Skip to main content
Download PDF

Corneal nerve structure in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome in China

BMC Ophthalmology volume 21, Article number: 211 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo confocal microscopic morphology of corneal subbasal nerves and its relationship with clinical parameters in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome in China.

Methods

This was a case control study of 22 dry eye disease (DED) patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and 20 control subjects with non-Sjögren dry eye disease (NSDE). Each patient underwent an evaluation of ocular surface disease using the tear film break-up time (TBUT), noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIKBUT), noninvasive tear meniscus height (NIKTMH), corneal staining (National Eye Institute scale, NEI), Schirmer I test, meibography, and corneal subbasal nerve analysis with in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). The right eye of each subject was included in this study.

Results

SS patients showed a shorter TBUT (P = 0.009) and Schirmer I test results (P = 0.028) than the NSDE group. However, there was no significant difference in NIKBUT between the two groups (P = 0.393). The nerve density of subbasal nerves, number of nerves and tortuosity of the SS group were significantly lower than those of the NSDE group (P = 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.039, respectively). In the SS group, the mean nerve length was correlated with age and the Schirmer I test (r = − 0.519, P = 0.013 and r = 0.463, P = 0.035, respectively). Corneal staining was correlated with nerve density and the number of nerves (r = − 0.534, P = 0.013 and r = − 0.487, P = 0.025, respectively).

Conclusions

Sjögren syndrome dry eye (SSDE) patients have more severe clinical dry eye parameters than non-Sjögren dry eye disease (NSDE) patients. Compared with NSDE patients, we found that SSDE patients showed decreased corneal subbasal nerve density and numbers.

Peer Review reports

Background

Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) is an autoimmune disorder with external exocrine gland dysfunction and multiorgan involvement [1]. Dry eye is its main clinical manifestation. In primary SS (pSS), the presence of specific antibodies and signs of mononuclear cell infiltration in the exocrine glands accompany reduced tear secretion. These changes can breakdown the homeostasis of the tear film and cause ocular surface inflammation, damage and neurosensory alterations [2,3,4]. A study has also confirmed that Sjögren syndrome dry eye (SSDE) is not only an aqueous-deficient dry eye but also a mixed type dry eye disease (DED) with both aqueous-deficient dry eye and evaporative dry eye [5].

In dry eye disease, reduced tear secretion leads to inflammation and peripheral nerve damage. Corneal nerves contribute to the reflex control of basal tear production and blinking and regulate corneal epithelial migration and proliferation [6, 7]. Impaired nerve function may evoke a dryness sensation and pain and reduce epithelial recovery. Therefore, the corneal nerve plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of DED [6].

In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), as a noninvasive technique, has been widely utilized to evaluate the ocular surface in dry eye disease at the cellular level, including corneal and conjunctival epithelial cell density, conjunctival squamous metaplasia, and corneal nerve morphology [8,9,10,11]. In terms of corneal subbasal nerve morphology, controversial results have been demonstrated in several studies among different DED types [12,13,14,15]. Previous study investigated the corneal nerve morphology of SSDE concluded that SSDE has more corneal nerve density and number than non-Sjögren dry eye disease (NSDE) in China, which is contrary to studies in western populations [13, 15]. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the morphology of corneal subbasal nerves and its relationship with clinical parameters in patients with primary SSDE and NSDE based on a Chinese population.

Methods

Study population

This study was conducted at the Peking University People’s Hospital ophthalmology department with the approval of the Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital. All patients were informed of the aims of the study, and their consent was obtained according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. In this study, data were collected from 22 patients (22 women) with a mean age of 52.36 ± 10.18 years (ranging from 26 to 65 years) affected by SSDE. Patients with pSS were referred to the Peking University People’s Hospital Rheumatology Department. The patients were diagnosed with primary Sjögren’s syndrome according to the American-European Consensus Group (AECG) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [16]. A total of 20 patients with DED without Sjögren syndrome (20 women) with a mean age of 38.20 ± 13.37 years (ranging from 25 to 61 years) were recruited as the control group. Non-Sjögren dry eye disease (NSDE) was defined as a tear film break-up time (TBUT) less than 5 s, accompanied by complaints of ocular irritation in the absence of other ocular or systemic diseases [2]. Exclusion criteria for both groups were: aged under 18 years and over 70 years; sarcoidosis, diabetes mellitus, corneal dystrophies and inflammations (infectious keratitis, interstitial keratitis and immunological disorder of cornea (corneal disease in rheumatoid disease, corneal disease with nonrheumatoid collagen-vascular disease, phlyctenular keratoconjunctivitis and Mooren ulcer), systemic therapy with drugs having corneal toxicity, glaucoma, recent use of drugs with anticholinergic properties, use of contact lenses (within 1 month from enrollment) and history of ocular surgery.

Methods/procedures

All patients underwent a complete examination of the ocular surface of both eyes as follows by a masked operator: tear film break-up time (TBUT), noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIKBUT), noninvasive tear meniscus height (NIKTMH), Schirmer I test, meibography and IVCM analysis of the central cornea subbasal nerves. NIKTMH, NIKBUT and meibography were performed with Oculus Keratograph 5 M (Oculus Keratograph, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Partial or complete loss of meibomian glands was scored using the grades described by Reiko [17]: 0, no loss of meibomian glands; 1, the loss of area was 1/3 of the total meibomian gland area; 2, the loss of area was between 1/3 and 2/3; and 3, the loss of area was more than 2/3. Scores for the upper and lower eyelids were analyzed using ImageJ (ImageJ; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and summed to obtain a score for each eye (0–6). TBUT was measured by instilling fluorescein into the inferior cul-de-sac and calculating the average of two consecutive break-up times. Corneal staining was evaluated using the National Eye Institute (NEI) scale after the instillation of fluorescein. Schirmer I test was conducted by inserting Schirmer strips (Jingming Co., Ltd., Tianjing, China) into the lower conjunctival sac at the junction of the lateral and middle thirds without anesthesia for 5 min and wetting of the strips was recorded in millimeters.

In vivo confocal microscopy

In vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy was performed using confocal microscopy (Rostock Cornea Module of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph [HRT/RCM]; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Images of subbasal nerves of the central cornea were acquired using sequence mode by focusing the microscope beneath the basal epithelium. Approximately 200 corneal subbasal nerve layer images were acquired in the central cornea for each eye. Five images of most subbasal nerve fibers without repeated presence of the same region were selected for quantitative analysis. As described previously, images of corneal subbasal nerves were analyzed retrospectively using NeuronJ (Biomedical Imaging Group, Lausanne, Switzerland) by a single researcher, who was unaware of the patient’s condition and the results of the ocular surface investigations (Fig. 1) [18]. The different parameters used for evaluating the corneal subbasal nerves were: the nerve density (total length of the nerves visible within a frame); the mean nerve length (mean length of nerves and nerve fragments within a frame), maximum length of the corneal nerves (length of the longest nerve or nerve fragment observed within a frame), the number of corneal nerves (sum of the long nerve fiber bundles observed within a frame) and tortuosity (graded 0–4 following the Oliveira-Soto scale) [19]. For each eye and each parameter, the results were the mean of the analysis of five images.

Fig. 1
figure 1

IVCM images of corneal subbasal nerves in the NSDE group a and in the SSDE group c. Images b and d are their respective subbasal nerve tracings using NeuronJ software

Full size image

Statistical analysis

For each patient, the right eye was chosen for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the characteristics of the patients using the mean and standard deviation or frequency and percentages. A linear model with heterogeneous variance was used to compare group differences, controlling for age. In addition, to identify relationships between different variables, correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman) and age-adjusted partial correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman) were calculated. For all tests, the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

There was no difference in terms of sex (P = 1.000) between the SS group and NSDE group. The patients with SSDE were significantly older than those in the NSDE group (P = 0.001). Concerning ocular surface clinical evaluation, SS patients had a significantly lower TBUT (P = 0.009), lower Schirmer I test results (P = 0.028) and a higher NEI score (P = 0.001) compared with the NSDE group. However, there was no significant difference in NIKBUT between the two groups (P = 0.392). SS patients had more meibomian gland dropouts than the NSDE patients, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.649). The results of the clinical data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Test Results
Full size table

In relation to subbasal nerves, the results of the analysis were as follows: SS patients showed significantly lower nerve density (P = 0.001). In the comparison of the number of nerves, the SS group was significantly lower than the NSDE group (P < 0.001). In addition, greater nerve tortuosity was observed in SSDE (P = 0.039). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in mean length (P = 0.057) or maximum length (P = 0.229). The IVCM analysis of the subbasal corneal nerves is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 IVCM Analysis of Subbasal Nerve Parameters
Full size table

In SS patients, a correlation was found between age and TBUT (r = − 0.647, P = 0.001). However, no correlation was found between TBUT and NIKBUT (r = 0.047, P = 0.840). NIKBUT was correlated with NIKTMH (r = 0.547, P = 0.007). The meibomian gland dropout rate was not correlated with either TBUT or NIKBUT (r = − 0.212, P = 0.357 and r = − 0.521, P = 0.272, respectively). The results of the correlation between dry eye clinical tests of the SS group are presented in Table 3. Within the NSDE group, we found Schirmer test to be significantly related to NIKBUT (r = − 0.585, P = 0.009), TBUT (r = − 0.458, P = 0.049) and corneal staining (r = − 0.508, P = 0.026). NIKBUT was correlated with TBUT (r = 0.567, P = 0.011). No statistical correlations were found between the meibomian gland dropout rate and either TBUT or NIKBUT (r = 0.339, P = 0.091 and r = 0.408, P = 0.083, respectively). The correlations of the clinical data are shown in Table 4.

Table 3 Statistically Significant Correlations Between Dry Eye Clinical Tests in SSDE Group
Full size table
Table 4 Statistically Significant Correlations Between Dry Eye Clinical Tests in NSDE Group
Full size table

In the SSDE group, the mean nerve length was correlated with age (r = − 0.534, P = 0.013). We found a relationship between mean nerve length and the Schirmer test (r = 0.463, P = 0.035). Corneal staining was correlated with both mean nerve length (r = − 0.534, P = 0.013) and the number of nerves (r = − 0.487, P = 0.025). In the NSDE group, NIKBUT was correlated with nerve density (r = − 0.459, P = 0.048), mean nerve length (r = 0.529, P = 0.020) and the number of nerves (r = − 0.668, P = 0.002). We also observed a significant relationship between the number of nerves and corneal staining (r = − 0.462, P = 0.046). The statistical results of the correlation between dry eye and IVCM subbasal parameters in the SS and NSDE groups are presented in Tables 5 and 6, respectively.

Table 5 Statistical Results of Correlations Between Dry Eye Clinical Tests and IVCM Subbasal Parameters in SSDE group
Full size table
Table 6 Statistical Results of Correlations Between Dry Eye Clinical Tests and IVCM Subbasal Parameters in NSDE group
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, our study found that subbasal nerve density was significantly lower in the SSDE group than in the NSDE group. The mean length and maximum number of nerves were not significantly different between the two groups. SSDE patients had fewer nerves than NSDE patients. Therefore, we considered that this apparent difference may be attributed to the smaller numbers of nerves of SSDE but not the shorter length of each nerve. Previous studies focusing on corneal subbasal nerves in patients with SSDE and NSDE have demonstrated controversial results regarding nerve density. Most of studies concluded there was a decrease in nerve density in both SSDE and NSDE [18, 20, 21]. Nevertheless, Tuominen et al. [22] and Hosal et al. [23] reported unchanged nerve density in DED patients. While Zhang et al. reported increased corneal nerve density of SSDE in a Chinese population which is contrary result to ours, and they hypothesized that the increase in nerves was an indication of nerve regeneration [14]. In our opinion, the controversial finding might be caused by either different stages or severity of the disease which might induce different degeneration/regeneration patterns of nerves, levels of inflammation or levels of corneal hyperalgesia and allodynia [6]. Our results showed that SSDE patients suffered decreased corneal nerve density or were in a nerve-damaging stage. Most patients in the SSDE group had severe DED, so decreased corneal nerve density might be a later period of SSDE after nerve regeneration or serious inflammation of the ocular surface of SSDE sabotaged nerve regeneration. Forty percent of primary Sjögren’s syndrome patients experience chronic neuropathic pain, and skin biopsies show either reduced epidermal nerve fiber (ENF) density or abnormal morphology [24,25,26]. Therefore, the reduction in the corneal subbasal nerves might be primary damage due to pSS or a combined consequence of secondary damage from dry eye disease and pSS.

The two techniques of tear break-up time should be correlated, and the noninvasive technique (NIKBUT) is about 2.0 s longer than TBUT [27, 28]. In our study, NIKBUT of SSDE was not correlated with TBUT with a mean difference of 3.5 s, while NIKBUT had a relationship with TBUT and NIKBUT was 0.7 s longer than TBUT in the NSDE group. A significant drawback of TBUT is that the measurement of TBUT depends on subjective assessment by the observer. The SSDE patients in our study had severe DED. TBUT observer’s assessment may have been interfered with by a worse fluorescein staining status. This might explain the tear break-up time discrepancy of the two techniques. Future studies should investigate the best way to evaluate the tear break-up time of severely dry eye patients, especially among those with Sjögren’s syndrome.

This study found that dry eye clinical parameters of the SSDE group were worse than those of the NSDE group. SSDE patients had shorter TBUTs and lower NIKTMH and Schirmer test results than the NSDE group. Previous studies have shown that SSDE also manifests evaporative dry eye [5] and has a higher frequency of severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) than NSDE [8]. In our study, SSDE patients suffered more meibomian dropouts accompanied by a lower TBUT, suggesting that SSDE might have more severe MGD. The SSDE group had more meibomian gland dropout than the NSDE group, but the difference was not significant. Meanwhile, the meibomian gland dropout rate was not associated with the dry eye clinical parameters in either group. The meibomian gland dropout rate is one of the parameters used for evaluating the meibomian gland, which may not represent meibomian gland function or meibum quality [29]. Therefore, dropout ratio was not associated with corneal staining, NIKBUT or any other parameters in this study. This indicates that even though SSDE is a combined dry eye, the meibomian gland structural variations is not the prime pathogenesis of SSDE.

The major limitation of these studies arises from the inhomogeneous distribution of nerve fibers across the area of the cornea [30]. A single IVCM image (typically 0.16 mm2) is insufficient for reliable morphometric characterization of the subbasal nerve plexus. Three to eight multiple nonoverlapping IVCM images are recommended to effectively expand the examined corneal area [31, 32], which have to be manually selected from a larger set of acquired images according to predefined quality criteria. However, several selected IVCM images may not fully represent the subbasal nerve condition of the patient, which will cause systemic error. Various alternative approaches to increase the examined area have been developed, such as the EyeGuidance system [33]. Composite images covering larger areas or even the whole cornea subbasal nerve will certainly provide more reliable evaluations in the future. Another limitation of our study is the relatively small sample size.

Conclusions

In our study, SSDE patients showed decreased corneal subbasal nerve density and numbers of nerves compared with the NSDE group. We conclude that corneal subbasal nerve decreases in SSDE, this difference may be attributed to the fewer numbers of nerves of SSDE. And decreased corneal nerve may contribute to the pathophysiology of SSDE. Therefore, further corneal nerve investigations could improve our understanding and treatment of SSDE.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IVCM:

In vivo confocal microscopy

DED:

Dry eye disease

pSS:

Primary Sjögren’s syndrome

NSDE:

Non-Sjögren dry eye disease

TBUT:

Tear film break-up time

NIKBUT:

Noninvasive tear film break-up time

NIKTMH:

Noninvasive tear meniscus height

SSDE:

Sjögren syndrome dry eye

SS:

Sjögren’s syndrome

AECG:

American-European Consensus Group

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

NEI:

National Eye Institute

MGD:

Meibomian gland dysfunction

ENF:

Epidermal nerve fiber

References

  1. Patel R, Shahane A. The epidemiology of Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;30(6):247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Craig JP, Nelson JD, Azar DT, Belmonte C, Bron AJ, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II report executive summary. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(4):802–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z, Xie Y, Macri A, Pflugfelder SC. Pro- and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(10):2283–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tincani A, Andreoli L, Cavazzana I, Doria A, Favero M, Fenini M, et al. Novel aspects of Sjogren’s syndrome in 2012. BMC Med. 2013;4(11):93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimazaki J, Goto E, Ono M, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjogren syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1988;105(8):1485–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belmonte C, Nichols JJ, Cox SM, Brock JA, Begley CG, Bereiter DA, et al. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(4):404–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Hirschfeld J, Lopez-Briones LG, Belmonte C. Neurotrophic influences on corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59(5):597–605. https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1994.1145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erdelyi B, Kraak R, Zhivov A, Guthoff R, Nemeth J. In vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy of the cornea in dry eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0375-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Villani E, Magnani F, Viola F, Santaniello A, Scorza R, Nucci P, et al. In vivo confocal evaluation of the ocular surface morpho-functional unit in dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(6):576–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318294c184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakamatsu TH, Sato EA, Matsumoto Y, Ibrahim OM, Dogru M, Kaido M, et al. Conjunctival in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in patients with Sjögren syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):144–50. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Villani E, Galimberti D, Viola F, Mapelli C, Ratiglia R. The cornea in Sjogren's syndrome: an in vivo confocal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(5):2017–22. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tuisku IS, Konttinen YT, Konttinen LM, Tervo TM. Alterations in corneal sensitivity and nerve morphology in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86(6):879–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabbriellini G, Baldini C, Varanini V, Notarstefano C, Pepe P, Fanucci F, et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: A monocentric experience. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(4):585–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2014.979523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang M, Chen J, Luo L, Xiao Q, Sun M, Liu Z. Altered corneal nerves in aqueous tear deficiency viewed by in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2005;24(7):818–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000154402.01710.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joana C, Filipe B, Helena C, Diogo H, Sara C, José V, et al. Tear meniscus and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus assessment in primary Sjögren syndrome and Sicca syndrome patients. Cornea. 2019;38(2):221–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiboski SC, Shiboski CH, Criswell L, Baer A, Challacombe S, Lanfranchi H, et al. American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjogren’s international collaborative clinical Alliance cohort. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(4):475–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, Amano S. Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):911–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Labbé A, Liang Q, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Xu L, Baudouin C, et al. Corneal nerve structure and function in patients with non-sjogren dry eye: clinical correlations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5144–50. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2001;20(4):374–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200105000-00008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benítez-Del-Castillo JM, Acosta MC, Wassfi MA, Díaz-Valle D, Gegúndez JA, Fernandez C, et al. Relation between corneal innervation with confocal microscopy and corneal sensitivity with noncontact esthesiometry in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(1):173–81. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kheirkhah A, Dohlman TH, Amparo F, Arnoldner MA, Jamali A, Hamrah P, et al. Effects of corneal nerve density on the response to treatment in dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(4):662–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuominen IS, Konttinen YT, Vesaluoma MH, Moilanen JA, Helinto M, Tervo TM. Corneal innervation and morphology in primary Sjogren's syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(6):2545–9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hosal BM, Ornek N, Zilelioglu G, Elhan AH. Morphology of corneal nerves and corneal sensation in dry eye: a preliminary study. Eye. 2005;19(12):1276–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chai J, Herrmann DN, Stanton M, Barbano RL, Logigian EL. Painful small-fiber neuropathy in Sjogren sydrome. Neurology. 2005;65(6):925–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000176034.38198.f9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawagashira Y, Koike H, Fujioka Y, Hashimoto R, Tomita M, Morozumi S, et al. Differential, size-dependent sensory neuron involvement in the painful and ataxic forms of primary Sjögren's syndrome-associated neuropathy. J Neurol Sci. 2012;319(1–2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.05.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fauchais AL, Richard L, Gondran G, Ghorab K, Palat S, Bezanahary H, et al. Small fibre neuropathy in primary Sjögren syndrome. Rev Med Internet. 2011;32(3):142–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2010.08.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang MTM, Craig JP. Comparative evaluation of clinical methods of tear film stability assessment: A randomized crossover trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(3):291–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mooi JK, Wang MT, Lim J, Muller A, Craig JP. Minimising instilled volume reduces the impact of fluorescein on clinical measurements of tear film stability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(3):170–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clara LQ, Laura RDV, Syga P, et al. Meibomian gland morphology: the influence of structural variations on gland function and ocular surface parameters. Cornea. 2019;38(12):1506–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel DV, McGhee CNJ. Mapping of the normal human corneal sub-basal nerve plexus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;46(12):4485–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kheirkhah A, Muller R, Mikolajczak J, Ren A, Kadas EM, Zimmermann H, et al. Comparison of standard versus wide-field composite images of the corneal subbasal layer by in vivo confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(10):5801–7. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Vagenas D, Pritchard N, Edwards K, Shahidi AM, Sampson GP, Russell AW, et al. Optimal image sample size for corneal nerve morphometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(5):812–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31824ee8c9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Allgeier S, Maier S, Mikut R, Peschel S, Reichert KM, Stachs O, et al. Mosaicking the subbasal nerve plexus by guided eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(9):6082–9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere thanks to Dr. Mingwu Li for providing advice on this project.

Funding

This project was supported by the Peking University People’s Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds (RDX2020–03) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81701607).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fangting Li and Qin Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, Xicheng District, China

    Fangting Li, Qin Zhang, Xin Ying & Mingwei Zhao

  2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases, College of Optometry, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

    Fangting Li

  3. Department of Rheumatology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

    Jing He, Yuebo Jin & Yaobin Cheng

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Huiwen Xu

  5. Medical Informatics Center, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Huiwen Xu

Authors
  1. Fangting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Ying
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuebo Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Huiwen Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yaobin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mingwei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FL, QZ and MZ planned the study. YJ, QZ and JH wrote the applications to the Ethical Review Board. YJ, YC and XY examined the patients. HX, FL and QZ did the data analyses. FL and QZ were the main contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingwei Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures in the study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Peking University People’s Hospital Ethical Review Board in Beijing, China (number: 2017PHB167–01). Informed written consent for participation was obtained from the individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. No individual data, details or images are presented in the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1

. Statistical Results of Correlations Between Dry Eye Clinical Tests in the SSDE Group. Supplementary Table 2. Statistical Results of Correlations Between Dry Eye Clinical Tests in the NSDE Group.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F., Zhang, Q., Ying, X. et al. Corneal nerve structure in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome in China. BMC Ophthalmol 21, 211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01967-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01967-7

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us