Skip to main content
Download PDF

Predictors of visual recovery in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion after treatment with Conbercept

BMC Ophthalmology volume 21, Article number: 402 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The use of Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to evaluate the predictors of visual acuity-recovery in patients treated with conbercept for macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) has rarely been seen. We collected 26 CRVO-ME patients with different OCT measures at 6 months follow-up to identify the factors that are most strongly correlated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) post-treatment in CRVO-ME patients treated with conbercept.

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal conbercept injections for the treatment of CRVO-ME and to determine the major predictors of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) post-treatment.

Methods

A retrospective study methodology was used. Twenty-six eyes from 26 patients with CRVO-ME were enrolled in the study. After an initial intravitreal injection of conbercept (0.5 mg/0.05 ml), monthly injections for up to 6 months were given following a 1 + PRN (pro re nata) regimen. Data collected at monthly intervals included measurements of the logMAR BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), photoreceptor layer thickness (PLT), outer nuclear layer thickness (ONLT), and the disrupted ellipsoid zone (DEZ). The correlation between BCVA, before and after injections, and each of CST, MV, PLT, ONLT, DEZ was analyzed.

Results

The logMAR BCVA in months 3 and 6 post-injection was significantly improved relative to the baseline. In this same period the CST, MV, PLT, ONLT and DEZ were also significantly improved relative to the baseline. There was a negative correlation between PLT and logMAR BCVA at months 3 and 6 after treatment (r = − 0.549, P < 0.001; r = − 0.087, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Intravitreal injection of conbercept is an effective treatment for CRVO-ME. With 6 months of follow-up, logMAR BCVA and CST, MV, PLT, ONLT, DEZ improved. PLT was negatively correlated with the visual function in CRVO-ME patients after conbercept treatment, which may be a predictor of vision recovery in patients with CRVO-ME.

Peer Review reports

Background

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is one of the leading causes of vision loss among people aged 50 years or older. The incidence rate of CRVO in this group is approximately 1.36% [1]. Macular edema (ME) is the most common complication and a major cause of visual impairment in people with CRVO [2].

During CRVO formation, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels increase resulting in an increase in the permeability of the retinal vessel walls. This causes the breakdown of the blood retinal barrier and ultimately leads to ME [3]. Many studies have shown that intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is considered safe and effective for the treatment of CRVO-ME [4, 5]. Conbercept, an anti-VEGF medication, is a humanized, soluble, VEGF receptor (VEGFR) protein comprising extracellular domain-2 of VEGFR1, and extracellular domains-3 and-4 of VEGFR-2. Intravitreal injection of conbercept has been proven safe and effective for the treatment of CRVO-ME [6, 7]. However, clinically, repeated administration and follow-up visits are required, and some patients do not respond to treatment or have a poor visual outcome after repeated administration [8, 9]. Thus, it is very important to explore the predictive factors of a successful clinical outcome from conbercept therapy.

SD-OCT has been demonstrated to be an effective technique for analyzing macular edema through the evaluation of retinal structures. For example, using this technique, Xu et al. discovered that the ganglion cell layer and the inner plexiform layer are associated with visual gains in patients with diabetic macular edema [10]. Liu et al. discovered that external limiting membrane integrity is a prediction factor of visual function in CRVO-ME patients that have received ranibizumab injections [11]. However, SD-OCT assessment is still rarely to predict the visual acuity in CRVO-ME patients after conbercept therapy.

In this study, we investigated the retinal microstructure in patients with CRVO-ME after treatment with intravitreal conbercept during six-months follow-up period. We aim to identify the factors that are most strongly correlated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) post-treatment.

Materials and methods

Patients and inclusion criteria

This was a retrospective study. The patient group in this study consisted of 26 individuals diagnosed with CRVO-ME (26 eyes). All patients were examined and treated in the Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), China, from February 2016 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: (1) fundus fluorescein angiography diagnosis of CRVO; (2) OCT showed macular edema with macular thickness > 250 μm; (3) no prior treatment for CRVO-ME; (4) intraocular pressure within the normal range; (5) no other eye diseases present, including severe cataract, glaucoma, uveitis, fundus diseases, myopia more than 3.00 diopters (D); (6) no history of eye surgery; and (7) no other serious medical diseases. All patients had a detailed understanding of the treatment benefits and risks, and of the study’s medical ethics requirements. The study conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), China (LLSC-2021-095). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to participation in the study.

Treatments and ophthalmic examination

All patients initially received one intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg/0.05 mL of conbercept (Chengdu Kang Hong Biotech Co, Ltd., Sichuan, China) and PRN (pro re nata) thereafter. All patients were evaluated monthly, including fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherent tomography (OCT) (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). The diagnostic criteria are according to previous studies [12]. The occlusion of the vein trunk and avascular zones in the retina are according to the performance of FA. If persistent or recurrent edema was detected, the 1 + PRN regimen was adopted. A persistent or recurrent edema was defined as a relapse of the cystoid space at the foveal center and an increase of the foveal thickness to 250 μm [13, 14].

For all participants, we used OCT for data collection, including the logMAR BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), photoreceptor layer thickness (PLT), outer nuclear layer thickness (ONLT), and disrupted ellipsoid zone (DEZ) (Fig 1). Before the examination, the patients may be given Compound Topicamide eye drops for convenience of examination. During the examination, the examiner aims the lens at the patient's eye sitting directly in front of OCT, and lets the patient look at a fixed point of view and adjust the fixed point of view until a clear fundus image and OCT scanning line are presented on the fundus imaging display. At this time, relevant data required by OCT can be displayed and collected three times and took the average of them automatically according to the OCT instrument.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image of a CRVO-ME eye. SD-OCT image shows that central subfield thickness (CST), photoreceptor layer thickness (PLT), outer nuclear layer thickness (ONLT), and the disrupted ellipsoid zone (DEZ) (yellow arrow)

Full size image

Outcome measurements

All patients were followed for 6 months post-treatment. The logMAR BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), photoreceptor layer thickness (PLT), outer nuclear layer thickness (ONLT), and disrupted ellipsoid zone (DEZ) were evaluated at the baseline, week 1, and at months 1, 3, and 6 post-treatment.

Statistical analyses

All analyzes were conducted using SPSSv.18.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Quantitative data that were normally distributed were analyzed using ANOVA. The correlation assesses between BCVA after medication and the OCT parameters using Pearson’s analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients (11 females, 15 males) with CRVO-ME met the inclusion criteria between February 2016 and December 2019 (Table 1). The mean age of the participants was 57.70 ± 12.91 years. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) of patients was 12.64 ± 2.13 mmHg. All patients received the 1 + PRN regimen. The total number of injections was 53, while the average number of injections per patient was 3.08 ± 0.21 (minimum = 1; maximum = 5). Three cases of subconjunctival hemorrhage occurred post-injection, with each undergoing self-absorption after 1 week of observation. There were no special complications in the remaining cases.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of CRVO-ME patients
Full size table

Baseline and follow-up characteristics

The mean logMAR BCVA was 1.00 ± 0.73 at baseline, and the respective values for the mean logMAR BCVA in week 1, and months 1, 3, and 6 were 0.53 ± 0.33, 0.44 ± 0.29, 0.40 ± 0.25, and 0.36 ± 0.08. Comparison of the logMAR BCVA pre-injection and post-injection showed a statistically significant difference in months 3 (P = 0.007) and 6 (P = 0.003) post-injection (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of BCVA (A), CST (B), MV (C), PLT (D), and ONLT (E) and DEZ (F) from baseline to month 6. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD, Compared with baseline (** p < 0.001)

Full size image

The mean CST was 747.58 ± 149.38 μm at baseline, and the respective values for the mean CST in week 1, and in months 1, 3, and 6 were 609.92 ± 187.73 μm, 404.50 ± 129.49 μm, 299.50 ± 74.24 μm, and 274.08 ± 29.30 μm. Mean CST decreased between the baseline period and week 1 (P = 0.003), month 1 (p ≤ 0.001), month 3 (p ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection. Mean CST decreased between week 1 post-injection and month 1 (p ≤ 0.001), month 3 (p ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection. Mean CST also decreased between month 1 post-injection and both month 3 (P = 0.018) and month 6 (P = 0.004) post-injection (Fig. 2B).

The mean MV was 30.87 ± 2.63 μm3 at baseline, and the respective values for the mean MV in week 1, and in months 1, 3, and 6 were 28.62 ± 1.41 μm3, 12.70 ± 2.10 μm3, 11.57 ± 1.35 μm3, and 10.93 ± 0.52 μm3. Mean MV in decreased between the baseline and week 1 (P = 0.005), month 1 (p ≤ 0.001), 3 (p ≤ 0.001), and 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection. Mean MV decreased between week 1 post-injection and month 1 (p ≤ 0.001), month 3 (p ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection. Mean MV also decreased between month 1 post-injection and month 6 post-injection (P = 0.023, Fig. 2C).

The mean PLT was 58.96 ± 8.56 μm at baseline, and the respective values for the mean MV in week 1, and in months 1, 3, and 6 were 51.85 ± 8.22 μm, 39.04 ± 9.03 μm, 20.92 ± 5.36 μm, and 19.15 ± 1.68 μm. PLT decreased between the baseline period and week 1 (P = 0.006), month 1 (p ≤ 0.001), month 3 (P = 0.006), and month 6 (P = 0.006) post-injection. PLT decreased between week 1 post-injection and month 1 (p ≤ 0.001), month 3 (p ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection. PLT also decreased between month 1 post-injection and both month 3 (p ≤ 0.001) and month 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection (Fig. 2D).

The mean ONLT was 432.58 ± 45.24 μm at baseline, and the respective values for the mean MV in week 1, and in months 1, 3, and 6 were 389.31 ± 42.45 μm, 317.96 ± 41.57 μm, 217.04 ± 48.86 μm, and 157.92 ± 8.87 μm. The ONLT decreased between the baseline period and week 1 (P = 0.002), month 1 (P ≤ 0.001), month 3 (P ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (p ≤ 0.001) post-injection. The ONLT decreased between week 1 post-injection and month 1 (P ≤ 0.001), month 3 (P ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (P ≤ 0.001) post-injection. The ONL also decreased between month 1 post-injection and both month 3 (P ≤ 0.001) and month 6 (P ≤ 0.001) post-injection. Furthermore, the ONLT decreased between month 3 and month 6 post-injection (P = 0.001, Fig. 2E).

The mean DEZ is 2921.04 ± 536.37 μm at baseline, and the respective values for the mean MV in week 1, and in months 1, 3, and 6 were 2401.23 ± 543.33 μm, 1944.73 ± 522.30 μm, 1440.88 ± 542.88 μm, and 1245.42 ± 105.19 μm. The DEZ decreased between the baseline and week 1 (P = 0.002), month 1 (P ≤ 0.001), month 3 (P ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (P ≤ 0.001) post-injection. The DEZ decreased between week 1 post-injection and month 1 (P = 0.005), month 3 (P ≤ 0.001), and month 6 (P ≤ 0.001) post-injection. The DEZ also decreased between month 1 post-injection and both month 3 (P = 0.002) and month 6 (P ≤ 0.001) post-injection (Fig. 2F).

Correlation analysis of BCVA after injection

The results of the Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that there was a statistically significant correlation between the baseline of PLT and the post-injection BCVA correlated at month 3 (r = − 0.549, P < 0.001) and month 6 (r = − 0.087, P < 0.001, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between baseline PLT and logMAR BCVA at month 3 of post-injection (r = − 0.549, P ≤ 0.001, Fig. A), Association between baseline PLT and logMAR BCVA at month 3 of post-injection (r = − 0.087, P ≤ 0.001, Fig. B)

Full size image

Discussion

Macular edema is the major complication secondary to central retinal vein occlusion that can lead to severe impairment of central vision [15]. Previous studies have shown that CRVO-ME can destroy the normal structure of macular causing photoreceptor dysfunction [16, 17]. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the changes in macular structure and visual function associated with gains in visual acuity after an intravitreal conbercept injection. In this study, we found that after conbercept injection, CST, MV, PLT, ONL, and DEZ all improved with observation time relative to baseline measurements. The mean logMAR BCVA improved significantly in the 3 months after treatment and stabilized by 6 months. Furthermore, we showed that the baseline of PLT and BCVA at months 3 and 6 after treatment have a negative correlation, which indicated that PLT may be a predictor for vision recovery of CRVO-ME.

Although treatment of macular edema typically follows a 3 + PRN regimen due to regional economic influences [18], our treatment regimen was monthly intravitreal conbercept injections for 1 month followed by 1 + PRN regimen. It was found that the structure and function of the macular area were improved relative to the baseline and the visual acuity improved over the duration of the study. This suggests that the treatment program is effective for treating CRVO-ME. The results reported here are consistent with previous studies [19, 20]. However, the macular edema has not yet disappeared significantly in many cases 1 week after the first injection in this study. The mean CST of greater than 400 μm 1 month after the first injection, less than 400 μm after 3 months after treatment. The results suggests that macular edema may not soon disappeared after treatment initiation in many cases. Previous studies discovered that CST does not soon decreased in RVO patients with the longer course, with the phenomenon of antagonism of VEGF or recurrent edema occurs [21]. Thus, it may be due to the longer course of RVO-ME, as well as ischemic cases in some patients, the macular edema has not yet disappeared in some cases after treatment.

Previous studies have noted that vision recovery was limited even though retinal thickness was reduced to normal levels after treatment [22, 23]. The reason for this is not clear. It is known that macular edema was noted mostly in the outer nuclear layer, causing photoreceptor cell loss and fovea dysfunction [23]. Akagi-Kurashige et al. found that macular photoreceptor abnormalities of RVO patients could cause a decrease in parafoveal cone density and disrupt the cone mosaic spatial arrangement [24]. Therefore, the assessment of the retinal layers, especially those consisting of photoreceptor layers, is useful for evaluating visual prognosis.

In our study, we found a negative correlation between BCVA and PLT. The photoreceptor layer is the area where photoreceptor cells are distributed on the OCT. Therefore, the variation of photoreceptor thickness reflects the loss of photoreceptors. Histologic studies have showed that macular edema secondary to RVO is mostly detected in the outer nuclear layer, along with cystoid spaces and causes liquefaction necrosis, which results in loss of photoreceptor cells and photoreceptor dysfunction in the fovea [25]. To recover visual acuity that was adversely affected by macular edema, a reduction in retinal thickness may be necessary. However, the loss of photoreceptor cells may lead to limited visual recovery. Therefore, preservation of the photoreceptor cells would thus be necessary [26].

In this study, we measured the thickness of the photoreceptor layer, and found there was a negative correlation between photoreceptor layer thickness and logMAR BCVA at months 3 and 6 after treatment. We hypothesized that macular edema secondary to CRVO may result in structural damages, disorganization, and loss of photoreceptor cells. Especially when macular edema exceeds its elastic limit of outer nuclear layer, the damage of photoreceptor cells is irreversible. Following macular edema subsiding, the thinning of the PLT may reflect the loss of photoreceptor cells, which was responsible for the limited improvement in vision. Of course, the sample size of this study is small and the observation time is short, which may lead to the deviation of the results. In the future, large samples, multi-center, long-term observations are needed to be to be carried out.

There are some methodological limitations that should be considered when evaluating the results of this study. First, the study was performed at a single center and the sample size was relatively small. A larger sample size and longer follow-up period will be needed to validate our results. Second, CRVO is a chronic disease, while the observation time in this study is short. It is therefore difficult to fully assess the long-term prognosis with conbercept treatment. Third, we manually measured the various retinal layer thicknesses, although automated software would have allowed a more objective evaluation and erased any potential bias.

In sum, the study demonstrated the efficacy of conbercept treatment for CRVO-ME using a 1 + PRN regimen. Improvements with observation time over the 6 months follow-up period were found in the central subfield thickness, macular volume, photoreceptor layer thickness, outer nuclear layer and disrupted ellipsoid zone. The mean logMAR BCVA are improved significantly in the 3 months after treatment and stabilized by 6 months post-treatment. PLT is associated with the visual function in CRVO-ME patients after conbercept treatment and may be a predictor for vision recovery.

Availability of data and materials

The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SD-OCT:

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography

BCVA:

Best-corrected visual acuity

CRVO-ME:

Macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

CST:

Central subfield thickness

MV:

Macular volume

PLT:

Photoreceptor layer thickness

ONLT:

Outer nuclear layer thickness

DEZ:

The disrupted ellipsoid zone

References

  1. Ehlers JP, Fekrat S. Retinal vein occlusion: beyond the acute event. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(4):281–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rhoades W, Dickson D, Nguyen QD, Do DV. Management of macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion - The role of aflibercept. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2017;7(2):70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McIntosh RL, Rogers SL, Lim L, Cheung N, Wang JJ, Mitchell P, et al. Natural history of central retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(6):1113–23 e1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daien V, Eldem BM, Talks JS, Korobelnik JF, Mitchell P, Finger RP, et al. Real-world data in retinal diseases treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy - a systematic approach to identify and characterize data sources. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Callizo J, Ziemssen F, Bertelmann T, Feltgen N, Vogeler J, Koch M, et al. Real-world data: Ranibizumab treatment for retinal vein occlusion in the OCEAN study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2167–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J, Liang Y, Xie J, Li D, Hu Q, Li X, et al. Conbercept for patients with age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng Y, Zhong QW, Zhang AQ, Cai XJ, Lu MZ, Zhang SC, et al. Microvascular changes after conbercept therapy in central retinal vein occlusion analyzed by optical coherence tomography angiography. International journal of ophthalmology. 2019;12(5):802–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ip MS, Oden NL, Scott IU, VanVeldhuisen PC, Blodi BA, Ghuman T, et al. Month 12 outcomes after treatment change at month 6 among poor responders to Aflibercept or bevacizumab in eyes with macular edema secondary to central or Hemiretinal vein occlusion: a secondary analysis of the SCORE2 study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(3):281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eldeeb M, Chan EW, Dedhia CJ, Mansour A, Chhablani J. One-year outcomes of ziv-aflibercept for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2017;8:58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Y, Qu Y, Suo Y, Gao J, Chen X. Correlation of retinal layer changes with vision gain in diabetic macular edema during conbercept treatment. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Li S, Zhang Z, Shen J. Predicting the visual acuity for retinal vein occlusion after ranibizumab therapy with an original ranking for macular microstructure. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(1):890–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turczynska MJ, Krajewski P, Brydak-Godowska JE. Wide-field fluorescein angiography in the diagnosis and Management of Retinal Vein Occlusion: a retrospective single-center study. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e927782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung SH, Kim KA, Sohn SW, Yang SJ. Association of aqueous humor cytokines with the development of retinal ischemia and recurrent macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2290–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogino K, Tsujikawa A, Murakami T, Muraoka Y, Kurashige Y, Yoshimura N. Grid photocoagulation combined with intravitreal bevacizumab for recurrent macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1031–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang P, Niu W, Ni Z, Wang R, Sun X. A meta-analysis of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor remedy for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shin HJ, Chung H, Kim HC. Association between integrity of foveal photoreceptor layer and visual outcome in retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(1):e35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Altunel O, Duru N, Goktas A, Ozkose A, Goktas E, Atas M. Evaluation of foveal photoreceptor layer in eyes with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion after ozurdex treatment. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(2):333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo W, Jia F, Liu M, Wang Y, Zhang T. The analysis of correlative factors of visual acuity with intravitreal Conbercept injection in macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:7348153.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Osaka R, Muraoka Y, Miwa Y, Manabe K, Kobayashi M, Takasago Y, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: 1 initial injection versus 3 monthly injections. Ophthalmologica. 2018;239(1):27–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miwa Y, Muraoka Y, Osaka R, Ooto S, Murakami T, Suzuma K, et al. Ranibizumab for macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion: One Initial Injection Versus Three Monthly Injections. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2017;37(4):702–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Campochiaro PA, Hafiz G, Channa R, Shah SM, Nguyen QD, Ying H, et al. Antagonism of vascular endothelial growth factor for macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusions: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(12):2387–94 e2381–2385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Zamil WM, Yassin SA. Recent developments in age-related macular degeneration: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1313–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu JJ, Thomas AS, Berry D, Yoon S, Fekrat S, Grewal DS. Association of Retinal Inner Layer Disorganization with Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiographic Features and Visual Acuity in branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50(6):354–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Akagi-Kurashige Y, Tsujikawa A, Ooto S, Makiyama Y, Muraoka Y, Kumagai K, et al. Retinal microstructural changes in eyes with resolved branch retinal vein occlusion: an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(6):1239–49 e1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dysli M, Ruckert R, Munk MR. Differentiation of underlying pathologies of macular edema using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(3):474–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ota M, Tsujikawa A, Murakami T, Yamaike N, Sakamoto A, Kotera Y, et al. Foveal photoreceptor layer in eyes with persistent cystoid macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81700867), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China (grant No. 1808085MH253) and the Training Program for Talents from Higher Education of Anhui Province, China (grant No. gxgwfx2019034). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. None of authors have any financial interest in any of the material described herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, 241001, China

    Qi Zhang, Yinfen Hou, Xiao Cao, Rongrong Zhang, Yinping Liu, Chenghua Wei, Changfan Wu, Lixin Mei & Pengfei Zhang

Authors
  1. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yinfen Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiao Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rongrong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yinping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chenghua Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Changfan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lixin Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pengfei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QZ, PFZ conceived and designed the study. QZ, YFH, XC, RRZ, YPL, CHW, CFW, LXM participated in information gathering and editing, analyzed and interpreted all the data. QZ wrote the first draft of manuscript. Other authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. QZ reviewed and approved the final the version published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pengfei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhu Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, China (LLSC-2021-095). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to participation in the study.

Consent for publication

We have obtained explicit written informed consent to publish all data (including individual details, images or videos) related to the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Hou, Y., Cao, X. et al. Predictors of visual recovery in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion after treatment with Conbercept. BMC Ophthalmol 21, 402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02174-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02174-0

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us