Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of tilt and decentration of Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) on visual quality: an observational study

BMC Ophthalmology volume 22, Article number: 294 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The central hole of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) provides a reference to observe its tilt or decentration. This study aimed to investigate the tilt and decentration effects of ICL V4c on visual quality after implantation.

Methods

A total of 135 eyes from 69 patients who underwent ICL V4c implantation were included in this study. Evaluation of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and aberrations were performed 6-months postoperatively. The anterior segment parameters were collected using CASIA2 anterior segment-optical coherence tomography, tilt and decentration of ICL V4c were analyzed using MATLAB software. All patients received questionnaires to investigate the visual quality postoperatively.

Results

The safety and effectiveness were 1.18 ± 0.17 and 1.11 ± 0.18, respectively. No significant changes were observed regarding higher-order and spherical aberrations after the operation; however, coma and trefoil significantly increased compared to preoperative values. The average total decentration and tilt was 0.21 ± 0.12 mm and 2.54 ± 1.00°, respectively. Horizontal, vertical, and total values of tilt and decentration were not significantly associated with postoperative CDVA, UDVA, and aberrations. The most common visual symptom was halo, and 97.04% of patients had a satisfaction score ≥ 8. The total or horizontal tilt was significantly positively correlated with the frequency, severity, and bothersome scores from the questionnaires.

Conclusions

ICL V4c implantation can obtain high visual quality and patient satisfaction. Although the degree of tilt and decentration after ICL V4c implantation was small, a positive effect on subjective visual quality was observed.

Peer Review reports

Background

In 2005, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL, STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland), which has since demonstrated its safety and efficacy as a treatment method for high myopia [1,2,3]. The ICL is reversible, and maintains the central cornea integrity and promotes early recovery of visual acuity [4, 5]. The CentraFLOW technology [6] in the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) contains a 360-μm central hole that promotes aqueous humor circulation, which reduces the incidence of cataract formation, decreases reduction of corneal endothelial cells and eliminates the need to perform neodymium: YAG (Nd: YAG) iridotomy before ICL implantation [7,8,9].

Studies have shown that ICL V4c implantation produces better visual quality compared to that of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction. However, post-ICL implantation complications including high-order aberrations and coma aberrations increased still occur, as well as symptoms, including halo and glare [10,11,12,13,14].

Tilt and decentration of the intraocular lens (IOL) can cause higher-order aberrations, which may lead to deterioration of visual function [15, 16]. Therefore, ICL tilt and decentration effects on postoperative visual quality those patients that had no history of. The hole in the ICL provides a reference that allows observation of the position of the lens to evaluate the presence of tilt or decentration. The ICL hole is not usually located in the central pupil [17]; however, previous studies regarding the effect of ICL V4c decentration on visual acuity were in-vitro studies, and in-vivo experiments are lacking [18, 19]. The new generation anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) possesses a 1310-nm laser wavelength (CASIA2, Tomey, Japan), and has the advantages of high axial and transverse resolutions of 10 μm and 30 μm, respectively, high repeatability, and is non-mydriatic [20]. Furthermore, it can clearly display the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea, ICL, and crystalline lens. Additionally, AS-OCT automatically measures the tilt and decentration of the lens as a reference to the corneal topographic axis. This is the first study aimed at measuring and analyzing the post-implantation tilt and decentration of the ICL V4c and evaluating their the effects on patients’ visual quality.

Methods

Subjects

All patients were fully informed of the details and potential risks of the procedure, and wrote informed consent was obtained from all patients. The Ethics Committee of the Fudan University EENT Hospital Review Board approved the study protocol (No. 2016038), and the study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

In this observational study, we recruited individuals who underwent ICL V4c implantation at our hospital. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged 20 – 42 years, those with a stable refractive error (≤ 0.50 D change per year in refractive error for the past 2 years), minimum anterior chamber depth (ACD) of 2.8 mm, a minimum endothelial cell density (ECD) of 2000 cells/mm2, and no contact lens use for at least 2 weeks. The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with comorbid eye disorders, suspicion of keratoconus and presence of comorbid systemic diseases.

Visian implantable collamer lens

The power calculation of the ICL V4c (STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland) was performed using a modified vertex formula based on the preoperative refractive parameters, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The size of the implanted ICL V4c was determined from the white-to-white and ACD both obtained by pentacam.

Surgical procedure

An experienced surgeon (XZ) performed all ICL V4c implantations, as described previously [21]. Briefly, pupils were dilated preoperatively. A mark was made to show the horizontal axis on the limbus to allow the use of a Toric ICL (TICL). Using an injector cartridge, the ICL was implanted via a 3.0-mm temporal corneal incision. Then a moderate viscoelastic surgical agent (1% sodium hyaluronate) was injected into the anterior chamber, and the ICL V4c lens was placed and positioned in the posterior chamber. The viscoelastic surgical agent was washed away entirely using a balanced salt solution, and a miotic agent was instilled. Postoperative medications included antibiotic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, steroidal, and artificial tears eye drops.

Follow-up examination

All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative ocular examinations. The following main parameters were evaluated: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective manifest refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP, Canon, Japan), corneal topography and vault (Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), wavefront aberration analysis (WASCA Wavefront Analyzer, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany), ECD (SP-95 2000P, Topcon Corporation, Japan), and ultrasound biomicroscopy (Quantel Medical, French). Patients were followed-up after 6 months postoperatively. The wavefront aberration was analyzed using the Zernike polynomials, recommended by the Optic Society of America, under an analysis of 5 mm pupil diameter.

AS-OCT measurement

The ocular anterior segment parameters were measured using AS-OCT (CASIA2; TOMEY, Nagoya, Japan). The chin and forehead of patient was fixed and gazed at a fixation target to fully expose the corneal limbus. A total of 128 anterior segment tomographic images of the entire circumference were obtained in only 2.4 s, and the measurements were repeated three times by the same examiner. Each OCT image clearly presents the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea, lens, and ICL. Sixteen images from 0° to 180° with different directions (0, 11, 23, 34, 45, 56, 68, 79, 90, 101, 113, 124, 135, 146, 158, and 169 degrees) were selected for each eye for analysis.

Tilt and decentration values

Detailed description of the measurements of tile and decentration of the ICL is presented in the Supplementary Method. Briefly, the raw measurement images of AS-OCT were exported to MATLAB software (R2018a, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) with a purpose-designed program. Four registration lines were manually adjusted to align the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and ICL surfaces. Then the location of marked point on the image were expressed in pixels (x and y, per pixel equaled to 7.749 μm) relevant to the coordinate XY axis. The corneal topography axis was defined as the connecting line of the fixation point of the machine and the corneal vertex, which was vertical to the X axis in each image. The tilt value of ICL was determined by averaging the degrees of rotation of the registration lines fitted to the anterior and posterior surfaces of the ICL in each image. The highest value of tilt within the 16 images represented the total tilt value. The horizontal and vertical tilt were the values on the 0- and the 90-degree images.

The decentration was defined as the horizontal distance between the center of the central hole and the corneal topographic axis. Since the location of the ICL central hole was not present in all 16 images, the highest value of decentration among the images with a central hole represented the total decentration value. The horizontal and vertical decentration values were based on the total decentration value and calculated according to the image direction and the Pythagorean theorem.

Only absolute values of tile and decentration were used for analysis. All image analyses were performed independently by two examiners and the consistency of the results were evaluated.

Questionnaire design

All patients completed a questionnaire to report their subjective quality of vision during the follow-up at 6 months postoperatively. The Quality of Vision (QoV) Questionnaire by McAlinden consists of a Rasch-tested, linear-scaled, 30-item instrument that includes three scales and provides a QoV score in terms of symptom frequency, severity, and bothersome [22]. It is suitable for measuring QoV in patients with refractive correction. The 10 symptoms included glare, haloes, starbursts, hazy vision, blurred vision, distortion, double vision, fluctuation, focusing difficulties, and depth perception. Patients were asked regarding their overall satisfaction with the surgery, with “0” being dissatisfied and “10” being a perfect score of satisfied.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R software Version 3.4.3 (http://www.R-project.org). Continuous and categorical variables were expressed as means ± standard deviations and frequencies (percentages), respectively. A paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between postoperative horizontal and vertical tilt or decentration. The generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze the correlation between tilt or decentration and aberration or visual quality score, which was adjusted for age, eye, preoperative refraction, and preoperative scotopic pupil at treatment. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Subjects’ biometrics

A total of 135 eyes from 69 patients (56 women and 13 men) with an average age of 28.88 ± 5.46 years (20–40 years) were enrolled in this observational clinical study; among them, 89 eyes were implanted with a TICL. The preoperative mean CDVA was 1.01 ± 0.17 (0.5 to 1.2) and the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -10.16 ± 2.99 diopters (D) (-4.0 to -18.50 D). At the 6-month follow-up, the mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 1.12 ± 0.23 (0.5 to 1.5) and 1.18 ± 0.19 (0.6 to 1.5), respectively; the mean postoperative SE was -0.13 ± 0.44 (-2.25, 0.75). The efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.11 ± 0.18 and the safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.18 ± 0.17. All 135 eyes achieved a postoperative SE within ± 1.0 D of the attempted SE.

No significant changes in IOP were observed between the preoperative (15.25 ± 2.60 mmHg) and 6 months postoperative (14.87 ± 2.82 mmHg) values (p = 0.61). The number of ECD decreased by 0.6% compared with the preoperative ECD (2577.71 ± 214.58 cell/mm2 vs. 2568.66 ± 229.75 cell/mm2, p = 0.61). The vault was 554.62 ± 227.83 μm (165–1360 μm), and no clinical cataracts were observed. Additionally, 91.9% of patients had a scotopic pupil with a preoperative diameter > 5.8 mm.

Tilt and decentration

The detailed results of the total, horizontal, and vertical tilt and decentration of all ICLs at 6 months postoperatively are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The tilt and decentration of ICL V4c postoperatively (N = 135 eyes)
Full size table

The horizontal tilt was significantly greater than the vertical tilt (p = 0.000). Among them, 28.1% of the operated eyes were tilted within 2.0°, 91.85% within 4.0°, and the maximum did not exceed 5.0° (Fig. 1A). No significant difference was observed between the horizontal and vertical decentration (p = 0.730). The distribution of the decentration was 47.4% within 0.2 mm, 98.5% within 0.5 mm, and the maximum decentration value did not exceed 0.6 mm (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Percentage of ICL V4c tilt at the six-month follow-up; B Percentage of ICL V4c decentration at the six-month follow-up

Full size image

Aberration

At the 6-month follow-up, both coma and trefoil were significantly increased, from 0.12 ± 0.09 μm and 0.09 ± 0.08 μm to 0.14 ± 0.09 μm (p = 0.003) and 0.16 ± 0.09 μm (p = 0.000), pre- and postoperatively respectively. In contrast no significant changes were observed in total higher-order and spherical aberrations after surgery (0.34 ± 0.88 μm and 0.06 ± 0.05 μm preoperatively vs. 0.28 ± 0.10 μm and 0.07 ± 0.05 μm postoperatively, respectively; p = 0.443 and 0.274).

Quality of vision questionnaire

At the 6-month follow-up, the most frequent visual symptoms reported by the patients were halos (93.33%), glare (54.81%), blurred vision (41.48%), and fluctuation (33.33%), which were only reported in 8.15%, 1.48%, 1.38%, and 0% of the operated eyes, respectively, as more than mildly bothersome to the patient. The frequency, severity, and bothersome scores of the 10 different postoperative visual symptoms are shown in Fig. 2. The visual symptom frequency, severity, and bothersome scores were 33.87 ± 12.29 (0–59), 25.28 ± 11.29 (0–49), and 15.77 ± 13.31 (0–46), respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of frequency, severity, and bothersome of visual symptoms after ICL V4c implantation

Full size image

Relationship between tilt, decentration, and visual quality

Horizontal, vertical, and total ICL tilt or decentration were not significantly correlated with postoperative CDVA, UDVA, higher-order aberration, coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration (p > 0.05). Contrastingly, the total and horizontal tilt were positively correlated with frequency (p = 0.000, r = 0.414, and p = 0.003, r = 0.255, respectively), severity (p = 0.000, r = 0.367, and p = 0.001, r = 0.292, respectively), and bothersome (p = 0.000, r = 0.380, and p = 0.000, r = 0.421, respectively) scores of visual symptoms (Fig. 3). No significant correlation was observed between vertical tilt, total decentration, horizontal decentration, vertical decentration, and visual symptom scores.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A-F Correlation between the total or horizontal tilt and the frequency, severity, or bothersome scores. The X-axis is labeled as total tilt or horizontal tilt, and Y-axis is labeled as the score of frequency, severity and bothersome

Full size image

Discussion

The clinical efficacy and long-term safety of ICL implantation for myopia correction have been widely recognized [1,2,3,4,5]. However, technological and material developments have led to higher standards of postoperative visual quality in both doctors and patients. Moreover, some patients complained of their visual disturbances despite having visual acuities of 1.0 or better and refractions close to plano after surgeries. Our study is the first to measure and analyze tilt and decentration after ICL V4c implantation and to evaluate their effects on the visual quality of patients.

The CentralFLOW technology in the ICL V4c contains a 360-μm central hole, which provides a reference to fix the center of the ICL and allows observation of ICL decentration relative to the corneal topographic axis. Our study collected images using the AS-OCT, and analyzed the decentration and tilt values of the ICL using MATLAB software. The average total decentration was 0.21 ± 0.12 mm and the 98.5% decentration was within 0.5 mm at 6 months postoperatively. Several clinical studies have reported that the average decentration of IOL post-cataract surgery is approximately 0.23–0.40 mm and the tilt is 3.03°–7.00° [23,24,25]. Compared with these values, our findings are relatively lower; this discrepancy may be attributed to the location of the ICL haptics on the ciliary sulcus, which allows more stability and less influence from the suspensory ligament and other structures [26]. A study of ICL that used the pupil center as the reference, reported that decentration of 48.9% and 93.6% of eyes were within 0.36 mm and 0.72 mm after ICL implantation, respectively [27]. Notably, the selection criteria of the reference axis remain ununified. In corneal refractive surgery, significant decreases were observed in higher-order aberration and coma, and significant increase in contrast sensitivity when the corneal vertex was used as the correction center rather than the center of the pupil [28,29,30]. Since it is affected by pupil shape, the pupil axis may not be the best reference to evaluate the tilt and decentration of an ICL [31]. The axis of corneal topography is a line connecting the fixed point of the machine and the first Purkinje image on the anterior surface of the cornea; while the vertex of the cornea is a reflection point on the anterior surface of the cornea [32]. In this study, we used the second generation AS-OCT to measure the tilt and decentration of ICL, which is not affected by the pupil shape and diameter with high repeatability.

A previous study reported that tilt and decentration of the IOL can induce image quality degradation in patients who developed postoperative coma, spherical aberration, and higher-order aberrations [15, 16], especially with an aspheric IOL [33, 34]. Some studies have measured the maximum decentration and tilt of the aspheric IOL, which ensured the comparable visual quality between aspheric and standard IOL. Holladay reported that the critical decentration and tilt values are 0.4 mm and 7°, respectively; visual function will be affected once values are beyond these ranges [33]. The aberration or astigmatism caused by the tilt or decentration of aspheric IOL may affect the image quality of the retina, which inhibits clear image formation of the peripheral part of the retina, leading to glare, halo or monocular diplopia. The spherical shape of the optical zone of the ICL causes the decentration and tilt to have little influence on the objective visual quality. Pérez-Vives [18, 19] reported the results of an ICL decentration simulation test in vitro, and found that coma was directly correlated with the decentration value of the ICL and increased more with pupil diameter and higher refractive degree. Our study showed that tilt and decentration had no significant effect on postoperative aberrations, and had no significant correlation with postoperative UDVA and CDVA after adjusting for age, eye, preoperative refraction, and preoperative scotopic pupil, which is consistent with the results of Park [27]. Additionally, the effect of ICL decentration and tilt on postoperative visual acuity would be clinically insignificant.

The reported visual symptoms of patients after ICL implantation in the order of most to least frequent were halo, glare, blurred vision, fluctuation, hazy vision, starbursts, focusing difficulties, double vision, depth perception, and distortion [14]. Similarly, Chen et al. found that patients with a small pupil diameter had a smaller halo radius after ICL implantation [35]. The largest optical area of ICL V4c was 5.8 mm. In our study, 91.9% of the eyes had scotopic pupil diameter larger than 5.8 mm; therefore, most patients occasionally experienced symptoms such as halo or glare. The total and horizontal tilt were positively correlated with the frequency, severity, and bothersome of visual symptoms scores. Eom et al. suggested that the halo is mainly due to the reflection of the inner wall of the central hole and posterior surface of ICL [13]. Eppig found that light through the central hole has no influence on the postoperative visual quality; however, the off-axis light will increase the intraocular reflection and scattering, which affects the postoperative visual quality [36]. Therefore, visual disturbances may be more evident with severe tilt.

The limitations of this study were an observational study with short follow-up postoperative period and we will design further studies to observe the time-dependent changes of tilt and decentration results post-ICL implantation. Additionally, to overcome these limitations, both eyes were enrolled in this study, and we adjusted for eye laterality, patient age, and preoperative refraction during the statistical analysis to increase the accuracy and robustness of the results. Another limitation of the paper was that the QoV score was a composite of 10 symptoms and it was hard to identify which factor would be the problem. Further study on the effect of tilt or decentration on different visual symptoms after ICL implantation is required.

Conclusions

ICL V4c implantation can obtain high visual quality and patient satisfaction. Although the degree of tilt and decentration after ICL V4c implantation was small, a positive effect on subjective visual quality was observed.

Availability of data and materials

The data and Materials are available upon request from the corresponding author at doctzhouxingtao@163.com.

Abbreviations

ICL:

Implantable Collamer Lens

UDVA:

Uncorrected distance visual acuity

CDVA:

Corrected distance visual acuity

AS-OCT:

Anterior segment-optical coherence tomography

ACD:

Anterior chamber depth

IOP:

Intraocular pressure

ECD:

Endothelial cell density

SE:

Spherical equivalent

D:

Diopters

QoV:

Quality of Vision

References

  1. Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Kamiya K. Eight-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(3):532-539 e531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jimenez-Alfaro I. Benitez del Castillo JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Gil de Bernabe JG, Serrano de La Iglesia JM: Safety of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of high myopia: anterior segment changes after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(1):90–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanders DR, Vukich JA, Doney K, Gaston M. Implantable Contact Lens in Treatment of Myopia Study G: U.S Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Contact Lens for moderate to high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Matsumura K, Komatsu M, Shimizu K. Long-term quality of life after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(12):2019–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Randomized prospective comparison of visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(9):853–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(3):409–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernandez-Vega L, Almanzar D, Perez-Vives C, Montes-Mico R. Prevalence of cataract after collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens implantation for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):800–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goukon H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with and without a central hole. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(11):1461–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guber I, Mouvet V, Bergin C, Perritaz S, Othenin-Girard P, Majo F. Clinical outcomes and cataract formation rates in Eyes 10 Years After posterior phakic lens implantation for Myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(5):487–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen X, Guo L, Han T, Wu L, Wang X, Zhou X. Contralateral eye comparison of the long-term visual quality and stability between implantable collamer lens and laser refractive surgery for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(3):e471–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Komatsu M. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):164-170 e161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niu L, Miao H, Tian M, Fu D, Wang X, Zhou X. One-year visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) implantation for high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(6):e662–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eom Y, Kim DW, Ryu D, Kim JH, Yang SK, Song JS, Kim SW, Kim HM. Ring-shaped dysphotopsia associated with posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central hole. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):e170–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei R, Li M, Niu L, Aruma A, Miao H, Shen Y, Yao P, Wang X, Zhang H, Zhou X. Comparison of visual outcomes after non-toric and toric implantable collamer lens V4c for myopia and astigmatism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(5):511–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He W, Qiu X, Zhang S, Du Y, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Zhu X. Comparison of long-term decentration and tilt in two types of multifocal intraocular lenses with OPD-Scan III aberrometer. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(7):1237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aizawa N, Kunikata H, Maeda N, Nakazawa T. Analysis of higher-order aberrations in eyes having undergone intraocular lens suturing. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;43(1):92–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He X, Niu L, Miao H, Zhao F, Zhou X. Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, Garcia-Lazaro S, Montes-Mico R. Optical quality comparison of conventional and hole-visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(1):69-76 e61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, Garcia-Lazaro S, Montes-Mico R. Visual quality comparison of conventional and Hole-Visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(1):59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kimura S, Morizane Y, Shiode Y, Hirano M, Doi S, Toshima S, Fujiwara A, Shiraga F. Assessment of tilt and decentration of crystalline lens and intraocular lens relative to the corneal topographic axis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2017;12(9): e0184066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miao HM, Zhao F, Niu LL, Zhao J, Wang XY, Zhou XT. One-step viscoelastic agent technique for ICL V4c implantation for myopia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(9):1359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5537–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baumeister M, Neidhardt B, Strobel J, Kohnen T. Tilt and decentration of three-piece foldable high-refractive silicone and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with 6-mm optics in an intraindividual comparison. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(6):1051–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Castro A, Rosales P, Marcos S. Tilt and decentration of intraocular lenses in vivo from Purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging Validation study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(3):418–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oshika T, Sugita G, Miyata K, Tokunaga T, Samejima T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y. Influence of tilt and decentration of scleral-sutured intraocular lens on ocular higher-order wavefront aberration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(2):185–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Walkow T, Anders N, Pham DT, Wollensak J. Causes of severe decentration and subluxation of intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(1):9–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Park MJ, Jeon HM, Lee KH, Han SY. Comparison of postoperative optical quality according to the degree of decentering of V4c implantable collamer lens. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(4):619–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Is topography-guided ablation profile centered on the corneal vertex better than wavefront-guided ablation profile centered on the entrance pupil? J Refract Surg. 2012;28(2):139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba-Mosquera S. Clinical outcomes of corneal vertex versus central pupil references with aberration-free ablation strategies and LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Okamoto S, Kimura K, Funakura M, Ikeda N, Hiramatsu H, Bains HS. Comparison of wavefront-guided aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: coaxially sighted corneal-light-reflex versus line-of-sight centration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(11):1951–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Porter J, Yoon G, Lozano D, Wolfing J, Tumbar R, Macrae S, Cox IG, Williams DR. Aberrations induced in wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery due to shifts between natural and dilated pupil center locations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(1):21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang DH. Waring GOt: The subject-fixated coaxially sighted corneal light reflex: a clinical marker for centration of refractive treatments and devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(5):863–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18(6):683–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Piers PA, Weeber HA, Artal P, Norrby S. Theoretical comparison of aberration-correcting customized and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(4):374–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen X, Han T, Zhao F, Miao H, Wang X, Zhou X. Evaluation of Disk Halo Size after Implantation of a Collamer Lens with a Central Hole (ICL V4c). J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:7174913.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Eppig T, Spira C, Tsintarakis T, El-Husseiny M, Cayless A, Muller M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Ghost-image analysis in phakic intraocular lenses with central hole as a potential cause of dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(11):2552–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Jian Gao of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University for providing statistical consultations. We would also like to thank all the patients participating in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81770955), Research Project Grant of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202040285), Project of Shanghai Science and Technology (Grant No.20410710100), Joint research project of new frontier technology in municipal hospitals (SHDC12018103), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR1043B), Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology (2020–015). The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of data, or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lingling Niu and Zhe Zhang are contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Lingling Niu, Zhe Zhang, Huamao Miao, Jing Zhao, Meiyan Li, Peijun Yao & Xingtao Zhou

  2. NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China

    Lingling Niu, Zhe Zhang, Huamao Miao, Jing Zhao, Meiyan Li, Peijun Yao & Xingtao Zhou

  3. Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China

    Lingling Niu, Zhe Zhang, Huamao Miao, Jing Zhao, Meiyan Li, Peijun Yao & Xingtao Zhou

  4. New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, USA

    Ji C. He

Authors
  1. Lingling Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhe Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huamao Miao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meiyan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ji C. He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peijun Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xingtao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Literature screening and selection was performed by LN. XZ and PY participated in the design of the study. LN and ZZ drafted the manuscript. ML and JZ carried out the statistical analysis. HM prepare and review of the manuscript. JH has designed the analysis program in the MATLAB software. XZ have given final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peijun Yao or Xingtao Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye and ENT Hospital Review Board of Fudan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients after the nature and possible consequences of the study were explained.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Figure 1. A representative raw image from the MATLAB software showing the location of ICL V4c central hole in the eye. The X-axis (horizontal location) and Y-axis (vertical location) are labeled at the bottom and left side of the image, respectively. B. Four registration dotted lines from the top to the bottom are aligned to the anterior (line a) and posterior (line b) surfaces of the cornea and the anterior (line c) and posterior (line d) surfaces of the ICL, respectively. The left and right edge of the ICL central hole are labelled as A and B. For registration, all four dotted lines can be moved (horizontally and vertically), and line c and d can be rotated (clockwise or anti-clockwise) and flexed by clicking relevant buttons in the software. C. The blue dashed line (line e) represents the vertical line passing through the corneal vertex. The center of the central hole is labelled as C, and the decentration of the ICL is determined by calculating the horizontal distance between the point C and the line e on the X-axis. The tilt of the ICL were measured by calculating the average rotation degree of line c and d. Supplementary Figure 2. Bland-Altman analysis plot showed consistent results of the ICL tilt (A) and decentration (B) of 135 eyes analyzed by the two examiners.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, L., Zhang, Z., Miao, H. et al. Effects of tilt and decentration of Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) on visual quality: an observational study. BMC Ophthalmol 22, 294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02499-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02499-4

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us