Skip to main content
Download PDF

Design, methodology, and preliminary results of the non-human primates eye study

BMC Ophthalmology volume 23, Article number: 53 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the normative profile of ophthalmic parameters in a healthy cynomolgus monkey colony, and to identify the characteristic of the spontaneous ocular disease non-human primates (NHP) models.

Methods

The NHP eye study was a cross-sectional on-site ocular examination with about 1,000 macaques held in Guangdong Province, southeastern China. The NHPs (Macaca fascicularis, cynomolgus) in this study included middle-aged individuals with a high prevalence of the ocular disease. The NHP eye study (NHPES) performed the information including systematic data and ocular data. Ocular examination included measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior segment- optical coherence tomography (OCT), slit-lamp examination, fundus photography, autorefraction, electroretinography, etc. Ocular diseases included measurement of refractive error, anisometropia, cataract, pterygium, etc.

Results

A total of 1148 subjects were included and completed the ocular examination. The average age was 16.4 ± 4.93 years. Compared to the male participants, the females in the NHPES had shorter axial length and the mean Average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (except for the nasal quadrants). The mean IOP, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, axial length, central corneal thickness, choroid thickness and other parameters were similar in each group.

Conclusion

The NHPES is a unique and high-quality study, this is the first large macaque monkey cohort study focusing on ocular assessment along with comprehensive evaluation. Results from the NHPES will provide important information about the normal range of ophthalmic measurements in NHP.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

It was estimated that 895 million people with vision impairment worldwide, of whom 61 million may suffer from blindness by 2050 [1]. About 65% of individuals with mild to severe visual impairment are over 50 years old [2], and aging populations face an increasing burden of ocular diseases, resulting in substantial health and economic burdens. Glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, high myopia, cataracts are the most common aging-related ocular diseases [3,4,5,6,7], resulting in irreversible blindness worldwide. It is critical to identify the biomarkers and mechanism of visual impairment to prevent the occurrence of optic nerve degeneration and macular disease among middle-aged or older individuals through clinical and basic research.

To clarify the pathogenesis of ocular diseases, several animal models were developed to study the disease process [8,9,10]. Different from small animals like mice, non-human primates (NHP) have more human-resemble eye structures, such as the macula structure, and vitreous volumes. Meanwhile, the macaques share more than 90% DNA sequence and highly conserved protein sequences with humans [11], with the substantial similarities in anatomy, physiology and genetics [12] In addition, using invasive methods and novelty treatment in NHP studies may complement those in human volunteers and patients. Therefore, NHPs were regarded as an attractive model for providing new exploration directions and practical basis for human visual biology and ocular disease in preclinical studies [11].

With the increasing application of the NHP experimental model using to ocular research, it is truly needed to establish a preclinical evaluation system and standardized procedures for NHP ophthalmic examination. Meanwhile, considering the differences between NHP and human eye biological parameters, a standardized database of ophthalmic parameters in healthy NHP populations should be established for the disease model evaluation, a thorough understanding of the normal range of ophthalmic biological structure and retinal anatomical parameters in NHPs is critical for laying the foundation for preclinical visual science research [13]. Unlike the numerous human ocular epidemiological studies have been performed worldwide the previous NHP eye studies with small sample size and unrepresentative results [14, 15], there was a scarcity on a large-scale ophthalmic epidemiological study of NHPs to provide a reference range for normal values of ophthalmic parameters and reporting the screening information.

We held the NHP eye study for describing the normative profile of ophthalmic parameters in a healthy cynomolgus monkey colony, which might be helpful to provide criteria for using NHP experimental models. Meanwhile, since the NHP experimental model may have distinct pathophysiology from the spontaneously developed disease, we attempt to discover NHP spontaneous ocular disease models using for further investigated the pathogenesis of the ocular disease. Furthermore, the NHPS assist the preclinical research to identify the etiology and biomarkers of visual impairment in human ocular disease. In this report, we describe the objective, study design, baseline characteristics, and strengths and potential limitations of the NHP Eye Study (NHPES).

Methods

Study design

The NHP eye study (NHPES) was a cross-sectional on-site ocular examination with more than 1,000 macaques held in Guangdong Province, southeastern China. This study was performed from 2021 to 2022, the location was illustrated in Fig. 1. The NHPES was designed to describe the normative ocular parameters distribution in NHPs colony, discovered, and further displayed the characteristics of the spontaneously developed ocular disease NHPs using the digitization of image data.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The location of non-human primates eye study

Full size image

This study complied with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and the guidelines of the Association for Research of Vision and Ophthalmology for the Use of Animal in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Guangzhou Huazhen Biosciences Company (Ethics Number: 2020–168) and Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Permit Number: SYXK (YUE) 2018–0189).

Animals

All NHPs (Macaca fascicularis, cynomolgus) included in this study were from Huazhen Biosciences(HZ-Bio) company and were treated following the ARVO Statement. HZ-Bio is a subsidiary of Huazhen Laboratory Animal Breeding Center, which is a fully Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)-accredited facility permitted to perform laboratory animal research in China.

HZ-Bio is a company that specialized in NHP research, with the mission to provide research models and services to the biomedical research community and bio-pharmaceutical industry. All macacas were housed in air-conditioned rooms at temperatures of 16 °C-26°C with a relative humidity of 40-70% and a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle in a climate-controlled room. Free access to drinking water and commercial primate diet (12% calories from fat, 18% calories from protein, and 70% calories from carbohydrates at 200 to 300 g/d), fresh fruits, and additional supplements were also provided on a daily basis. Meanwhile, entertainment and welfare including toys and music were also provided. In addition, veterinarians with more than 20 years of experience were 24-h monitoring the healthy status of cynomolgus.

Specific aims

  1. 1.

    To establish a normative database of cynomolgus monkeys, and describe the normal range of the ocular parameters.

  2. 2.

    In search of the spontaneously ocular disease models in NHPs used in the following basic and preclinical studies (exploring the pathogenesis, novelty treatment such as gene therapy and new biopharmaceuticals).

  3. 3.

    To describe ophthalmic characteristics of the NHPs defined by the spontaneously developed ocular diseases model.

  4. 4.

    To provide a standard reference range for the experimental ophthalmic disease model in cynomolgus monkeys.

  5. 5.

    To establish a preclinical evaluation system and standard operating procedure for NHP in ophthalmic examination

Sample size considerations

We used the following calculation formula to estimate the sample size: n = \({u}_{a/2}^{2}\) × p × (1-p)/d2. Considering a confidence interval of 95% (bilateral), \({u}_{a/2}^{2}\)of 1.96. In the formula, d represented the difference between the prevalence of the sample and the population, here we set it as 1%. Based on the previous studies, the prevalence of the main ocular diseases was estimated to be over 2% [3, 16,17,18,19], as the p value in the formula was set as 2.5% in this study. Based on the data above and assuming a final response rate of 85%, about 1,100 subjects would be recruited for this study. The target subject included middle-aged individuals with a high prevalence of the ocular disease. Aged over 10 years in good healthy state were included in the examinations.

Examination procedures

All subjects were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of Zoletil (4 mg/kg body weight, Virbac) mixed with xylazine/ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (Sumianxin, Shengda Animal Medicine), and underwent all examinations in 60 to 120 min according to the standardized protocols. The NHPES performed the information including systematic data (sex, age, weight), and ocular data (refractive state; intraocular pressure (IOP); slit-lamp examination; fundus photography; AL-100 examination; optical coherence tomography (OCT) image, etc.). The anesthesia dose was within safety range while veterinarians took care of the examination site during the whole process. The procedures were outlined in Fig. 2.

  1. 1.

    Registration: At the beginning of the NHPES, each subject was encoded and registered according to the specific identification brand. The systematic data including sex, date of birth, age, and history of surgery were recorded. The body weight was measured according to a standardized protocol by a certified veterinarian.

  2. 2.

    IOP Measurements: After being anesthesia the technician stabilized the monkey in a flatting position and kept its head in a primary gaze state. An eyelid speculum was used to immobilize the eyelids, while the IOP measurements were conducted by an experienced technician using an Icare tonometer (TA01i; Icare, Helsinki, Finland) collimating the center of the pupil. The instrument automatically collected and displayed the value of six average measurements. The IOP measurements were excluded if the difference between each measurement exceeded 3 mmHg and we obtained six measurements in three series. All subjects measured the IOP at the beginning, middle, and end of anesthesia, three times measurements were obtained finally.

  3. 3.

    Anterior Segment-OCT Measurements: The anterior chamber structure was scanned using anterior segment OCT (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg) before dilation. Each scan included the scleral spur and iris recess. Both cornea and angle patterns were conducted in each subjects to determine the central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber width (ACW), and angle parameters (angle opening distance [AOD], angle recess area [ARA], trabecular-iris space area, and trabecular-iris angle [TIA]) analyzed using the manufacturer provided software.

  4. 4.

    Dilation: Macaques were properly situated in a headrest position and pupils were dilated by the application using one drop of 0.5% tropicamide phenylephrine hydrochloride (Mydrin P, Santen, Osaka, Japan) in both eyes after anterior segment examination. A self-retaining eyelid speculum was placed to enable the examination until the pupil diameter reached ≥ 6 mm.

  5. 5.

    Slit-lamp Examination: Examinations were performed by experienced ophthalmologists after anesthesia (described above) using slit-lamp biomicroscopy (TOPCON Slit-lamp SL-D701) to evaluate the overall structures of the anterior segment, including eyelids, cornea, anterior chamber, lens, iris, and related structures. The slit-lamp beam held a width of 0.3 mm and a height of 9.0 mm for the lens photographs, and the angle between the slit-lamp beam and the sagittal axis was set as 45°. Initial examination confirmed the anterior segment diseases such as pterygium and keratitis, the peripheral anterior chamber depth was evaluated using the method of Van Herick [20]. The cataract diagnosis used the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS-III) as a reference [21]. All subjects were checked the right eye first followed by the left eye.

  6. 6.

    Fundus Photography: Experienced ophthalmic technicians used a digital fundus scope(APS-BER Fundus Camera & FFA model, AITOMU) to obtain the fundus photos after adjusting to ensure the image was focused clearly. Each subject was taken with at least two high-quality fundus photographs following the operation rules, bilateral retinal 45-degree images of the optic nerve (centered on the disc), and the macula (centered on the fovea). Both eyes of each subject were well taken. Fundus photographs were graded preliminarily for the level of fundus lesions by two graders.

  7. 7.

    Optic Nerve Head (ONH) Parameter Measurements: The examinations were performed after pupil dilation using Heidelberg Spectral-domain OCT (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The images of ONH scans were obtained by circular scans. The location of the aiming circle was adjusted by the experienced operators to match the ONH, and the 24 radial scans (scans ranging from 1.3 to 4.9 mm) were well-conducted covering a 3.4 mm diameter circle that included ONH surroundings structure. ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) was used to measure the LC parameters (Bruch's membrane opening, LC depth, posterior LC surface depth, anterior laminar insertion depth, LC thickness, LC curve index).

  8. 8.

    Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Measurements: The RNFL thickness was assessed automatically by the Heidelberg OCT software into six sectors. Included temporal (T; 315° to 45°), temporal-superior (TS; 45° to 90°), temporal-inferior (TI; 90° to 135°), nasal (N; 135° to 225°), nasal-superior (NS; 225° to 270°), and nasal-inferior (NI; 270° to 315°), respectively. The means of RNFL thickness were calculated by averaging the thickness values of 360° measures.

  9. 9.

    Retinal Thickness (RT) Measurements: RT scan was carried out between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the edge defined by the mean value of the maximum reflectance of the RPE [retina 9]. The built-in software automatically generates the RT map by a common center of three concentric circles was located in the macular fovea, and the diameters were 1 mm (innermost ring), 3 mm (inner ring), and 6 mm (outer ring), and was divided into 9 sectors (central macular areas, above the inner ring, below the inner ring, nasal side of the inner ring, temporal side of the inner ring, above the outer ring, below the outer ring, nasal side of the outer ring and temporal side of the outer ring) according to the definition of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The signal strength index (SSI) less than 15 dB (as recommended by the manufacturer) was excluded further from the analysis.

  10. 10.

    A-scan Ultrasonography: Ocular biometry parameters were acquired by using the A-scan ultrasonography (Tomey AL-4000, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan). Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and axial length were examined with a transducer frequency of 10 MHz applied to execute measurement. The upper eyelid was manually retracted with an eyelid speculum was placed to facilitate. Directly put the ultrasound probe with an integrated red fixation light at the central cornea in a contact mode, the measurement will automatically start if the system detects a sufficient sound echo. Data along with standard ultrasonic waveforms of cornea, anterior and posterior surface of lens and retina as well as standard deviation less than 0.13 mm were acceptable and recorded the ACD, LT, AL value respectively.

  11. 11.

    Autorefraction Measurements: Refractive status was measured using an autorefractor (Fario FXR-710), with the combination function of optometer and keratometer. Cycloplegia was administered one drop 1% tropicamide (Sandoz) every 5-min interval for twice. A third drop would be administered if pupillary light reflex was still present or the pupil size was less than 6.0 mm 30 min after the last drop. Spherical refraction (SR), cylinder refraction (CR) and corneal radius of curvature (CRC) were repetitively measured for three times, the mean of SR, CR, SE and CRC were calculated to analyze.

  12. 12.

    Retinoscopy Refraction: Subjective Refraction was performed by one experienced technician and one optometrist. Cycloplegic retinoscopy was used to determine the spherical and cylindrical components on subjects with uncorrected visual acuity less than 20/40 in either eye after pupil dilation. To avoid observer bias, the optometrist who performed retinoscopy was blinded to the results of autorefractors. An average of three measurements was acquired.

  13. 13.

    Electroretinography (ERG): ERG technology (Roland consult® RETImap Model 520 ERG, Germany) was used to quantify neuroretinal, retinal ganglion cells and visual pathway function. Active electrodes were placed into the eyelid, references electrode was placed at both sides under the skin and the ground electrode was placed near the tail of the subject. Electrode impedance was acceptable with the difference less than 2 KΩ, and the pattern VEP and flash VEP were conducted after the electrodes were proper placed. After both eye were full dilatation using topical eye drops (previously mentioned), the pattern ERG and photopic negative response (PhNR) test was performed according to the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard protocol.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The procedure of ocular examination for macaques in non-human primates eye study

Full size image

Quality control and data management

Quality control were conducted throughout the study procedures to ensure that the accuracy and completeness of the final dataset. The ophthalmologists, technicians, and assistant staff were trained to understand the aims of this study, the standardized examination procedures, and diagnostic criteria. A pilot study with approximately 100 subjects enrolled was conducted to ensure data consistency by determining the repeatability of the examination and diagnosis by different examiners. An experienced ophthalmologist (JW) and investigators supervised the field site to ensure and monitor the standardized procedures.

Initial data were collected with a combination of paper and digital formats. Ophthalmic examination records, printouts (eg, refractive parameters) and OCT reports were compiled into specific case report forms labeled with each subject’s unique study ID. Clinical examination data forms were reviewed for accuracy and completeness before input to electronic format. Imaging data including fundus photo, OCT image and lens photographs, were retrieved directly from ocular instruments and stored in the PC and backup in the mobile disk. Initial data were collected with a combination of paper and electronic formats, paper data were input by double entry and validation.

Primary outcome measures

Refractive error and anisometropia: The refractive error was referenced by spherical equivalent (SE). Myopia and hyperopia defined as SE ≤  − 0.5 D and ≥  + 0.5 D (also alternatively as ≤  − 1.0 D and ≥  + 1.0 D) respectively. Astigmatism was defined as minus cylinders ≤  − 0.5 D or ≤  − 1.0 D. Anisometropia was referred to the difference from binocular SE more than 1.0 D or 2.0 D.

Cataract: The lens opacities classification system (LOCS) III [21] was used to evaluate the severity of lens opacity in four major characteristics: nuclear opalescence (NO), nuclear color (NC), cortical (C), and posterior subcapsular (P). Cataract was defined based on the lens images using slit-lamp reference to standard grading photos, and diagnosis as significant nuclear, cortical, or posterior subcapsular cataract.

Pterygium: The pterygium was defined under the slit-lamp microscope as an extension of conjunctiva onto the clear cornea without an alternative explanation such as ocular trauma. Pterygium was graded in grade 1 (transparent), grade 2 (intermediate) and grade 3 (opaque) based on relative transparency of pterygium tissue.

Posterior segment eye diseases: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was graded by fundus photo using the Wisconsin AMD classification system [22]. Glaucoma was defined using the recommendations of the Association of International Glaucoma Societies [23]. Meanwhile, myopic retinopathy was categorized by the International Photographic Classification and Grading System. For the diabetic retinopathy diagnosis, the grading protocols was according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) adaptation of the modified Arlie House classification of DR criteria [24]. And non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) diagnosis criteria was defined as a small optic disc (a cup/disc diameter ratio of 0.3 or less), with segmental pallor or segmental loss of retinal nerve fiber layer [25]. All images and relevant data were reviewed by two well-trained ophthalmologists, a third senior specialist will determine the final diagnosis when appear the consensus on diagnosis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software (SPSS 23.0 and SAS 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data was performed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables. An independent t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare the differences between groups in normally distributed quantitative data. A Wilcoxon or Kruskal–Wallis test was used for non-normal data. The Chi-squared test was use to evaluate categorical variables. The statistical strength of correlations was described using odds ratio (OR), confidence intervals (CI, 95%) were also presented. P < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered as statistically significant.

Results

During the period from July 2021 to June 2022, a total of 1148 subjects were included and completed the ocular examination (Fig. 2). Number 1029 finally took part in the study and the response rate was 89.6%

All participants were Macaca fascicularis (cynomolgus) species. Of the excluded-subjects, about 60% were pregnancy, 25% were older than 25 years, and 15% with systematic disease were not suitable for anesthesia. Supplementary Fig. 1 provides the complete details on selection of the study subjects. The systematic characteristics of including subjects were shown in Table 1. The majority of the included subjects were female (52.1%). The average age was 16.4 ± 4.93 years (range 2 years to 26 years) (Table 1).

Table 1 General characteristics of the included subjects in the non-human primate eye study
Full size table

Table 2 showed the general features of majority ophthalmic parameters, and presented the primary results of the physical measurements for the male and female subjects in both eyes. We measured the parameters of the eyes of monkeys with different genders. Compared to the male participants, the females in the NHPES had shorter axial length which may related to the weight measurement (Table 2). The mean IOP, Anterior chamber Depth, Anterior chamber depth, Lens Thickness (LT), axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), choroid thickness (CT) and other parameters were similar in each group. However, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) of OS (-1.47 ± 3.61 diopters, Female; -1.62 ± 3.68 diopters, Male) were higher than OD (-0.55 ± 3.63 diopters, Female; -0.81 ± 3.51 diopters, Male). As for the mean Average RNFL thickness. The results were similar except for the nasal quadrants, in the nasal quadrant, the mean value of male monkeys (77.43 ± 34.93 OD; 78.76 ± 40.29, OS) was significantly higher than that of female (58.07 ± 12.65, OD; 78.76 ± 40.29, OS). In Table 2, according to comparison of female’s OD and OS, IOP 2nd,3rd, IOP, SE, corneal radius of curvature, ACD, AXL, CCT, average RNFL thickness have statistical significance. Male have similar trend expect SE, ACD, with LT and RNFL thickness have statistical significance. Comparing the females and males, IOP, corneal radius of curvature, ACD, LT, AXL, CT, RNFL thickness have statistical significance. Furthermore, we have compared several age-related ocular parameters of different age groups in supplementary table 2. The results of normality test are showed in supplementary table 3 and supplementary table 4. We meanwhile presented the photos from a healthy female monkey aged 19, including colorful fundus photos and OCT (both anterior and posterior segments) in Fig. 3.

Table 2 Ocular parameters of the included subjects in the non-human primate eye study
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The photos of a health female monkey aged 19, including silt-limp photos (A), colorful fundus photos (B), anterior segment OCT photos (C) and posterior segments OCT photos (D)

Full size image

Discussion

Currently, we reported the rationale, methodology, and demographic characteristics data of systematic and ocular parameters in a NHP colony. The NHPES is a unique and high-quality study, to our knowledge, this is the first large macaque monkey cohort study focusing on ocular assessment along with comprehensive evaluation, to provide the normal range of ophthalmic measurements in NHP, to identify and describe the characteristic of the sponstaneous ocular disease NHP models.

In the long process of animal testing and the development of new drugs, monkeys play an indispensable role. Compared with rodents, primates have much similar biology to humans and are often modeled as monkeys with human diseases. However, laboratory monkeys are more demanding in terms of environment, space and climate, with more expensive price. On the choice of experimental monkey field, we gathered about Guangzhou HuaZhen biological (HZ-Bio) technology company, Beijing Zhongkelingrui biological technology company, Guangxi Weisen primate experimental animal breeding development company, and Shanghai Medicilon biological pharmaceutical company, as shown in Fig. 1. Considering that the growth environment of the monkey group is mainly in the southeast coastal area with warm climate, meanwhile our research needs a relatively large number of experimental monkeys, finally we chose Guangzhou HZ-Bio. There are several advantages, firstly, HZ-Bio located in the south of China, with the coastal area between 22°26 '– 23°56' north latitude and 112°57 '– 114°03' East longitude. It has a subtropical monsoon climate, warmer and rainy, and has rich vegetation, which is more suitable for the living habits of monkeys. Secondly, Hz-bio has the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) accredited facility with over 32,000 quality rhesus monkeys (crabeater monkeys). Monkey cages are much more numerous, with more than 500 single cages and 20 group cages, as well as fully equipped LABS and surgical rooms. Thirdly, Hz-bio is dedicated to NHP research and has more than 20 years of experience in providing quality NHP animal models. Furthermore, Hz-bio is an expert in animal medicine and care.

Compared with the data of healthy monkey eyes in previous studies (Table 3), the difference in intraocular pressure is not significant. While lens thickness and AL are smaller, compared with the results of Kira H. Lin et al. [26]. For the Average RNFL thickness, our results were significantly higher than those of Corinne Maurice et al. [27], which may be due to their use of postmortem monkey eyes. Compared with the study with larger sample sizes, the RNFL thickness of monkeys was similar to that of normal adults in the Superior, Inferior, and Temporal quadrants, but the Nasal RNFL thickness of female monkeys was thinner (Alasil et al. 75.0 ± 14.0; Zangalli et al. 86.0 ± 13.8; Appukuttan et al. 79.7 ± 12.1;) [28,29,30]. It may be related to the thinning only in the nasal region (the thinnest RNFL region) obtained in the study on the influence of IOP on RNFL mentioned by Jordan Dwell et al. [31].

Table 3 Ocular parameters in previous non-human primate eye studies
Full size table

After comparing several population-based studies with our data, we found a similar prevalence of several eye diseases, including glaucoma, cataracts, AMD, and pterygium (Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, we found that the high prevalence of myopia in monkeys is higher than in humans, which may be caused by these factors. Firstly, nearly 10 monkeys were fed in a small room less than 5 m in length and width. Therefore, the monkeys had been looking at short-distance things essential for developing myopia. In addition, due to the monkeys' need for warmth, the ceiling had only one small window in the feeding room. As a result, most monkeys failed to receive full sunlight, which might be another cause of high myopia.

Our study have several advantages. The major strength of NHPES was including large sample size, with comprehensive ocular examinations, which provide the normative profile of ophthalmic parameters in cynomolgus monkey for assessing subtle changes in retinal anatomy in this species. Moreover, the captivity NHPs are considered to be good model animals for disease research since they grow up in a simplified environment. Furthermore, we used advanced instruments for measurement, such as multi-colour OCT and nonmydriatic colour fundus photography.

There are still several limitations to the NHPES study. Firstly, the selecting bias may exist for most including subjects were middle-to-old aged monkeys with a small age span, making it difficult to observe and interpret age-related changes in ophthalmic characteristics. Meanwhile, due to the objective facts of the monkey factory, there are still some deficiencies in sex and distribution. However, a young group study is planned for next year. Secondly, some of the data may be missing due to the large number of examination items in NHPES, which may leading to information biases due to data completeness. Thirdly, it was difficult to avoid the limitations of cross-sectional studies, such as the inability to establish a causal relationship. However, a follow-up study is being drafted and scheduled to be carried out in one years later.

Generally, we reported the detailed ocular features of a macaque monkeys colony under carefully ophthalmic examination. In the further study, we will dress out the normal value database in NHP for providing the reference when ocular disease model was built up. The salient characteristics of classic ocular disease will also be displayed. Overall, the data from the NHPES will give us unprecedented opportunity to insight the natural development and pathogenesis of ocular disease.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Burton MJ, Ramke J, Marques AP, et al. The lancet global health commission on global eye health: vision beyond 2020. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(4):e489–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li JQ, Welchowski T, Schmid M, et al. Prevalence, incidence and future projection of diabetic eye disease in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(1):11–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Colijn JM, Buitendijk GHS, Prokofyeva E, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: the past and the future. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):1753–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, et al. Glaucoma Lancet. 2017;390(10108):2183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CM, Afshari NA. The global state of cataract blindness. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28(1):98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrison JC, Johnson E, Cepurna WO. Rat models for glaucoma research. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)01121-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yun H, Lathrop KL, Yang E, et al. A laser-induced mouse model with long-term intraocular pressure elevation. PlosOne. 2014;9: e107446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Troilo D, Smith EL 3rd, Nickla DL, et al. IMI - report on experimental models of Emmetropization and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M31–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Picaud S, Dalkara D, Marazova K, et al. The primate model for understanding and restoring vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(52):26280–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902292116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan G, Zhang G, Fang X, et al. Genome sequencing and comparison of two nonhuman primate animal models, the cynomolgus and Chinese rhesus macaques. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(11):1019–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1992. PMID: 22002653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burgoyne CF. The non-human primate experimental glaucoma model. Exp Eye Res. 2015;141:57–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi KE, Anh VTQ, Yun C, et al. Normative data of ocular biometry, optical coherence tomography, and electrophysiology conducted for Cynomolgus macaque monkeys. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(13):14. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.13.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pasquale LR, Gong L, Wiggs JL, et al. Development of primary open angle glaucoma-like features in a rhesus macaque colony From Southern China. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(9):20. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang FH, Liang YB, Zhang F, Wang JJ, Wei WB, Tao QS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in rural China: the Handan eye study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3):461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delcourt C, Le Goff M, von Hanno T, et al. The decreasing prevalence of nonrefractive visual impairment in older Europeans: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(8):1149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonas JB, Cheung CMG, Panda-Jonas S. Updates on the epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6(6):493–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Song P, Wang H, Theodoratou E, Chan KY, Rudan I. The national and subnational prevalence of cataract and cataract blindness in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8(1): 010804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(4):626–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The beaver dam eye study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(6):933–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs–an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5Suppl):786–806.

  25. Jonas JB, Xu L. Optic disc morphology in eyes after nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(7):2260–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin KH, Tran T, Kim S, et al. Advanced retinal imaging and ocular parameters of the rhesus macaque eye. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(6):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maurice C, Friedman Y, Cohen MJ, et al. Histologic RNFL thickness in glaucomatous versus normal human eyes. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(5):447–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alasil T, Wang K, Keane PA, et al. Analysis of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by age, sex, and race using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):532–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zangalli CES, Reis ASC, Vianna JR, Vasconcellos JPC, Costa VP. Interocular asymmetry of minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in healthy Brazilian individuals. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(12):1136–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Appukuttan B, Giridhar A, Gopalakrishnan M, Sivaprasad S. Normative spectral domain optical coherence tomography data on macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in Indians. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(3):316–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dwelle J, Liu S, Wang B, et al. Thickness, phase retardation, birefringence, and reflectance of the retinal nerve fiber layer in normal and glaucomatous non-human primates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(8):4380–95. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-9130. Published 1 Jul 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Duan XR, Liang YB, Wang NL, et al. Prevalence and associations of cataract in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:203–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:106–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of pterygium and pinguecula: the Tehran eye study. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:1125–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pasquale LR, Gong L, Wiggs JL, et al. Development of primary open angle glaucoma-like features in a rhesus macaque colony from Southern China. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(9):20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Y, Toris CB, Liu Y, Ye W, Gong H. Morphological and hydrodynamic correlates in monkey eyes with laser induced glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89(5):748–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ollivier FJ, Brooks DE, Komaromy AM, et al. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measured by non-contact specular microscopy and pachymetry in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76(6):671–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hashemi H, Yekta A, Khodamoradi F, et al. Anterior chamber indices in a population-based study using the Pentacam. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(9):2033–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1037-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yin G, Wang YX, Zheng ZY, et al. Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: the Beijing Eye Study. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, et al. Corneal thickness in a population-based, cross-sectional study: the Tehran Eye Study. Cornea. 2009;28(4):395–400. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31818c4d62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Song Y, Tham YC, Chong C, et al. Patterns and determinants of choroidal thickness in a multiethnic Asian population: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(5):458–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hashemi H, Pakzad R, Iribarren R, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, Fotouhi A. Lens power in Iranian schoolchildren: a population-based study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(6):779–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nousome D, Mckean-Cowdin R, Richter GM, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in healthy eyes of black, Chinese, and Latino Americans: a population-based multiethnic study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(7):1005–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Duan XR, Liang YB, Friedman DS, et al. Normal macular thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes of adult Chinese persons: the Handan eye study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(8):1585–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liang YB, Friedman DS, Zhou Q, et al. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in a rural adult Chinese population: the Handan eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2005. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Project of China (2020YFA0112701), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171057), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China(202206080005) , and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (GZR-2012–009). We thank Rongsheng Liao, Xiaorong Wu, Jingming Hu, Ziming Liao, Jiahe Song, Xuehui Shi, M.D., Ph.D. for helping in the collection of monkey tissues, experimental advice.

Funding

The study was funded by Beijing Municipal of Health Reform and Development Project, #2019–4 (Beijing, China), Capital Health Research and Development of Special (2020–2-1081), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (JQ20029), National Key R&D Project of China (2020YFA0112701), Beijing Talents Found (2016000021223ZK28), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071000).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jian Wu and Wei Liu contributed equally as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China

    Jian Wu, Hongyi Liu, Lijie Pan, Ruyue Li, Caixia Lin, Jiaxin Tian & Ningli Wang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China

    Jian Wu, Kezhe Chen, Yingting Zhu, Zhidong Li, Wenru Su & Yehong Zhuo

  3. School of Food Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, China

    Wei Liu & Jiaoyan Ren

  4. Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China

    Sirui Zhu

  5. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China

    Chenlong Yang

  6. Guangzhou Huazhen Biosciences, Guangzhou, 510900, China

    Liangzhi Xu, Hanxiang Yu, Fagao Luo & Zhiwei Huang

Authors
  1. Jian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sirui Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongyi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kezhe Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yingting Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhidong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chenlong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lijie Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ruyue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Caixia Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jiaxin Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jiaoyan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Liangzhi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Hanxiang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Fagao Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Zhiwei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Wenru Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Ningli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Yehong Zhuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Contributors JW and LW completed the design, data collection, data analysis and manuscript writing of this study. They contributed equally as co-first authors. Sirui Zhu, Hongyi Liu, Kezhe Chen and Yingting Zhu participated in the data collection and method design of this study, Zhidong Li, Chenlong Yang, Lijie Pan, and Ruyue Li participated in the research design and statistical analysis of this study, Caixia Lin, Jiaxin Tian, and Jiaoyan Ren participated in the statistical analysis of this study and the grammar modification of the manuscript, Liangzhi Xu, Hanxiang Yu, Fagao Luo and Zhiwei Huang participated in the design of the statistical method of this study, Wenru Su and Yehong Zhuo participated in the later revision of this study. NW was the corresponding author of this study, is responsible for the overall content as guarantor, accepts full responsibility for the finished work and the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ningli Wang or Yehong Zhuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study complied with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and the guidelines of the Association for Research of Vision and Ophthalmology for the Use of Animal in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Guangzhou Huazhen Biosciences Company (Ethics Number: 2020–168) and Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Permit Number: SYXK (YUE) 2018–0189). All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines for the reporting of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Supplementary Table 1. The prevalence of ocular diseases in NHPES [7, 13, 32,33,34]. Supplementary Table 2. The result of ocular parameters for gender in different age groups [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Supplementary Table 3. The ocular parameters of normality test in OD. Supplementary Table 4. The ocular parameters of normality test in OS. Supplementary Fig. 1. The flow chart of NHPES exclusion criteria and quality control (QC) process.

Additional file 2: Appendix.

 The non-human primates (NHP) eye study team.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Liu, W., Zhu, S. et al. Design, methodology, and preliminary results of the non-human primates eye study. BMC Ophthalmol 23, 53 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02796-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02796-6

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us