This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Attempting to distinguish between endogenous and contaminating cytokeratins in a corneal proteomic study
© Lyngholm et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 April 2010
Accepted: 27 January 2011
Published: 27 January 2011
The observation of cytokeratins (CK's) in mass spectrometry based studies raises the question of whether the identified CK is a true endogenous protein from the sample or simply represents a contaminant. This issue is especially important in proteomic studies of the corneal epithelium where several CK's have previously been reported to mark the stages of differentiation from corneal epithelial stem cell to the differentiated cell.
Here we describe a method to distinguish very likely endogenous from uncertain endogenous CK's in a mass spectrometry based proteomic study. In this study the CK identifications from 102 human corneal samples were compared with the number of human CK identifications found in 102 murine thymic lymphoma samples.
It was anticipated that the CK's that were identified with a frequency of <5%, i.e. in less than one spot for every 20 spots analysed, are very likely to be endogenous and thereby represent a 'biologically significant' identification. CK's observed with a frequency >5% are uncertain endogenous since they may represent true endogenous CK's but the probability of contamination is high and therefore needs careful consideration. This was confirmed by comparison with a study of mouse samples where all identified human CK's are contaminants.
CK's 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 23 are very likely to be endogenous proteins if identified in a corneal study, whilst CK's 1, 2e, 5, 6A, 9, 10, 14 and 16 may be endogenous although some are likely to be contaminants in a proteomic study. Further immunohistochemical analysis and a search of the current literature largely supported the distinction.
Cytokeratins (CK's) belong to the family of intermediate filaments, and are expressed in a variety of different cell types, including those of the eye. CK's can be classified into type I (acidic) and type II (basic), and they often appear together as pairs of these two types of proteins [1, 2]. Within the eye in particular, CK's have been shown to be important proteins with regard to cellular development, proliferation and differentiation [3–7].
Proteomics using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) is often used as a screening tool in the search for differentially expressed proteins . If CK's are the subject of such an experiment, an important issue to determine is whether the CK originates from the investigated tissue or whether its presence is a consequence of contamination from the laboratory environment.
As a consequence of the very high cell turn-over of the surface epithelia the environment is contaminated with cells from hair, skin, nails, eyebrows, eyelashes, airways, etc. Furthermore, CK's remain ubiquitous contaminants even in laboratories with very high cleaning standards being extremely difficult to eliminate , though their presence in MS laboratories should be reduced as much as possible . One way to diminish the environmental contribution of CK's is to filter all the liquids used for 2D-PAGE, including the reducing agents  and to have efficient laboratory protocols to maintain clean conditions in general .
In the search for stem cell markers, we previously investigated the differences in protein expression between the central corneal epithelium and the limbal epithelium by a proteomic approach, in an effort to identify proteins either highly expressed or exclusively present in limbal epithelium . The limbus, which is located between the conjunctiva and the cornea, is a niche for corneal epithelial stem cells. Several CK's have been proposed as markers of stem cells, transient amplifying cells or differentiated cells [5, 7, 14]. Therefore, we wanted to include biologically significant CKs in the investigation in the search for limbal stem cell markers.
This study attempts to discuss whether it is possible by a simple procedure to distinguish between very likely endogenous and uncertain endogenous CK's by counting and evaluating all the human CK's identified by mass spectrometry in a human and murine study. These results are compared with previous reports on location and distribution of CK's in the ocular surface tissue. Further examination was performed by evaluating the specific mass spectra of the cytokeratins in conjunction with immunohistochemistry.
Human sample collection and preparation
Seven human eyes were obtained from The Institute of Anatomy, Aarhus University within 48 hours post mortem. The study adhered with the guidelines from the local ethical committee and the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The eyes were carefully rinsed in sterile isotonic saline and the epithelium was marked with 8 and 10 mm trephines prior to loosening the epithelium by dabbing with 70% alcohol. Under clean conditions, the corneal epithelium was gently scraped to separate the central 8 mm epithelium. The intermediate epithelium (8-10 mm ring) was discarded and the limbal fractions were considered to be the epithelium scraped outside the 10 mm ring since, the conjunctival epithelium was not able to be as easily loosend by this method. Both fractions were transfered to lysis buffer, pH 3-10 NL .
Mouse sample collection and preparation
Two spontaneously developed thymic lymphomas, SM5 and SM7, from C57BL/6J-Trp53tm1Tyj mice deficient for the p53 gene were explanted, in vitro cultured, and established as cell lines growing in RPMI-1640 culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Freshly prepared thymocytes obtained from pools of five mice (either C57BL/6J-Trp53tm1Tyj or normal C57BL/6) and cultured SM5 and SM7 cells were washed extensively in PBS and subsequently freeze dried. The cell pellets were dissolved in lysis buffer, pH 3-10 NL .
2D-PAGE and MS identification
2D-PAGE and silver staining was performed as previously described [8, 13]. The gels were re-hydrated and the cellophane sheets peeled off prior to protein gel spot excision. Gel pieces were dehydrated in acetonitrile, dried and the proteins reduced for 1 h at 56°C in 10 mM dithiotreitol (DTT) and 100 mM NH4HCO3. The solution was exchanged with 55 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM NH4HCO3 for 45 min. Gel pieces were then washed in 100 mM NH4HCO3, dehydrated in acetonitrile, rehydrated in 100 mM NH4HCO3, dehydrated in acetonitrile, dried and swelled in digestion buffer (50 mM NH4HCO3, 5 mM CaCl2 and 12.5 ng/μl trypsin Gold (mass spectrometry grade; Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The digestion was performed overnight at 37°C prior to peptide extraction by 1 change of 20 mM NH4HCO3 and 3 changes of 5% formic acid in 50% acetonitrile. The sample was dried and peptides resuspended in buffer A (water/acetonitrile/formic acid, 97.7/2/0.3, V/V/V). The peptides were separated on an inert nano LC system of a Famos micro autosampler, a Switchos micro column switching module and an Ultimate micro pump from LC Packings (San Francisco, CA) before MS analysis. Samples were concentrated and desalted on a 300 μm inner diameter x 5 mm precolumn (LC Packings) packed with 5 μm C18 PepMap100 material. A 75 μm inner diameter x 15 cm Nano column packed with 3 μm C18 PepMap100 material was used to separate the peptides. Gradient elution from the column was performed by mixing decreasing volumes of buffer A with increasing volumes of buffer B (water/acetonitrile/formic acid, 9.7/90/0.3, V/V/V). The peptides were eluted into the nano electrospray ion source of the quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, UK). MS survey scans were acquired using MassLynx 4 SP4 (Waters). The instrument was operated in a data-dependent MS to MS/MS switching mode. Doubly, triply and quadruply charged peptide ions detected in MS survey scans triggered a switch to MS/MS for obtaining peptide fragmentation spectra. The processed data were used to search in the Swiss-Prot Database (version 56.9) using the on-line version of the Mascot MS/MS Ion Search facility (Matrix Science, Ltd., http://www.matrixscience.com) . Searching was performed with doubly and triply charged ions with 2 missed cleavages, a peptide mass tolerance of 50 ppm, one variable modification, Carbamidomethyl-C and an MS/MS tolerance of ± 0.02 Da. Only human proteins identified by bold red peptides were regarded as significant and reported (excluding duplicate homologous proteins).
Evaluation of the LC-MS/MS identifications
Frequency of human cytokeratins identified in spots from 2D-PAGE in a human corneal study and mouse thymic lymphoma study.
Type I(acidic)/II(neutral or basic)
Previously described in human non-tumour-tissue
Previously described in ocular epithelium
Total count in 102 mouse spots - %
Very likely endogenous (observed in <5% of human samples)
Sebaceous glands, airway epithelium19
Central basal cornea17No found20
Glands, airway epithelium19,2
Hair follicle, nails2
Glands, simple epithelium19,2
Glands, airway epithelium19
Conjunctiva4, basal limbus2
Gastrointestinal tract epithelium2
Non (found in pancreatic tumours)22
Uncertain endogenous (observed in >5% of human samples)
Epidermis, glands, airway epithelium, hair follicles19
Conjuntiva25, cornea19, 24
Glands, airway epithelium, hair follicles19
Epidermis, glands, airway epithelium, hair follicles19
Antibodies against CK 3/12 and 19 were obtained from Chemicon (Billerica, MA), and antibodies for CK 15 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The immunohistochemical protocol has previously been published .
An unpaired non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney) was performed to test for significant differences between CK expression in the human and mouse studies.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of some very likely endogenous cytokeratins.
Spot number in gels (6%=',12%=*)
Observed M (kDA)
Theoretical M (kDA)
Fraction of protein covered (%)1
Very likely endogenous CK's
CK 3 and CK 12 were identified in 4% and 1% of the human samples respectively and are both specific markers for differentiated corneal epithelial cells (Figure 2C) [5, 17, 19]. A mass spectrum from a 28-kDa spot identified CK3 by two peptides from the C-terminal of the protein (64.5 kDa) and thereby could be an identification of an endogenous protein. However, we cannot exclude that this is a cleaved contaminating protein introduced before electrophoresis (Figure 3B).
CK 4 and CK 13 were identified in 3% and 5% of the spots in the human set. Both proteins have previously been identified in the ocular surface (immunohistochemically), in addition to dermal glands and airway epithelium [2, 5, 19]. A 60-kDa spot was identified as CK 4 by two peptides in the C-terminal part of the protein (Figure 3C). This could be a cleaved endogenous protein, however, contamination cannot be excluded. CK 4 and CK13 were observed in 4 and 2 samples in the mouse study respectively, indicating that they may be rare contaminants.
Some of the keratins were rarely identified, some were not observed and among these some have to our knowledge not been reported to be localized in the cornea, i.e. CKs 11, 20 and 23 (table 1). Thus, if identified, they would be very likely endogenous CK's[20–22].
Uncertain endogenous CK's
CK 16 appeared in 6% of the spots in both the human and the mouse study. It is expressed in palmoplantar epidermis, in epidermal appendage and in mucosa [2, 19, 23]. However, CK 16 has also been shown to be expressed in corneal epithelium to a minor extent . None of the mass spectra proved useful in determining the origin of the contamination (data not shown).
CK 5 and CK 14 are paired CK's and were present in 12% and 19% of the samples respectively. CK 5 and CK 14 have previously been found in the corneal epithelium [17, 24], however, they are also present in basal keratinocytes in epidermis [2, 19, 23]. Therefore, most of the identified CK 5 and CK 14 are considered as contaminants, though a few of the identifications could be endogenous.
CK 6A was identified in 22% of the spots and was most likely a contaminant. CK 6A is expressed in palmoplantar epidermis, epidermal appendage and mucosa [2, 19, 23]. Again, none of the mass spectra aided in determining the origin of the contamination (data not shown).
CK's 1, 2e, 9 and 10 were identified in more than 73% of the human spots. Figure 3D shows the peptide-sequence leading to identification of CK 9 in a spot focused at around 10 kDa in the gel. Fragments of peptides were identified throughout the whole protein (62 kDa). It entails that the identification was based not only on a 10-kDa fragment, but rather on the whole protein. This can only be explained by contamination with an un-cleaved protein located on the surface of the excised spot or contamination introduced into the sample prior to enzymatic digestion. All 4 keratins are abundantly expressed in suprabasal cells of stratified and cornified epithelia or palmoplantar epidermis [2, 19, 23], but not in the corneal epithelium [4, 17, 25]. CK's 1, 2e, 9 and 10 are all considered to be contaminating. This is consistent with previous reports [26, 27].
Aspects of contamination
Contamination of CK's occur principally during sample collection or gel preparation and excision. Indeed, by our scraping method there is a risk of contaminating the limbal epithelial fraction by conjunctival epithelium. Immunohistochemistry is especially effective in revealing this type of contamination. If contamination occurs during sample collection and preparation prior to loading on the gels, the contaminating CK's may be focused as spots in the gels. If the contamination occurs during the preparation of the gel solutions, gel casting, spot excision or in the preparation of the spots prior to digestion, the contaminants may appear as identified proteins with molecular masses not in accordance with the spot position.
Impact of the number of investigated spots
The total number of investigated spots is important in this set-up. The more frequent a CK is identified the more likely it is to be a contaminant. However, it should also be considered that endogenous CK's that have several isoforms or have undergone degradation could erroneously be interpreted as contamination and be excluded from the investigation.
Optimization of the method
In a proteomic screening experiment, it may be desirable to obtain as many protein candidates as possible if specific validation techniques are to be subsequently undertaken. An important issue is how much of the sample should be loaded onto the gel. Overloaded gels may lead to increased spot size that can merge with neighbouring spots making further analysis potentially difficult and inaccurate. Conversely, if an inadequate amount of sample is loaded onto the gel, the relative amount of contaminating proteins will tend to increase. In the present study, a relatively small amount of protein was loaded, in an effort to preserve the resolution of proteins in the 40-60 kDa range where gel spots have a tendency to merge together. However, despite the gels produced well-focused spots with low background staining the number of successful identifications was lower than expected, probably as a result of the relatively small amount of protein loaded and the relatively high frequency of contaminating CK's.
It is very important to consider possible contamination of CK's when undertaking MS based proteomic screening experiments, especially with regard to studies of the cornea. Using proteomics as a screening tool in the search for differences in protein expression, including CK's, careful consideration should be applied to the sample amount chosen. Generally one should load as much sample as possible, to the point of not compromising 2D-gel spot resolution. We have shown that if several 2D-gel spots are being processed, CK's represented in less than 5% percent of the spots are very likely to be endogenous identifications (CK's 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 23). If a CK is identified in a large part of the samples it is an uncertain endogenous CK (CK's 1, 2e, 5, 6A, 9, 10, 14 and 16). Confirmation of the CK identification by other biochemical methods such as immunohistochemistry is also very important.
We are grateful to Nakul Mandal MRCOphth, for reading and commenting on the manuscript. We would like to thank Inge Kjærgaard for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by The Danish Medical Research Council, Aarhus University Research Foundation, The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, The Velux Foundation, The Synoptic Foundation and The Beckett Foundation.
- Linder S: Cytokeratin markers come of age. Tumour Biol. 2007, 28: 189-195. 10.1159/000107582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irvine AD, McLean WH: Human keratin diseases: the increasing spectrum of disease and subtlety of the phenotype-genotype correlation. Br J Dermatol. 1999, 140: 815-828. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02810.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uusitalo M, Kivela T: Development of cytoskeleton in neuroectodermally derived epithelial and muscle cells of the human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995, 36: 2584-2591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kivela T, Uusitalo M: Structure, development and function of cytoskeletal elements in non-neuronal cells of the human eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1998, 17: 385-428. 10.1016/S1350-9462(98)00001-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kasper M, Moll R, Stosiek P, Karsten U: Patterns of cytokeratin and vimentin expression in the human eye. Histochemistry. 1988, 89: 369-377. 10.1007/BF00500639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kasper M, Viebahn C: Cytokeratin expression and early lens development. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1992, 186: 285-290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Figueira EC, Di Girolamo N, Coroneo MT, Wakefield D: The phenotype of limbal epithelial stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007, 48: 144-156. 10.1167/iovs.06-0346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Honoré B, Vorum H, Pedersen AE, Buus S, Claesson MH: Changes in protein expression in p53 deleted spontaneous thymic lymphomas. Exp Cell Res. 2004, 295: 91-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ochs D: Protein contaminants of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1983, 135: 470-474. 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90714-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mann M, Hendrickson RC, Pandey A: Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001, 70: 437-473. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul-Pletzer K, Parness J: Elimination of keratin contaminant from 2-mercaptoethanol. Anal Biochem. 2001, 289: 98-99. 10.1006/abio.2000.4949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lubec G, Afjehi-Sadat L: Limitations and pitfalls in protein identification by mass spectrometry. Chem Rev. 2007, 107: 3568-3584. 10.1021/cr068213f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyngholm M, Vorum H, Nielsen K, Ostergaard M, Honore B, Ehlers N: Differences in the protein expression in limbal versus central human corneal epithelium--a search for stem cell markers. Exp Eye Res. 2008, 87: 96-105. 10.1016/j.exer.2008.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kruse FE: Identification and characterization of limbal stem cells. Exp Eye Res. 2005, 81: 247-264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS: Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999, 20: 3551-3567. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Honore B, Buus S, Claesson MH: Identification of differentially expressed proteins in spontaneous thymic lymphomas from knockout mice with deletion of p53. Proteome Sci. 2008, 6: 18-10.1186/1477-5956-6-18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Elder MJ, Hiscott P, Dart JK: Intermediate filament expression by normal and diseased human corneal epithelium. Hum Pathol. 1997, 28: 1348-1354. 10.1016/S0046-8177(97)90222-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitbread LA, Powell BC: Expression of the intermediate filament keratin gene, K15, in the basal cell layers of epithelia and the hair follicle. Exp Cell Res. 1998, 244: 448-459. 10.1006/excr.1998.4217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R: The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell. 1982, 31: 11-24. 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90400-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cockerham GC, Laver NV, Hidayat AA, McCoy DL: An immunohistochemical analysis and comparison of posterior polymorphous dystrophy with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 2002, 21: 787-791. 10.1097/00003226-200211000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merjava S, Neuwirth A, Mandys V, Jirsova K: Cytokeratins 8 and 18 in adult human corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2009, 89: 426-431. 10.1016/j.exer.2009.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JS, Wang L, Huang H, Nelson M, Smith DI: Keratin 23 (K23), a novel acidic keratin, is highly induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors during differentiation of pancreatic cancer cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001, 30: 123-135. 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1070>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurokawa I, Mizutani H, Kusumoto K, Nishijima S, Tsujita-Kyutoku M, Shikata N, Tsubura A: Cytokeratin, filaggrin, and p63 expression in reepithelialization during human cutaneous wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2006, 14: 38-45. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2005.00086.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Endo K, Kawasaki S, Nakamura T, Kinoshita S: The presence of keratin 5 as an IgG Fc binding protein in human corneal epithelium. Exp Eye Res. 2004, 78: 1137-1141. 10.1016/j.exer.2004.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitz S, Moll R: Intermediate-filament expression in ocular tissue. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002, 21: 241-262. 10.1016/S1350-9462(01)00025-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parker KC, Garrels JI, Hines W, Butler EM, McKee AH, Patterson D, Martin S: Identification of yeast proteins from two-dimensional gels: working out spot cross-contamination. Electrophoresis. 1998, 19: 1920-1932. 10.1002/elps.1150191110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding Q, Xiao L, Xiong S, Jia Y, Que H, Guo Y, Liu S: Unmatched masses in peptide mass fingerprints caused by cross-contamination: an updated statistical result. Proteomics. 2003, 3: 1313-1317. 10.1002/pmic.200300452.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/11/3/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.