Skip to main content
Download PDF

Interobserver reproducibility and interocular symmetry of the macular ganglion cell complex: assessment in healthy children using optical coherence tomography

BMC Ophthalmology volume 20, Article number: 197 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Assessment of interobserver reproducibility and interocular symmetry using optical coherence tomography (OCT)–based measurements of the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) in healthy children facilitates interpretation of OCT data. We assessed the interobserver reproducibility and interocular symmetry of GCC and evaluated candidate determinants.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study performed in a primary and tertiary health-care setting. A total of 126 healthy participants aged 5 to 18 years were eligible. GCC scans were performed by 4 operators using the Topcon 3D OCT-2000 device. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to estimate reproducibility and symmetry. Cut-off points for symmetry were defined as the 95th percentile of the absolute interocular difference for 6 GCC parameters. Percentile distributions of interocular difference were generated based on age and difference in absolute interocular spherical equivalent (SE).

Results

The reproducibility ICC ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 for all 6 GCC parameters. Cut-off points for interocular symmetry of the superior and inferior quadrants and total macular retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (mRNFL) and macular ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness were 3.5, 4.5, 3.0, 3.0, 2.5, and 2.5 μm respectively. A positive association was observed between the absolute interocular difference of SE and superior and total mRNFL symmetry values (p = 0.047 and p = 0.040, respectively).

Conclusions

OCT measurements of GCC in healthy children show excellent reproducibility. Interocular differences in SE should be assessed when mRNFL differences exceed the 95% cut-off. These findings can contribute to establish reference values for interocular symmetry in paediatric GCC parameters.

Peer Review reports

Background

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a rapid, noninvasive, noncontact method that plays an increasingly important role in paediatric ophthalmology [1]. It uses low-coherence interferometry to perform high-resolution cross-sectional imaging of tissue morphology, thus providing an optical biopsy [2]. The introduction of the spectral domain (SD-OCT) in 2006 improved both precision and resolution [1]. Topcon 3D OCT-2000 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) is an SD-OCT device that includes a fully automated OCT layer segmentation algorithm, TABSTM (Topcon Advanced Boundary SegmentationTM), which is now included in its OCT FastMapTM software.

All OCT devices have an integrated normative database, which includes data only from individuals aged ≥18 years [3]. The OCT has become an essential tool in scientific and clinical practice in ophthalmology. In particular, the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), which comprises macular ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness (GCL-IPL) and macular retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (mRNFL), is a potential marker for glaucoma, optic nerve disease, and neurological diseases and progression [4, 5]. To evaluate changes in retinal and optic nerve measurements accurately, it is first necessary to determine the range in the normal population and to quantify the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of measurements made by the system [6]. Reliability and repeatability of diagnostic tools is very important, especially in children, because collaboration is limited. Numerous authors to date have investigated the reproducibility of OCT in macular and optic nerve measurements in healthy children [3, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. To our knowledge, few studies have researched the values of GCL-IPL in healthy children, with one in children with refractive errors [14], one in healthy Turkish children [15], one in healthy Spanish children [16], and another that compared the result obtained in healthy children with the results for children with congenital glaucoma [17]. However, none of these studies included reproducibility analyses. Only 1 article included reproducibility of GCL-IPL measurements with a handheld OCT device in children with optic pathway gliomas [18].

The objectivity and reproducibility of Topcon OCT have been proven by several authors in healthy adults, but never in children [19,20,21,22,23].

Interocular asymmetry of retinal biometric parameters may be indicative of disease [24]. However, it is important to know the extent to which these parameters can be asymmetric in normal eyes [25]. Although the symmetry of the optic disk and retina in children has been studied [1, 13, 24, 26,27,28,29], to the best of our knowledge, no such data are available for GCL-IPL and mRNFL in healthy children. In this report, we used Topcon 3D OCT-2000 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to examine interocular differences in macular GCL-IPL and RNFL in healthy children aged between 5 and 18 years and to determine which factors affect interocular symmetry. The detection of interocular asymmetry in optic nerve or macula parameters may have diagnostic advantages over using isolated measures from a single eye [30]. An absolute interocular difference in GCL-IPL exceeding normal limits may be indicative of glaucoma [31].

In the current study, we examined the interobserver reproducibility of repeated measurements of GCC and interocular symmetry and their determinants using SD-OCT in healthy children.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional observational study of Spanish children aged 5–18 years. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee and Research Board at Madrid University Hospital 12 Octubre, Spain (reference number 13/399). All of the children were enrolled through a primary health care centre and a tertiary referral hospital of the Madrid Regional Health Service (SERMAS) (respectively, Centro de Salud Almendrales and Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, both in Madrid, Spain). All parents and guardians provided their written informed consent. Children aged ≥12 years also provided written informed assent. The study protocols adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human participants [16].

Patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including visual-acuity measurement, refractive error measurement with and without cycloplegia, anterior segment examination with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and dilated fundus and stereoscopic optic disc examination. Images were acquired using fundus photography (Topcon 3D OCT-2000, Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) under cycloplegic mydriasis.

The inclusion criteria have been previously detailed [16].

The macula 3D scan (V) protocol was used to evaluate the GCC. mRNFL and GCL-IPL thickness were recorded as superior, inferior, and total average components within the 7 mm2 area centred on the fovea, with a scan density of 512 (vertical) × 128 (horizontal) scans. For all participants, 2 scans were performed for each eye, and the mean of both measurements was used in the statistical analyses. Only children with good quality scans were included in the study. Good quality scan has been previously defined [16]. A total of 4 observers participated in this study. Two OCT scans were performed on each eye of each patient by 2 different observers. Observer A scanned 228 eyes (45.6%), observer B 103 eyes (20.6%), observer C 71 eyes (14.2%), and observer D 96 eyes (19.2%). The average of the 2 observers’ measurements was computed for each macular scan. Analyses for reproducibility were performed only on the right eye. The average of the 2 macular scans of both eyes was used in the statistical analyses of symmetry. Average symmetry was evaluated using relative and absolute interocular differences of the 6 GCC parameters, including their respective percentiles. Cut-off points for interocular symmetry were defined as the 95th percentile of the absolute interocular differences of the 6 GCC parameters. Symmetry was evaluated by age group and SE based on absolute interocular differences.

The software included in Topcon 3D OCT-2000 compares each measurement with the percentile distribution of an embedded adult database and assigns a colour label for different percentile categories [16]. In order to document the qualitative agreement for paediatric OCT of GCC, we estimated the agreement between both OCT scans categorized according to percentile 5. The proportion of observed agreement (OA) refers to the overall agreement, whereas the specific agreement (SAp ≤ 5) quantifies the agreement for measurements ≤5 [32, 33].

Data analysis

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined to evaluate interobserver reproducibility [25]. The ICC was also determined to estimate interobserver reproducibility for GCL-IPL and mRNFL as a function of age and SE. Qualitative agreement was also evaluated in order to determine whether OCT interobserver reproducibility was also high when the specific colour label was assigned to each measurement.

Symmetry was analysed by calculating mean differences for all parameters, first by subtracting left eye parameters from right eye parameters (with positive differences when right eyes had higher values and negative differences when left eyes had higher values), and second based on the absolute value of the interocular difference (only positive values). The ICC was computed to measure interocular agreement/correlation. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to estimate the interocular differences of GCL-IPL and mRNFL as a function of age and SE, for which the regression coefficient was reported along with the p value. A p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. The normal ranges for absolute interocular differences were established as the 95th percentile for the GCL-IPL and mRNFL.

Data were analysed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

For the initial assessment, 280 eyes from 140 healthy children aged 5 to 18 years old were consecutively enrolled in the present study. Of the 140 children, 14 (10%) were excluded because they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria [16], leaving a sample of 126 right eyes and 124 left eyes in 126 healthy children with a mean age of 10.26 years (SD, 3.37; range, 5.03 to 17.37). Most children were of European origin (82.5%), and 48.4% (n = 61) were male. Mean SE was 0.88 (1.49; range, − 3.38 to 4.63) for right eyes and 0.99 (1.63; range, − 3.63 to 5) for left eyes; mean cylinder was − 0.40 (0.48; range, − 3.00 to 0) for right eyes and − 0.39 (0.51; range, − 3.00 to 0) for left eyes. All results presented hereafter refer to the participant’s right eye (n = 126) for reproducibility analyses and both eyes for symmetry analyses (n = 124, as 2 participants had a cylinder below − 3.00 in the left eye).

All GCL-IPL and mRNFL measurements were highly reproducible. ICCs showed almost perfect reliability in all the parameters evaluated (ICCs > 0.95) (Table 1). Qualitative agreement was also evaluated for all measurements, showing a very high OA (ICCs > 0.95). Specific agreement for the detection of measurements less than or equal to the fifth percentile was also high. Figure 1 shows Bland-Altmann plots for the reproducibility of total mRNFL and GCL-IPL between the interobserver measurements. Quantitative reproducibility was also high when analyzed separately by age and SE group, with ICCs above 0.91 in all cases.

Table 1 Interobserver reproducibility and agreement of macular fibre complex OCT measurements in healthy children (n = 126)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Bland-Altman plot showing the level of interobserver agreement between the optical coherence tomography measurements of the mRNFL and GCL-IPL in children

Full size image

Global symmetry analyses are shown in Table 2. Interocular symmetry measurements showed high ICCs for all measurements (ICCs > 0.82). ICCs were also high when symmetry was evaluated by age and SE groups (ICCs above 0.92 and 0.91 respectively). Interocular symmetry by age and interocular differences in SE groups are presented in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 2 Interocular symmetry of macular fibre complex OCT measurements in healthy children (n = 124)
Full size table
Table 3 Interocular symmetry of OCT measurements of GCL-IPL and RNFL in healthy children (age groups)
Full size table
Table 4 Interocular symmetry of OCT measurements of GCL-IPL and mRNFL in healthy children (groups of spherical equivalent)
Full size table

We quantified the impact of age and SE in GCC symmetry. Multivariate regression analysis revealed no statistically significant associations between age and differences in interocular mRNFL and GCL-IPL (p > 0.33). A statistically significant correlation was found between the absolute interocular difference in SE groups (SE < 0.75 D and ≥ 0.75 D) and the absolute interocular difference in superior mRNFL (p = 0.047) and total mRNFL measurements (p = 0.040).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study provides the first report on interobserver reproducibility and interocular symmetry of macular GCL-IPL and mRNFL thicknesses, as measured by OCT in healthy children aged 5–18 years. OCT measurements showed excellent interobserver reproducibility. Cut-offs for interocular differences were provided for all 6 GCC parameters. A positive association was observed between the absolute interocular difference of SE and superior and total mRNFL symmetry values.

The main strength of our study was its ability to demonstrate that the Topcon 3D OCT-2000 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) device obtains reproducible measurements in healthy children. The study also investigated the interocular symmetry of GCC measurements in healthy children and established normal limits of symmetry, which ophthalmologists can use in their daily practice. We also demonstrate the absence of statistical associations between age and differences in interocular mRNFL and GCL-IPL. However, a statistically significant correlation was found between the absolute interocular difference in SE and the absolute interocular difference in superior and total mRNFL (p = 0.047 and p = 0.040, respectively), meaning that in cases of asymmetry, biometric parameters should be assessed in order to determine their influence.

The results of reproducibility and symmetry provided in this study are only applicable to the SD-OCT device Topcon 3D OCT-2000. Measurements are not interchangeable between OCT devices [23, 34,35,36]. Therefore, direct comparison of GCL-IPL and mRNFL values between various OCT devices may be difficult because of differences in technical specifications, imaging protocols, and thickness measurement algorithms.

Our findings suggest that Topcon OCT shows good interobserver reproducibility when measuring GCC thickness in healthy children. ICCs were higher than 0.9 for all parameters, indicating that this approach is highly reproducible. Our values of interobserver reproducibility are consistent with those of other studies in healthy children based on different OCT devices. Prakalapakorn et al. [9] assessed the reproducibility for pRNFL and macular measurements provided by Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss, Dublin, California, USA) in 27 healthy and 37 glaucomatous eyes in children and found ICCs higher than 0.9 in macular measurements. Altemir et al. [3] investigated the interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for macular and optic disc measurements in 100 eyes from 100 healthy children using Cirrus OCT (Humphrey Zeiss Instruments, Dublin, California, USA) and recorded ICCs higher than 0.82 in all measurements. Kiziloglu et al. [37] assessed reproducibility for optic head parameters with iVue 100 SD-OCT (version 3.1; Optovue Inc., Fremont, California, USA) in healthy Turkish children and recorded ICCs higher than 0.9 in all measurements.

We found the worst interobserver reproducibility in the superior quadrant for mRNFL (ICC = 0.96) and inferior quadrant for GCL-IPL (ICC = 0.97), although all ICCs were higher than 0.9.

In contrast with other studies on reproducibility, we analysed this parameter by comparing different groups of age and SE and again found that all ICCs were above 0.9. Analysis of qualitative reproducibility also showed ICCs to be above 0.95, meaning that OCT assigns the same colour label when the measurements are made by 2 different observers. Therefore, Topcon 3D OCT-2000 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) generated reproducible measurements of GCL-IPL and mRNFL in healthy children irrespective of age and SE.

Several studies have used different OCT devices to assess the asymmetry of pRNFL and macular thickness in children and young adults [1, 13, 24, 25, 27, 29, 38]. However, to our knowledge, no previous studies have assessed paediatric interocular asymmetry in macular GCC. We found the mean differences in average mRNFL and GCLT to be < 0.2 μm, whereas the mean differences in the quadrants ranged from 0.26 to 0.50 μm in mRNFL and from 0.05 to 0.60 μm in GCL-IPL. High interocular correlations (> 0.8) were found in all macular parameters. GCL-IPL measurements were more symmetric than mRNFL measurements. Overall, interocular mean differences in macular GCL-IPL and mRNFL measurements were minimal, although large degrees of asymmetry were detected in specific cases. Altemir et al. [25] studied pRNFL and macular symmetry in healthy children by setting the interocular difference tolerance limits for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. These percentiles were used as a reference for the study of pRNFL and macular thickness by Dalgliesh et al.43 and by Zhou et al.5 for their research on GCC symmetry, both in young adults [5, 38]. Budenz [39] used the 5th and 95th percentiles as tolerance limits of interocular difference to assess pRNFL symmetry in adults. Al-Haddad et al. [1] used the 5th and 95th percentiles to assess macular and pRNFL symmetry in healthy children based on the Cirrus device. As these authors conclude, changes in OCT measurements compared with previous examinations or interocular asymmetry exceeding normal limits should be considered warning signs and an indication for further assessment [25]. All of the abovementioned authors used the relative percentile values and obtained symmetry values by subtracting the value of the left eye from that of the right one. We used the same measurement, but we also determined the absolute symmetry value (always a positive number), as it is easier to interpret. Taking these data as our reference, the cut-off points we established for the superior and inferior quadrants and total mRNFL and GCL-IPL were 3.5 μm, 4.5 μm, 3.0 μm, 3.0 μm, 2.5 μm, and 2.5 μm, respectively, based on the 95th percentile.

Interocular asymmetry of retinal biometric parameters should be evaluated in context with other clinical measures, because large degrees of asymmetry may be found in specific cases [25]. In order to determine whether higher interocular differences could be explained by higher interocular differences in SE or age groups, symmetry was evaluated by comparing age and SE groups. A statistically significant correlation was found between absolute interocular differences in SE and absolute interocular differences in superior mRNFL (p = 0.047) and total mRNFL (p = 0.040). However, careful examination of the sample included in this study showed that the highest absolute interocular difference in SE to be 3D, followed by 2.125D and 1.75D. In other words, our sample included very few patients with marked differences in interocular SE, thus potentially explaining why we were unable to find a stronger association. Therefore, interocular differences in SE should be explored in daily clinical practice if high levels of asymmetry in GCC values are found. In their study of young Chinese patients assessed using RTVue-100 OCT, Zhou et al. [5] also found that interocular differences in average GCC thickness were significantly correlated with interocular differences in SE in the multiple regression analysis.

The limitations of the present study are mainly related to possible confounding factors influencing the examination (axial length was not measured) [16]. Wang et al. [7] concluded that magnification attributable to axial length and refractive error had minimal impact on measurements of macular and pRNFL. Another limitation may be that all the examinations were performed on the same day and with the same device. However, Cremasco et al. [40] showed that measurements are not significantly affected by these factors.

It would be very interesting to perform further studies including samples of patients with high values of interocular SE asymmetry in order to determine whether SE really affects the remaining GCC measurements. Studies including intraobserver reproducibility could also be performed.

We found that SD-OCT measurements of macular GCC (GCL-IPL and mRFNL) using the Topcon 3D OCT-2000 device (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) are reliable and highly reproducible in children aged 5 to 18 years irrespective of age and SE.

Conclusions

Interocular symmetry is subject to normal variation. Our results contribute to establish reference values for interocular differences in GCL-IPL and mRNFL parameters in children aged 5–18 years using the Topcon OCT device. Interocular asymmetry of SE should be evaluated in order to explain large degrees of asymmetry that can be observed in healthy children.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the prevision of further publications coming soon, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Al-Haddad C, Antonios R, Tamim H, Noureddin B. Interocular symmetry in retinal and optic nerve parameters in children as measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:502–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Drexler W, Fujimoto JG. State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27:45–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altemir I, Pueyo V, Elía N, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Oros D. Reproducibility of optical coherence tomography measurements in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:171–176.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martucci A, Cesareo M, Nucci C, Mancino R. Macular ganglion cells alteration in a patient with left homonymous hemianopia subsequent to surgical excision of an arteriovenous malformation. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018;12:9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou M, Lu B, Zhao J, Wang Q, Zhang P, Sun X. Interocular symmetry of macular ganglion cell complex thickness in young Chinese subjects. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Varma R, Schuman J, Cantor L, Savell J, et al. Determinants of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by stratus OCT. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1046–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang XY, Huynh SC, Burlutsky G, Ip J, Stapleton F, Mitchell P. Reproducibility of and effect of magnification on optical coherence tomography measurements in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:484–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksson U, Holmström G, Alm A, Larsson E. A population-based study of macular thickness in full-term children assessed with stratus OCT: normative data and repeatability. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:741–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prakalapakorn SG, Freedman SF, Lokhnygina Y, Gandhi NG, Holgado S, Chen BB, et al. Longitudinal reproducibility of optical coherence tomography measurements in children. J AAPOS. 2012;16:523–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee H, Proudlock F, Gottlob I. Is handheld optical coherence tomography reliable in infants and young children with and without nystagmus? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:8152–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molnar A, Holmström G, Larsson E. Macular thickness assessed with spectral domain OCT in a population-based study of children: normative data, repeatability and reproducibility and comparison with time domain OCT. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:470–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung HK, Han YK, Oh S, Kim SH. Comparison of optical coherence tomography measurement reproducibility between children and adults. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsson E, Molnar A, Holmström G. Repeatability, reproducibility and interocular difference in the assessments of optic nerve OCT in children- a Swedish population-based study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goh JP, Koh V, Chan YH, Ngo C. Macular ganglion cell and retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness in children with refractive errors-an optical coherence tomography study. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:619–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Totan Y, Gürağaç FB, Güler E. Evaluation of the retinal ganglion cell layer thickness in healthy Turkish children. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:e103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muñoz-Gallego A, De la Cruz J, Rodríguez-Salgado M, Torres-Peña JL. de-Lucas-Viejo B, Ortueta-Olartecoechea a, et al. assessment of macular ganglion cell complex using optical coherence tomography: impact of a paediatric reference database in clinical practice. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47:490–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morales-Fernandez L, Jimenez-Santos M, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Sanchez-Jean R, Nieves M, Saenz-Frances F, et al. Diagnostic capacity of SD-OCT segmented ganglion cell complex versus retinal nerve fiber layer analysis for congenital glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2018;32:1338–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Avery RA, Cnaan A, Schuman JS, Chen C-L, Glaug NC, Packer RJ, et al. Intra- and inter-visit reproducibility of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer measurements using handheld optical coherence tomography in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:916–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierro L, Gagliardi M, Iuliano L, Ambrosi A, Bandello F. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reproducibility using seven different OCT instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:5912–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirasawa H, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, Iwase A, Sugiyama K, Kishi S, et al. Reproducibility of Circumpapillary retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness measurements evaluated by circle and annulus area with and without correction for ocular rotation. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:e12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirasawa H, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Konno S, Saito H, Iwase A, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness determined by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in ophthalmologically normal eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:1420–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sull AC, Vuong LN, Price LL, Srinivasan VJ, Gorczynska I, Fujimoto JG, et al. Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness. Retina. 2010;30:235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, Deiro AP, Oldani M, Pellegrini M, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:815–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huynh SC, Wang XY, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P. Symmetry of optical coherence tomography retinal measurements in young children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:518–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Altemir I, Oros D, Elía N, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pueyo V. Retinal asymmetry in children measured with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:1238–1243.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huynh SC, Wang XY, Rochtchina E, Crowston JG, Mitchell P. Distribution of optic disc parameters measured by OCT: findings from a population-based study of 6-year-old Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qian J, Wang W, Zhang X, Wang F, Jiang Y, Wang W, et al. Optical coherence tomography measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in chinese children and teenagers. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:509–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larsson E, Nuija E, Alm A. The optic nerve head assessed with HRT in 5-16-year-old normal children: normal values, repeatability and interocular difference. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:755–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pawar N, Maheshwari D, Ravindran M, Ramakrishnan R. Interocular symmetry of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters measured by cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in a normal pediatric population. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65:955–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cameron JR, Megaw RD, Tatham AJ, McGrory S, MacGillivray TJ, Doubal FN, et al. Lateral thinking - Interocular symmetry and asymmetry in neurovascular patterning, in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;59:131–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee S-Y, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim DM. Macular ganglion cell imaging study: interocular symmetry of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in normal healthy eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:315–323.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Vet HCW, Dikmans RE, Eekhout I. Specific agreement on dichotomous outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;83:85–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UEK, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, Iliev ME, Frey M, Rothenbuehler SP, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Seibold LK, Mandava N, Kahook MY. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal eyes using time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:807–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pierro L, Giatsidis SM, Mantovani E, Gagliardi M. Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:199–204.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yabas Kiziloglu O, Toygar O, Toygar B, Hacimustafaoglu AM. Optic nerve head parameters measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in healthy Turkish children: Normal values, repeatability, and Interocular symmetry. Neuroophthalmology. 2018;42:83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dalgliesh JD, Tariq YM, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P. Symmetry of retinal parameters measured by spectral-domain OCT in normal young adults. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:20–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Budenz DL. Symmetry between the right and left eyes of the normal retinal nerve fiber layer measured with optical coherence tomography (an AOS thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;106:252–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cremasco F, Massa G, Gonçalves Vidotti V. Pedroso de Carvalho Lupinacci Á, Costa VP. Intrasession, intersession, and interexaminer variabilities of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements with spectral-domain OCT. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21:264–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Beatriz De-Lucas-Viejo for her contribution to ophthalmological examinations and Thomas O’Boyle for writing assistance.

Funding

Spain National Institute of Health (Grant PI 17/01073, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, Spain) and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

    Alicia Muñoz-Gallego, José L. Torres-Peña, Javier Sambricio, Ana Ortueta-Olartecoechea & Pilar Tejada-Palacios

  2. Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS), Primary Health Care, Madrid, Spain

    Martín Rodríguez-Salgado

  3. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Healthcare Research Institute (IMAS12), Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS-H12O), CAA-6D. Avda. de Códoba s/n, E-28041, Madrid, Spain

    Javier De la Cruz & Pilar Tejada-Palacios

  4. Spanish Network for Research in Mother&Child Health and Development (RED SAMID RD16/0022/0011), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain

    Javier De la Cruz

  5. Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain

    Alicia Muñoz-Gallego & Pilar Tejada-Palacios

Authors
  1. Alicia Muñoz-Gallego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier De la Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martín Rodríguez-Salgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. José L. Torres-Peña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Javier Sambricio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ana Ortueta-Olartecoechea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pilar Tejada-Palacios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PTP is the project leader. PTP and AMG developed the original concept. AMG designed the present study with support from PTP. AMG, MRS, JLTP and JS participated in patient recruitment and data collection. AMG and JDC designed all statistical plans. JDC performed the data analysis. AMG and JDC interpreted the results. AMG wrote the manuscript with support from PTP and JDC. All authors (AMG, PTP, JDC, MRS, JLTP, JS and AOO) discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. They also read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier De la Cruz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee and Research Board at Madrid University Hospital 12 Octubre, Spain (reference number 13/399). All parents and guardians provided their written informed consent. Children aged ≥12 years also provided written informed assent. The study protocols adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human participants.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muñoz-Gallego, A., De la Cruz, J., Rodríguez-Salgado, M. et al. Interobserver reproducibility and interocular symmetry of the macular ganglion cell complex: assessment in healthy children using optical coherence tomography. BMC Ophthalmol 20, 197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01379-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01379-z

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us