Skip to main content
Download PDF

Inflammatory profile of keratoconic corneal epithelium

BMC Ophthalmology volume 23, Article number: 326 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have presented inflammatory features on keratoconus (KC) and many inflammatory markers are described in the tears of patients with this disease. The KC pathogenesis is still unknown just like the correlation with inflammatory patterns. However, environmental and genetic issues may be part of the progress of KC. In addition, some systemic features, such as allergy and obesity, seem to be related to the progression of KC. Our purpose was to evaluate the neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), chemokines ligand 2 (CCL-2) and 5 (CCL-5), and interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 8 (IL-8) on corneal epithelial cells and blood of patients with KC and in healthy controls. In addition, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was evaluated to predict inflammation.

Methods

This including prospective observational study included 32 KC patients who underwent corneal crosslinking (CXL) and 32 control patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Patients’ corneal epithelial cells were removed surgically, and blood (buffy coat) was analyzed. Samples in triplicate were evaluated on rt-PCR for neuropeptides (VIP e NPY), interleukins (IL-6 e IL-8), and chemokines (CCL-2 and CCL-5).

Results

Our study showed statistically higher CCL-5 and IL-8 on corneal epithelial cells in patients with KC. Blood cells were statistically higher in VIP and NPY in the KC group. Interleukin-8 on blood cells was statistically significant in KC’S group; for CCL-2 and CCL-5 they were statistically lower in patients with KC compared with controls. NLR showed no difference between the groups.

Conclusions

Our data support the findings of other studies that suggested altering KC status, such as inflammatory corneal disease. The presence of IL-8 in the cornea and blood samples of KC’s group suggested systemic disease with a possible local or repercussion action. Further studies are warranted to elucidate KC pathogenesis and its correlation to systemic disease.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Keratoconus (KC) is an ocular disease characterized by the steepening and thinning of the cornea that may lead to visual impairment [1]. The pathogenesis of this disease is not well established, and many studies have highlighted the presence of inflammatory status of the cornea [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Proteases, cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and beta, and proteolytic activity are described in tear film of patients with KC [8,9,10,11,12].

Peripheral blood samples have been studied to correlate KC with other systemic changes linked to inflammation [2]. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been used as a marker of inflammation, and it has been associated with the severity and prognosis of some cardiologic and oncologic diseases. In addition, this ratio has been described in ophthalmological diseases, and this incidence has been found to be raised in patients with KC [13].

Neuropeptides are molecules produced and released by neurons. They have a trophic effect communicating neurons and effector cells like glands, muscles, and immune cells [14]. Some authors defend that corneal innervation releases neuropeptides on the ocular surface and then they active immune system leading to neurogenic inflammation [15,16,17]. Mostly studied neuropeptides in ocular diseases are CGRP, SP, VIP, and NPY.

Interleukins (IL) and chemokines are small molecules involved in the cells immune response mediating some physiological signaling like allergy and inflammation. A disbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules may alter local homeostasis and elevate proteolytic activity, associated with KC progression [18].

This study’s aim was to evaluate neuropeptides VIP and NPY, chemokines CCL-2 and CCL-5, and interleukins IL-6 and IL-8 on corneal epithelial cells and blood, in patients with KC and health controls. In addition, we also studied neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to predict inflammation.

Materials and methods

Thirty-two eyes previously diagnosed with KC that would be submitted to corneal crosslinking (CXL) and thirty-two normal eyes that underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) were enrolled in the study. All patients accepted the consent form that was previously approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Both groups were asked about their height and weight and also about the continuous use of medication or systemic diseases. Patients using topical or systemic corticosteroids or non-steroid medication, and antiallergic or immunosuppressive drugs were not eligible. All participants were not previously submitted ocular surgeries.

Blood samples were collected before corneal samples for all subjects. And then, they were immediately processed. Buffy coat was separated and placed in the freezer at -70 °C. Corneal epithelium samples were collected with a crescent blade and stored on RNA later in the freezer at -70 °C. We extracted cDNA from all samples using PureLink ™ DNAse (ThermoFisher Scientific) and then thermal cycler according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Real-time PCR QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System® (Applied BioSystems, ThermoFisher Sc.) was then performed with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, EUA). The primers (Invitrogen®, ThermoFisher Sc.) in triplicate we used were: Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a control; Vasoactive Intestinal Neuropeptide – VIP; Neuropeptide Y – NPY; Interleukin-6 - IL-6; Interleukin − 8 - IL-8; Chemokine ligand 2 - CCL2; Chemokine ligand 5 - CCL5. The system ran hold stage 95℃ for 10 min; PCR stage (40 cycles) -95℃ for 15 s, followed by 60℃ for 1 min; Melt curve stage − 95℃ for 15 s, and then 60℃ for 1 min and 95℃ for 15 s.

Statistics

Fisher’s exact or chi-square tests were adopted for qualitative data analysis. Quantitative data were performed with histograms and quartiles, and Shapiro-Wilk test was also performed to test normality. Samples were described using mean and standard deviation. Quantitative data comparison between groups was performed using the Student’s t-test and by adopting normality and Mann-Whitney test for other data. Spearman correlation was performed to evaluate correlation between quantitative data. All the analyses were performed by SPSS software (IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. 2019) adopting statistics significance of 5%.

Results

We had 64 eyes divided into two groups: 32 eyes with KC and 32 normal controls. Men were 62.5% in the KC group and 53.1% in the control group (p = 0.448). The mean age was 26.3 in the KC group and 27.5 years (p = 0.309) in the control group. In terms of height no difference was noticed between groups (p = 0,192); however, there was a statistical difference in weight and body mass index (BMI) in KC group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.015, respectively). Considering overweight, we found 71.9% in KC group and 37.5% in the control group (p = 0.006). This is the first description of the association between KC and obesity in Brazil.

The right eye was found more frequent in the control group (53.1%) than in the KC group (43.8%) with p-value 0,453. The presence of other diseases was more frequent in the KC group (37.5%) and the most commonly cited disease was respiratory allergy (p = 0.604) followed by thyroids disease (p = 0.450) and anxiety or depression (p > 0.99). The continuous use of medication was cited by 43.8% of KC group and 21.9% of controls (p = 0.062). Table 1 describes the sociodemographic characteristics of both groups.

Table 1 Sociodemographic and clinical features of groups
Full size table

The lymphocytes, neutrophils, and NLR index are described in Table 2. There was no statistical difference between groups on NLR blood samples demonstrated as follows in Table 2.

Table 2 Blood samples results
Full size table

Comparison between corneal samples and buffy coat on different genes of interest.

All samples were analyzed in fold induction for cornea (C) and blood samples (buffy coat – BC), as shown in Table 3.

On corneal samples, neuropeptides VIP and NPY did not show the statistical difference (respectively p = 0.413 and p = 0,638). Chemokine CCL-2 was p = 0.052, and CCL-5 was p < 0.001. Interleukin IL-8 was p = 0.002 while IL-6 presented no statistical significance (p = 0.376).

For BC results both VIP and NPY were statistically different (p < 0.001). Chemokines CCL-2 and CCL-5 showed statistical difference results in the KC group (respectively p = 0.006 and p = 0.005). As seen on corneal results, BC has a statistical difference on IL-8 (p < 0.001) but not on IL-6 (p = 0.063).

The IL-8 is augmented on the KC group on corneal epithelia and BC.

Table 3 Results on fold induction
Full size table

Discussion

Keratoconus has still unknown etiology, which is possibly associated with environmental, biomechanics, biochemical, and genetic factors, or maybe the association between them. Studies show no genre predilection, since they have methodological differences [1, 18,19,20]. Our study showed more male individuals in both groups with no statistical significance as reported by other studies in the published literature.

Our results demonstrated that in our sample patients with KC are associated with higher overweight and obesity than those in the control group. We believe it is the first description in Brazilian literature correlates obesity and KC. This correlation is described in the literature, although it’s not well established [21]. Obese individuals have higher incidences of inflammation, a chance of infection, and other comorbidities [22]. Recently an Israeli study with adolescents showed higher chances of developing kc among those who are overweight or obese [23]. However, a Turkish study demonstrated no statistical difference in body mass index (BMI) between KC and the control healthy group [24]. It is believed that obesity could be a risk factor for development of KC in predisposed people and this might occur due to decreased tarsal elastin, which leads to laxity of palpebral skin, changes palpebral function, and provides corneal irritation [21]. Also, a pro-inflammatory environment with decreased immune response is associated with adipose tissue accumulation [22] and could be correlated with KC pathogenesis.

Our study described the presence of other diseases in the KC group compared with controls. Claessens et al. [25] discuss the positive association of KC and immune-mediated diseases. Among them are respiratory allergies and psychiatric diseases (depression and anxiety). Allergy was not statically significant in our study as shown by Woodward et al., 2016 [26]. However, it is often described among KC patients and might be poorly diagnosed because of a rare clinical impact that does not require continuous treatment. This may justify the fact that KC patient’s rubber eyes is associated with disease progression [1] and allergy [26, 27]. Lema et al. described that 64.3% of KC patients reported that they rub their eyes frequently and vigorously [10]. Sharma et al. showed a strong correlation between ocular allergy and KC progression [4]. It is important to remember that inflammatory events lead to biochemical events and accumulation of immune cells that might cause local discomfort and consequentially itching.

Tears and corneal samples are wildly used in KC research, and since systemic repercussion is not well established in KC, some studies described blood investigation.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) shows a number that might be used as an inflammation predictor [13]. This author described statistical results in the KC patients, the same showed by Oltulu et al. [28]. Otherwise, our results agree with Bozkurt [29], that did not show a difference between groups on NLR.

We also investigated neuropeptides which participate in the wound healing process and homeostasis [14, 30]. These molecules are liberated by neurons that innervate the cornea. We studied VIP and NPY peptides in cornea and blood samples. In corneal epithelium, we did not find statistical significance for both neuropeptides, unlike Sachetti et al. [31], which found VIP higher in corneal tissue from keratoplasty of KC patients. Our results showed that VIP and NPY were higher in KC patients’ blood samples. We did not find any research correlating blood samples, neuropeptides and KC. However, studies in mice with obesity showed NPY concentration on blood was found to be higher. The NPY can be produced by adipocyte cells and on fatty tissue might participate as an autocrine, paracrine, or endocrine mediator. This peptide also promotes adipocyte differentiation and fat accumulation in white tissue metabolism [32].

In our corneal epithelium samples, no statistical difference was found on neuropeptides. However, neuropeptide VIP was described by Sacchetti el al. but in corneal tissue from keratoplasty [31]. The VIP is known to have anti-inflammatory action inhibiting pro-inflammatory chemokines like CCL-2 and 5 [17]. Mantelli et al. described that neuropeptides could be enrolled in local inflammation by neurogenic inflammation, in which a stimulus liberates local neuromodulators and produce and promotes local liberation of cytokines and chemokines [16].

The chemokines regulate inflammatory response and homeostasis [33]. We demonstrate that CCL-2 was higher expressed in the control group for both corneal and blood samples. Ebihara et al. described a possible association of ocular inflammation conditions with the expression of CCL-2 on normal corneal epithelium cells and in a culture of keratocytes cells and their receptor interaction on corneal layers [34]. Recently, Villarreal-Ponce et al. described the influence of CCL-2 in corneal healing that suggested that its absence delays wound healing [35]. We then infer that lower levels of CCL-2 could affect the wound-healing process in corneal KC patients.

The CCL-5 augmented on KC patients may suggest local inflammation once this chemokine is related to many other inflammatory situations like angiogenesis, cancer, upper airway, and rheumatoid arthritis [36]. Previous studies have described CCL-5 in tears [6], but not on corneal tissue. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe it.

Chemokines and interleukins are described in KC tears samples [9, 10, 28]. Interleukin 6 is one of the studied molecules in KC tears. It regulates MMP-9 that acts in the corneal collagen structure matrix that might play a role in KC pathogenesis [18]. Taurone et al. [37] found statistically higher IL-6 on immunohistochemical essay of keratoconic corneal tissue. However, in our study, no statistical difference was found in corneal or blood samples. The IL-6 acts on the inflammation cascade and induces CCL-2 and IL-8 expression [38].

In comparison with Spandau et al. [39] our study showed IL-8 on corneal cells in both groups; however, which was statistically augmented in KC group. Interleukin-8 is synthesized by corneal cells as a local inflammation response [12] and it was also described as a component of allergic response [40]. Higher concentrations of IL-8 in the cornea and blood of KC patients allow us to infer a correlation with a systemic disease with influence on the eyes. Obesity could be, among others, a stimulus for inflammation and/or reason to perpetuate (or be redundant) IL-8 action [41, 42].

In conclusion, our data support findings of previous studies that suggested the alteration of KC status such as inflammatory corneal disease. The presence of IL-8 in the cornea and blood samples from KC’s group suggested a correlation with a systemic disease with a possible local or repercussion action. Further studies must elucidate KC pathogenesis and its correlation with systemic disease.

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BC:

Buffy coat

CCL:

Chemokine ligand

CGRP:

Calcitonin-gene-related peptide

CXL:

Corneal colagen crosslinking

DEPC:

Diethyl pyrocarbonate

GADPH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

IL:

Interleukin

KC:

Keratoconus

MMP:

Metilmetaloproteinase

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

NPY:

Neuropeptide Y

PCR:

Polimerase chain reaction

PRK:

Photorefractive keratectomy

SP:

Substance P

TGF:

Transforming growth factor

TNF:

Tumoral necrosis factor

VIP:

Vasoative intestinal peptide

References

  1. Gomes JAP, et al. Keratoconus and ectatic diseases: global consensus. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Navel V, Malecaze J, Pereira B, Baker JS, Malecaze F, Sapin V, et al. Oxidative and antioxidative stress markers in keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta ophtahlmol. 2021 Sep;99(6):e777–94.

  3. Seppala HP, Maatta M, Rautia M, Mackiewicz Z, Tuisku I, Tervo T, Konttinen YT. EMMPRIN and MMP-1 in keratoconus. Cornea. 2006 Apr;25(3):325–30.

  4. Sharma N, Rao K, Maharana PK, Vajpayee RB. Ocular allergy and keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;61(8):407–9.

  5. Glosh A, Zhou L, Ghosh A, Shetty R, Beuerman R. Proteomic and gene expression patterns of keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;61(8):389–91.

  6. Jun AS, Cope L, Speck C, Feng X, Lee S, Meng H, et al. Subnormal cytokine profile in the tear fluid of keratoconus patients. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(1):e16437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheater MK, Kernacki KA, Hazlett LD. Corneal cell proteins and ocular surface pathology. Biotech Histochem. 1999;74(3):146–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wisse RPL, Kuiper JJW, Gans R, Imhof S, Radstake TRDJ, van der Lelij A. Cytokine expression in keratoconus and its corneal microenvironment: a systematic review. Ocul Surf. 2015 Oct;13(4):272–83.

  9. Balasubramanian SA, Mohan S, Pye DC, Wilcox MDP. Proteases, proteolysis and inflammatory molecules in the tears of people with keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:e303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lema I, Duran JA. Inflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalology. 2005;112:654–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Cao X, Liu Y, Wang P, Li X. Tear levels of inflammatory cytokines in Keratoconus: a Meta-analysis of case-control and cross-sectional studies. Biomed Res Int 2021 Sep 30;2021:6628923.

  12. D’Souza S, Nair AP, Sahu GR, Vaidya T, Shetty R, Khamar P, et al. Keratoconus patients exhibit a distinct ocular surface immune cell and inflammatory profile. Sci Rep. 2021 Oct;22(1):20891.

  13. Karaca EE, Özmen MC, Ekici F, Yüksel E, Türkoglu Z. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict progression in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2014;33:1168–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dartt DA, Dana R, D’Amore P, Niederkorn JY. Immunology, inflammation and diseases of the eye. Elsevier. 2011. ISBN 978-0-12-381974-1.

  15. Sacchetti M, Scorcia V, Lambiase A, Bonini S. Preliminary evidence of neuropeptides involvement in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:e315–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mantelli F, Micera A, Sacchetti M, Bonini S. Neurogenic inflammation of the ocular surface. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10:498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabatino F, Zazzo A, Simone L, Bonini S. The intriguing role of neuropeptides at the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(1):2–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, Merayo J, Barrera R, Acera A. Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder? Eye (Lond). 2015 Jul; 29(7): 843–59.

  19. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv ophthalmol 1998. Jan-Fev;42(4):297–319.

  20. Ferrari G, Roma P. The keratoconus enigma: a review with emphasis on pathogenesis. Ocul surf. 2020 Jul;18(3):363–73.

  21. Pihlblad M, Schaefer DP. Eyelid laxity, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea in keratoconus. Cornea. 2013 Sep;32(9):1232–6.

  22. Nyambuya TM, Dludla PV, Mxinwa V, Nkambule BB. Obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance: a mini-review on T-cells. Metabol Open 2019 Aug 10;3:100015.

  23. Eliasi E, Bez M, Megreli J, Avramovich E, Fischer N, Barak A, et al. The association between keratoconus and body mass index: a population-based cross-sectional study among half a million adolescents. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:200–6.

  24. Gencer B, Ozgurhan EB, Kara S, Tufan HA, Arikan S, Bozkurt E, et al. Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea in patients with keratoconus in a turkish population. Cornea. 2014 Feb;33(2):137–40.

  25. Claessens JLJ, Godefrooij DA, Vink G, Frank LE, Wisse RPL. Nationwide epidemiological approach to identify associations between keratoconus and immune-mediated diseases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;106(10):1350–4.

  26. Woodward MA, Blachley TS, Stein JD. The association between sociodemographic factors, common systemic diseases, and keratoconus: an analysis of a nationwide health care claims database. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):457–65.

  27. Balasubramanian SA, Pye DC, Willcox MD. Effects of eye rubbing on the levels of protease, protease activity and cytokines in tears: relevance in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Mar;96(2):214–8.

  28. Oltulu R, Katipoğlu Z, Gündoğan AO, Mirza E, Belviranlı S. Evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with keratoconus. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;32(1):154–9.

  29. Bozkurt E, Ucak T. Serum inflammation biomarkers in patients with Keratoconus. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2020 Apr 7:1–4.

  30. Jiang X, McClellan SA, Barrett RP, Zhang Y, Foldenauer ME, Hazlett LD. The role of VIP in cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012 Nov 7;53(12):7560–6.

  31. Sacchetti M, Micera A, Lambiase A, Speranza S, Mantelli F, Petrachi G et al. Tear levels of neuropeptides increase after specific allergen challenge in allergic conjunctivitis. Mol Vis 2011 Jan 7;17:47–52.

  32. Halfon SB, Pecht T, Jung S, Rudich A. Obesity and dysregulated central and peripherical macrophage-neuron cross-talk. Eur J Immunol. 2019;49:19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Palomino DCT, Marti LC. Chemokines and immunity. Einstein. 2015;13(3):469–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ebihara N, Yamagami S, Yokoo S, Amano S, Murakami A. Involvement of C-C chemokine ligand2-CCR2 interaction in monocyte-lineage cell recruitment of normal human corneal stroma. J Immunol. 2007;178(5):3288–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Villarreal-Ponce A, Tiruneh MW, Lee J, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Kuhn J, David JA et al. Keratinocyte-macrophage crosstalk by the Nrf2/Ccl2/EGF signaling axis orchestrates tissue repair. Cell Rep 2020 Nov 24;33(8):108417.

  36. Marques RE, Guabiraba R, Russo RC, Teixeira MM. Targeting CCL5 in inflammation. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17(12):1439–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Taurone S, Ralli M, Plateroti AM, Scorcia V, Greco A, Nebbioso M, et al. Keratoconus: the possible involvement of inflammatory cytokines in its pathogenesis. An experimental study and review of the literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jul;25(13):4478–89.

  38. Wang XM, Hamza M, Wu TX, Dionne RA. Upregulation of IL-6, IL-8 and CCL2 gene expression after acute inflammation: correlation to clinical pain. Pain. 2009;142(3):275–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Spandau UHM, Toksoy A, Verhaart S. High expression of chemokines Gro-a (CXCL-1), IL-8 (CXCL-8), and MCP-1 (CCL-2) in inflamed human corneas in vivo. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(6):825–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Castellani ML, De Lutiis MA, Toniato E, Conti F, Felaco P, Fulcheri M, et al. Impact of RANTES, MCP-1 and IL-8 in mast cells. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2010 Jan-Mar;24(1):1–6.

  41. Straczkowski M, Dzienis-Straczkowska S, Stêpieñ A, Kowalska I, Szelachowska M, Kinalska I. Plasma interleukin-8 concentrations are increased in obese subjects and related to fat mass and tumor necrosis factor-alpha system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Oct;87(10):4602–6.

  42. Akter N, Wilson A, Thomas R, Al-Rashed F, Kochumon S, Al-Roub A et al. ROS/TNF-a crosstalk triggers the expression of IL-8 and MCP-1 in human monocytic THP-1 cells via NF-kB and ERK1/2 mediated signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep29;22(19):10519.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, Brazil

    Junia Cabral Marques, Karina Inácio Ladislau de Carvalho, Rafaela Xavier & Luiz Vicente Rizzo

  2. Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Walton Nosé

Authors
  1. Junia Cabral Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karina Inácio Ladislau de Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafaela Xavier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Walton Nosé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luiz Vicente Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JCM collected data and was the major contributor in writing the manuscriptKILC analyzed data and was contributor in writing the manuscriptRX performed laboratory essays and was contributor in writing the manuscriptWN collected surgical material and was contributor in writing the manuscriptLVR analyzed data and was contributor in writing the manuscriptAll authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junia Cabral Marques.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This paper was previously approved by the institutional ethics committee of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) number CEP 2.956.600 (11.10.2018) and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All participants signed informed consent to enroll this study. All methods were carried out in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki. This research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (CAEE: 97314818.7.0000.0071). All participants signed informed consent to enroll this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques, J.C., Ladislau de Carvalho, K.I., Xavier, R. et al. Inflammatory profile of keratoconic corneal epithelium. BMC Ophthalmol 23, 326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03013-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03013-0

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us