Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of anthropometric measures across the life-course with refractive error and ocular biometry at age 15 years

BMC Ophthalmology volume 20, Article number: 269 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A recent Genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) of refractive error reported shared genetics with anthropometric traits such as height, BMI and obesity. To explore a potential relationship with refractive error and ocular structure we performed a life-course analysis including both maternal and child characteristics using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort.

Methods

Measures collected across the life-course were analysed to explore the association of height, weight, and BMI with refractive error and ocular biometric measures at age 15 years from 1613children. The outcome measures were the mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of refractive error (dioptres), axial length (AXL; mm), and radius of corneal curvature (RCC; mm). Potential confounding variables; maternal age at conception, maternal education level, parental socio-economic status, gestational age, breast-feeding, and gender were adjusted for within each multi-variable model.

Results

Maternal height was positively associated with teenage AXL (0.010 mm; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.017) and RCC (0.005 mm; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.007), increased maternal weight was positively associated with AXL (0.004 mm; 95% CI: 0.0001, 0.008). Birth length was associated with an increase in teenage AXL (0.067 mm; 95% CI: 0.032, 0.10) and flatter RCC (0.023 mm; 95% CI: 0.013, 0.034) and increasing birth weight was associated with flatter RCC (0.005 mm; 95% CI: 0.0003, 0.009). An increase in teenage height was associated with a lower MSE (− 0.007 D; 95% CI: − 0.013, − 0.001), an increase in AXL (0.021 mm; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.028) and flatter RCC (0.008 mm; 95% CI: 0.006, 0.010). Weight at 15 years was associated with an increase in AXL (0.005 mm; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.009).

Conclusions

At each life stage (pre-natal, birth, and teenage) height and weight, but not BMI, demonstrate an association with AXL and RCC measured at age 15 years. However, the negative association between refractive error and an increase in height was only present at the teenage life stage. Further research into the growth pattern of ocular structures and the development of refractive error over the life-course is required, particularly at the time of puberty.

Peer Review reports

Background

The influence of prenatal factors in the development of conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity is well reported, with maternal health and the prenatal environment known to influence development throughout the life-course [1]. Early life influences on myopia have also been explored, with childhood growth between birth and ten years showing some effect [2, 3]. Childhood growth is known to be associated with maternal metabolism [4] and there is evidence that maternal stature influences the development of myopia, with maternal height being associated with myopia in adulthood [5]. Refractive error is determined by the ocular structure of the eye with the key components being axial length, corneal power and lens power; myopia occurs when axial length exceeds the focal length [6]. Axial length is highly correlated with refractive error and increased axial length related to myopia is well documented [3, 6, 7]. A recent Genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) of refractive error investigated the overlap of genes identified in refractive error with other common traits and reported shared genetics with anthropometric traits such as height, BMI and obesity [8]. In order to explore a potential relationship between stature, refractive error and ocular structure we performed an analysis including both maternal and child characteristics across the life-course using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) cohort [9, 10].

Methods

Study population

ALSPAC is a birth cohort of mothers and their children born between 1991 and 1992 residing in the county of Avon, South West England. A variety of measures have been collected prospectively from the participants, with the methodology of collection of ALSPAC measures detailed previously elsewhere [9, 10].

The ALSPAC study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool. (https://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/).

Refractive and biometric data were available for 2555 children. We excluded individuals with missing exposure (n = 825) and covariable (n = 117) data; the final cohort for this study is 1613 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart describing the data of the participants included in the analysis

Full size image

Outcome measures

The three main outcome measures were the mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of refractive error (dioptres), axial length (AXL; mm), and radius of corneal curvature (RCC; mm). All outcome measures were collected from the participants at age 15 years. Non-cycloplegic autorefraction was used to estimate the refractive error (Canon R50 instrument, Canon USA Inc., Lake Success, NY). This was measured in both eyes and then used to calculate the MSE (sphere plus half of cylinder). AXL and RCC were measured using Zeiss IOL master (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Welwyn Garden City, UK). The mean measure of both eyes for each outcome measure was used in the analyses, coded as continuous variables.

Exposure variables

We examined variables previously identified as potentially being associated with myopia: height [5, 8], weight [8] and BMI [8] were examined at three life stages: the prenatal period (maternal factors), birth, and at 15 years of age. Maternal height (cm) [5], pre-natal weight (kg) [8], and BMI (kg/cm2) [8], were self-reported by the mother and collected by questionnaire. Birth weight [3, 11] was extracted from medical records and birth length [8] was measured by the ALSPAC team after birth (median 1 day, range 1–14 days) using a Harpenden neonatometer. Teenage height (measured using Harpenden Stadiometer) and weight (Tanita Body Fat Analyser Model TBF 305; Tanita Europe Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) were collected at 15 years of age at research clinic attendances.

Covariables

Potential confounding variables previously reported to be associated with myopia throughout the life course were adjusted for within each life stage model: Maternal age at conception (years) [5], maternal education level [5], and parental socio-economic status [5] were self-reported by the mother and collected by questionnaire. Gestational age [3, 11], breast-feeding [5] and gender [7] were extracted from medical records.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata (v 15). Initially, univariable linear regression was performed to examine the relationship between each exposure variable and each covariable (listed above) with each of the three outcome measures (MSE, AXL and RCC) at each life stage; those with the strongest associations (p < 0.20) were included in the multivariable linear regression models. In each multi-variable model interactions between gender and height and gender and weight were included, retaining those that were significant in the final models.

Results

Participant characteristics are summarised in Table 1. In the univariable analysis, BMI was not found to be associated with any of the three outcome measures therefore we examined the associations of height and weight, but not BMI, in each of the multivariable analyses. Univariate analysis found females had a reduced teenage AXL (− 0.499 mm; 95% CI: − 0.583,-0.415) and steeper corneas (RCC) (− 0.100 mm; 95% CI: − 0.125,-0.075) compared to males, however no interactions were identified.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants (mothers and children)
Full size table

Life stage: prenatal (Table 2)

The factors found to be significant in univariable analysis and included in the multivariable prenatal life stage model were: maternal age at conception (years), maternal height (cm), pre-natal weight (kg), maternal education level, and parental socio-economic status.

Table 2 Associations between prenatal (maternal) factors and refractive error mean spherical equivalent (MSE in dioptres), axial length (AXL in mm) and radius of corneal curvature (RCC in mm) measured at age 15 years
Full size table

No prenatal association was found between maternal height or weight with MSE. Maternal height was positively associated with a longer teenage AXL (0.010 mm; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.017) and greater RCC (0.005 mm; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.007), increased maternal weight was also associated with an increase in AXL (0.004 mm; 95% CI: 0.0001, 0.008) (Table 2).

Life stage: birth (Table 3)

The multivariable model of the birth life stage included gestational age (weeks), birth weight (g), and length at birth (cm). No association was found between birth length or weight with MSE. Birth length was associated with an increase in teenage AXL (0.067 mm; 95% CI: 0.032, 0.10) and flatter RCC (0.023 mm; 95% CI: 0.013, 0.034) respectively. An increase in birth weight was also associated with flatter RCC (0.005 mm; 95% CI: 0.0003, 0.009).

Table 3 Associations between birth factors and refractive error mean spherical equivalent (MSE dioptres), axial length (AXL mm) and radius of corneal curvature (RCC mm) measured at age 15 years
Full size table

Life stage: teenage (15 years) (Table 4)

Factors included in the teenage life stage model included weight (kg) and height (cm) at 15 years of age. An increase in teenage height was associated with a reduction in MSE (− 0.007 D; 95% CI: − 0.013, − 0.001), an increase in AXL (0.021 mm; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.028) and flatter RCC (0.008 mm; 95% CI: 0.006, 0.010). Weight at 15 years was also associated with an increase in AXL (0.005 mm; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.009).

Table 4 Associations between teenage factors height and weight and refractive error mean spherical equivalent (MSE dioptres), axial length (AXL mm) and radius of corneal curvature (RCC mm) measured at age 15 years
Full size table

Discussion

The anthropometric measures of height and weight, but not BMI, across the life-course demonstrate an association with the optical biometric measures of AXL and RCC measured at age 15 years. However the negative association between refractive error (MSE) and an increase in height was only found to be associated at the teenage life stage (age 15 years) and no other life stage.

BMI is commonly used as a measure of obesity in adults however in children and adolescents there is no agreed definition of BMI relating to health outcomes, this is due to greater variation in body fat content in comparison to adults [12, 13]. Height and weight are therefore believed to be more accurate predictors of obesity in children and adolescents [13]. This may contribute to our finding that height and weight, but not BMI demonstrated an association with ocular structure.

The association we report of increasing maternal height with increasing offspring AXL and RCC is comparable to previous reporting of a relationship between height and ocular dimensions [14], we additionally report an association between increase in maternal pre-natal weight and offspring AXL at age 15 years. The positive relationship we report between longer and heavier babies and increased AXL and larger RCC has been shown previously [15] with this positive relationship reported during early childhood [3] however our findings indicate that these relationships are consistent and continue beyond the onset of puberty. The associations we report between maternal height, birth length and height at age 15 years may be due to a combination of shared genetic and environmental factors. Maternal lifestyle is known to be strongly associated with both improved nutrition and increased height in childhood, with older better educated mothers reported to influence the child’s environment positively, and hence improve their child’s development [16].

The lack of association of MSE in the prenatal and birth models we report is similar to findings in a study of Singapore Chinese children who demonstrated an association between AXL and birth length and weight but not refractive error at age 7–9 years [17]. Refractive change occurs throughout the life-course with greater levels of hyperopia in young children followed by the process of emmetropisation which can lead to the potential development of myopia [6]. Myopia prevalence increases with age in Western populations and is rarely found in young children, it is commonly referred to as “school myopia” with increased incidence around the time of puberty, a time of increased growth [18].

Previous studies reporting the relationship between refractive error, height and weight have reported varying results, with Rosner et al. finding no association between myopia and stature in conscripted male teenagers [19] and Rahi et al. reporting a relationship between myopia and height in an adult population at age 44 years [5]. Our study found AXL and RCC associated with height and weight across the life course analyses but a decrease in MSE (increase in myopia) was only found to be associated with an increase in height at age 15 years. The variance between studies reporting the association of height with MSE, AXL and RCC may be influenced in part by the age at which the measures were collected with growth patterns and myopic refractive error being influenced by puberty [18]. The female children in this study are known to have progressed through puberty by age 15 years [20] and this may have influenced the change in association between height and MSE with increased height associated with an increase in myopia, reported only at the teenage life stage. Growth at puberty is complex and not fully understood, and there are many environmental factors that combine with a person’s genetic susceptibility to influence growth and eventual height [21, 22]. When energy stores are suitable for puberty, biochemical reactions take place in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus with the hormone leptin playing a role in pubertal development stimulating the pulsatile release of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [23]. Increase in adiposity at the point of puberty triggers the release of leptin and in order to maintain hormonal balance, the suppression of dopamine occurs [24].

A study of the allelic score from 180 SNPs associated with adult height has been undertaken for this ALSPAC cohort with children having an above average increase in the height allelic score having a flatter corneal curvature [2]. A GWAS study of refractive error [8] which reported an overlap of genes with anthropometric traits also presented a number of newly identified genes related to the physiological process of light stimulation and visual information processing; in particular a genetic association of the DRD1 gene which is linked to the dopaminergic pathway is reported.

Dopamine has been suggested as a possible hormonal mechanism influencing the development of myopia with lower levels of dopamine and increased axial length reported in low light levels [25]. There are many studies in the field of growth and development presenting the regulatory mechanism occurring between leptin and dopamine [24, 26, 27] and there are a number of studies reporting the influence of dopamine on axial length growth in myopia [25, 28] but the authors are not aware of studies reporting interaction between leptin and dopamine in the development of myopia. This may be an important area that may benefit from further investigation.

Our data indicates an association between anthropomorphic measures, ocular biometry and refractive error and supports the theory that refractive error results from a complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors [8], adding to our understanding of the development of myopia and informing future clinical treatment. The strengths of this study are the large sample size with measures at key life stages; pre-natal, birth and teenage. The inclusion of teen measurements provides the opportunity to explore the influence of puberty, a period of significant growth. There are also a number of limitations. The measure of refractive error (MSE) was obtained from non-cycloplegic autorefraction, and this is likely to have over-estimated the number of myopic children. An independent evaluation of the MSE indicates a small (− 0.25D) systematic bias [29]; however, this would not influence the reported relationships and neither should it affect the AXL or RCC results. The onset of myopia is reported at a younger age in East Asian populations and we do not include a measure of ethnicity as the cohort is predominately of white British origin, our findings will therefore not be representative of other more ethnically diverse populations. We were not able to adjust for all potential confounders in our models, measures for time spent outdoors with an accelerometer previously reported in the ALSPAC children was not used in these analyses due to the small sample available [30]. No measure of sustained close work or childhood educational attainment were included, although all children were in the same age group and had the same number of school years in mandatory education.

Conclusion

Our findings are consistent with a small number of studies reporting association between anthropomorphic measures and ocular parameters [3, 5, 17] and add to the understanding of ocular structure, refractive error and myopia and their changing relationship with height and weight. Further research is required into the development of refractive error over the life-course, the hormonal mechanism for general growth particularly at the time of puberty and how this impacts on refractive growth patterns along with the mediating effect of environmental factors, including maternal lifestyle, on refractive development at each life stage.

Availability of data and materials

Please note that the ALSPAC study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/.

Abbreviations

ALSPAC:

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

AX:

Axial length

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CI:

Confidence Interval

GWAS:

Genome-wide association meta-analysis

GnRH:

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone

MSE:

Mean spherical equivalent

RCC:

Radius of corneal curvature

SNP’s:

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

SD:

Standard Deviation

References

  1. Barker DJ. The developmental origins of chronic adult disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2004;93(446):26–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Northstone K, Guggenheim JA, Howe LD, et al. Body stature growth trajectories during childhood and the development of myopia. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1064–73 e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Jaddoe VWV, Vingerling JR, Klaver CCW. Growth in foetal life, infancy, and early childhood and the association with ocular biometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:245–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman DJ. Effects of maternal obesity on fetal growth and body composition: implications for programming and future health. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15(2):113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS. Myopia over the lifecourse: prevalence and early life influences in the 1958 British birth cohort. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):797–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Mitchell GL, et al. Refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(6):2510–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Meng W, Butterworth J, Malecaze F, et al. Axial length of myopia: a review of current research. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225(3):127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis highlights light-induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nat Genet. 2018;50(6):834–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser A, Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, et al. Cohort profile: the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(1):97–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, et al. Cohort profile: the ‘children of the 90s’--the index offspring of the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(1):111–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ouyang L-J, Yin Z-Q, Ke N, et al. Refractive status and optical components of premature babies with or without retinopathy of prematurity at 3-4 years old. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11854–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Allison DB, et al. Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: a validation study. J Pediatr. 1998;132(2):204–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Savva SC, Tornaritis M, Savva ME, et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(11):1453–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nangia V, Jonas JB, Matin A, et al. Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural Central India. The Central India eye and medical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(11):1657–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friling R, Weinberger D, Kremer I, Avisar R, Sirota L, Snir M. Keratometry measurements in preterm and full term newborn infants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(1):8–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.88.1.8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson MI, Kiernan K, McLanahan S. Maternal education, changing family circumstances, and children’s skill development in the United States and UK. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2017;674(1):59–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Saw SM, Tong L, Chia KS, et al. The relation between birth size and the results of refractive error and biometry measurements in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(4):538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yip VC, Pan CW, Lin XY, et al. The relationship between growth spurts and myopia in Singapore children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(13):7961–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosner M, Laor A, Belkin M. Myopia and stature: findings in a population of 106,926 males. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1995;5(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Christensen KY, Maisonet M, Rubin C, et al. Pubertal pathways in girls enrolled in a contemporary British cohort. Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:329261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Burt Solorzano CM, McCartney CR. Obesity and the pubertal transition in girls and boys. Reproduction. 2010;140(3):399–410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Catalano PM, Ehrenberg HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG. 2006;113(10):1126–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shalitin S, Phillip M. Role of obesity and leptin in the pubertal process and pubertal growth--a review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(8):869–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beeler JA, Faust RP, Turkson S, et al. Low dopamine D2 receptor increases vulnerability to obesity via reduced physical activity, not increased appetitive motivation. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79(11):887–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Feldkaemper M, Schaeffel F. An updated view on the role of dopamine in myopia. Exp Eye Res. 2013;114:106–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hommel JD, Trinko R, Sears RM, et al. Leptin receptor signaling in midbrain dopamine neurons regulates feeding. Neuron. 2006;51(6):801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Belcher BR, Chou CP, Nguyen-Rodriguez ST, et al. Leptin predicts a decline in moderate to vigorous physical activity in minority female children at risk for obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2013;8(1):70–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss S, Schaeffel F. Diurnal growth rhythms in the chicken eye: relation to myopia development and retinal dopamine levels. J Comp Physiol A. 1993;172(3):263–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams C, Miller L, Northstone K, et al. The use of non-cycloplegic autorefraction data in general studies of children’s development. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:723–724.30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guggenheim JA, Northstone K, McMahon G, et al. Time outdoors and physical activity as predictors of incident myopia in childhood: a prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(6):2856–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses.

Funding

No funding was provided for this study.

The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref.: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, England

    Alison Bruce & Gillian Santorelli

  2. Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1NX, England

    Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad

Authors
  1. Alison Bruce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gillian Santorelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB initiated the project, wrote the statistical analysis plan, cleaned and analysed the data, and drafted and revised the paper. She is the guarantor. GS wrote the statistical analysis plan, cleaned the data and revised the draft paper. NGM contributed to the statistical analysis and revised the draft paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Bruce.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/research-ethics/

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruce, A., Mojarrad, N.G. & Santorelli, G. Association of anthropometric measures across the life-course with refractive error and ocular biometry at age 15 years. BMC Ophthalmol 20, 269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01480-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01480-3

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us