Skip to main content
Download PDF

ARC/Arg3.1 expression in the lateral geniculate body of monocular form deprivation amblyopic kittens

BMC Ophthalmology volume 23, Article number: 3 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The present study compared the expression of activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC/Arg3.1) in the lateral geniculate body between form deprivation amblyopia kittens and normal kittens to examine the significance of ARC/Arg3.1 in the lateral geniculate body in the pathogenesis of amblyopia.

Methods

Twenty kittens were randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 10) and a control group (n = 10). Black opaque covering cloth was used to cover the right eye of kittens in the experimental group. Pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) were detected weekly in all kittens. The expression of the ARC/Arg3.1 gene was detected by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, and apoptosis of lateral geniculate body cells was detected by TUNEL.

Results

PVEP detection showed that at the age of 5 and 7 weeks, the latency of P100 in the right eye of the experimental group was higher than that of the other three groups (P < 0.05), and the amplitude of P100 was lower than that of the other three groups (P < 0.05). The expression of ARC/Arg3.1 protein (P < 0.05) and mRNA (P < 0.05) in the lateral geniculate body of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group. The level of neuronal apoptosis in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The expression of the ARC/Arg3.1 gene was negatively correlated with the apoptosis level of lateral geniculate body neurons.

Conclusions

The expression of ARC/Arg3.1 is associated with monocular form deprivation amblyopia and apoptosis of lateral geniculate body cells.

Peer Review reports

Background

Related studies believe that visual developmental plasticity is the basis of amblyopia treatment, and its performance is closely related to synaptic plasticity [1, 2]. During the occurrence and development of amblyopia, the synaptic density in ganglion cells, lateral geniculate body, and visual cortex of animals changed [3,4,5]. Synapse, as the structural basis of information transmission between neurons, is the key part of visual development plasticity [6]. In many pathogeneses of amblyopia, synaptic plasticity is considered the most critical link and maybe the final pathway of other pathogenesis. Its plasticity can be divided into long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) according to time [7, 8].

Immediate early genes also have the effect of coupling short-term signals with long-term changes [9]. As one of the immediate early genes, activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC/Arg3.1) is induced in neurons in response to neural activity and is necessary for activity-induced forms of synaptic plasticity [10]. Moreover, it also is a crucial regulator of memory and cognitive flexibility [11]. However, there has been no study on the correlation between the expression of ARC/Arg3.1 and amblyopia. Therefore, we examined changes in ARC/Arg3.1 in the lateral geniculate body in amblyopia to investigate the significance of this body in the pathogenesis of amblyopia and provide theoretical support for the occurrence and development of amblyopia.

Methods

Animals

We used 20 healthy 3-week-old kittens weighing between 250 and 350 g, regardless of coat color and gender. All kittens were examined to rule out congenital and developmental abnormalities such as refractive media and fundus opacity, and the refractive errors were + 2.25 ~  + 3.50D. All kittens were kept in a room with an ambient temperature set to 24 ± 1 °C and relative humidity of 50 ± 10%, which had great ventilation and natural light. Up to the age of 5 weeks, all kittens were fed milk powder and water 5 times a day as they were unable to feed on their own. After 5 weeks of age, the kitten has fed solid food and drank water three times a day. This study has been approved and supervised by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of North Sichuan Medical College (NSMC Appl. No. 2021 [66]), and all animals in this study were provided by the Experimental Animal Center of North Sichuan Medical College.

Animals model establishment

Twenty kittens used the random number table method to divide into the experimental group (n = 10) and the control group (n = 10). The kittens were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 1% pentobarbital sodium (35 mg/kg). The right eye of the kittens in the experimental group was covered with black opaque covering cloth, while the control group was only anesthetized. Pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) examination was performed on two groups of kittens regularly every week. The successful establishment of the amblyopia model was based on the standard that the amplitude of the P100 wave in the right eye (the covering eye) of the experimental group was lower than that of the other three groups, and the latency of P100 wave was higher than that of the other three groups [12,13,14].

PVEP detection

All kittens were anesthetized intraperitoneally with 1% pentobarbital sodium (35 mg/kg). The refractive errors of all kittens were detected by retinoscopy and corrected by lenses. Then, the animal electrode needles (RL-1223000030-RC-D, Roland Consult Stasche Finger Gmbh) were inserted into the middle of the forehead, occipital and posterior part of the ear tip of kittens. Place the kitten 40 cm away from the vertical line in the center of the display screen, and adjust the head position so that its visual axis is perpendicular to the screen. Set the program of Reti-Port/Scan 21B (Roland Consult Stasche Finger Gmbh), select the chessboard flip mode, the time–frequency 1 Hz, 0.3 cpd mode, a contrast of 97%, superimposed 64 times and sampling time of 300 ms [15]. The test was repeated 3 times for each eye of each kitten and the average value was obtained.

Dissection of the lateral geniculate body

At the age of 7 weeks, after PVEP detection, all kittens were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of 2% pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg) according to the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Animal Euthanasia Guidelines (2020). According to the Atlas of Feline Anatomy For Veterinarians, the left lateral geniculate body of kittens was isolated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Fig. 1). Then paraffin embedding was carried out and paraffin sections were prepared. The paraffin section was made by treating the whole tissue block as a whole, and the thickness of the section was set to 4 μm. The expression of ARC/Arg3.1 was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), and the apoptosis of neurons in the lateral geniculate body was detected by TdT-mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Anatomical schematic diagram of the lateral geniculate body. According to the direction of the optic tract (blue arrow), the lateral geniculate body (black arrow) can be seen and separated

Full size image

Immunohistochemical staining

Sections were dewaxed to water and placed in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, AR0030) in turn to block endogenous peroxidase. The slices were placed in a repair box containing citric acid (pH 6.0) (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, AR0024) antigen repair buffer for antigen repair. The tissue was then evenly covered with 5% BSA blocking solution in the culture dish for serum blocking. Followed by the addition of the first antibody (the dilution ratio of the antibody was 1: 100) (ARC/Arg3.1) (Proteintech Group, Inc, China, 16,290–1-AP). The second antibody (Biotin Conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG) and strept avidin–biotin complex (SABC) (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, SA1022). Diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, AR1022) was used to show color, and positive results ranged from yellow to brownish yellow. The nucleus of hematoxylin staining (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China, Ltd, G1080) was blue. The tissue was then dehydrated, and microscopic examination, image acquisition, and analysis were performed. Three fields of view were randomly selected for each slice for statistical analysis.

In situ hybridization staining

Paraffin sections were dewaxed in water and digested with protease K (20 μl/ml) at 37℃ for 30 min. The 3% methanol-hydrogen peroxide was added, and the slide was placed in phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, AR0033) to block endogenous peroxidase. After pre-hybridization, ARC/Arg3.1 mRNA probe (5`-CGCTG GGTCA AGCGT GAGAT GCACG TGTGG AGGGA-3`; 5`-TATTG GCTGT CCCAG ATCCA GAACC ACATG AATGG-3`; 5`-TGGCG TAAGC GGGAC CTGTA CCAGA CACTG TATGT-3`) hybridization solution containing the probe was added (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, MK1612) at a concentration of 20 μl. Hybridization was conducted at 37℃ in an incubator overnight, and then the hybridization solution was washed away. BSA blocking solution was then added, followed by a drop of mouse anti-digoxigenin-labeled peroxidase (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, MK1748). DAB (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, AR1022) was used to show color, and positive results ranged from yellow to brownish yellow. The nucleus of hematoxylin staining (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China, Ltd, G1080) was blue. The tissue was then dehydrated, and microscopic examination, image acquisition, and analysis were performed. Three fields of view were randomly selected for each slice for statistical analysis.

TUNEL staining

Paraffin sections were dewaxed in water and digested with protease K, and 3% hydrogen peroxide was added to block endogenous peroxidase. Add Labeling Buffer, 5% BSA, the Anti-DIG-Biotin, and SABC (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, MK1015) in sequence. DAB (Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China, AR1022) was used for color development, and the color of the DAB positive reaction was brown-yellow; the nucleus appeared blue after hematoxylin staining. The tissue was then dehydrated, and microscopic examination, image acquisition, and analysis were performed. Three fields of view were randomly selected for each slice for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis software was Stata/SE 16.0 All data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (\(\overline{X }\) ± s). One-way ANOVA (LSD) was used to analyze the baseline data of each eye of the two groups of kittens, including axial length, diopter, and P100 wave of each eye. One-way ANOVA (LSD) was used to compare P100 waves in the same group at different times and in different groups at the same time. Paired sample t-test was used to compare the differences between different eyes in the same group, two independent sample t-test was used to compare the difference between the right eye in the control group and the experimental group. The results of IHC, ISH, and TUNEL were tested by independent sample t-test. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed on the IHC, ISH, and TUNEL data of the control group and the experimental group.

Results

Baseline condition

There was no significant difference in diopter (F = 0.483, P = 0.696), axial length (F = 0.509, P = 0.679), amplitude (F = 0.013, P = 0.998) and latency (F = 0.629, P = 0.601) of PVEP between the two groups at 3 weeks of age (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of baseline situation between two groups of three-week-old kittens. (\(\overline{X }\) ± S)
Full size table

P100 wave of PVEP

At the age of 3 weeks, there was no statistical difference in latency (F = 0.629, P = 0.601) and amplitude (F = 0.013, P = 0.998) of P100 wave between the right eye of the experimental group, the left eye of the experimental group, the right eye of the control group and the left eye of the control group. With the increase of age, the latency of four groups of P100 waves showed a downward trend, while the amplitude showed an upward trend. Moreover, although the latency and amplitude of the P100 wave in the right eye of the experimental group also showed a changing trend, the overall change was lower than that of the other three groups.

At postnatal age 5, 6, and 7 weeks, statistical differences were observed in latency and amplitude of P100 wave among the four groups. The latency of the P100 wave in the right (covered) eye of the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the left eye of the experimental group, the right eye, or the left eye of the control group (for F and P values, please see Tables 2 and 3). However, the amplitude of the P100 wave in the right (covered) eye of the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the left eye of the experimental group, the right eye, or the left eye of the control group (for F and P values, please see Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 P100 latency in each group. (\(\overline{X }\) ± S, ms)
Full size table
Table 3 P100 amplitude in each group. (\(\overline{X }\) ± S, μV)
Full size table

The results showed that after 5 weeks of age, monocular form deprivation amblyopia had formed in the right eye of kittens in the experimental group (Figs. 2 and 3, Tables 2 and 3). (relevant data is available at https://figshare.com/s/41efd7f80329308c0d0a).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The latency and amplitude trend of P100 waves in 3-week-old to 7-week-old kittens. With the increase of age, the latency showed an upward trend (A) and the amplitude of each group showed a downward trend (B). At 5 and 7 weeks of age, the latency and amplitude of the right eye in the experimental group were statistically different from those in the other three groups

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

PVEP waves of each group of kittens after covering the right eye of the experiential group for 4 weeks. The latency in the right eye of the experimental group (C) was longer, and the amplitude was lower than in the right eye of the control group (A), the left eye of the control group (B), and the left eye of the experimental group (D)

Full size image

Immunohistochemical staining

The results of IHC showed that ARC/Arg3.1 protein was expressed in sections of the experimental group and the control group. ARC/Arg 3.1 protein expression in the cytoplasm, which was brown-yellow, and the nucleus was blue. At the age of 7 weeks, the average optical density of positive cells in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001). The number of positive cells in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4, Table 4) (relevant data is available at https://figshare.com/s/41efd7f80329308c0d0a).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Immunohistochemical performance in the lateral geniculate body in each group (DAB X400). The black arrow in the picture indicates positive cells. The protein of ARC/Arg3.1 positive expression in the cytoplasm of neurons was brown-yellow. At the age of 7 weeks, there were more positive cells in the control group (A) and fewer in the experimental group (B)

Full size image
Table 4 ARC/Arg3.1 immunohistochemical results of visual cortex in each group. (\(\overline{X }\) ± S)
Full size table

In situ hybridization staining

The results of ISH showed that ARC/Arg3.1 mRNA was expressed in sections of the experimental group and the control group. ARC/Arg 3.1 mRNA expression in the cytoplasm, which was brown-yellow, and the nucleus was blue. At the age of 7 weeks, the average optical density of positive cells in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001). The number of positive cells in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001) (Fig. 5, Table 5) (relevant data is available at https://figshare.com/s/41efd7f80329308c0d0a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

In situ hybridization performance in the lateral geniculate body in each group (DAB X400). The black arrow in the picture indicates positive cells. The protein of ARC/Arg3.1 positive expression in the cytoplasm of neurons was brown-yellow. At the age of 7 weeks, there were more positive cells in the control group (A) and fewer in the experimental group (B)

Full size image
Table 5 ARC/Arg3.1 in situ hybridization results of visual cortex in each group. (\(\overline{X }\) ± S)
Full size table

TUNEL staining

The results of TUNEL showed that there were positive cells in the slices of the experimental group and the control group. The nucleus of positive cells was brown-yellow, while that of negative cells was blue. At the age of 7 weeks, the average optical density of positive cells in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001). The number of positive cells in the experimental group was more than that in the control group (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6, Table 6) (relevant data is available at https://figshare.com/s/41efd7f80329308c0d0a).

Fig. 6
figure 6

TUNEL performance in the lateral geniculate body in each group (DAB X400). TUNEL-positive cells were brown-yellow, while TUNEL-negative cells were blue. The black arrow in the picture indicates the positive cells. At 7 weeks of age, there were fewer TUNEL-positive cells in the control group (A) and more TUNEL-positive cells in the experimental group (B)

Full size image
Table 6 Tunel staining results in each group. (\(\overline{X }\) ± S)
Full size table

The analysis of the correlation

Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that the intensity of TUNEL positive reaction was negatively correlated with the mean optical density of positive cells from ARC/Arg3.1 protein (PCCs = -0.415, P = 0.001) and mRNA (PCCs = -0.409, P = 0.001) expression at the age of 7 weeks, and ARC/Arg3.1 protein expression was positively correlated with ARC/Arg3.1 mRNA expression (PCCs = 0.958, P < 0.001) (Table 7).

Table 7 The analysis of correlation analysis among ISH, IHC and TUNEL. (PCCs, P)
Full size table

Discussion

The application of kittens as models of formal deprivation amblyopia can be traced back to the studies of Wiesel & Hubel (1963) [16] and Hubel & Wiesel (1970) [17]. Some studies have shown that for kittens, the effect of form deprivation on vision usually peaks from birth to 4 weeks old. After 12 weeks of age, the form deprivation caused by occlusion can hardly interfere with their visual development [12, 17, 18]. Therefore, in this study, 3-week-old kittens were selected, which can fully ensure that their covering eyes are affected by form deprivation factors during the visual development period of kittens, and have maximum interference on their visual development, to successfully establish a monocular form deprivation amblyopia kitten model. Some studies have shown that when the eyes of kittens are covered by monocular deprivation, the transformation of the ocular dominance column can occur in a short time [19, 20]. With the prolongation of deprivation time, the deviation of dominant column pairs will become more obvious.

To observe the form deprivation eyes of kittens and compare whether form deprivation amblyopia is formed. In this study, the results of PVEP detection were used as the basis for the establishment of the amblyopia model. At present, it has been mature and applied to the establishment of the amblyopia animal model [21]. The retina is stimulated by external light, which will produce potential changes and form nerve impulses. Nerve impulses pass through the optic nerve, optic chiasma, optic bundle, lateral geniculate body, and optic radiation in turn, and finally pass to the visual center of the cerebral cortex. Under the condition of normal visual development of kittens, the conduction velocity and mode of cells related to vision can stimulate consistent potential activity, form harmonious synchronous oscillation in front of and visual cortex, and then produce a regular waveform [22].

The results showed that with the development of the visual system of kittens, after 4 weeks of covering, the latency of the P100 wave decreased and the amplitude increased in both eyes of the experimental group and control group. However, in the experimental group of the right eye compared with the other three groups, although there is a certain degree of change, the overall range is still lower than the other three groups. Moreover, after 2 weeks of occlusion (at the fifth week of age), the latency of the P100 wave in the occluded eyes of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the other three groups, and the amplitude of the P100 wave was significantly lower than that of the other three groups. Therefore, we believe that form deprivation amblyopia developed in the right eye of the experimental group at the fifth week of age. This result is consistent with the results of the previous [23, 24].

The balance of excitation and depression at the axonal level of the visual cortex is the condition of maintaining the normal development and function of the visual cortex, and it is also an important factor affecting the plasticity of the visual system [25]. The first synaptic replacement of optic nerve impulse in the brain occurs in the lateral geniculate body, and each lateral geniculate body receives projections from temporal optic nerve fibers of the ipsilateral retina and nasal optic nerve fibers of the contralateral retina, and this projection has strict local regional correspondence. As a semi-crossover animal, the optic nerve fibers of kittens pass through the optic chiasma to the lateral geniculate body, and the lateral geniculate body of kittens can be divided into A, A1, C, and C1-C3 layers. Layers A, C, and C2 received projections from contralateral ocular fibers, while layers A1 and C1 received projections from ipsilateral ocular fibers. Some studies have found that C-fos, GABA, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the contralateral lateral geniculate body of the amblyopic eyes are down-regulated compared with those in the ipsilateral amblyopic eyes in kittens with monocular form deprivation amblyopic eyes [26,27,28].

Synapse, as the structural basis of information transmission between neurons, is the key part of visual development plasticity. Some studies have suggested that synaptic plasticity is considered the most critical link in the pathogenesis of amblyopia [29]. Neural storage in neural networks is considered to depend partly on the plasticity of synapses [30, 31]. Synaptic plasticity refers to the change of synaptic connections between neurons when synapses are in use or disuse [31, 32]. In terms of time, it can be divided into two types: LTP and LTD [33]. LTP is a kind of information storage mode at the synaptic level, and the induction mechanism of LTP is mainly the Ca2+ influx caused by the change of the NMDAR channel in the postsynaptic membrane, which triggers a series of biochemical processes in cells. LTD refers to activity-dependent persistent potential attenuation induced on an unstimulated pathway, which is the opposite of LTP. For example, the visual cortex response caused by visual deprivation is an LTD phenomenon.

Considering the induction and expression mechanism of LTP and LTD in the lateral geniculate body, it is similar to the hippocampus [34,35,36,37,38]. For example, NMDAR needs to be activated, which leads to the activation of a series of intracellular kinases and the redistribution of AMPA receptors. The first change in the plasticity of the lateral geniculate body is synaptic efficiency, which does not need to synthesize new proteins, and then there will be long-term changes in neural pathways. However, long-term changes in neural pathways require gene expression and new protein synthesis, so kinase activation will lead to gene expression, which may be realized through the activation of transcription factors. Some studies have shown that NMDAR is related to the changes in the visual cortex in amblyopia animals [39, 40]. However, Ziburkus et al. [41] found that the expression of NMDAR in the lateral geniculate body of amblyopia animals did not seem to be affected. This is contrary to some research results in recent years.

Arc/arg3.1 encodes a protein of about 400 amino acids, which has no catalytic or other known functional motifs [42,43,44]. Arc/Arg3.1 protein interacts directly or indirectly with many proteins, indicating that it has the function of a pivotal protein [45,46,47,48,49]. Most of its functions are thought to occur at postsynaptic sites. Biochemical and electron microscopic studies show that Arc/Arg3.1 protein exists in the postsynaptic density of activated neurons [50,51,52]. As an archetypal immediate-early gene, ARC/Arg3.1 is generally considered a reliable marker of neuronal activity [53, 54]. ARC/Arg3.1 is also necessary for various forms of learning and memory, and some studies suggest that it is related to synaptic plasticity [44]. For example, ARC/Arg3.1 could regulate the expression of AMPAR during homeostatic plasticity with LTD and then maintain LTP [55,56,57]. ARC/Arg3.1 plays a key role in the long-term synaptic plasticity of excitatory synapses and memory and postnatal cortical development [58, 59]. These results suggest a physiological function of Arc in enhancing the overall orientation specificity of visual cortical neurons during the post-eye-opening life of an animal. Wang et al. [60] showed a physiological function of Arc in enhancing the overall orientation specificity of visual cortical neurons.

Some studies have shown that LTP and LTD, heterosynaptic LTD (inverse synaptic tagging), and homeostatic scaling all require the synthesis of ARC/Arc3.1, but the specific mechanism that determines the prominent changes is still unclear [58]. When BDNF was injected into the hippocampus, researchers found that a transcription-dependent LTP induced by ARC/Arg3.1 mRNA in the granulosa cell body and dendrite can be induced [61, 62]. Another study shows that the expression of BDNF is associated with the maintenance of high-frequency stimulation long-term potential (HFS-LTP) [57]. Injection of Arc antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (Arc-AS) before injection of BDNF inhibits the induction of LTP, which indicates that the process is completely downstream of the BDNF signaling pathway [57, 63]. After injecting BDNF for 2 h, the LTP can be restored to the baseline level by injecting Arc-AS (Arc antisense oligodeoxynucleotides) again. However, after injecting BDNF for 4 h, Arc-AS injection has no effect [57]. Therefore, some researchers believe that the newly synthesized ARC/Arg 3.1 can regulate the expression and consolidation of LTP induced by HFS-LTP and exogenous BDNF [58] In addition, Qi et al. [64] showed that ARC/Arg3.1 can be activated and up-regulated by PKA/CREB and ERK/CREB signaling pathways and they found a significant increase in the number of neuronal apoptosis in the model group after ARC/Arg 3.1 gene knockout.

Based on these studies and our results, we speculate that the number of neuronal apoptosis in the lateral geniculate body increases due to the influence of form deprivation. The change of neuron number in the lateral geniculate body further leads to the decrease of ARC/Arg3.1 expression, which leads to abnormal activities such as LTP and LTD, and finally promotes the further development of amblyopia.

However, this study still has some limitations. We proved that the expression protein and mRNA of ARC/Arg3.1 were down-regulated in the visual cortex of amblyopia kittens, but we failed to detect the dynamic change of ARC/Arg3.1 or set different groups to observe its changes with age. On the other hand, we only compared the expression of ARC/Arg3.1 in the lateral geniculate body of amblyopia kittens and normal kittens and did not study the change of its expression in different layers of the lateral geniculate body. In addition, the statistics of slices in this study were carried out at high power using three random visual fields. Although we have adopted some methods to reduce the risk of bias as much as possible, this method still has some limitations.

Conclusions

To sum up, the expression of ARC/Arg3.1 is associated with monocular form deprivation amblyopia and apoptosis of lateral geniculate body cells. This study speculates that ARC/Arg3.1 gene plays an important role in visual development.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Or all relevant datasets related to the study can be found in the specified (database.https://figshare.com/s/41efd7f80329308c0d0a).

Abbreviations

ARC/Arg3.1:

Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated

LTP:

Long-term potentiation

LTD:

Long-term depression

PVEP:

Pattern visual evoked potential

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

ISH:

In situ hybridization

TUNEL:

TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling

HFS-LTP:

High-frequency stimulation long-term potential

Arc-AS:

Arc antisense oligodeoxynucleotides

DAB:

Diaminobenzidine

SABC:

Strept avidin–biotin complex

References

  1. Hooks BM, Chen C. Circuitry Underlying Experience-Dependent Plasticity in the Mouse Visual System. Neuron. 2020;106(1):21–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hess RF, Thompson B. Amblyopia and the binocular approach to its therapy. Vision Res. 2015;114:4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiorpes L. Understanding the development of amblyopia using macaque monkey models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(52):26217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu L, Li Z, Rong J, Lang L. Effect of regulation of the NRG1/ErbB4 signaling pathway on the visual cortex synaptic plasticity of amblyopic adult rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2021;35(9):e22841.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nucci C, Piccirilli S, Nisticò R, Morrone LA, Cerulli L, Bagetta G. Apoptosis in the mechanisms of neuronal plasticity in the developing visual system. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13(Suppl 3):S36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu B, Figurov A. Role of neurotrophins in synapse development and plasticity. Rev Neurosci. 1997;8(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bliss TV, Cooke SF. Long-term potentiation and long-term depression: a clinical perspective. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(Suppl 1):3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neves G, Cooke SF, Bliss TV. Synaptic plasticity, memory and the hippocampus: a neural network approach to causality. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):65–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Teissier A, Le Magueresse C, Olusakin J, Andrade da Costa BLS, De Stasi AM, Bacci A, et al. Early-life stress impairs postnatal oligodendrogenesis and adult emotional behaviour through activity-dependent mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(6):1159–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barylko B, Wilkerson JR, Cavalier SH, Binns DD, James NG, Jameson DM, et al. Palmitoylation and Membrane Binding of Arc/Arg3.1: A Potential Role in Synaptic Depression. Biochemistry. 2018;57(5):520–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksen MS, Bramham CR. Molecular physiology of Arc/Arg3.1: The oligomeric state hypothesis of synaptic plasticity. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2022;236(3):e13886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy KR, Lingley AJ, Holman KD, Mitchell DE. Susceptibility to monocular deprivation following immersion in darkness either late into or beyond the critical period. J Comp Neurol. 2016;524(13):2643–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder A, Shapley R. Deficits in the visual evoked potentials of cats as a result of visual deprivation. Exp Brain Res. 1979;37(1):73–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jang J, Kyung SE. Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan H, Wang Y, Tang X, Yang L, Song W, Zou Y. Expression of early growth responsive gene-1 in the visual cortex of monocular form deprivation amblyopic kittens. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cats lateral geniculate body. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:978–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol. 1970;206(2):419–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baro JA, Lehmkuhle S, Kratz KE. Electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in long-term monocularly deprived cats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31(7):1405–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Feller MB, Scanziani M. A precritical period for plasticity in visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15(1):94–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trachtenberg JT, Trepel C, Stryker MP. Rapid extragranular plasticity in the absence of thalamocortical plasticity in the developing primary visual cortex. Science. 2000;287(5460):2029–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. DeBruyn EJ, Corbett GK, Bonds AB. Pretreatment with physostigmine, mecamylamine and atropine reduces the impact of soman on the cortical visual evoked potential of the cat. Life Sci. 1991;48(13):1277–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bush PC, Sejnowski TJ. Effects of inhibition and dendritic saturation in simulated neocortical pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol. 1994;71(6):2183–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burns BD, Pritchard R. Cortical conditions for fused binocular vision. J Physiol. 1968;197(1):149–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Halfeld Furtado de Mendonça R, Abbruzzese S, Bagolini B, Nofroni I, Ferreira EL, Odom JV. Visual evoked potential importance in the complex mechanism of amblyopia. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(5):515–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bavelier D, Levi DM, Li RW, Dan Y, Hensch TK. Removing brakes on adult brain plasticity: from molecular to behavioral interventions. J Neurosci. 2010;30(45):14964–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu M. Relationship between monocularly deprivation and amblyopia rats and visual system development. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7(07):568–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li B, Zou Y, Yin X, Tang X, Fan H. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the lateral geniculate body of monocular form deprivation amblyopic kittens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(5):2724–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng G, Kaminski HJ, Gong B, Zhou L, Hatala D, Howell SJ, Zhou X, Mustari MJ. Monocular visual deprivation in macaque monkeys: a profile in the gene expression of lateral geniculate nucleus by laser capture microdissection. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1401–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sengpiel F. Plasticity of the visual cortex and treatment of amblyopia. Curr Biol. 2014;24(18):R936–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Josselyn SA, Tonegawa S. Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future. Science. 2020;367(6473):eaaw4325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Abraham WC, Jones OD, Glanzman DL. Is plasticity of synapses the mechanism of long-term memory storage? NPJ Sci Learn. 2019;4:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ashley J, Cordy B, Lucia D, Fradkin LG, Budnik V, Thomson T. Retrovirus-like Gag Protein Arc1 Binds RNA and Traffics across Synaptic Boutons. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):262–274.e11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith GB, Heynen AJ, Bear MF. Bidirectional synaptic mechanisms of ocular dominance plasticity in visual cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1515):357–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Araújo SES, Mendonça HR, Wheeler NA, Campello-Costa P, Jacobs KM, Gomes FCA, Fox MA, Fuss B. Inflammatory demyelination alters subcortical visual circuits. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson KO, Smith NA, Goldstein EZ, Gallo V, Triplett JW. NMDA Receptor Expression by Retinal Ganglion Cells Is Not Required for Retinofugal Map Formation nor Eye-Specific Segregation in the Mouse. eNeuro. 2021;8(4):ENEURO.0115-20.2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pape HC, McCormick DA. Electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of interneurons in the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuroscience. 1995;68(4):1105–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bae YS, Yoon SH, Kim YS, Oh SP, Song WS, Cha JH, Kim MH. Suppression of exaggerated NMDAR activity by memantine treatment ameliorates neurological and behavioral deficits in aminopeptidase P1-deficient mice. Exp Mol Med. 2022;54(8):1109–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Li C, Xie M, Luo F, He C, Wang J, Tan G, Hu Z. The extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure differently affects the AMPAR and NMDAR subunit expressions in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex and prefrontal cortex without effects on the rat spatial learning and memory. Environ Res. 2014;134:74–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphy KM, Duffy KR, Jones DG. Experience-dependent changes in NMDAR1 expression in the visual cortex of an animal model for amblyopia. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21(4):653–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fong MF, Finnie PS, Kim T, Thomazeau A, Kaplan ES, Cooke SF, Bear MF. Distinct Laminar Requirements for NMDA Receptors in Experience-Dependent Visual Cortical Plasticity. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30(4):2555–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ziburkus J, Bickford ME, Guido W. NMDAR-1 staining in the lateral geniculate nucleus of normal and visually deprived cats. Vis Neurosci. 2000;17(2):187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lyford GL, Yamagata K, Kaufmann WE, Barnes CA, Sanders LK, Copeland NG, et al. Arc, a growth factor and activity-regulated gene, encodes a novel cytoskeleton-associated protein that is enriched in neuronal dendrites. Neuron. 1995;14(2):433–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang W, Wu J, Ward MD, Yang S, Chuang YA, Xiao M, et al. Structural basis of arc binding to synaptic proteins: implications for cognitive disease. Neuron. 2015;86(2):490–500.

  44. Bramham CR, Alme MN, Bittins M, Kuipers SD, Nair RR, Pai B, et al. The Arc of synaptic memory. Exp Brain Res. 2010;200(2):125–40.

  45. Myrum C, Baumann A, Bustad HJ, Flydal MI, Mariaule V, Alvira S, et al. Arc is a flexible modular protein capable of reversible self-oligomerization. Biochem J. 2015;468(1):145–58.

  46. Nair RR, Patil S, Tiron A, Kanhema T, Panja D, Schiro L, et al. Dynamic Arc SUMOylation and Selective Interaction with F-Actin-Binding Protein Drebrin A in LTP Consolidation In Vivo. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2017;9:8.

  47. Frank RA, Komiyama NH, Ryan TJ, Zhu F, O’Dell TJ, Grant SG. NMDA receptors are selectively partitioned into complexes and supercomplexes during synapse maturation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11264.

  48. DaSilva LL, Wall MJ, P de Almeida L, Wauters SC, Januário YC, Müller J, et al. Activity-Regulated Cytoskeleton-Associated Protein Controls AMPAR Endocytosis through a Direct Interaction with Clathrin-Adaptor Protein 2. eNeuro. 2016;3(3):ENEURO.0144-15.2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bloomer WA, VanDongen HM, VanDongen AM. Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein Arc/Arg3.1 binds to spectrin and associates with nuclear promyelocytic leukemia (PML) bodies. Brain Res. 2007;1153:20–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chowdhury S, Shepherd JD, Okuno H, Lyford G, Petralia RS, Plath N, et al. Arc/Arg3.1 interacts with the endocytic machinery to regulate AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron. 2006;52(3):445–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rodríguez JJ, Davies HA, Silva AT, De Souza IE, Peddie CJ, Colyer FM, et al. Long-term potentiation in the rat dentate gyrus is associated with enhanced Arc/Arg3.1 protein expression in spines, dendrites and glia. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21(9):2384–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Moga DE, Calhoun ME, Chowdhury A, Worley P, Morrison JH, Shapiro ML. Activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein is localized to recently activated excitatory synapses. Neuroscience. 2004;125(1):7–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Guzowski JF, Timlin JA, Roysam B, McNaughton BL, Worley PF, Barnes CA. Mapping behaviorally relevant neural circuits with immediate-early gene expression. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15(5):599–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Grinevich V, Kolleker A, Eliava M, Takada N, Takuma H, Fukazawa Y, et al. Fluorescent Arc/Arg3.1 indicator mice: a versatile tool to study brain activity changes in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;184(1):25–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Shepherd JD, Rumbaugh G, Wu J, Chowdhury S, Plath N, Kuhl D, et al. Arc/Arg3.1 mediates homeostatic synaptic scaling of AMPA receptors. Neuron. 2006;52(3):475–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Park S, Park JM, Kim S, Kim JA, Shepherd JD, Smith-Hicks CL, et al. Elongation factor 2 and fragile X mental retardation protein control the dynamic translation of Arc/Arg3.1 essential for mGluR-LTD. Neuron. 2008;59(1):70–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Messaoudi E, Kanhema T, Soulé J, Tiron A, Dagyte G, da Silva B, et al. Sustained Arc/Arg3.1 synthesis controls long-term potentiation consolidation through regulation of local actin polymerization in the dentate gyrus in vivo. J Neurosci. 2007;27(39):10445–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang H, Bramham CR. Arc/Arg3.1 function in long-term synaptic plasticity: Emerging mechanisms and unresolved issues. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;54(8):6696–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. McCurry CL, Shepherd JD, Tropea D, Wang KH, Bear MF, Sur M. Loss of Arc renders the visual cortex impervious to the effects of sensory experience or deprivation. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(4):450–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang KH, Majewska A, Schummers J, Farley B, Hu C, Sur M, Tonegawa S. In vivo two-photon imaging reveals a role of arc in enhancing orientation specificity in visual cortex. Cell. 2006;126(2):389–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ying SW, Futter M, Rosenblum K, Webber MJ, Hunt SP, Bliss TV, Bramham CR. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces long-term potentiation in intact adult hippocampus: requirement for ERK activation coupled to CREB and upregulation of Arc synthesis. J Neurosci. 2002;22(5):1532–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Panja D, Bramham CR. BDNF mechanisms in late LTP formation: A synthesis and breakdown. Neuropharmacology. 2014;76:664–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Kuipers SD, Trentani A, Tiron A, Mao X, Kuhl D, Bramham CR. BDNF-induced LTP is associated with rapid Arc/Arg3.1-dependent enhancement in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zeng Q, Huang Z, Zhang J, Liu R, Li X, Zeng J, Xiao H. 3’-Daidzein Sulfonate Sodium Protects Against Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion-Mediated Cognitive Impairment and Hippocampal Damage via Activity-Regulated Cytoskeleton-Associated Protein Upregulation. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:104.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan (No.2022NSFSC0754) and Project of Nanchong Science and Technology Bureau (No.22SXQT0350). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Haobo Fan and Ying Wang are the co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Optometry, North Sichuan Medical College, No.234 FuJiang Road, Nanchong, 637000, China

    Haobo Fan, Ying Wang, Yunchun Zou, Weiqi Song, Juan Xie, Xiuping Tang & Siyu Chen

  2. Department of Optometry and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu, China

    Haobo Fan

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Clinical College of North Sichuan Medical College (Nanchong Central Hospital), Nanchong, China

    Yunchun Zou

Authors
  1. Haobo Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunchun Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weiqi Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiuping Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Siyu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yunchun Zou participated in the design of the experiment, analyzed the data, and modified the manuscript. Haobo Fan and Ying Wang contributed equally to this work and participated in creating the animal model, specimen collection, experimental manipulation, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing. Weiqi Song, Juan Xie Siyu Chen, and Xiuping Tang participated in creating the animal model, PVEP testing, specimen collection, and experimental operation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunchun Zou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The study that has been performed according to the ARRIVE guidelines was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of North Sichuan Medical College and supervised throughout the process. (NSMC Appl. No. 2021 [66]).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, H., Wang, Y., Zou, Y. et al. ARC/Arg3.1 expression in the lateral geniculate body of monocular form deprivation amblyopic kittens. BMC Ophthalmol 23, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02757-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02757-5

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us