Skip to main content
Download PDF

IgG4-related disease in patients with idiopathic orbital inflammation

BMC Ophthalmology volume 21, Article number: 356 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To identify the prevalence of positive IgG4 immunostaining in orbital tissue among patients previously diagnosed with nongranulomatous idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI) and to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with and without IgG4-positive cells.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of IOI was performed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to identify IgG-positive cells and IgG4-positive cells. Multivariate analysis was performed using likelihood ratio-test logistic regression on the differences between IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) and non-IgG4-RD.

Results

Of the 45 patients included, 21 patients (46.7%) had IgG4-positive cells, with 52.4% being male and a mean age of 55.9 ± 13.4 years. Bilateral ocular adnexal involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.45; P = 0.016) and infraorbital nerve enlargement (aOR = 12.11; P = 0.008) were frequently found in IgG4-RD patients. Complete remission occurred in 23.8% of IgG4-RD patients and 41.7% of non-IgG4-RD patients. IgG4-RD patients had more frequent recurrent disease than non-IgG4-RD patients.

Conclusions

Nearly 50% of IgG4-RD patients were previously diagnosed with biopsy-proven IOI. IgG4-RD was more frequent in patients with bilateral disease and infraorbital nerve enlargement, showing the importance of tissue biopsy in these patients. Immunohistochemistry studies of all histopathology slides showing nongranulomatous IOI are highly recommended to evaluate for IgG4-RD.

Peer Review reports

Background

Idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI), previously named orbital pseudotumor, is a benign, noninfective, tumefactive lesion of the orbit. Inflammatory clinical syndrome is characterized by features of a nonspecific or nonidentifiable local or systemic inflammatory condition [1, 2]. IOI is a diagnosis of exclusion and comprises cases with heterogeneous clinicopathology [3,4,5]. IOI is the third most common orbital disease, following Graves’ ophthalmopathy and lymphoproliferative diseases [6, 7]. IOI accounts for 5.2–11.0% of orbital disorders [8, 9].

The pathogenesis of IOI has remained inconclusive. Various lines of evidence point to an immune-mediated process as the main mechanism [10, 11]. In recent years, IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) has emerged as a common cause of orbital inflammation, suggesting that IOI might be a part of the disease spectrum of IgG4-RD [12, 13]. The exact prevalence of IgG4-RD is difficult to estimate since there have been few published studies, and these studies used different criteria for diagnosis, tended to enroll small groups of patients with heterogeneous pathology, and had uncertain generalizability [4].

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of positive immunostaining of IgG4 in patients who were previously diagnosed with biopsy-proven nongranulomatous IOI. We also compared the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with and without biopsy-proven IgG4-RD.

Methods

Study population

The electronic medical records of the patients initially diagnosed with biopsy-proven nongranulomatous IOI and treated at Songklanagarind Hospital from October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2016, were reviewed. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and was performed in full compliance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization in Good Clinical Practice Guidelines (REC number 59–040–02-1). During the study period, tissue biopsies were not the first diagnostic step for all patients with IOI in our center. The inclusion criteria included all patients aged ≥18 years with biopsy-proven IOIs. Patients with a final diagnosis of other identifiable diseases, including Graves’ autoimmune disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener granulomatosis), lymphoma, and orbital cellulitis, were excluded from this study. We also excluded patients who had a follow-up time of less than 6 months and poor-quality histopathologic slides.

Data collection

Data were reviewed, including age, sex, affected eye, visual acuity (VA), signs and symptoms, the location and extent of the disease, radiologic data, histopathologic features, and treatment outcome. Blood eosinophilia was defined as a percentage of eosinophils > 10 [14].

Serial 3-μm-thick sections were sliced from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed using anti-IgG (rabbit polyclonal, dilution 1:2000; CELL MARQUE, California, United States) and anti-IgG4 (mouse monoclonal, dilution 1:100; CELL MARQUE, California, United States) antibodies. All histopathologic specimens that revealed lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates were reviewed by an expert pathologist (KK), and additional immunohistochemical staining was performed to identify IgG4-RD according to the new diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease, reported in 2014 by Goto et al. [15] (Table 1).

Table 1 Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease15
Full size table

For the tissue specimens of each patient, we selected three high-power fields (HPFs) with the highest concentration of IgG4-positive cells and IgG-positive cells, which were evaluated and counted. The average number of IgG4-positive cells per HPF and the average ratio of IgG4-positive to IgG-positive cells were then calculated. All orbital images were reported by the neuroradiologist (NS). Infraorbital nerve enlargement was evaluated using coronal sections of orbital computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. The criteria for the diagnosis of infraorbital nerve enlargement was abnormal findings including a loss of fat planes around the infraorbital nerve, focal or diffuse alteration of the caliber, irregular course, an expansion of the infraorbital canal or foramen, an enhancing infraorbital nerve, and asymmetrical size and signal intensity [16].

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of IgG4-RD in the case of previously diagnosed IOI. The secondary outcome measure was the difference between histopathologically confirmed IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD in terms of the clinical features and treatment outcomes. The treatment outcomes were classified into three categories: complete remission, partial response, and disease recurrence. Complete remission was defined as complete clinical remission, a lack of disease activity for 90 or more days with steroid or immunosuppressant discontinuation without relapse. Partial response was defined as persistent disease with relapse within 90 days after the discontinuation of steroid or immunosuppressant treatment. Disease recurrence was defined as repeated episodes of disease separated by periods of inactivity after 90 or more days without steroid treatment.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata Statistical Software (STATA MP 14.1 StataCorp LP). Clinical characteristics between the IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD groups were compared using Student’s t test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. In the analysis of histologic features, the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables across groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means between groups. The risks for predicting IgG4-RD was determined by calculating the odds ratio (OR). Multivariate analysis was performed using likelihood ratio-test logistic regression on the differences between the IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD groups. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Study population

Sixty-five patients underwent tissue biopsy, and 20 patients were subsequently excluded (follow-up time of < 6 months [n = 13]; poor quality of histopathologic slides [n = 7]). Of the 45 patients who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study, 21 patients (46.7%) had IgG4-positive cells, with 52.4% being male with a mean age of 55.9 ± 13.4 years, while the mean age at diagnosis of patients with IgG4-negative cells was 50.3 ± 17.1 years, and the patients were mainly female (79.2%). The mean logMAR of VA at diagnosis for IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD patients was 0.36 ± 0.33 and 0.39 ± 0.55, respectively. The most common presenting sign and symptom of both groups was a palpable mass or localized swelling in IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD patients (90.5 and 70.8%, respectively). Of the 21 IgG4-RD patients, 4 had lymph node enlargement. Between October 1, 2006, and March 25, 2014, serum IgG4 level testing was not available in our center. Only 5 out of 65 patients were tested to determine their serum IgG4 concentration, and all 5 patients had a concentration higher than 1.35 g/L. An imaging study was available for review in the picture archiving and communication system for 37 patients (82.2%). The most common imaging was computed tomography (70.3%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (29.7%).

Histopathologic features

The mean number of IgG-positive cells in IgG4-RD patients was 251.2 ± 172.4 cells, while the mean number of IgG-positive cells in non-IgG4-RD patients was 108.3 ± 119.6 cells (P = 0.002). The mean number of IgG4-positive cells in IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD patients was 138.1 ± 108.3 cells and 9.4 ± 13.2 cells, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean ratios of IgG4-positive cells to IgG-positive cells in patients with IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD were 56.3 ± 18.3 and 6.0 ± 8.2, respectively (P > 0.001). In the IgG4-RD group, we found that 95.2% of patients had > 50 IgG4+ cells/HPF, 81.0% of patients had an IgG4-positive cell/IgG-positive cell ratio ≥ 40, and 76.2% of patients fulfilled both criteria. Based on histopathologic criteria and limited evidence of serum IgG4 levels, only 2 patients were diagnosed with definite IgG4-RD, and 19 were diagnosed with probable IgG4-RD. Three patients who were histopathologically confirmed to have non-IgG4-RD with elevated serum IgG4 levels were diagnosed with possible IgG4-RD.

Univariate analysis

The results of the univariate analysis of the variables associated with IgG4-RD diagnosis are illustrated in Table 2. IgG4-RD was found predominantly in males (P = 0.032). The frequency of patients with bilateral ocular adnexal involvement tended to be higher in IgG4-RD patients than in non-IgG4-RD patients (P = 0.010). Twelve of the 13 IgG4-RD patients with an enlargement of the infraorbital nerve also had canal enlargement. Blood eosinophilia was found to be more common in IgG4-RD patients (P = 0.015).

Table 2 Univariate analysis for IgG4-RD diagnosis
Full size table

Multivariate analysis

The results of multivariate analysis using likelihood ratio-test logistic regression showed that the significant clinical characteristics for IgG4-RD compared with non-IgG4-RD were bilateral ocular adnexal involvement (P = 0.016) and an enlargement of the infraorbital nerve (P = 0.008) (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate analysis for IgG4-RD diagnosis
Full size table

Treatment regimen

Of the 45 patients, 41 (91.1%) patients received oral prednisolone in various doses. Oral prednisolone was given with an initial dose of 1 mg/kg/day or 60 mg/day for 2 weeks, which was then tapered by 5–10 mg every 2–4 weeks, adjusting the duration according to the patient’s response. Seven patients (15.6%) received high doses of intravenous corticosteroids due to severe visual loss associated with optic nerve involvement or severe bilateral inflammation, with a mean logMAR VA of 0.50 ± 0.55, whereas the mean logMAR VA of patients who received oral prednisolone was 0.38 ± 0.51 (P = 0.259). This study revealed that only 1 IgG4-RD patient received orbital radiation and showed a good response, and 3 non-IgG4-RD patients received orbital radiation and showed a good response. Methotrexate was used to treat 5 IgG4-RD patients and 2 non-IgG4-RD patients who had elevated serum IgG4 levels and were diagnosed with possible IgG4-RD. Observation was reported for 1 patient with IgG4-RD and 2 patients with non-IgG4-RD due to the refusal of treatment.

Treatment outcome

The mean follow-up time in this study was 58.8 ± 44.2 months (range, 7.5–169.2 months) in the IgG4-RD group and 51.9 ± 39.3 months (range, 10.5–163.4 months) in the non-IgG4-RD group. Among the 45 patients, complete resolution was reported in 15 patients (33.3%).

In IgG4-RD patients, on the basis of treatment response, only 23.8% of patients had a complete resolution of their symptoms and signs with one round of treatment, 57.1% of patients had a recurrence of disease. Ten (41.7%) out of 24 non-IgG4-RD patients had a complete response. The mean age of the IgG4 patients with complete remission was 65.20 ± 8.35 years, which was slightly higher than that of the noncomplete remission group (mean, 52.80 ± 16.03 years).

Overall, patients in the incomplete remission group received higher doses (1 mg/kg/day) of oral prednisolone than those in the complete remission group (85.1% versus 65.6%; P = 0.714). Seven patients (5 IgG4-RD patients and 2 non-IgG4-RD patients) were treated with methotrexate (6 with a good response and 1 being lost to follow-up). The treatment outcome in the patients with IgG4-RD tended to involve more disease recurrence or more intermittent episodes than in the non-IgG4-RD patients.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that IgG4-RD accounted for nearly half of the total cases previously classified as biopsy-proven nongranulomatous IOI. We observed that bilateral ocular adnexal disease and an enlargement of the infraorbital nerve were more frequent in IgG4-RD than in non-IgG4-RD patients.

In agreement with previous studies, IgG4-RD showed similarities with several of the clinical characteristics of IOI, which, in general, tends to affect men more than women [3, 14, 17]. Our study revealed that non-IgG4-RD patients were mostly female, which is similar to the findings in published studies [1, 18]. Bilateral ocular adnexal involvement tended to be significantly more common in IgG4-RD than in non-IgG4-RD patients, with an aOR of 9.45 (P = 0.016). This correlates with recent evidence suggesting that bilateral disease should be considered for IgG4-RD [19,20,21]. Additionally, IgG4-RD patients who had bilateral disease potentially had extraophthalmic involvement [22]. We also found that diffuse lesions and multiple structural involvements of the orbit were more frequent among IgG4-RD patients. None of the IgG4-RD patients presented with pure myositis or pure anterior orbital involvement. A study from the United States reported that in 21 patients with IgG4-RD, the lacrimal gland was the most commonly involved site (13/21, 61.9%) [23].

Infraorbital nerve and canal enlargement was strong evidence for a diagnosis of orbital reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and IgG4-RD with concurrent orbital myositis, focal orbital disease, or paranasal sinus disease [24,25,26]. Additionally, infraorbital nerve enlargement in IgG4 patients was associated with higher serum IgG4 [12]. This study also reported a strong association between IgG4-RD and infraorbital nerve enlargement, which was one of the significant clinical indicators of IgG4-RD. However, the main orbital imaging in our study was computed tomography. Therefore, the definition of infraorbital nerve enlargement in our study was different from that of the previous study that defined infraorbital nerve enlargement as this nerve being larger than the optic nerve in the coronal section of orbital magnetic resonance imaging scans [26].

Previous published studies on pathologic characteristics have advocated a strong relationship between IOI and IgG4-RD [4, 14, 19]. We found a high frequency of biopsy-proven IgG4-RD among patients with previously diagnosed IOI. The frequency of IgG4-RD in patients with IOI varies from 5.4 to 45.8% [4, 14, 21]. Such discrepancies between prior studies in the rates of IgG4-RD are possibly due to differences in diagnostic criteria retained for tissue IgG4 plasma cell infiltrates (i.e., either > 10 IgG4+ cells/HPF [27], > 30 IgG4+ cells/HPF [28], or > 50–100 IgG4+ cells/HPF [29]). Additionally, an elevated ratio of IgG4+ cells to IgG+ cells, the most sensitive and specific histopathologic parameter, was considered when the difference in these cell counts was more than 40% [30]. A limitation of the use of the average number of IgG4+ plasma cells counted was also recognized because of the patchy distribution of IgG4+ cells, the variability in the size of an HPF across microscopes, and the relatively low specificity of IgG4+ cell counts [31]. However, there were no differences between the use of one criterion and the use of both criteria for diagnosis. We suggest following the diagnostic criteria reported in 2014 [15]. Our study also revealed significantly more IgG+ cells/HPF in patients with IgG4-RD; therefore, pathologists should be concerned with additional evidence of IgG4-RD. Histopathologic features of ocular adnexal IgG4-RD reveal the similarity of the other sites, except in the case of storiform fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis, which were less common in several prior studies [4, 32]. Therefore, we focused on the IgG4+ cell to IgG+ cell ratio and the number of IgG4+ cells.

We reported that IgG4-RD accounted for a high prevalence of cases originally diagnosed as IOI. The reasons for the higher frequency of probable IgG4-RD may be due to the following facts. First, the study was performed in a tertiary-care hospital; thus, more severe cases were included. Second, some patients underwent multiple incisional biopsies due to partial response to treatment or a recurrence of inflammation. We used the most severe tissue specimen as the representative specimen. Third, we tended to perform incisional biopsy in patients with atypical presentations or those who failed to respond to the initial therapy rather than in patients with classic IOI cases, which might have led to a selection bias.

For the treatment of previously diagnosed IOI in the current study, most patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids, primarily at various doses. The majority of patients initially received oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day with a low chance of complete resolution. High doses of intravenous corticosteroids were used for patients with severe visual loss associated with optic nerve involvement and severe orbital inflammation to hasten inflammation reduction. However, there was no consensus on the treatment protocol, and the choice of therapy needs to be individualized by ophthalmologists and physicians with experience using these drugs in ocular inflammatory disease [20]. This high rate of initial response to prednisone is a common feature of IgG4-RD. However, recurrence, partial response, and severe prolonged inflammation with this disease were frequent (roughly three-quarters of patients). Our study demonstrated that IgG4-RD tended to be recurrent or had more intermittent episodes than non-IgG4-RD, although the difference was not statistically significant (57.1% versus 33.3%).

Five tissue-proven IgG4-RD and 2 possible IgG4-RD patients were treated with methotrexate. Therefore, ophthalmologists preferred prescribing steroid-sparing agents in patients with intractable orbital inflammation, including IgG4-RD, which was more prevalent in elderly patients with frequent comorbidity and polypharmacy [33]. Methotrexate was safe and cost-effective in patients with IgG4-RD [34]. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the diagnosis of IgG4-RD, which may require more aggressive treatments or the maintenance of low-dose systemic steroid treatment to prevent disease recurrence [35].

The strength of the present study was its enrollment of nongranulomatous IOI patients and focus on the significant clinical differences between IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD, including treatment outcomes with long-term follow-up. We could determine the predictors for the diagnosis of IgG4-RD in terms of demographic data, imaging studies, and laboratory features. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to determine clinical differences between IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD using multivariate analysis. Clinical indicators of IgG4-RD were bilateral disease and an enlargement of the infraorbital nerve. The findings from our report could provide more information on IgG4-RD to clinicians in a developing country with a limited number of oculoplastic surgeons. Therefore, the clinical features could help in the formation of the diagnosis, especially in patients with suspected IgG4-RD in whom a surgeon cannot perform a tissue biopsy. Reportedly, lymphoid hyperplasia of IgG4-RD can provide a substrate for the emergence of lymphoma [36, 37]; thus, long-term observation is also warranted.

The data of this study were reviewed between 2006 and 2016. Nearly 50% of all biopsy-proven cases were previously diagnosed as IOI. Interestingly, IgG4-RD has been underestimated until now. Furthermore, the identification of IgG4-RD using serum IgG4 levels and immunohistochemistry staining in patients with suspected IgG4-RD is beneficial for more systemic investigation, optimal treatments, and adequate follow-up time. Prospective randomized controlled trials are required to determine the pattern of tissue involvement and histopathology in IgG4-RD, in addition to the development of effective treatment.

There were some limitations in our study. First, given the retrospective nature of this study, information bias arising from incomplete or missing data may be more pronounced than in a prospective study. Second, there was a lack of consistent laboratory testing for serum IgG4 levels when the patients underwent tissue biopsy, for which serum IgG4 concentration is one of the IgG4-RD diagnostic criteria. Therefore, there were few patients with definitive diagnoses of IgG4-RD in our study. If clinical features, orbital imaging, and pathologic findings met the diagnostic criteria, a probable diagnosis of IgG4-RD could be made. Last, we found that lymph node involvement was low because the lymph node status was assessed by manual palpation, which may have led to an underestimation of the rate of lymph node involvement. Additionally, we could not assess the association with extraorbital manifestations of IgG4-RD due to the low awareness of this disease in recent decades.

In summary, the results of our study revealed that IgG4-RD accounted for nearly half of cases initially diagnosed as biopsy-proven IOI. The main clinical features were strong recognition of IgG4-RD, including bilateral disease and an enlargement of the infraorbital nerve. Patients presenting with orbital inflammatory lesions should have biopsies obtained whenever possible and should be evaluated for IgG4-RD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IOI:

idiopathic orbital inflammation

IgG4-RD

IgG4-related disease

aOR

adjusted odds ratio

VA

visual acuity

HPFs

high-power fields

References

  1. Yuen SJ, Rubin PA. Idiopathic orbital inflammation: distribution, clinical features, and treatment outcome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:491–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon LK. Orbital inflammatory disease: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Eye (Lond). 2006;20:1196–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobs D, Galetta S. Diagnosis and management of orbital pseudotumor. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13:347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrew NH, Sladden N, Kearney DJ, Selva D. An analysis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) among idiopathic orbital inflammations and benign lymphoid hyperplasias using two consensus-based diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:376–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon LK. Diagnostic dilemmas in orbital inflammatory disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2003;11:3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belanger C, Zhang KS, Reddy AK, Yen MT, Yen KG. Inflammatory disorders of the orbit in childhood: a case series. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:460–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber AL, Romo LV, Sabates NR. Pseudotumor of the orbit. Clinical, pathologic, and radiologic evaluation. Radiol Clin N Am. 1999;37:151–68 xi.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shinder R, Al-Zubidi N, Esmaeli B. Survey of orbital tumors at a comprehensive cancer center in the United States. Head Neck. 2011;33:610–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shields JA, Shields CL, Scartozzi R. Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: the 2002 Montgomery lecture, part 1. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:997–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Atabay C, Tyutyunikov A, Scalise D, et al. Serum antibodies reactive with eye muscle membrane antigens are detected in patients with nonspecific orbital inflammation. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:145–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mombaerts I, Koornneef L. Current status in the treatment of orbital myositis. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:402–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu A, Andrew NH, McNab AA, Selva D. IgG4-related ophthalmic disease: pooling of published cases and literature review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berry-Brincat A, Rose GE. Idiopathic orbital inflammation: a new dimension with the discovery of immunoglobulin G4-related disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:415–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abad S, Martin A, Héran F, et al. IgG4-related disease in patients with idiopathic orbital inflammation syndrome: data from the French SIOI prospective cohort. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97:e648–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goto H, Takahira M, Azumi A. Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2015;59:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chhabra A, Bajaj G, Wadhwa V, et al. MR Neurographic evaluation of facial and neck pain: Normal and abnormal Craniospinal nerves below the Skull Base. Radiographics. 2018;38:1498–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stone JH, Zen Y, Deshpande V. IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:539–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spindle J, Tang SX, Davies B, et al. Pediatric idiopathic orbital inflammation: clinical features of 30 cases. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2016;32:270–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Plaza JA, Garrity JA, Dogan A, Ananthamurthy A, Witzig TE, Salomao DR. Orbital inflammation with IgG4-positive plasma cells: manifestation of IgG4 systemic disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:421–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheuk W, Chan JK. IgG4-related sclerosing disease: a critical appraisal of an evolving clinicopathologic entity. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010;17:303–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sa HS, Lee JH, Woo KI, Kim YD. IgG4-related disease in idiopathic sclerosing orbital inflammation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1493–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu A, Andrew NH, McNab AA, Selva D. Bilateral IgG4-related ophthalmic disease: a strong indication for systemic imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1409–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallace ZS, Deshpande V, Stone JH. Ophthalmic manifestations of IgG4-related disease: single-center experience and literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;43:806–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hardy TG, McNab AA, Rose GE. Enlargement of the infraorbital nerve: an important sign associated with orbital reactive lymphoid hyperplasia or immunoglobulin g4-related disease. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Soussan JB, Deschamps R, Sadik JC, et al. Infraorbital nerve involvement on magnetic resonance imaging in European patients with IgG4-related ophthalmic disease: a specific sign. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:1335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohshima K, Sogabe Y, Sato Y. The usefulness of infraorbital nerve enlargement on MRI imaging in clinical diagnosis of IgG4-related orbital disease. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:380–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), 2011. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:21–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Japanese study group of IgG4-related ophthalmic disease. A prevalence study of IgG4-related ophthalmic disease in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57:573–9.

  29. Deshpande V, Zen Y, Chan JK, et al. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arora K, Rivera M, Ting DT, Deshpande V. The histological diagnosis of IgG4-related disease on small biopsies: challenges and pitfalls. Histopathology. 2019;74:688–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Strehl JD, Hartmann A, Agaimy A. Numerous IgG4-positive plasma cells are ubiquitous in diverse localised non-specific chronic inflammatory conditions and need to be distinguished from IgG4-related systemic disorders. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Deschamps R, Deschamps L, Depaz R, et al. High prevalence of IgG4-related lymphoplasmacytic infiltrative disorder in 25 patients with orbital inflammation: a retrospective case series. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:999–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Akiyama M, Takeuchi T. IgG4-related disease: beyond glucocorticoids. Drugs Aging. 2018;35:275–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Della-Torre E, Campochiaro C, Bozzolo EP, et al. Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in IgG4-related disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54:1934–6.

  35. Woo YJ, Kim JW, Yoon JS. Clinical implications of serum IgG4 levels in patients with IgG4-related ophthalmic disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:256–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheuk W, Yuen HK, Chan AC, et al. Ocular adnexal lymphoma associated with IgG4+ chronic sclerosing dacryoadenitis: a previously undescribed complication of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1159–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kubota T, Moritani S, Yoshino T, Nagai H, Terasaki H. Ocular adnexal marginal zone B cell lymphoma infiltrated by IgG4-positive plasma cells. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63:1059–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University. We would like to thank Dr. Alan Geater and Ms.Walailuk Jitphiboon for their suggestions concerning the statistics used in this project. We also thank Ms. Parichat Damthongsuk for her assistance in collecting and analyzing the data.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand

    Orapan Aryasit, Nanida Tiraset, Passorn Preechawai & Wantanee Sittivarakul

  2. Anatomical Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand

    Kanita Kayasut

  3. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand

    Nuttha Sanghan

Authors
  1. Orapan Aryasit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nanida Tiraset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Passorn Preechawai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kanita Kayasut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nuttha Sanghan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wantanee Sittivarakul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: O.A., N.T., and P.P.; Acquisition of data: O.A., N.T., P.P., N.S., K.K., and W.S.; Analysis and interpretation of data: O.A., N.T., P.P., N.S., K.K., and W.S.; Drafting the manuscript: O.A., N.T., and W.S.; Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: O.A., N.T., P.P., N.S., K.K., and W.S.; Study supervision: O.A., N.T., P.P., N.S., K.K., and W.S. All authors had full access to all of the data in this study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orapan Aryasit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Songklanagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, and adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Songklanagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University that approved the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aryasit, O., Tiraset, N., Preechawai, P. et al. IgG4-related disease in patients with idiopathic orbital inflammation. BMC Ophthalmol 21, 356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02115-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02115-x

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us