Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of atropine and tropicamide on ocular biological parameters in children: a prospective observational study

BMC Ophthalmology volume 23, Article number: 96 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of cycloplegia in delaying the progression of myopia and its application in refractive examination in children have been extensively studied, but there are still few studies on the effects of atropine/tropicamide on ocular biological parameters. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of atropine/tropicamide on children's ocular biological parameters in different age groups and the differences between them.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study in which all school children were examined for dioptres and ocular biological parameters in the outpatient clinic, and 1% atropine or tropicamide was used for treatment. After examination, we enrolled the patients grouped by age (age from 2 to 12 years treated by atropine, 55 cases; age from 2 to 10 years treated by tropicamide, 70 cases; age from 14 to 17 years treated by tropicamide, 70 cases). The ocular biological parameters of each patient before and after cycloplegia were measured, and the difference and its absolute value were calculated for statistical analysis using an independent-samples t test.

Results

We compared the value and the absolute value of the differences in ocular biological parameters before and after cycloplegia in the same age group, and we found that the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the corresponding values of AL, K1 and ACD among the different age groups (P < 0.05). Before cycloplegia, there were significant differences in AL, K, K1, K2 and ACD in different age groups (P < 0.05). However, the differences in AL, K, K1, K2 and ACD among different age groups disappeared after cycloplegia (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that atropine/tropicamide have different effects on cycloplegia in children of different ages. The effects of atropine/tropicamide on ocular biological parameters should be fully considered when evaluating the refractive state before refractive surgery or mydriasis optometry for children of different ages.

Highlights

1. Cycloplegic drugs have effects on the ocular biological parameters of children at different ages.

2. The effects of different types of cycloplegic drugs were almost the same in children within the same age groups.

3. There were significant differences in the effects of different types of cycloplegic drugs on ocular biological parameters in children of different age groups.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Myopia is caused by a late elongation of the eyeball, which can cause light the focus only in front of the retina, not on it. The incidence of myopia in East Asian countries has risen rapidly in the past 50 years [1]. Myopia seriously threatens people's physical and mental health and even leads to blindness, especially in cases of high myopia. The prevalence of myopia worldwide is almost 2 billion people, accounting for approximately 28.3% of myopia cases [2]. Simultaneously, approximately 277 million people have high myopia, approximately 4.0% of the worldwide population [2]. The incidence of myopia and high myopia worldwide is also increasing yearly [2, 3]. Refraction error is the primary cause of vision loss in children and adolescents, and the prevention and treatment of myopia are facing serious challenges in China [4,5,6]. On all accounts, the accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of myopia is increasingly important.

Mydriasis optometry with ciliary paralysis is the most commonly used method to detect refractive dioptres in children [7,8,9]. The ciliary paralysis reagents mainly used in China are atropine as a long-acting agent and tropicamide as a short-acting agent. However, previous studies have shown that cycloplegia has a certain impact on ocular biological parameters, especially in children, including refractive state [10,11,12,13], axial length (AL) [11, 13,14,15,16], corneal curvature, axial position of corneal astigmatism, central corneal thickness (CCT) [10, 15,16,17,18,19], anterior chamber depth (ACD) [11, 13, 15,16,17, 20,21,22,23,24,25], anterior chamber volume (ACV) [17, 22], and white-to-white (WTW) distance [16, 23] of the participants. These effects will change the refractive state and ocular biological parameters of patients, which will further affect the accuracy of preoperative measurement of corneal refractive surgery. With the increasing number of myopic patients and the stringent requirements for visual quality after surgery, an increasing number of children need to undergo orthokeratology, which highlights the importance of the accurate evaluation of preoperative optometry [26,27,28,29,30,31]. The main purpose of this study was to explore the differences in the effects of the two drugs on biological parameters to provide a more reliable reference for the results of optometry before keratoplasty or atropine application. The application of low-concentration atropine worldwide to control myopia in children and the exploration of the best concentration make the study of the influence of drugs on biological parameters more important.

Atropine and tropicamide have different effects on ocular biological parameters due to their different pharmacological characteristics. At present, there is no research on which cycloplegic can be used for optometry at different ages to minimize the impact on ocular biological parameters and no research on the differences in the effects on ocular biological parameters between the two drugs. In this study, a prospective observation method was used to compare and draw relevant conclusions among patients of the same age groups and different age groups who used atropine or tropicamide. Ocular biological parameters were obtained before and after the application of atropine/tropicamide in these school children.

Methods

Study participants

We enrolled 195 patients with refractive error in this prospective observational study, and only the right eye of each patient was included. The implementation of this study followed the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was also approved by the ethics committee of the First People's Hospital of Jiujiang City in China. Furthermore, written informed consent was obtained from each participant and their legal guardian at the time of study enrolment. We divided all patients into three groups. The first group was treated by atropine and included 55 children aged 2–12 years (mean age, 5.38 ± 2.44 years), the second group was treated by tropicamide and included 70 children aged 2–10 years (mean age, 5.59 ± 2.45 years), and the third group was also treated by tropicamide and included 70 children aged 14–17 years (mean age, 15.27 ± 1.01 years). We compared the changes in the ophthalmic biological parameters before and after cycloplegia and evaluated the effects of the application of the two types of ciliary muscle paralysis agents. All children were recruited from the outpatient clinic, including 91 males and 104 females. Those who conformed to the following criteria were included in this study: age-appropriate patients with no eye diseases found after systematic eye examination (vision, FSLB, fundus examination, etc.). The exclusion criteria were as follows: suffering or having a history of eye diseases; suffering from chronic diseases such as asthma and heart disease; and wearing corneal contact lenses in the past month. Systematic ophthalmological examination was administered to the children, including ocular anterior segment examination, eye vision, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), functional slit lamp biomicroscopy (FSLB), intraocular pressure (IOP) and fundus examination, which were performed by an ophthalmologist to rule out organic ophthalmopathy.

Ocular examinations

Ocular examination was performed in the hospital after patients were screened for abnormal vision when they were at school. Ocular biological parameters were measured before and after cycloplegia with a noncontact apparatus (AL-Scan, NIDEK CO., LTD., Aichi Prefecture, Japan). We asked the patients to stare at the detection beam during the measurement. Both eyes were measured each time, but only the right eye was included because of the high correlation between right and left eyes of the same individual [4]. We measured the mean keratometry (K), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), axis, CCT, ACD and WTW of each patient only once, whereas 5 measurements of AL were generated automatically and averaged. The system software automatically calculated the values of CCT and ACD through image analysis. ACD was defined as the distance from the anterior corneal pole to the anterior lens surface. Computer optometry was performed on the patients before and after cycloplegia using a desktop autorefractor (RM8900; Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan); measurements were repeated 3 times in each eye, and the average value was recorded. All data were artificially extracted from the device and filled in a spreadsheet file. We assigned a unique identification number for each patient throughout the study.

Fifty-five children aged 2 to 12 years old were administered 1% atropine sulfate eye gel to induce cycloplegia 3 times a day, and their eyes were treated for 3 consecutive days. After 3 days, they were revisited, and optometry was performed. Seventy age-matched children from 2 to 10 years were treated with tropicamide phenylephrine eye drops (Mydrin-P). Another 70 age-unmatched children from 14 to 17 years were also treated with Mydrin-P. The tropicamide drop was administered 4 times in one day every 5 min. We evaluated cycloplegia and pupil dilation in the patients after an additional 20 min. Cycloplegia was considered complete when the pupil was dilated to at least 6 mm and a pupillary light reflex was absent [4, 32]. Ultimately, we evaluated the indicators AL, K, K1, K2, axis, CCT, ACD and WTW.

Statistical analysis

We compared the atropine group with the age-matched tropicamide group and the atropine group with the age-unmatched tropicamide group. All continuous data we gained from the research were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (x̅ ± s). The Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test was performed to detect the normality of the data. One-way ANOVA was used for the homogeneity test of variances. The independent-samples t test was used for statistical analysis between the independent groups when the continuous data were normally distributed. The constituent ratios of counting data (for example, gender) were analysed by χ2 test. Two-tailed P values were used in all analyses. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference was calculated for the comparison of different independent samples. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

In this study, we compared the effects of atropine and tropicamide on ocular biological parameters in the same age groups, which were defined as under 13 years old treated with atropine and under 13 years old treated with tropicamide (P > 0.05 for age statistical analysis), and in the different age groups, which were defined as under 13 years old treated with atropine and over 13 years old treated with tropicamide (P < 0.05 for age statistical analysis) (Table 1). Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the atropine group, and 70 patients were enrolled in each of the tropicamide groups. There was no significant difference in sex among the three groups (P > 0.05) (Table 1). We calculated the differences in ocular biological parameters after ciliary paralysis, that is, the value after cycloplegia minus the value before cycloplegia, and recorded the absolute value of the difference between the two measurements. The difference reflects the overall trend of these parameters, and increases and decreases may cancel each other out. The absolute value reflects the absolute trend, and increases or decreases in parameters were regarded as the same trend. The differences and absolute values of ocular biological parameters were all compared in the same age groups and different age groups. In this study, the biometric parameters of the eyes of patients were as follows: AL, K, K1, K2, axis, CCT, ACD and WTW.

Table 1 The distribution of cases, gender, and age of the three different groups
Full size table

We found that there were no significant differences in the value of each parameter before and after atropine/tropicamide treatment within the same age group (P > 0.05) (Table 2). However, the differences in AL and ACD after the application of atropine/tropicamide in different age groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) (Table 2). AL and ACD increased in patients under 13 years of age treated with atropine (mean ± standard deviation, 1.71 ± 2.38 and 0.42 ± 0.42, respectively), and they decreased in patients over 13 years of age treated with tropicamide (mean ± SD, -1.47 ± 2.13 and -0.01 ± 0.34, respectively) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of the differences in ocular biological parameters before and after atropine/tropicamide in the same age groups and different age groups
Full size table

We found the same trend in the absolute difference value of each parameter in the different age groups compared to the same age groups post-cycloplegia (P > 0.05) (Table 3). The absolute values of K1 and ACD were statistically significant after cycloplegia in the two groups (P < 0.05) (Table 3). The study showed that K1 and ACD increased after treatment with atropine/tropicamide in the different age groups (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of the absolute value of the difference in ocular biological parameters before and after atropine/tropicamide in the same age groups and different age groups
Full size table

There were no significant differences in the ophthalmic biological parameters before atropine/tropicamide treatment in the same age groups (P > 0.05) (Table 4). The parameters AL, K, K1, K2 and ACD in the different age groups were statistically significant before atropine/tropicamide (P < 0.05) (Table 4). When these children were treated with atropine/tropicamide, there were no significant differences in any of the ocular biological parameters, whether in the same age groups or in different age groups (P > 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 4 Comparison of the ocular biological parameters before atropine/tropicamide in the same age groups and different age groups
Full size table
Table 5 Comparison of the ocular biological parameters after atropine/tropicamide in the same age groups and different age groups
Full size table

Discussion

Ciliary paralysis agents are increasingly widely used in ophthalmology. They were mainly used for dioptre examination in the past, but currently, they can be used to delay the development of myopia in children [33,34,35]. There are three main kinds of ciliary muscle paralysis agents used in the clinic: atropine, tropicamide and cyclopentolate [8]. Current research is mainly focused on the control of myopia in children with low concentrations of atropine [36]. Wei S et al. [37] conducted a study on the effect of low-concentration atropine in delaying myopia and eye axis prolongation in children. They enrolled 220 children aged 6 to 12 years with myopia of − 1.00 D to − 6.00 D in both eyes; designed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked study; measured the parameters at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months; and grouped patients in a 1:1 ratio to 0.01% atropine or placebo. Wei S et al. [37] found that the difference in myopia progression was statistically significant at 0.26 D (95% CI, 0.12–0.41; P < 0.001) over 1 year, with mean myopia progression of − 0.49 (0.42) D and − 0.76 (0.50) D in the 0.01% atropine and placebo groups, respectively. They also found a relative decrease of 34.2% in myopia headway, and the axial elongation was reduced by 22.0%. However, these changes over 1 year were slight and were limited by approximately 70% follow-up. Saxena R et al. [35] also carried out a multicentric, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, followed up for one year, and reported that myopia progression emerged with the application of 0.01% atropine drops in Indian children, but the axial length elongation had no significant difference. Wei S et al. [37] reported no serious adverse events related to atropine among the children. The above studies show that the effect of cycloplegic agents, especially atropine, on myopia is clear, but the difference in the effects of atropine and tropicamide on ocular biological parameters is still unclear. A recent study by Li FF [38] detected the effects of different concentrations of atropine (0.05%, 0.025% and 0.01%) on ocular biological parameters when controlling the progression of myopia compared to placebo over one year. They measured the ocular biometric parameters of cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER), AL, corneal curvature, and ACD by IOL Master; calculated corneal astigmatism and lens power; and evaluated their associations with the changes in SER. Ultimately, they found that the changes in AL were statistically significant with a concentration-dependent response over one year (p < 0.001), the corneal power remained stable (p = 0.10), and lens power and ACD were similar across all concentrations (p = 0.24 and 0.41, respectively) [38]. They concluded that different low concentrations of atropine had no significant influence on corneal power and lens power in clinical practice, and its main efficacy in reducing the risk of myopia complications was to reduce AL elongation [38].

Through the above studies, we know that the continuous application of low concentrations of atropine will delay the prolongation of AL and control myopia. In this study, we examined the effects of high concentrations of atropine (1%) and tropicamide on ocular biological parameters in children and calculated the changes in parameters before and after cycloplegia (difference: postcycloplegia minus precycloplegia; absolute value of difference: |postcycloplegia minus precycloplegia|). In previous studies, some scholars had confirmed that cycloplegia in children could lead to changes in AL, K, CCT and ACD, among which studies on ACD increased observably [7, 11, 13,14,15,16, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Similar conclusions were obtained in our study; the ocular biological parameters changed (increased or decreased) to varying degrees after cycloplegia. Most of the previous studies were in response to changes in AL, CCT and ACD. Our study showed that the differences in AL and ACD were significantly different between the atropine group aged 2–12 years and the tropicamide group aged 14–17 years (P < 0.05). The absolute value of the difference between the two groups was significant in K1 and ACD (P < 0.05). However, in the comparison of the same age groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the changes caused by atropine or tropicamide. The situation changed when we switched our attention to a separate comparison of the parameters before and after cycloplegia. Before cycloplegia, there were no significant differences in ocular biological parameters in the same age groups (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences in AL, K, K1, K2 and ACD between different age groups (P < 0.05). After cycloplegia, the differences in AL, K, K1, K2 and ACD among different age groups disappeared (P > 0.05). This is due to the different intensity and duration of atropine and tropicamide on the ciliary nerve, and there are significant differences in the response of children of different ages to these two kinds of ciliary paralysis agents. Therefore, the difference before cycloplegia was offset by the application of cycloplegia.

In this study, we included a certain number of patients and divided them into different age groups. We have obtained some scientific results that are different from those of our predecessors. The conclusions we obtained have definite reference value. A limitation of our study was that a group using atropine in older children was not included because atropine is rarely used for mydriasis in these individuals, which remains to be further discussed.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that atropine and tropicamide have different effects on cycloplegia in children of different ages. Atropine is recommended for mydriasis optometry in young children due to its stronger effect on ciliary paralysis. The effects of these two drugs on children's ocular biological parameters are also different, and both will lead to different changes in the parameters. The effects of atropine/tropicamide on ocular biological parameters should be fully considered when evaluating the refractive state before refractive surgery or calculating the degree of intraocular lens before cataract surgery. In view of the significance of this study, we hope to include more patients of other ages for further study in the future.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. All data are available upon request; please contact Yulin Tao and Jun Ouyang to request the data.

References

  1. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015;519(7543):276–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird PN, Saw SM, Lanca C, Guggenheim JA, Smith Iii EL, Zhou X, Matsui KO, Wu PC, Sankaridurg P, Chia A, et al. Myopia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo X, Fu M, Ding X, Morgan IG, Zeng Y, He M. Significant Axial Elongation with Minimal Change in Refraction in 3- to 6-Year-Old Chinese Preschoolers: The Shenzhen Kindergarten Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):1826–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li T, Jiang B, Zhou X. Axial length elongation in primary school-age children: a 3-year cohort study in Shanghai. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e029896.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang SK, Guo Y, Liao C, Chen Y, Su G, Zhang G, Zhang L, He M. Incidence of and Factors Associated With Myopia and High Myopia in Chinese Children, Based on Refraction Without Cycloplegia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(9):1017–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye L, Li S, Shi Y, Yin Y, He J, Zhu J, Xu X. Comparisons of atropine versus cyclopentolate cycloplegia in myopic children. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;104(2):143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Major E, Dutson T, Moshirfar M. Cycloplegia in Children: An Optometrist’s Perspective. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020;12:129–33.

  9. Li T, Zhou X, Zhu J, Tang X, Gu X. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(2):160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagheri A, Feizi M, Shafii A, Faramarzi A, Tavakoli M, Yazdani S. Effect of Cycloplegia on Corneal Biometrics and Refractive State. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018;13(2):101–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng HC, Hsieh YT. Short-term refractive change and ocular parameter changes after cycloplegia. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(9):1113–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hiraoka T, Miyata K, Nakamura Y, Miyai T, Ogata M, Okamoto F, Oshika T. Influences of cycloplegia with topical atropine on ocular higher-order aberrations. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho MC, Hsieh YT, Shen EP, Hsu WC, Cheng HC. Short-term refractive and ocular parameter changes after topical atropine. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020;10(2):111–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bahar A, Pekel G. The effects of pharmacological accommodation and cycloplegia on axial length and choroidal thickness. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021;84(2):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raina UK, Gupta SK, Gupta A, Goray A, Saini V. Effect of Cycloplegia on Optical Biometry in Pediatric Eyes. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(4):260–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuncer I, Zengin MO, Yildiz S. The effect of cycloplegia on the ocular biometry and intraocular lens power based on age. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(2):676–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palamar M, Egrilmez S, Uretmen O, Yagci A, Kose S. Influences of cyclopentolate hydrochloride on anterior segment parameters with Pentacam in children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(5):e461-465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao L, Fan H, Cheng AC, Wang Z, Lam DS. The effects of eye drops on corneal thickness in adult myopia. Cornea. 2006;25(4):404–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng Y, Gao JH. Effects of Mydrin eye-drops on central corneal thickness values in adult patients with myopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(2):151–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodriguez-Raton A, Jimenez-Alvarez M, Arteche-Limousin L, Mediavilla-Pena E, Larrucea-Martinez I. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25(4):309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saitoh K, Yoshida K, Hamatsu Y, Tazawa Y. Changes in the shape of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces caused by mydriasis and miosis: detailed analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(5):1024–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Momeni-Moghaddam H, Maddah N, Wolffsohn JS, Etezad-Razavi M, Zarei-Ghanavati S, AkhavanRezayat A, Moshirfar M. The Effect of Cycloplegia on the Ocular Biometric and Anterior Segment Parameters: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(3):387–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang J, McAlinden C, Su B, Pesudovs K, Feng Y, Hua Y, Yang F, Pan C, Zhou H, Wang Q. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(12):1691–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Polat N, Gunduz A. Effect of Cycloplegia on Keratometric and Biometric Parameters in Keratoconus. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:3437125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang SW, Lo AY, Su PF. Anterior Segment Biometry Changes with Cycloplegia in Myopic Adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(1):12–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho P, Tan Q. Myopia and orthokeratology for myopia control. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(4):364–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bullimore MA, Johnson LA. Overnight orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(4):322–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vincent SJ, Cho P, Chan KY, Fadel D, Ghorbani-Mojarrad N, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Johnson L, Kang P, Michaud L, Simard P, et al. CLEAR - Orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(2):240–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Toda I. Dry Eye After LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(14):DES109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson S. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003;18(1):2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mimouni M, Pokroy R, Rabina G, Kaiserman I. LASIK versus PRK for high astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(6):2091–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Negrel AD, Maul E, Pokharel GP, Zhao J, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(4):421–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Repka MX. Myopia Control With Low-Dose Atropine Eyedrops. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(11):1185–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sankaridurg P, Tran HDM. The Lowdown on Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(1):125–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saxena R, Dhiman R, Gupta V, Kumar P, Matalia J, Roy L, Swaminathan M, Phuljhele S, Velpandian T, Sharma N. Atropine for the Treatment of Childhood Myopia in India: Multicentric Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(9):1367–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bullimore MA, Berntsen DA. Low-Dose Atropine for Myopia Control: Considering All the Data. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(3):303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei S, Li SM, An W, Du J, Liang X, Sun Y, Zhang D, Tian J, Wang N. Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Atropine Eyedrops for the Treatment of Myopia Progression in Chinese Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(11):1178–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li FF, Kam KW, Zhang Y, Tang SM, Young AL, Chen LJ, Tham CC, Pang CP, Yam JC. Differential Effects on Ocular Biometrics by 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% Atropine: Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression Study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(12):1603–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the donors enrolled in the present study.

Funding

This work was supported by the General Project of the Key R & D Program of the Department of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province (No. 005062833097), the Science and Technology Plan Project of the Health Commission of Jiangxi Province (No. 202140286), and the Science and Technology Program of Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Jiangxi Province (No. 2021A151).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yulin Tao, Mohan Li and Jian Tan contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Jiujiang No 1 Peoples Hospital, Affiliated Jiujiang Hospital of Nanchang University, 48 South Taling Road, Jiujiang, 332000, Jiangxi, China

    Yulin Tao, Xiaokang Cheng, Ping Xie, Xiansheng Liu & Jun Ouyang

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi Center of National Ocular Disease Clinical Research Center, 17 Yongwai Main Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China

    Yulin Tao, Jian Tan, Jing Huang & Qiong Zhou

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No.678 Furong Road, Economic Development Zone, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China

    Mohan Li

Authors
  1. Yulin Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaokang Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiansheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jun Ouyang conceived of this study and obtained financial support. Jun Ouyang, Qiong Zhou, Yulin Tao and Mohan Li contributed to the study design. Jian Tan, Jing Huang, Ping Xie and Xiansheng Liu conducted material preparation and sample selection. Mohan Li and Xiaokang Cheng executed data analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yulin Tao, and all authors gave input for revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiong Zhou or Jun Ouyang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The implementation of this study followed the Declaration of Helsinki. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Jiujiang No 1 Peoples Hospital (Affiliated Jiujiang Hospital of Nanchang University) in China, approval number JJSDYRMYY-YXLL-2022–243. Written informed consent for study participation was obtained from a parent or legal guardian of the participants in this study at the time of study enrolment. Their parent or legal guardian has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, Y., Li, M., Tan, J. et al. Effects of atropine and tropicamide on ocular biological parameters in children: a prospective observational study. BMC Ophthalmol 23, 96 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02840-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02840-5

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us