segmentation and area calculation using Image J software. MG loss (MGL) was quantified by outlining its area and expressing it as a percentage of the total MG per Pult’s grading scheme. Dry eye measures included Tear Film Break Up - Time (TUBT), Schirmer’s test and Ocular Surface Staining (OSS). Symptoms were evaluated using the SPEED II questionnaire. Correlations between MGL and age, ocular signs and symptoms were analyzed by Pearson’s. Differences between comparable groups were analyzed by Mann - Whitney test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Overall mean MGL was 32.10% ± 25.0% (26.25% ± 22.40% for UL and 40.33% ± 26.70% for LL). MGL correlated significantly with age [r = 0.91, p = 0.001], SPEED scores [r = 0.90, p = 0.001], OSS [r = 0.75, p = 0.001] and TBUT [r = − 0.81, p = 0.001]. MGL scores were significantly higher in the UL than LL [U = 1293.5 p = 0.004].

Conclusion

This study for the first time presents data on the status of Meibomian glands in Africa. It furthermore suggests that it is feasible to examine Meibomian glands using a custom meibographer in developing countries with limited access to complex imaging systems. It also demonstrates the benefit and cost-effectiveness of a simple device by the observed significant relations between meibomian gland loss and DED in these patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Dry eye disease (DED), synonymous to dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS) or dysfunction of the lacrimal functional unit (LFU) is a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface which results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance and tear film instability with potential damage to the ocular surface [1, 2]. DED can broadly be classified as evaporative and aqueous – deficient DED or overlapping forms. In evaporative DED, there is decreased stability of the tear film due to abnormality in its lipid component. Aqueous – deficient DED on the other is linked to a reduced volume of the aqueous component of the tear film [3, 4].

The tear film lipids are produced by modified sebaceous glands in the eye lids, located within the tarsal plates [5]. These glands are called Meibomian glands (MG). Their secretion, also called meibum, is produced within these glands. It is secreted via ductal systems which open at the lid margin where it forms a thin layer on top of the aqueous and mucin tear components on the surface of the eye, preventing fast evaporation of tears and enhancing the lubricant properties of tears [5, 6]. A dysfunction of these glands is clinically referred to as Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). In MGD, there is poor quality and/or reduced volume of meibum – it is these alterations which lead to evaporative DED [7]. Different forms of MGD are distinguished as recently defined in the International Workshop on MGD Report. In particular low delivery and high delivery forms are distinguished that are related to dermatological diseases such as rosacea, systemic cicatrizing diseases such as pemphigoid or induced by drugs such as retinoids [2] .

Comparable to most developed countries, DED is a growing significant clinical problem in developing countries and emerging economies. Early studies conducted in these regions of the world have reported associations between DED and infectious disease like Trachoma and forms of malnutrition like vitamin A deficiency [8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, the current patterns of industrialization, modernization, urbanization and general socioeconomic transformations – including significant successes achieved at combating these infectious diseases and malnutrition in these areas could mean a present shift to other forms and causes of DED [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], such as MGD induced by aging, androgen deficiency, skin diseases, contact lens wear, etc.

It is widely known that MGD causes DED by altering the tear film lipids, destabilizing the entire tear film structure by disrupting the cohesivity between the various components. This causes tears to evaporate from the eye leading to reduced lubricity of the ocular surface therefore dryness at the ocular surface. Thus, assessment of the MG [5] is a crucial component in the comprehensive clinical evaluation and successful management of DED patients. The International Workshop on MGD suggests assessing for MGD in people by evaluating eyelid morphology, MG mass, MG expressibility, tear film lipid layer and MG drop-out or loss by meibography [7, 22].

Meibography is an imaging technique that provides an in - vivo means to assess the structure of the MG and makes it possible to view and quantify loss of glandular tissue (MGL) using a device called meibographer [24]. This is achievable because the technique allows for photographic documentation of Meibomian glands under specialized illumination situations. Meibography has undergone remarkable evolution but presently exists in two main forms – transillumination of the everted eye lids and direct illumination of the everted eyelids [24, 25]. The latter form is also called the non-contact (NCT) meibography, which has previously been described in different reports [23, 24].

NCT meibography comprises a slit lamp equipped with an infrared – charge coupled device with a video camera and infrared transmitting filter which makes it possible to view the glands in the everted lid non-invasively - without touching the eyelids. NCT meibography is believed to be a comfortable procedure for most patients compared to the transillumination method [25] but commercially existing NCT meibographers are expensive and thus may not be readily obtainable by most clinics especially those in developing countries.

Herein, we investigated the feasibility of conducting meibography in a developing country using a custom-made meibographer.

Methods

Construction of the customized meibographer

Following Pult’s suggestions [26], We obtained a simple infra – red video camera (Sunluxy SL – C221, Shen Zhen, China) and adapted it for near field imaging by an additional + 20 dioptre lens (Fig. 1). In addition, we blocked the light sensor of this camera to permanently cause it to image in dark or low levels of illumination – a condition which allows for the maximal illumination of the lids by the light source from the infrared diodes. The video camera is connected to a computer via a video –to – high speed serial bus converter / Logilink®VGA0001A (2direct GmbH, Schalksmühle, Germany).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Computer - meibographer set up. b Picture of meibographer with major components labelled

Full size image

Clinical measurements and subject inclusion

Meibomian glands (MG) in one eye (overall 76 UL and 49 LL) of 125 patients, randomly selected from a patient pool presenting with subjective dry eye symptoms at a private practice in Kumasi Ghana, were photographed with the custom-made meibographer. Single frames were captured, and the MG area was determined. Additionally, a thorough slit lamp examination was conducted, and 2% topical fluorescein was applied to the ocular surface to measure Tear Film Break – Up Time (TBUT). We also graded Ocular Surface Staining (OSS) in 95 subjects using the Oxford Grading Scheme described by Bron et al. [27] using a Wratten # 12 filter (Kodak, New Jersey, USA). Symptoms of DED were evaluated using the SPEED II Questionnaire.

None of subjects included in the study had a history of ocular surgery including lid correction, neither did any report use of systemic drugs like isotretinoin [28] that could impair MG function. Further, none of the subjects had ever received treatment for MGD prior to the study.

Meibomian gland evaluation

Meibography images were evaluated by intensity threshold segmentation and area calculation with Image J software [29]. In detail, Meibomian Gland Loss (MGL) was determined by outlining the meibomian gland area present and expressing the area as a percentage of the total tarsal area as described by Pult’s et al. [26]. MGL was assigned grade 0 when there was approximately no (0%) glandular loss. Grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 represented ≤ 25%, 26–50%, 51–75% and > 75% of glandular loss (MGL) respectively. Representative images are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Meibographs of (a) an upper eyelid with ≈ 0%MGL (grade 0) (b) an upper eyelid with ≈50% MGL (grade 2)

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Normality was assessed using a graphical approach (visual inspection) method and the appropriate statistical testing performed subsequently. Relationship between MGL, age and ocular signs and symptoms were evaluated by Pearson’s Correlation. The differences between comparable categorical groups were investigated by performing the Mann – Whitney U test. Chi-square test was performed on certain distributions. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Ethical considerations

We adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics at the School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology/ Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana (CHRPE/ AP/448/16).

Results

The summary of results of the major parameters of interests are represented in Table 1.

Table 1 Overview of results
Full size table

Meibomian gland loss

As many as 84% of the patients studied showed some degree of Meibomian gland loss. The distribution of MGL based on Pult’s grading scheme is cross-tabulated in Table 2 for gender groups and eyelids. A Chi test revealed a statistically meaningful difference in the distribution of MGL between eyelid types (UL and LL) and between genders, χ2(12, N = 125) =28.49, p = 0.0047 We observed a significant difference in MGL between the UL (mean MGL = 26.25% ± 22.40) MGL and LL (mean MGL = 40.33% ± 26.70); [U = 1293.5, p = 0.004] but no significant difference between males (mean MGL = 32.56% ± 26.50) and females (mean MGL = 30.98% ± 23.70); [U = 1934. 5, p = 0.927] (Fig. 3a, b).

Table 2 Distribution of MGL grades between gender groups and eyelids
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

a Difference in MGL between gender groups and b Difference in MGL between upper and lower lids. * p < 0.05

Full size image

Tear film stability and ocular surface staining

There was a general reduced tear film stability among the study subjects. The overall mean TBUT was 6.5 s ± 3.5. Tear film stability scores among male patients were similar to that among females. Mean TBUT among males was 6.4 s ± 3.6 and that of females was 6.03 s ± 3.6; (U = 1813, p = 0.488).

The mean OSS value (for 95 subjects) was 0.65 ± 0.79. The difference in OSS between gender groups was not significant. We detected similar grades of ocular surface staining across male versus female groups. For males, mean OSS was 0.71 ± 0.85 and for females, mean OSS was 0.59 ± 0.74; (U = 1190 p = 0.609).

Dry eye symptoms

The severity and frequency of dry eye symptoms was measured with the SPEED II questionnaire. An item on the questionnaire is graded a 0–4 Likert-type scale; where 0 means no symptoms and 4 means intolerable symptom. The composite score on the SPEED questionnaire ranges from 0 to 28 where 0 means and 28 would very severe and frequent symptoms. Average SPEED scores were similar between gender groups; males (6.65 ± 3.74) and females (6.81 ± 4.05); (U = 1943.0, p = 0.960).

Relationship meibomian gland loss and age, speed, TBUT and OSS scores

We detected a strong positive correlation between MGL and age [r = 0.91, p = 0.001]. A similar correlation was also found between MGL and SPEED scores [r = 0.90, p = 0.001] and between MGL and Ocular Surface Staining [r = 0.75, p = 0.001]. There was a strong negative correlation between MGL and TBUT [r = − 0.81, p = 0.001]. (Fig. 4a,b) and (Fig. 5a,b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Correlation between MGL and age and b Correlation between MGL and SPEED scores

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

a Correlation between MGL and Ocular surface staining b Correlation between MGL and Tear break up time

Full size image

Discussion

Our findings from this first African study on meibomian glands and dry eye disease underscore Meibomian gland dysfunction as a major underlying cause of dry eye disease in this region of the world. Our findings hereby demonstrate a greater percentage (84%) of the total number of the subjects showed MGD of various degree or severity. While there is no reported absolute prevalence of MGD in Africa, our reported value is slightly higher than the 69.3% reported in the Beijing Eye Study [30] and 61.9% in the Japanese Studies [31]. It however, very high than 3.5% reported in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study [32] and 19.9% in the Melbourne Visual Impairment [33, 34].

The current understanding is that the prevalence of MGD is seemingly higher from studies conducted in Asian population compared to Caucasian populations [33]. As first-time study, our finding does not provide a complete picture of the prevalence of MGD among Africans; this warrants future studies necessary for knowing how MGD distributes on the Continent. It is important to state that these different studies report variable prevalence values due to differences in study design, especially variations in the diagnostic criterion for MGD. However, all of our study patients presented with subjective complaints of DED, suggesting a potential contribution of MGD to the dry eye disease process. Several different studies have also reported the presence of dysfunctional Meibomian glands in DED cohorts [35, 36].

It is understood that, MGD can lead to diffuse and specific changes in the gland itself resulting in reduced quality and volume of meibum [36]. MGD may present as hyposecretory action of the Meibomian gland, inspissation of meibum, change in colour and consistency of meibum, change in meibum oils composition and overall atrophy of the glands [4, 7, 36]. These changes prohibit the tear lipid layer from playing its normal role of preventing faster evaporation and enhancing the lubrication property of the tear film.

While the link between MGD and DED is well understood, the exact pathomechanism underlying MGD itself is poorly understood. Some experimental studies conducted to understand the disease process in MGD suggests the potential involvement of keratinization of the Meibomian gland ductal epithelium, chronic infection of the eyelids and inflammation [37, 38]. Others have also suggested the role of ageing, use of certain medications, dyslipidemia, and hyperosmolar stress at the ocular surface [39,40,41,42].

Additionally, it has been frequently reported that there is high prevalence of MGD among contact lens wearers [43, 44] even though the role of contact lens in the development of MGD is not completely understood yet. None of the subjects reported a history of contact lens wear but this does not preclude the likely role of other factors that could influence MGD-related DED. What draws our attention is that, infectious diseases (Trachoma) and malnutrition (vitamin A deficiency) have effectively being controlled (with some reports of successful eradication) in this region of Africa by global health interventional programmes like the World Health Organization’s SAFE strategy [S = surgery for trichiasis, A = Antibiotics F = Facial cleanliness, E = Environmental improvement] for trachoma control. Vitamin A supplementation programs have also seen significant success in these parts of the world [12,13,14, 18, 19]. We thus believe there are other risk factors and causes influencing DED - especially there may be greater role of environment and lifestyle in development of DED [13].

Higher temperatures and low humidity are believed to influence MGD and DED. Ghana like many other Africa countries have these characteristic climatic conditions and these may indirectly impact ocular surface health. Low humidity, dusty environment, high ventilation flow, prolonged use of computers and longer hours spent in air-conditioned environment among other factors can lead to ocular surface “injury” and inflammatory responses which mediate the vicious cycle of MGD and DED [33, 45].

In present day Ghana and many other developing nations, there is increased use of computers in schools and offices, many buildings and cars used in these hot climate regions are also air conditioned now. Much of the formerly agrarian settlements have also become heavily industrialized. This comes with alterations in the natural environment due increased construction of roads, factories, houses, and offices – all of which can cause concomitant increase in environmental pollution - directly or indirectly impacting health and disease including ocular surface health [13, 22, 45, 46].While this present study did not look at the potential contributions of these environmental factors to MGD and MGD-related dry eye, future studies should look at these factors may modulate MGD and MGD -related dry eye.

We found a significantly higher MGL in the UL than LL. This contradicts the findings of the Pult et al. who rather found greater MGL in the LL than UL [47]. While there is no definite explanation to this, earlier and current reports document a generally high number of glands in the UL than LL [5, 37]. In terms of morphology however, they report that LL MGs appeared more wider and shorter than UL MGs. We realize, this configuration may due to the relatively small physical space in the LL fornix; this perhaps makes it less easy to perform meibography on LL MGs than on UL MGs. We also think that; the upper eyelids do the greater part of movement during blinking and so its MGs are bound to experience mechanical (friction) forces that could affect its morphology and function and the overall development of MGD later in life – particularly in contact lens wearers [44, 48].

Further, we observed no significant difference in MGL between males and females. Our study is only a cross-sectional observational study with a limited number of participants. Therefore, the statistical interpretation of our findings should be considered in the same context. Several other studies suggest differences in phenotypes of MGD and therefore DED between male and female subjects [22, 33]. The function of the entire lacrimal functional unit, particularly the Meibomian glands is said to be regulated by sex - specific steroids [49,50,51] .

As has been frequently reported in other studies, we found a generally reduced tear film stability – measurable as low TBUT. A TBUT value less than the clinical average normal of 15 s is indicative of dry eye [52]. An overall of mean 6.2 ± 3.5 s was recorded in this study population, suggesting a general presence of DED population [53]. TBUT scores further correlated with meibomian gland dropout. This indicates the observed changes in the meibomian glands could be influencing the DED situation in our subjects. While correlations do not mean causations, several studies have reported that patients with meibomian gland dropout or MGD in general have issues with tear film instability. Patients with evaporative DED essentially have tears which dry away quickly from the ocular surface because they have poor quality and low volume meibum because of MGD [49, 54]. Dryness at the ocular surface can excite cascades of inflammatory response – including the expression inflammatory cytokines. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) is one of such expressed inflammatory factors – this is known to cause destruction of ocular surface integrity. MMP9s can slough off epithelial tight junctions of the conjunctival and cornea [55].

This causes irregularity in the cornea and conjunctiva. In the cornea, this can impair optical transmission of light resulting in blur or reduced visual acuity in most DED patients [56]. We detected such a change on slit lamp examination as ocular surface staining of various degrees following topical application of 2% fluorescein.

Dry eye patients may or may not be symptomatic. According to the SPEED scores we obtained, the subjects experienced one form or the other of DED -related symptoms. These may include pain, itchiness, redness, tearing, burning sensation, blur and itchiness [57, 58]. Different questionnaires for assessing dry eye symptoms demonstrate different degrees of sensitivity. The SPEED questionnaire was used in this population because it was simple to interpret, in the local Twi language, to some of patients when necessary. It also contained fewer items making it time - efficient to administer. Additionally, a previous study conducted in another region of Ghana concluded that SPEED questionnaire proves useful as valid measure of DED symptoms in the population [59]. We reported an average SPEED score of 6.7 ± 3.9 and a range of 2–6, comparable to the SPEED score of asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe dry eye groups respectively reported in this other Ghanaian study [59]. Furthermore, it appeared useful but redundant to use a symptom assessment tool like the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire because not many people in this Ghanaian community operated an ATM or drove a car [60]. This limitation presents an opportunity to design and validate region - specific questionnaire for evaluating DED patients in Ghana and other developing countries [13].

It is important to mention that, the clinical signs and symptoms of DED do not always correlate. Our findings however showed that MGL correlated well with age, DED symptoms (SPEED scores), tear film instability (TBUT) and ocular surface damage (OSS) among the subjects of this study. Atrophy of the Meibomian gland is known to increase with ageing. Plausible reasons offered to explain to this phenomenon include reduced cell cycling of MG acinar basal cells, reduced proliferative potential, hyperkeratinization and age-related co-morbidities [39, 40, 58]. Regarding relation between MGL, TBUT and OSS, there is a defined clear connection. When MGL occurs, volume and quality of meibum decreases, tear film evaporates faster from the ocular surface – inflammation may set in causing damage to ocular surface – which in turn causes and or exacerbates symptoms of dryness, pain and general ocular discomfort [57, 58].

Conclusion

To summarize, this study for the first time presents data on the status of Meibomian glands in Africa. The observed results show that there is presently a potential link between DED and other factors (like MGD) other than infectious diseases and malnutrition in these regions. We have also demonstrated the feasibility of conducting meibography in DED patients using a custom-made meibographer in a developing country where there is limited access of complex imaging systems.

Abbreviations

DED:

Dry Eye Disease

LFU:

Lacrimal Functional Unit

LL:

Lower Lid

MG:

Meibomian Gland

MGD:

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

MGL:

Meibomian Gland Loss

NCT:

Normal Contact

OSDI:

Ocular Surface Disease Index

OSS:

Ocular Surface Staining

SPEED:

Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness

TBUT:

Tear Break Up Test

UL:

Upper Lid

References

  1. Stern ME, Schaumburg CS, Pflugfelder SC. Dry eye as a mucosal autoimmune disease. Int Rev Immunol. 2013;32(1):19–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Craig JP, McCulley JP, Den S, et al. The international workshop on Meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1930–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3(1):405–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Phadatare SP, Momin M, Nighojkar P, Askarkar S, Singh KK. A comprehensive review on dry eye disease: diagnosis, medical management, recent developments, and future challenges. Adv Pharm. 2015;2015

  5. Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, Obata H, Sullivan DA. The international workshop on Meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the Meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1938–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bron A, Tiffany J, Gouveia S, Yokoi N, Voon L. Functional aspects of the tear film lipid layer. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78(3):347–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, Amano S, Paugh JR, Pearce EI, et al. The international workshop on Meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):2006–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. West KP. Extent of vitamin a deficiency among preschool children and women of reproductive age. J Nutr. 2002;132(9):2857S–66S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore DB, Shirefaw W, Tomkins-Netzer O, Eshete Z, Netzer-Tomkins H, Ben-Zion I. Prevalence of xerophthalmia among malnourished children in rural Ethiopia. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(5):455–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schémann J-F, Malvy D, Sacko D, Traore L. Trachoma and vitamin a deficiency. Lancet. 2001;357(9269):1676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(9):1264–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abrahams C, Ballard R, Sutter E. The pathology of trachoma in a black south African population. Light microscopical, histochemical and electron microscopical findings. South Afr Med J. 1979;55(27):1115–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Osae A, Gehlsen U, Horstmann J, Siebelmann S, Stern M, Kumah D, et al. Epidemiology of dry eye disease in Africa: the sparse information, gaps and opportunities. Ocular Surface. 2017;15(2):159-68.

  14. Thylefors B, Dawson CR, Jones BR, West SK, Taylor HR. A simple system for the assessment of trachoma and its complications. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(4):477.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dawson CR, Jones BR, Tarizzo ML. Guide to trachoma control in programmes for the prevention of blindness. Geneva: The World Health Organization; 1981.

  16. Negrel A, Mariotti S. WHO alliance for the global elimination of blinding trachoma and the potential use of azithromycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998;10(4):259–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevens GA, Bennett JE, Hennocq Q, Lu Y, De-Regil LM, Rogers L, et al. Trends and mortality effects of vitamin a deficiency in children in 138 low-income and middle-income countries between 1991 and 2013: a pooled analysis of population-based surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(9):e528–e36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayo-Wilson E, Imdad A, Herzer K, Yakoob MY, Bhutta ZA. Vitamin a supplements for preventing mortality, illness, and blindness in children aged under 5: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;343:d5094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Burki T. The broad benefits of trachoma elimination. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(5):530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fund. TUNCs. In: Vitamin A Supplementation; a Statistical Snapshot; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bureau TPR. World population data sheet and press release. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, Glasgow BJ, Dogru M, Tsubota K, et al. The international workshop on Meibomian gland dysfunction: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1922–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wise RJ, Sobel RK, Allen RC. Meibography: a review of techniques and technologies. Saudi J Ophthal. 2012;26(4):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, Amano S. Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):911–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arita R. Validity of noninvasive meibography systems: noncontact meibography equipped with a slit-lamp and a mobile pen-shaped meibograph. Cornea. 2013;32:S65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pult H, Riede-Pult B. Non-contact meibography: keep it simple but effective. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35(2):77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moy A, McNamara NA, Lin MC. Effects of isotretinoin on meibomian glands. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(9):925–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int. 2004;11(7):36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jie Y, Xu L, Wu Y, Jonas J. Prevalence of dry eye among adult Chinese in the Beijing eye study. Eye. 2009;23(3):688.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Uchino M, Dogru M, Yagi Y, Goto E, Tomita M, Kon T, et al. The features of dry eye disease in a Japanese elderly population. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(11):797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schein OD, MUÑO B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):723–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The international workshop on Meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1994–2005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, Taylor HR. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia 1. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(6):1114–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Viso E, Gude F, Rodríguez-Ares MT. The association of meibomian gland dysfunction and other common ocular diseases with dry eye: a population-based study in Spain. Cornea. 2011;30(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McCulley JP, Shine WE. Meibomian gland function and the tear lipid layer. Ocular Surface. 2003;1(3):97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Obata H. Anatomy and histopathology of human meibomian gland. Cornea. 2002;21:S70–S4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mathers WD, Shields WJ, Sachdev MS, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Meibomian gland dysfunction in chronic blepharitis. Cornea. 1991;10(4):277–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nien CJ, Massei S, Lin G, Nabavi C, Tao J, Brown DJ, et al. Effects of age and dysfunction on human meibomian glands. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(4):462–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jester JV, Parfitt GJ, Brown DJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: hyperkeratinization or atrophy? BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15(1):156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Braich PS, Howard MK, Singh JS. Dyslipidemia and its association with meibomian gland dysfunction. Int Ophthalmol. 2016;36(4):469–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bron AJ, Yokoi N, Gaffney EA, Tiffany JM. A solute gradient in the tear meniscus. II. Implications for lid margin disease, including meibomian gland dysfunction. Ocular Surface. 2011;9(2):92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Lee AJ, Maroun R, Wang JJ. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains eye study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31(3):229–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Villani E, Ceresara G, Beretta S, Magnani F, Viola F, Ratiglia R. In vivo confocal microscopy of meibomian glands in contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5215–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fenga C, Aragona P, Cacciola A, Spinella R, Di Nola C, Ferreri F, et al. Meibomian gland dysfunction and ocular discomfort in video display terminal workers. Eye. 2008;22(1):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rooney MS, Arku RE, Dionisio KL, Paciorek C, Friedman AB, Carmichael H, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of particulate matter sources and pollution in four communities in Accra. Ghana Sci Total Env. 2012;435:107–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH, Nichols JJ. Relation between upper and lower lids' meibomian gland morphology, tear film, and dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(3):E310–E5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, Kuchiba A, Yamaguchi T, Amano S. Contact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glands. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3):379–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Green-Church KB, Butovich I, Willcox M, Borchman D, Paulsen F, Barabino S, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on tear film lipids and lipid–protein interactions in health and disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1979–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sullivan DA, Jensen RV, Suzuki T, Richards SM. Do sex steroids exert sex-specific and/or opposite effects on gene expression in lacrimal and meibomian glands? Mol Vision. 2009;15:1553–72.

  51. Sullivan DA, Sullivan BD, Evans JE, Schirra F, Yamagami H, Liu M, et al. Androgen deficiency, meibomian gland dysfunction, and evaporative dry eye. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;966(1):211–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tiffany JM. The normal tear film. In: Surgery for the Dry Eye. 41: Karger Publishers; 2008. p. 1–20.

  53. Abelson MB, Ousler GW, Nally LA, Welch D, Krenzer K. Alternative reference values for tear film break up time in normal and dry eye populations. In: Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 3: Springer; 2002. p. 1121–5.

  54. McCulley JP, Shine WE. The lipid layer of tears: dependent on meibomian gland function. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78(3):361–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z, Xie Y, Macri A, Pflugfelder SC. Pro-and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(10):2283–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Goto E, Yagi Y, Matsumoto Y, Tsubota K. Impaired functional visual acuity of dry eye patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(2):181–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease. Cornea. 2004;23(8):762–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Abetz L, Venkataraman K, Mertzanis P, Caffery BA, et al. The relationship between habitual patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs among patients with dry eye of varying severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(11):4753–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Asiedu K, Kyei S, Mensah SN, Ocansey S, Abu LS, Kyere EA. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) versus the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED): a study of a nonclinical sample. Cornea. 2016;35(2):175–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Schiffman RM, Walt JG, Jacobsen G, Doyle JJ, Lebovics G, Sumner W. Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(7):1412–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Kwadwo Amoah and Dr. Angela Ofeibea Amedo, both faculty at the Department of Optometry at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana supported data collection.

Funding

As of the time of the study, Philipp Steven had a Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Forschergruppe FOR2240, DFG STE 1928/4–1 grant.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials related to this work are available with the authors and will be shared upon reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, Kumasi, Ghana

    Eugene Appenteng Osae, Reynolds Kwame Ablorddepey & David Ben Kumah

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Eugene Appenteng Osae, Jens Horstmann & Philipp Steven

  3. Cluster of Excellence: Cellular Stress Response in Aging – associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Jens Horstmann & Philipp Steven

Authors
  1. Eugene Appenteng Osae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reynolds Kwame Ablorddepey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Horstmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Ben Kumah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philipp Steven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PS and EAO conceived the project idea. JH with support from PS provided technical expertise including the construction, testing and training for using the custom meibographer. PS provided EAO with further training in dry eye diagnostics. EAO and RKA coordinated data collection and analysis. Finally, PS and DBK provided overall supervision for the project. EAO composed the final manuscript with the support of PS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Appenteng Osae.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics at the School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology/ Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana (CHRPE/ AP/448/16). Informed consent was sought and obtained from each subject.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional information

This work was presented as a poster at the 2016 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting in Seattle, USA.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osae, E.A., Ablorddepey, R.K., Horstmann, J. et al. Assessment of meibomian glands using a custom–made meibographer in dry eye patients in Ghana. BMC Ophthalmol 18, 201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0869-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0869-0

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us