Volume 15 Supplement 1
Wakayama symposium: role of canonical Notch signaling in conjucntival goblet cell differentiation and dry eye syndrome
© Liu. 2015
Published: 17 December 2015
This review summarizes a recent finding regarding the intrinsic canonical Notch signaling pathway in regulating normal ocular surface morphogenesis and its role in the pathogenesis of goblet cell deficiency-associated keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS, or dry eye). Specifically, we used novel transgenic mice to investigate the mechanism of how the Notch1 activation may serve as the upstream control of expression of transcription factors Krüppel-like factors 4 or 5 (Klf4 or Klf5) which in turn controls goblet cell differentiation and activates mucin 5/ac synthesis during ocular surface morphogenesis.
KeywordsDry eye Goblet cells Ocular surface Morphogenesis Notch signaling
Ocular surface goblet cells are polarized epithelial cells scattered along the conjunctival epithelium in which their numbers in bulbar (or ocular) conjunctiva at the fornix area are much more abundant than those in palpebral (or tarsal) conjunctiva. Conjunctival goblet cell is the major cell type that synthesizes and secrets mucins for the maintenance of ocular surface integrity. Lack of mucins in tear film due to goblet cells abnormality causes dry eye syndrome (DES) and affects millions of people’s vision and life [1–3]. The lack of knowledge regarding the regulatory mechanisms by which conjunctival epithelial cells differentiate to form goblet cells hampers the development of treatment regimens for DES.
The cellular mechanism underlying goblet cell formation and related pathogenesis in the ocular surface epithelia is poorly understood. A recent report showed that members of the canonical Notch signaling pathway i.e., Notch1, Notch2, Notch3, Jagged1, Dll1, were significantly down-regulated in dry eye as compared to the non-dry eye conjunctival epithelia . This result suggested that Notch deregulation played an important role in the pathogenesis of human dry eye syndrome. Nevertheless, the specific function of canonical Notch signaling pathway in ocular surface goblet cell fate determination has not been well documented or explored in vivo. Therefore, it is important to understand the molecular basis of how epithelial phenotypes of nonkeratinization and mucin expression are modulated by Notch signaling to endow the mucous ocular surface with sufficient moisture that is essential to maintain the integrity and health of the corneal and conjunctival surface.
Canonical Notch signaling
Notch signaling is a central mediator of short-range inter-cellular communication in metazoans [5, 6]. It regulates cell fate decision and plays critical roles in controlling goblet cell differentiation in the gut epithelium . Moreover, Notch activation has been postulated to contribute in the maintenance of corneal [8–11] and conjunctival [12, 13] phenotypes. The Notch receptor exists at the cell surface as a proteolytically cleaved heterodimer consisting of a large ectodomain and a membrane-tethered intracellular domain. Ligands of the Delta-like (DLL1, DLL3, DLL4) and Jagged (JAG1 and JAG2) families interact with receptors of Notch family (NOTCH1-4) on an adjacent cell. The ligand-receptor interaction induces further proteolytic cleavages of the Notch that release the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) from the cell membrane. The NICD translocates into the nucleus, where it forms a complex with the recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBP-Jκ) protein, displacing a histone deacetylase (HDAc)-co-repressor (CoR) complex from the RBP-Jκ protein. Components of an activation complex, i.e., transcriptional co-activators mastermind-like protein 1 (MAML1) and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) p300, are recruited to the NICD-RBP-Jκ complex, leading to the transcriptional activation of Notch target genes such as Hes1 (hairy and enchancer of split-1)/Hey1 (Hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW motif 1) and others .
Findings in transgenic mouse model
K14-rtTA (K14-rt): Keratin 14-promoter-driven reverse tetracycline trans-activator ,
tet-O-Cre (TC): Cre recombinase under the control of a tetracycline-responsive promoter element (TRE; tet-O) , and
Rosa LSL-dnMAML1 : a fusion cDNA cassette LSL-dnMAML1 consisting of two LoxP (L) sites flanked stop (S) sequence followed by a dominant negative MAML1 under the control of the mouse Rosa 26 gene locus .
All the mice were bred at the Animal Facility of the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. Experimental procedures for handling the mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, University of Cincinnati/College of Medicine.
This work was supported by grants from NIH/NEI RO1 EY21501, Research Prevent Blindness, Ohio Lions Foundation for Eye Research.
This article has been published as part of BMC Ophthalmology Volume 15 Supplement 1, 2015: Proceedings of the 2nd Ocular Cell Biology Symposium at Wakayama. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcophthalmol/supplements.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- DePaiva CS, Villarreal AL, Corrales RM, Rahman HT, Chang VY, Farley WJ, et al. Dry eye-induced conjunctival epithelial squamous metaplasia is modulated by interferon-gamma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(6):2553–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corrales RM, de Paiva CS, Li DQ, Farley WJ, Henriksson JT, Bergmanson JP, et al. Entrapment of conjunctival goblet cells by desiccation-induced cornification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(6):3492–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dogru M, Tsubota K. Pharmacotherapy of dry eye. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(3):325–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mantelli F, Schaffer L, Dana R, Head SR, Argüeso P. Glycogene expression in conjunctiva of patients with dry eye: downregulation of Notch signaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6):2666–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kovall RA, Blacklow SC. Mechanistic insights into Notch receptor signaling from structural and biochemical studies. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010;92:31–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersson ER, Sandberg R, Lendahl U. Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development. 2011;138(17):3593–612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radtke F, Clevers H. Self-renewal and cancer of the gut: two sides of a coin. Science. 2005;307(5717):1904–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma A, Boulton M, Zhao B, Connon C, Cai J, Albon J. A role for notch signaling in human corneal epithelial cell differentiation and proliferation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(8):3576–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vauclair S, Majo F, Durham A, Ghyselinck NB, Barrandon Y, Radtke F. Corneal epithelial cell fate is maintained during repair by Notch1 signaling via the regulation of vitamin A metabolism. Dev Cell. 2007;13(2):242–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djalilian AR, Namavari A, Ito A, Balali S, Afshar A, Lavker RM, et al. Down-regulation of Notch signaling during corneal epithelial proliferation. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1041–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura T, Ohtsuka T, Sekiyama E, Cooper LJ, Kokubu H, Fullwood NJ, et al. Hes1 regulates corneal development and the function of corneal epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26(5):1265–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukushima A, Sumi T, Ishida W, Ojima A, Kajisako M, Koyanagi A, et al. Notch ligand Delta-like4 inhibits the development of murine experimental allergic conjunctivitis. Immunol Lett. 2008;121(2):140–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiong L, Woodward AM, Argüeso P. Notch signaling modulates MUC16 biosynthesis in an in vitro model of human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cell differentiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5641–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Borggrefe T, Oswald F. The Notch signaling pathway: transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(10):1631–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen H, Rendl M, Fuchs E. Tcf3 governs stem cell features and represses cell fate determination in skin. Cell. 2006;127(1):171–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perl AK, Wert SE, Nagy A, Lobe CG, Whitsett JA. Early restriction of peripheral and proximal cell lineages during formation of the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(16):10482–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tu L, Fang C, Artis D, Shestova O, Pross SE, Maillard I, et al. Notch signaling is an important regulator of type 2 immunity. J Exp Med. 2005;202(8):1037–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Lam O, Nguyen MT, Ng G, Pear WS, Ai W, et al. Mastermind-like transcriptional co-activator-mediated Notch signaling is indispensable for maintaining conjunctival epithelial identity. Development. 2013;140(3):594–605.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Shatos MA, Hodges RR, Dartt DA. Role of PKCα activation of Src, PI-3K/AKT, and ERK in EGF-stimulated proliferation of rat and human conjunctival goblet cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5661–874.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Heuberger J, Kosel F, Qi J, Grossmann KS, Rajewsky K, Birchmeier W. Shp2/MAPK signaling controls goblet/paneth cell fate decisions in the intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(9):3472–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ng GY, Yeh LK, Zhang Y, Liu H, Feng GS, Kao WW, et al. Role of SH2-containing tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 in mouse corneal epithelial stratification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):7933–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar