Skip to main content
Download PDF

Switching to ziv-aflibercept in resistant diabetic macular edema non responsive to ranibizumab injection

BMC Ophthalmology volume 22, Article number: 287 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of visual loss in diabetic patients and is managed using multiple anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents such as bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept. The present study evaluates effectiveness of intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept in resistant diabetic macular edema.

Methods

This is a prospective interventional study that was carried out on 59 eyes of 40 diabetic patients with diabetic macular edema resistant to three prior consecutive ranibizumab injections. On all patients, thorough ophthalmic evaluation including optical coherence tomography was performed. In patients with persistent intraretinal or subretinal fluid, ziv- aflibercept 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) was administered by intravitreal injection monthly during the 6 month study period from June to December 2019.

Results

The central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly from 395.08 ± 129.9 um at baseline to 282.39 ± 95.278, 245.36 ± 79.861 and 201.17 ± 54.042 after 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment respectively (p < 0.001). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in log MAR units was significantly improved from 0.95 ± 0.21 to 0.51 ± 0.23 after 6 months (p = 0.001). After treatment, negative correlations were detected between age, number of injections, duration of DM and level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and variation of both CMT and BCVA. The only significant predictor for low final CMT after 6 months of injection was the CMT after 3 months of injection (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Ziv-aflibercept is a highly effective and safe drug in cases of DME resistant to previous ranibizumab injections especially in low-income countries.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04290195) on 28-2-2020.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual impairment. In the past, DME was managed by focal laser photocoagulation and more recently by intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and less often by intravitreal dexamethasone implant or intravitreal corticosteroid injections [1].

The safety and efficacy of different anti-VEGF drugs, namely ranibizumab [2] and bevacizumab [3] in the management of DME have been assessed in several studies. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aflibercept to treat DME after the phase 3 trials VIVID and VISTA which provided evidence of significant visual and morphological improvement in patients suffering from DME [4, 5].

According to protocol T of the diabetic retinopathy clinical research network (DRCR.net) [6], aflibercept can be used to treat DME cases, especially those presenting with poor vision. Switching from bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept is one promising step in managing DME [7,8,9].

Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap; Regeneron, New York, USA), an anti-VEGF drug, is a recombinant fusion protein with a similar mechanism to aflibercept. It was approved by the FDA in August 2012 for the treatment of resistant metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Recently, intravitreal ziv-aflibercept has been considered a safe treatment for age-related macular degeneration, with no ocular toxicity up to 4 weeks after administration [10].

Furthermore, Ziv aflibercept is viewed positively in developing countries as the cost of one dose of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) are $1850 and $1170, respectively, while that for off-label intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) are $50 and $30 per dose, respectively [11, 12]. Hence, ziv-aflibercept is a safe and inexpensive alternative to other anti VEGF agents for the management of DME.

The present study evaluates the efficacy of ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap) in cases of resistant diabetic macular edema after previous ranibizumab injections and illustrates the role of proper control of diabetes mellitus (DM) in improving the effectiveness of ziv-aflibercept injection in resistant DME cases.

Methods

Study design

A prospective interventional study was conducted on 59 eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with resistant DME after approval from the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt (approval code 32970/02/19). The study cases were recruited in June 2019 and the results were obtained after 6 months in December 2019. All procedures followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was given by each participant after discussing the procedure, alternative treatment plans, follow-up schedules and possible benefits and risks.

The study was retrospectively registered with the clinicaltrials.gov database (ID: NCT04290195) on 28-2-2020.

The sample size was calculated using the formula N = (Z 1α + Z1β)2(σ12 + σ22)/(m1 − m2)2 = 35.

Z1α = 1.96, Z 1β =0.842, σ1, σ2 (standard deviation SD) = (0.33–0.32), m1, m2 = the mean for each group = (0.55–0.33).

Participants

Patients diagnosed with DME secondary to type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus were eligible for inclusion. Those diagnosed with resistance to other treatment were considered for treatment with ziv-aflibercept 1.25 mg/0.05 ml. Patients fulfilling all the following criteria were considered to have resistant DME after at least three consecutive monthly ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections in the previous 6 months: 1-Central macular thickness greater than 300 μm by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), 2-Reduction of retinal thickness by less than 10% of baseline retinal thickness, 3-Suboptimal visual improvement (failure to gain at least three lines on the Snellen chart). Thorough ophthalmic evaluation was conducted on all patients, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Snellen measure converted to log MAR for statistical analysis; intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using applanation tonometry; anterior segment examination using slit lamp; and posterior segment examination using indirect ophthalmoscopy. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed on all patients at presentation and 1 month after the first injection. Patients with history of previous intraocular surgery, coincident retinal pathology such as choroidal neovascular membrane, retinal vein occlusion or age-related macular degeneration, previous laser photocoagulation, or intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide were excluded from the study. Furthermore, patients with prior ocular inflammation, the presence of retinal degeneration and those who did not complete 6 months of follow up were not included in our study.

Preparation and storage of ziv-aflibercept

Zaltrap (ziv-aflibercept) injection is a clear, colorless to pale-yellow solution supplied in single-dose vials with a concentration of 25 mg/mL. NDC 0024–5840-01: carton containing one single-dose vial of 100 mg/4 mL (25 mg/mL). Zaltrap vials were stored in a refrigerator at 2 °C to 8 °C (36 °F to 46 °F). The vials were kept in the original outer carton to protect from light and the unused portion was discarded. We got the vial from SANOFI medical company after being prescribed by a specialist in the Oncology department in Tanta University for research purpose after being approved by the ethical review board of Tanta University.

Surgical procedure

The intravitreal injection was carried out in the operating room using a surgical microscope. The eye was prepared using topical anesthesia with one drop of (Benoxinate hydrochloride 0.4% (Benox, Epico, Egypt) to the ocular surface followed by topical instillation of 10% povidone iodine (Betadine) to the eye lashes, lids and periocular area and 5% povidone iodine inside the conjunctival sac 3 min before the procedure. Intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 1.25 mg of Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap) was administered in the inferotemporal quadrant of the globe using a 30gauge needle 4 mm from the limbus.

Post-operative care

After the injection, topical antibiotic was administered (Moxifloxacin hydrochloride 0.5% drops, Vigamox, Alcon, USA) with application of an eye patch for several hours.

The patients were examined the next day and the third day after injection to exclude any complications such as increased IOP, endophthalmitis, retinal break, retinal detachment or vitreous hemorrhage. All patients were followed up at 4-week intervals after the first injection for 6 month duration of the study. At each visit a thorough ophthalmic examination was performed including BCVA and SD-OCT. Additional intravitreal injection of Zaltrap was given after 1 month if persistent intraretinal or subretinal fluid was detected on SD-OCT.

Statistical analysis

Statistical presentation and analysis of the data were conducted using the mean, standard deviation, Student’s t- test, Chi-square, Linear Correlation Coefficient and analysis of variance [ANOVA] tests in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to compare between two groups in quantitative data. Chi-square indicates that the row and column variables are independent, without indicating strength or direction of the relationship. Linear correlation analysis was used to look for correlations between two quantitative variables in one group. Analysis of variance [ANOVA] test was used for comparison between quantitative data collected at the different time intervals in the same group. Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess predictors of final anatomical results with involvement of significant predictors only. P-values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The baseline demographic and clinical data of all patients are shown in Table 1. The mean age of patients was 51.36 ± 6.98; 22 females and 18 males were included in the study. Sixteen patients were under insulin treatment and the remaining 24 patients were receiving oral treatment. The mean number of intravitreal injections of ziv-aflibercept patients had received throughout the study was 3.52 ± 1.4 and the mean level of HbA1c was 8.76 ± 0.99. All patients were referred to the internal medicine department for proper control of HbA1c throughout the duration of the study. The central macular thickness (CMT) was significantly decreased from 395.08 ± 129.9 um at baseline to 282.39 ± 95.278, 245.36 ± 79.861 and 201.17 ± 54.042 after 1, 3 and 6 months of injection respectively (p < 0.001; Table 2, Fig. 1). The log MAR BCVA improved from 0.95 ± 0.21 to 0.51 ± 0.23 after the six-month injection (p = 0.001; Table 1, Fig. 2). Table 3 shows correlations between different predictors of response to ziv-aflibercept injection with variation in CMT and BCVA after the switch to ziv-aflibercept. Significant negative correlations were found between CMT variation and the following three factors: number of injections, duration of DM and HbA1c level (p < 0.003). Correlations between these factors and BCVA were not significant, however (p > 0.05). Results of multivariate linear regression analyses are presented in Table 4, and show that the CMT after 3 months was the only significant predictor for final CMT at 6 months (p = 0.001).

Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients
Full size table
Table 2 Central macular thickness (CMT) before injection and after one, three and six months of injection
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Variation in mean central macular thickness (um) before and after ziv-aflibercept injection

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Variation in mean BCVA by logMAR before and after ziv-aflibercept injections

Full size image
Table 3 Correlations between possible predictors for response to ziv-aflibercept
Full size table
Table 4 Multivariate linear regression analysis for predictors of ziv-aflibercept anatomical response after 6 months
Full size table

Subconjunctival hemorrhage occurred in five eyes after injection and resolved spontaneously. No major ocular complications such as glaucoma, ocular hypertension, endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, or retinal detachment occurred. No serious systemic complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction or death were reported during the follow up period of the study.

Figure 3 is an example of a case of bilateral diabetic macular edema with CMT 426 um in the right eye (Fig. 3A), and 334 um in the left eye (Fig. 3B). The BCVA is 1(log MAR) in the right eye and 0.82 (log MAR) in the left eye. Figure 4: OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 3 loading doses of ranibizumab in each eye. The CMT did not decrease after injection, the CMT is 593 um in the right eye (Fig. 4A) and 363 um in the left eye (Fig. 4B); the BCVA did not improve after injection, the BCVA is 1 (log MAR) in the right eye and 0.82 (log MAR) in the left eye. Figure 5: OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 1 month of the first injection of ziv-aflibercept. The CMT decreased to 292 um in the right eye (Fig. 5A) and 220 um in the left eye (Fig. 5B), Fig. 6: OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 3 injections of ziv-aflibercept (after 3 months). The CMT decreased to 262 um in the right eye (Fig. 6A) and 197 um in the left eye (Fig. 6B). Figure 7: OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 6 ziv-aflibercept injections (after 6 months) showing decreased CMT to 253 um in the right eye (Fig. 7A) and 158 um in the left eye (Fig. 7B); the BCVA improved to 0.3 (log MAR) in the right eye and 0.4 (log MAR) in the left eye.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A case of bilateral diabetic macular edema with CMT 426 um in the right eye (A), and 334 um in the left eye (B). The BCVA is 1(log MAR) in the right eye and 0.82 (log MAR) in the left eye

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 3 loading doses of ranibizumab in each eye. The CMT did not decrease after injection, the CMT is 593 um in the right eye (A) and 363 um in the left eye (B); the BCVA did not improve after injection, the BCVA is 1 (log MAR) in the right eye and 0.82 (log MAR) in the left eye

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after one month of the first injection of ziv-aflibercept. The CMT decreased to 292 um in the right eye (A) and 220 um in the left eye (B)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 3 injections of ziv-aflibercept (after 3 months). The CMT decreased to 262 um in the right eye (A) and 197 um in the left eye (B)

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

OCT of the case shown in Fig. 3 after 6 ziv-aflibercept injections (after 6 months) showing decreased CMT to 253 um in the right eye (A) and 158 um in the left eye (B); the BCVA improved to 0.3 (log MAR) in the right eye and 0.4 (log MAR) in the left eye

Full size image

Discussion

DME is mainly caused by increased retinal vascular permeability leading to the accumulation of fluid in the retina with subsequent increase in its thickness. These events are associated with disruption of the blood retinal barrier and increased production of VEGF [13, 14]. Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of VEGF inhibitors (anti-VEGF) in the treatment of DME with improvement in visual acuity and a reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) [1, 2, 4, 5].

Intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept has been used in multiple chorioretinal conditions with great success especially in the developing countries [15,16,17,18]. In the present study, we investigated the safety and the efficacy of intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of ziv-aflibercept in 59 eyes with diabetic macular edema resistant to previous ranibizumab injection.

No cases of uveitis or endophthalmitis were reported in our study indicating high safety profile of the new drug. However, a previous study reported 0.03–0.05% incidence of endophthalmitis after injection of bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept [18].

Among the 59 eyes that received intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept in the present study, no cases of glaucoma or ocular hypertension were reported. In contrast, previous studies have reported increased IOP in 6.25–33% of eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension and in 1.6–7.1% of non-glaucomatous eyes following anti-VEGF injections [19,20,21]. The present study found marked functional and anatomical improvements after 6 months of follow up, with significant improvement in BCVA and marked reduction in CMT.

In agreement with our study, two randomized controlled trials have found the new drug to be effective. Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) treatments were compared in 123 eyes with DME. Patients were randomized to one of three loading doses of 1.25 mg IVZ, 2.5 mg IVZ or 1.25 mg IVB administered by injection. At 12 weeks both doses of ziv-aflibercept achieved similar results with greater visual improvement than IVB [16]. After 12 weeks, IVB was injected every 4 weeks, whereas both IVZ groups were injected every 8 weeks through 1 year, after which BCVA outcomes were better in patients with IVZ than in those with IVB treatment [22].

Other studies have confirmed the efficacy of ziv-aflibercept, in support of our study. The earliest of these was performed on 50 eyes, with ziv-aflibercept injections in 27 eyes and bevacizumab was injected in 23 eyes in a pro-re-nata regimen (PRN). Both groups achieved similar improvements in mean visual acuity at 3 months but patients receiving ziv-aflibercept required fewer injections (2.4 vs. 3.6) [23, 24].

Another 30-month prospective study assessed the efficacy of ziv-aflibercept in18 eyes with DME in a treat and extend regimen. At the 30-month examination, improvements in both mean CMT (p = 0.027) and mean visual acuity (p = 0.042) were reported [25].

In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of proper control of DM and its duration on the anatomical and functional response after a switch to ziv-aflibercept treatment. Our correlation analysis findings indicate poorer response to ziv-aflibercept in patients with poorer metabolic control, higher HbA1c or longer duration of DM. This is not in agreement with a previous study on treatment switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept, which found no association between control or duration of DM and response to aflibercept [26].

Our investigation of the possible predictors for better anatomical response to ziv-aflibercept found that the only significant predictor for this outcome was the central macular thickness 3 months after treatment onset. Thus, cases with lower CMT after 3 months showed better anatomical response after 6 months of ziv-aflibercept injection. In contrast, one other study reported that the baseline CMT before the treatment switch is the only significant predictor for a better anatomical response after switching to aflibercept [26]. The cost of the treatment procedure in the present study included the hospital costs, hospital user fees, cost of investigations such as OCT, fluorescein angiography, and cost of the anti-VEGF drug. The mean number of injections was 3.52 ± 1.4. The costs of one dose of IVB and IVZ are similar ($50 and $30 per dose, respectively) [11, 17]. However, the cost of IVA or IVR is 20–30 times this amount [27]. The relative affordability of IVB or IVZ may be of great benefit to the patients in the developing and low-middle-income countries where there is limited insurance coverage. In addition, a reduction in the number of hospital visits required for patients who receive IVZ may reduce further costs.

A limitation of this study is the small sample with short duration of follow up. In further research, a larger number of patients needs to be evaluated with a longer follow up period to assess the efficacy of this new drug.

Conclusion

The study confirmed the efficacy, safety and the cost effectiveness of ziv-aflibercept in cases of diabetic macular edema resistant to prior ranibizumab injections. In addition, the worse DM control and the higher baseline HbA1C level, the less response to ziv-aflibercept injection. In developing countries ziv-aflibercept may be used to replace other more expensive agents.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BCVA:

Best corrected visual acuity

CMT:

Central macular thickness

DME:

Diabetic macular edema

DRCR.net:

Diabetic retinopathy clinical research network

FDA:

Food and drug administration

FFA:

Fundus fluorescein angiography

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

IOP:

Intraocular pressure

IVA:

Intravitreal aflibercept

IVB:

Intravitreal bevacizumab

IVR:

Intravitreal ranibizumab

IVZ:

Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

PRN:

Pro-re-nata

SPSS:

Statistical package for the social sciences

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Massin P, Schlingemann RO, et al. The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):615–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, Boyer D, Patel S, Feiner L, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajendram R, Fraser-Bell S, Kaines A, Michaelides M, Hamilton RD, Degli Esposti S, et al. A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema: 24-month data: report 3. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(8):972–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, Holz FG, Boyer DS, Midena E, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 100-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(10):2044–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Do DV, Nguyen QD, Boyer D, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Brown DM, Vitti R, et al. One-year outcomes of the da Vinci study of VEGF trap-eye in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(8):1658–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Wells JA, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, et al. Afliibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(13):1193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashraf M, Souka AA, ElKayal H. Short-term effects of early switching to ranibizumab or aflibercept in diabetic macular edema cases with non-response to bevacizumab. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48(3):230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahrami B, Hong T, Zhu M, Schlub TE, Chang A. Switching therapy from bevacizumab to aflibercept for the management of persistent diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(6):1133–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen YY, Chang PY, Wang JK. Intravitreal aflibercept for patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to bevacizumab or ranibizumab: analysis of response to aflibercept. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6(3):250–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chhablani J, Narayanan R, Mathai A, Yogi R, Stewart M. Short-term safety profile of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept. Retina. 2016;36(6):1126–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mansour AM, Al-Ghadban SI, Yunis MH, El-Sabban ME. Ziv-aflibercept in macular disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(8):1055–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mansour AM, Ashraf M, Dedhia CJ, Charbaji A, Souka AA, Chhablani J. Long-term safety and efficacy of ziv-aflibercept in retinal diseases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(10):1374–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Polo RC, Sánchez CR, Guisado DMG, Luque MJD. Aflibercept for clinically significant diabetic macular edema: 12-month results in daily clinical practice. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:99–104. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S154421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fouda SM, Bahgat AM. Intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:567–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mansour AM, Ashraf M, Charbaji A, Younis MH, Souka AA, Dogra A, et al. Two-year out- comes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(10):1387–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baghi A, Bonyadi MHJ, Ramezani A, Azarmina M, Moradian S, Dehghan MH, et al. Two doses of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept versus bevacizumab in treatment of diabetic macular edema: a three-armed, double-blind randomized trial. Ophthalmol Retina. 2017;1(2):103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh SR, Dogra A, Stewart M, Das T, Chhablani J. Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept: clinical effects and economic impact. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6(6):561–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh SR, Stewart MW, Chattannavar G, Ashraf M, Souka A, ElDardeery M, et al. Safety of 5914 intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(6):805–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Good TJ, Kimura AE, Mandava N, Kahook MY. Sustained elevation of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(8):1111–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoang QV, Tsuang AJ, Gelman R, Mendonca LS, Della Torre KE, Jung JJ, et al. Clinical predictors of sustained intraocular pressure elevation due to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Retina. 2013;33(1):179–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wehrli SJ, Tawse K, Levin MH, Zaidi A, Pistilli M, Brucker AJ. A lack of delayed intraocular pressure elevation in patients treated with intra- vitreal injection of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Retina. 2012;32(7):1295–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jabbarpoor Bonyadi MH, Baghi A, Ramezani A, Yaseri M, Soheilian M. One-year results of a trial comparing 2 doses of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept versus bevacizumab for treatment of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmol Retina. 2018;2(5):428–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashraf M, El Kayal H, Souka AAR. Comparison between the short-term outcomes of bevacizumab and ziv-aflibercept in the treatment of primary diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(8):803–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ashraf M, Kayal HE, Souka AAR. Safety and efficacy of ziv-aflibercept in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48(5):399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansour AM, Charbaji A, Farah ME, Mansour HA, Chhablani J. Long-term out- come of treat and extend intravitreal ziv-aflibercept therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(7):938–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laiginhas R, Silva MI, Rosas V, Penas S, Fernandes VA, Rocha-Sousa A, et al. Aflibercept in diabetic macular edema refractory to previous bevacizumab: outcomes and predictors of success. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(1):83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross EL, Hutton DW, Stein JD, Bressler NM, Jampol LM, Glassman AR. Cost-effectiveness of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema treatment: analysis from the diabetic retinopathy clinical research network comparative effectiveness trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(8):888–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Tanta University Ophthalmology Hospital, Tanta University, in which the study was performed. Furthermore, many thanks to Charlesworth Author Services who edited the manuscript for proper English language, spelling, puctuation, grammar, and overall style by one of their highly qualified native English speakers editors.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funding agent supported the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, 31516, Egypt

    Amin E. Nawar, Tamer Wasfy & Heba M. Shafik

Authors
  1. Amin E. Nawar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamer Wasfy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heba M. Shafik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AEN performed ophthalmic clinical and ophthalmological evaluation of all patients, TW performed data collection for all patients and statistical analysis, HMS performed ophthalmic investigations including fundus fluorescein angiography and OCT for all patients. All authors contributed to writing, editing approval and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin E. Nawar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consents to participate

The Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt approved the research (approval code 32970/02/19). The study was retrospectively registered with the clinicaltrials.gov database (ID: NCT04290195) on 28-2-2020. All procedures followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was given by each participant after discussing the procedure, alternative treatment plans, follow-up schedules and possible benefits and risks.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nawar, A.E., Wasfy, T. & Shafik, H.M. Switching to ziv-aflibercept in resistant diabetic macular edema non responsive to ranibizumab injection. BMC Ophthalmol 22, 287 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02503-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02503-x

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us