- Matters Arising
- Open access
- Published:
Comments on “Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis”
BMC Ophthalmology volume 23, Article number: 272 (2023)
Dear Editor:
We read with interest the article “Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea‑sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis” by Zheng et al. [1]. In this article, the authors compared two different surgical techniques for treating myopic foveoschisis, and found that fovea‑sparing ILM peeling, either with or without inverted flap, resulted in similar anatomical and visual outcomes. These results are consistent with our previous study [2]. However, in our study, we found a significantly lower incidence of post-operative macular hole formation in the subgroup of myopic tractional maculopathy (MTM) with lamellar macular hole (LMH) in the combined fovea-sparing ILM peeling and inverted ILM flap group [2]. In Zheng et al’s article, the authors found that in each group, there was one case of MH after surgery as shown in Fig. 31. From the OCT images presented, the case in the inverted ILM flap group had MTM with lamellar macular hole (LMH); after surgery, the OCT images shows a flap closure configuration, instead of a true MH. This pattern is precisely what we would like to achieve with the addition of inverted ILM flap. Bonińska et al. [3] has reported that for flap closure image pattern, the gap usually closed eventually without further intervention. We also have presented the sequential OCT images showing such flap closure pattern in the combined fovea-sparing ILM peeling and inverted ILM flap group in a case of LMH in our previous study [4]. This post-operative OCT configuration highlights the possibility of MH formation after surgery and the advantage of inverted ILM flap in preventing a true MH formation in MTM with LMH. We also believe it may prevent MH formation after surgery in MTM with thin inner roof, even without LMH. Several factors may contribute to the post-operative MH formation after fovea-sparing ILM peeling for MTM: (1) an undetected micro-MH that has existed before the operation; (2) intra-operative manipulation on the thin fovea, such as in eyes with LMH or MTM with a thin foveal lining tissue, as in those with an outer gap and a thin inner roof, even without LMH; (3) asymmetric traction at the slope of posterior staphyloma; and (4) foveal dehiscence due to post-operative residual parafoveal traction. In all these scenarios, an inverted ILM flap may be beneficial to prevent post-operative MH. Given our interpretation of Fig. 3 and the small case number in the study by Zheng et al., [1] we think the conclusion made by them may require some modifications.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Zheng D, Huang Z, Zeng Q, et al. Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis. BMC Ophthalmol Nov. 2022;18(1):444. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02679-2.
Lin JP, Yang CM. Combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with internal limiting membrane flap technique for progressive myopic traction maculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Feb. 2022;260(2):489–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05397-5.
Bonińska K, Nawrocki J, Michalewska Z, Mechanism of “Flap, Closure” After the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique. Retina Nov. 2018;38(11):2184–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001861.
Tsui MC, Yang CM, Early and Late Macular Changes After the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap, Technique for a Full-Thickness Macular Hole. Retina Jan. 2021;1(1):20–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002796.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors have no funding sources to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.-T. H. wrote the main manuscript text and J.-P. L. and C.-M. Y. ciritically revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Hsieh, YT., Lin, JP. & Yang, CM. Comments on “Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis”. BMC Ophthalmol 23, 272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02963-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02963-9