Table 1 Comparative studies showing the technical failure rate for three different optical biometry technologies in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery

Srivannaboon et al. 2015 [24]

100/100

5

(IOLMaster 500)

0

(IOLMaster 700)

Shammas et al. 2016 [32]

107/66

13

(IOLMaster 500)

14

(Lenstar LS900)

2

(Argos)

Kurian et al. 2016 [33]

100/100

21

(Lenstar LS900)

4

(IOLMaster 700)

Akman et al. 2016 [34]

188/101

17

(IOLMaster 500)

0

(IOLMaster 700)

McAlinden et al. 2016 [13]

377/210

136

(IOLMaster 500)

51

(Aladdin)

0

(OA-2000)

Jung et al. 2017 [35]

101/54

7

(Galilei G6)

1

(IOLMaster 700)

Arriola-Villalobos et al. 2017 [36]

80/80

8

(Lenstar LS900)

0

(IOLMaster 700)

Higashiyama et al. 2018 [37]

55/55

7

(IOLMaster 500)

1

(Argos)

Lee and Kim 2018 [38]

175/175

25

(IOLMaster 500)

2

(IOLMaster 700)

An et al. 2019 [39]

431/431

66

(IOLMaster 500)

10

(Argos)

Huang et al. 2019 [40]

171/119

33

(IOLMaster 500)

1

(Argos)

5

(IOLMaster 700)

5

(OA-2000)

Yang et al. 2019 [41]

146/83

17

(IOLMaster 500)

3

(Argos)

3

(IOLMaster 700)

El Chebab et al. 2019 [42]

129/129

1

(Lenstar LS900)

1

(IOLMaster 700)

Cummings et al. 2020 [31]

299/NA

4

(Lenstar LS900)

0

(Argos)