Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparing myopic error in patients with basic and convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia in China

BMC Ophthalmology volume 23, Article number: 290 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the degree of myopia between the dominant and non-dominant eyes in teenagers with intermittent exotropia (IXT) in China.

Methods

A total of 199 IXT patients with myopia were included in this retrospective study and were divided into two groups according to the difference between near and distance exodeviation: basic IXT and convergence insufficiency (CI) IXT. Refractive errors were analyzed by spherical equivalent (SE) values. Patients were further stratified into anisometropia group and non-anisometropia group based on binocular SE values difference greater than 1.0D or not.

Results

There were 127 patients in the CI IXT group, with a near deviation of 46.94 ± 20.53 prism diopters (PD) and a distance deviation of 28.36 ± 14.34 PD, and there were 72 (36.2%) patients in the basic IXT group, with a near deviation of 37.68 ± 22.21 PD and a distance deviation angle of 33.21 ± 23.96 PD. The near exodeviation was significantly larger in the CI group than in the basic IXT group(P < 0.001). In the CI IXT group, the mean SE was − 2.09 ± 1.45 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and − 2.53 ± 1.44D in the non-dominant eye, while in the basic IXT group, the mean SE was − 2.46 ± 1.56D in the dominant eye and − 2.89 ± 1.37D in the non-dominant eye. The anisometropia group included 43 patients, while non-anisometropia group included 156 patients. The near and distance exodeviation in the anisometropia group were 45.26 ± 24.41 PD and 33.53 ± 23.31 PD, respectively, and those in the non-anisometropia group were 43.42 ± 20.69 PD and 29.07 ± 16.84 PD, respectively. There were no significant differences in near and distance deviation (P = 0.78 and P = 0.73 respectively) between the two groups. The SE of the dominant eye was less myopic than of the non-dominant eyes in both the CI and anisometropia groups (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Our study revealed that convergence insufficiency IXT is more common than the basic type in pediatric myopic population and is characterized by higher inter-eye differences of myopia. The dominant eye was found to be less myopic in IXT patients, particularly in those with convergence insufficiency and anisometropia.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common type of exotropia, accounting for approximately 25% of strabismus cases in children in the Western world and 44.9% in children in China [1, 2]. In children with IXT, emmetropia and myopia are the most common refractive errors [3]. There is a high prevalence of IXT and an even higher prevalence of myopia in Asia, prompting several studies to explore the relationship between these two conditions. A meta-analysis reported that children with myopia had a 5.23-fold increased risk of developing exotropia [4]. Another population-based observational study indicated that children with intermittent exotropia showed a significant trend toward myopia over time [5].

Research on ocular dominance and myopia in healthy individuals has been conducted [6,7,8,9], which has been suggested that eye dominance may play a role in the development of myopia. Ocular dominance refers to a preference for the visual input from one eye when viewing binocularly. Assessing ocular dominance or fixation preference is important in managing IXT, particularly when choosing the eyes to be operated on [10]. However, research on ocular dominance and IXT patients, particularly in the pediatric myopia population, has been limited [11].

The current study aimd to compare the degree of myopia between the dominant and non-dominant eyes in teenagers with IXT in China. These findings may help to further our understanding of the relationship between myopia and IXT.

Methods

Study population and clinical measures

This retrospective observational study was approved by the institutional Review Board of Peking University People’s Hospital and was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The medical records of children aged 5–18 years at the time of their operation from September 2018 to September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. These children had been diagnosed with IXT and myopia and had undergone unilateral or bilateral lateral muscle recession or unilateral recession-resection surgery as prescribed by the same surgeon.

The following preoperative characteristics were recorded from the patients’ charts: age at surgery, best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction and preoperative motor alignment at distance and near. The angle of deviation was determined by the prism alternate cover technique with a penlight at both distance (6 m) and near (1/3 m).

All patients were measured after 1 h of monocular occlusion of the non-dominant eye Patients were classified as having basic IXT if the difference between distance and near deviation was within 10 prism diopters (PDs). Convergence insufficiency was defined as an IXT at near measurement at least 10 PDs greater than that at distance measurement.

Refractive errors were analyzed by spherical equivalent (SE) values. Patients with amblyopia, oblique muscle dysfunction, vertical strabismus, A–V pattern strabismus, paralytic strabismus, previous extraocular muscle surgery, nystagmus, and neurological or other medical problems were excluded from this study.

Myopia was defined as a minus refractive error with an absolute value of SE power greater than 0.50 diopters(D) [12]. Myopic anisometropia was defined as an interocular refractive error difference of greater than 1.00 D, with each eye being either emmetropic or myopic. Astigmatism in both eyes should be less than 1.50 D [13].

Ocular dominance

Ocular dominance testing was a part of our routine practice of intermittent exotropia patients. We performed the hole-in-the-card test [14]. The patient was asked to hold a card with a hole in the middle using both hands and was told to view a 6-m target through the hole with both eyes open. Then each eye was occluded alternately by the examiner to establish which eye was aligned with the hole and the target. The process was repeated three times for confirmation.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with the R programming package (version 4.2.2; The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Means ± standard deviations were used for continuous variables and frequencies were presented for categorical variables. We perform Chi-square test for categoric parameters. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test the significant refractive error and exodeviation differences in continuous variables between groups. P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. A total of 199 patients were included in this retrospective study, consisting of 95 girls and 104 boys, with a mean age of 9.95 ± 2.73 years. The average near and distance deviation was 43.59 ± 21.57 PD and 30.12 ± 18.50 PD, respectively, which has significant difference(P < 0.001). The average SE of the non-dominant eye was − 2.67 ± 1.42D, and the average SE of the dominant eye was − 2.25 ± 1.47D, with a significant difference(P = 0.007).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics for intermittent exotropia (IXT) patients
Full size table

Out of the 199 patients, 127 (63.8%) were classified in the convergence insufficiency (CI) IXT group, with a mean near deviation of 46.94 ± 20.53 PD and mean distance deviation of 28.36 ± 14.34 PD, while 72 (36.2%) were in the basic IXT group, with a mean near deviation of 37.68 ± 22.21 PD and mean distance deviation of 33.21 ± 23.96 PD. In the CI IXT group, the mean SE was − 2.09 ± 1.45D in the dominant eye and − 2.53 ± 1.44D in the non-dominant eye, while in the basic IXT group, the mean SE was − 2.46 ± 1.56D in the dominant eye and − 2.89 ± 1.37D in the non-dominant eye. The near exodeviation was significantly larger in the CI group than in the basic IXT group(P < 0.001), and the average SE of the non-dominant eye was slightly more myopic in the basic group than in the CI group(P = 0.05). There were no differences in gender, age, distance deviation, or SE of the dominant eye between the CI and basic groups.

According to the binocular SE differences, the patients were divided into the anisometropia group and non-anisometropia group, as shown in Table 2. The anisometropia group included 43(21.6%) patients, with a mean age of 11.54±2.50 years, and non-anisometropia group included 156(78.4%) patients, with a mean age of 9.52±2.64 years, showing that patients in the anisometropia group were older (P < 0.001). The near and distance exodeviation in the anisometropia group were 45.26 ± 24.41 PD and 33.53 ± 23.31 PD, respectively, and those in the non-anisometropia group were 43.42 ± 20.69 PD and 29.07 ± 16.84 PD, respectively,. There were no significant differences in near and distance deviation between the two groups (P = 0.78 and P = 0.73 respectively). Additionally, near exodeviation was significantly greater than distance exodeviation both in anisometropia group and non-anisometropia group (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). The SE of the dominant eye was less myopic in the anisometropia group, as compared with the non-anisometropia group (-1.20 ± 1.50D vs. -2.42 ± 1.39D, P < 0.001), and the SE of the non-dominant eye was more myopic in the anisometropia group (-3.08 ± 1.38D vs. -2.59 ± 1.36D, P = 0.038).

Table 2 Characteristics of patients in the anisometropia and non-anisometropia group
Full size table

As shown in Table 3, the SE of the dominant eye was significantly lower than that of the non-dominant eye in all participants (P = 0.007), particularly in the CI group and anisometropia group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Right eyes were also significantly more myopic than the left eyes in the anisometropic IXT patients (P = 0.03).

Table 3 Spherical equivalent of eyes in IXT patients
Full size table

Discussion

According to the Burian’s classification, IXT could be divided into basic, divergence excess, pseudo-divergence excess, and convergence insufficiency [15]. The convergence insufficiency type, characterized by near deviation exceeding the distance deviation by at least 10 PD, is estimated to account for 1.2–11% of IXT cases [16, 17]. Our study found a higher proportion of convergence insufficiency type IXT patients (63.8%), which may be because all of the patients in our study had myopia. Myopic children showed greater divergent shift in vergence adaptation after near work [18]. It is speculated that in myopic patients, fusional control at distant of myopes is weakened due to the blurred distant vision, and for near vision, less accommodative effort is required for clear images in myopes due to a larger accommodation lag [19], which may lead to reduced accommodative convergence and ultimately result in convergence insufficiency [20].

The refractive error of the basic IXT group was more myopic than that in the CI IXT group. Patients with CI IXT typically have a reduced near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) for near viewing, as well as a low accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A) ratio [21]. However, higher AC/A ratios was related to a greater lag of accommodation and have been reported as a risk factor for myopia in children [22, 23].

As shown in Table 3, our results demonstrated that SE of the dominant eye was significantly less myopic than that of the non-dominant eye in the CI group(P = 0.002), but not in the basic group(P = 0.08), indicating that CI IXT patients have a greater difference in SE of the two eyes. Yang and Hwang [24] found that IXT patients displayed a greater lag of accommodation in the non-dominant eye compared to the dominant eye during binocular fixation, which provides a potential mechanism for why the nondominant eye becoming more myopic [25]. Patients with IXT suffer a large accommodative load, which has been proven to be related to the degree of exodeviation [25]. CI IXT patients exhibit a larger near-distance deviation difference than basic IXT, which might require greater accommodation at near viewing, leading to greater interocular asymmetry.

Furthermore, we divided IXT patients into the anisometropia and non-anisometropia groups based on intraocular refractive difference. Participants with anisometropia were much older, and previous studies have indicated that the prevalence and magnitude of anisometropia would increase in association with age throughout childhood to young adulthood [13, 26]. Our study revealed that the SE of the dominant eye was less myopic in the anisometropia group, while the SE of the non-dominant eye was more myopic. Additionally, the right eyes were more myopic in children with anisometropia. Linked et al. [6]. reported that the nondominant eye is more myopic in the anisometropia patients with interocular SE differences greater than 2.5 D. Wang et al. [27] identified the nondominant eye had a tendency of higher refraction when SE anisometropia larger than 1.75 D in adults. However, the results on which eye is more myopic are conflicting, possibly due to the discrepancies in subject ethnicity, age, magnitude of anisometropia and different methods for measuring ocular dominance [8, 13, 28].

There are several limitations to this study. It was a retrospective design study with a relatively small number of patients, which may introduce bias. Moreover, this study is cross-sectional, so it is not clear whether the difference in refractive error between the two eyes is a result of IXT or an adaptation. Longitudinal studies are needed to fully understand the relationship between IXT and ocular dominance refractive status. A longitudinal study is currently being conducted in our lab to examine whether ocular sensory dominance changes during the progression of IXT.

In conclusion, our study revealed that the convergence insufficiency type is more common than the basic type in Chinese myopic children and adolescents, and it is characterized by a higher inter-eye difference of myopia. The dominant eye was found to be less myopic in IXT, particularly in those with convergence insufficiency and anisometropia. Further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between ocular dominance and myopia in IXT patients.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IXT:

Intermittent exotropia

CI:

Convergence insufficiency

SE:

Spherical equivalent

PD:

Prism diopters

References

  1. Govindan M, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood exotropia: a population-based study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(1):104–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu CB, Fan DS, Wong VW, Wong CY, Lam DS. Changing patterns of strabismus: a decade of experience in Hong Kong. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(8):854–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee D, Kim M, Kim WJ, Kim MM. Changes in refractive error and axial length after horizontal muscle surgery for strabismus. J AAPOS. 2019;23(1):20. e21-20 e25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang SM, Chan RY, Bin Lin S, Rong SS, Lau HH, Lau WW, Yip WW, Chen LJ, Ko ST, Yam JC. Refractive errors and concomitant strabismus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekdawi NS, Nusz KJ, Diehl NN, Mohney BG. The development of myopia among children with intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(3):503–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Linke SJ, Baviera J, Munzer G, Steinberg J, Richard G, Katz T. Association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex: analysis of 10,264 myopic individuals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):9166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pozarickij A, Williams C, Guggenheim JA, and the, Vision UKBE. C: Non-additive (dominance) effects of genetic variants associated with refractive error and myopia. Mol Genet Genomics 2020, 295(4):843–853.

  8. Jiang S, Chen Z, Bi H, Xia R, Shen T, Zhou L, Jiang J, Zhang B, Lu F. Elucidation of the more myopic eye in anisometropia: the interplay of laterality, ocular dominance, and anisometropic magnitude. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Z, Lan W, Liu W, Chen X, Nie H, Yu M, Ge J. Association of ocular dominance and myopia development: a 2-year longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(11):4779–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quah BL, Lu Y, Smith D. The association of ocular dominance and the preferred eye for fixation in intermittent exotropia: a guide to choosing the eye for unilateral surgery. Am Orthopt J. 2001;51:111–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon Y, Kim JH, Lim HT. Difference in myopia progression between dominant and non-dominant eye in patients with intermittent exotropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(6):1327–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nemeth J, Tapaszto B, Aclimandos WA, Kestelyn P, Jonas JB, De Faber JHN, Januleviciene I, Grzybowski A, Nagy ZZ, Parssinen O, et al. Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(3):853–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Read SA, Carney LG. Myopic anisometropia: ocular characteristics and aetiological considerations. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97(4):291–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coren S, Kaplan CP. Patterns of ocular dominance. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973;50(4):283–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burian HM. Exodeviations: their classification, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;62(6):1161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hardesty HH, Boynton JR, Keenan JP. Treatment of intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(2):268–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Distance/near differences in intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(4):478–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sreenivasan V, Irving EL, Bobier WR. Effect of heterophoria type and myopia on accommodative and vergence responses during sustained near activity in children. Vis Res. 2012;57:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49(3):189–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma L, Yang L, Li N. Bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for the convergence insufficiency type of intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2016;20(3):194–6. e191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh NK, Mani R, Hussaindeen JR. Changes in stimulus and response AC/A ratio with vision therapy in Convergence Insufficiency. J Optom. 2017;10(3):169–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Logan NS, Radhakrishnan H, Cruickshank FE, Allen PM, Bandela PK, Davies LN, Hasebe S, Khanal S, Schmid KL, Vera-Diaz FA, et al. IMI Accommodation and Binocular Vision in Myopia Development and Progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones-Jordan LA, Cotter SA, Kleinstein RN, Manny RE, Twelker JD, Zadnik K, Group CS. The response AC/A ratio before and after the Onset of Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(3):1594–602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang HK, Hwang JM. Decreased accommodative response in the nondominant eye of patients with intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(1):71–76e71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Qi Z, Du L, Chen J, Xu X, He X, Qiang J. Accommodative responses under various viewing conditions in surgical patients with intermittent exotropia: an institutional, retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu YY, Wu JF, Lu TL, Wu H, Sun W, Guo DD, Jiang WJ, Wang XR, Jonas JB, Bi HS. Prevalence and Associations of Anisometropia in Children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(3):979–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Q, Wu Y, Liu W, Gao L. Dominant Eye and Visual Evoked Potential of Patients with Myopic Anisometropia. Biomed Res Int 2016, 2016:5064892.

  28. Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, Hsia WW, Hsu WM. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(8):2856–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Huixin Liu from Peking University People’ s Hospital for assistance with statistic method.

Funding

This work is supported by National Key R&D Program of China, No.2020YFC2008200.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology & Clinical Centre of Optometry, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

    Qingyu Meng, Lejin Wang, Mingwei Zhao, Xi Wu & Lili Guo

  2. Eye Disease and Optometry Institute, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

    Qingyu Meng, Lejin Wang, Mingwei Zhao, Xi Wu & Lili Guo

  3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases, Beijing, China

    Qingyu Meng, Lejin Wang, Mingwei Zhao, Xi Wu & Lili Guo

  4. College of Optometry, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

    Qingyu Meng, Lejin Wang, Mingwei Zhao, Xi Wu & Lili Guo

Authors
  1. Qingyu Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lejin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingwei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xi Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lili Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QYM and LLG designed the study. QYM conducted the research, collected data, and analyzed the data. LJW, MWZ and XW assisted in the study design and data interpretation. QYM wrote the draft and LLG reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study approved by the institutional ethics committee of Peking University People’s Hospital and was performed according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients were willing to volunteer for the research and signed a written informed consent. Their parents or guardians also signed the written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, Q., Wang, L., Zhao, M. et al. Comparing myopic error in patients with basic and convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia in China. BMC Ophthalmol 23, 290 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03043-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03043-8

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us