Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association between glaucoma and risk of depression: a nationwide population-based cohort study

BMC Ophthalmology volume 18, Article number: 146 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous cross-sectional studies revealed a higher prevalence of depression among glaucoma patients. However, cohort studies were in lack to build the risk of incident depression after the diagnosis of glaucoma. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between glaucoma and the subsequent risk of developing depression and to assess risk factors associated with depression in glaucoma patients.

Methods

A population-based retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was conducted from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2011. Glaucoma patients (n = 8777) and age- and gender-matched control subjects without glaucoma (n = 35,108) were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare the cumulative hazard of subsequent depression between the glaucoma and control groups. A Cox regression analysis estimated the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for depression. Risk factors leading to depression were investigated among the glaucoma patients.

Results

Glaucoma patients had a significantly higher cumulative hazard of depression compared to the control group (p-value < 0.0001). The Cox regression model indicated that the glaucoma group had a significantly higher risk of depression (adjusted HR = 1.71). Within the glaucoma group, significant risk factors for depression included age, female, low income, substance abuse, and living alone. However, the use of β-blocker eye drops and the number of glaucoma medications were not significant risk factors for depression.

Conclusion

Patients with glaucoma are at significantly greater risk of developing depression. Among glaucoma patients, age, female, low income, substance abuse, and living alone were significant risk factors for depression.

Peer Review reports

Background

Glaucoma is the most common cause of irreversible blindness [1]. Glaucoma patients must cope with visual impairment, the anxiety associated with blindness, long-term follow-up and a heavy economic burden. In addition, prior studies have shown an association between β-blocker eye drops (a common glaucoma treatment) and depression [2, 3]. In all, there are many factors associated with glaucoma that may lead to depression.

Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of depression among the glaucoma patients is higher than that among the non-glaucoma individuals [4,5,6,7,8]. The risk factors associated with depression among glaucoma patients have also been identified [6, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, the majority of the studies have been conducted in hospital settings with a small sample size. Moreover, most studies have been cross-sectional studies and as such cannot address the timeline between glaucoma and the development of depression.

To investigate the relationship of glaucoma and subsequent development of depression, we conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study with an 11-year follow-up period. A glaucoma group and non-glaucoma group were explored through the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan to see whether the risk of developing depression differed between groups. In addition, risk factors associated with the development of depression among glaucoma patients were explored.

Methods

Data source

The National Health Insurance (NHI) program of Taiwan covers the health care services of greater than 99% of Taiwan’s 23 million residents [15]. The NHIRD is maintained by the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan and includes inpatient as well as outpatient medical benefit claims. To ensure confidentiality, the identification of all patients in the database was encrypted prior to releasing data for research purposes [16]. Data from our study were extracted from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID), a subset of the NHIRD that contains the original claims data of 1,000,000 beneficiaries randomly sampled from all beneficiaries of the NHI program [16]. This study was approved by the ethical committee of Yang-Ming University Hospital (2015A017). The informed consent was exempt according to the Institutional Review Board because each patient record was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

A retrospective cohort study of patients in the LHID with a follow-up period from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011 was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification Codes (ICD-9-CM code: 365.X) were selected for the glaucoma group. Date of first glaucoma diagnosis was defined as the index date. Individuals who had never been diagnosed with glaucoma were randomly selected as a control group at a ratio of 1:4, and matched with the glaucoma group on age, gender, and index year (the year of index date or enrollment). The two groups were followed until the end of 2011 to see whether they had subsequent development of depression (ICD-9-CM codes: 296.2X, 296.3X, 3004, 311). Patients with depression were diagnosed by psychiatrists under the well-acknowledged diagnostic criteria and protocol. Glaucoma subjects and controls that were diagnosed with depression or a severe mental health disorder prior to the index year were excluded from the analysis.

Study variables

We compared the risk of developing depression among the glaucoma group and the control group. The covariates of age, gender and other risk factors for depression, including economic status and systemic diseases were adjusted. In the NHI program, insurance cost is correlated with income so that the greater the income of a patient, the more he/she pays for insurance. In addition, urbanization level of residency was also accessible. Living alone, substance abuse, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), which is generally regarded as a score for severity of systemic diseases [17], were also considered covariates in our study.

Association between topical glaucoma medication and depression

Risk factors associated with the development of depression were analyzed in the glaucoma group. The number and types of glaucoma medication, were entered into the analysis. Topical glaucoma medications were identified and classified by the National Drug Code and the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code. According to the classification system, topical glaucoma medications include sympathomimetics, parasympathomimetics (pilocarpine), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, β-blockers, prostaglandin analogs, and fixed combinations. The more degree of IOP lowering required, the greater number of glaucoma medications were prescribed. Current users were defined as those who had used medications in the past 6 months. A fixed-combination medication was counted as two medications.

Statistical analysis

Group differences between the glaucoma group and the control group in age, gender, CCI, insurance cost, urbanization level of residency, living alone, and substance abuse were analyzed by two-sample t-tests (for continuous variables) and chi-squared tests (for categorical variables). A survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier estimator with a log-rank test was applied to describe and compare the cumulative hazard curves of depression. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for the occurrence of depression according to each variable in univariate and multivariate analyses. Variables included in the regression analysis were glaucoma, age, gender, CCI, insurance cost, urbanization level of residency, living alone, and substance abuse.

Subsequently, the cox regression was used to investigate risk factors associated with depression among glaucoma patients. Variables included for analysis were age, gender, CCI, insurance cost, urbanization level of residency, living alone, substance abuse, number of glaucoma medications, and types of glaucoma medication. All statistical operations were performed using SAS statistical package, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Demographic characteristics of the study sample

A total of 8777 glaucoma patients and 35,108 matched controls were enrolled in the study. Table 1 displays demographics of the two groups. The mean age in both groups was 59.4 years. The glaucoma group had a higher CCI, higher insurance costs and a higher urbanization level of residency. During the 11-year follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of depression was significantly higher in the glaucoma group (5.9%) than the control group (3.2%).

Table 1 Characteristics of study subjects
Full size table

Cumulative hazard curves by the Kaplan-Meier method

Figure 1 illustrates the cumulative hazard curves for depression in the glaucoma group and the control group. A log rank test revealed a statistically significant difference between the hazard curves of the two groups (p-value < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curves for depression among glaucoma patients and the control group. The black line represents the glaucoma group and the gray line represents the control group

Full size image

Univariate and multivariate analyses by the cox regression model

The unadjusted HR for depression was 1.71 times greater in the glaucoma group compared to the control group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54–1.89) (Table 2). After adjusting for covariates, the significantly greater hazard for depression in the glaucoma group remained (adjusted HR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.54–1.89). Age was a significant risk factor for depression in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The adjusted HR for depression in patients over 70 years old reached 1.49 when compared with those between 30 to 50 years old. Males were less likely to develop depression than females (adjusted HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.61–0.74). In the univariate analysis, patients with a greater CCI had a significantly higher risk of developing depression. However, after adjustment for covariates, CCI was no longer a significant risk factor (adjusted HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.91–1.19). Both living alone and substance abuse were significantly associated with an increased risk of depression (adjusted HR =1.20 and 1.44, respectively). The risk of developing depression was significantly lower in patients with a higher insurance cost (adjusted HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.92). However, residential urbanization, was not significantly related to the risk of depression in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Table 2 Analyses of Risk Factors for depression in Patients with and without glaucoma
Full size table

Risk factors for depression among glaucoma patients

Table 3 displays the risk factors for depression among glaucoma patients. Older age, female gender, a lower insurance cost, living alone, and substance abuse, significantly increased the risk of developing depression among glaucoma patients in univariate as well as multivariate cox regression analyses. Neither residential urbanization nor the number of glaucoma medications were risk factors for depression. The use of β-blocker eye drops was not a significant risk factor for depression (adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.89–1.30). Similarly, none of other glaucoma medications was a risk factor or protective factor of depression.

Table 3 Analyses of Risk Factors for depression among Patients with glaucoma
Full size table

Discussion

We conducted an 11-year follow-up study on population-based data from the Taiwan LHID. Compared to those without glaucoma, patients with glaucoma had a significantly higher risk (HR = 1.71) of developing depression. Among glaucoma patients, older age, female gender, lower income, living alone, and substance abuse were significant risk factors for developing depression. Neither the number nor the types of glaucoma eye drops were significant risk factor of depression.

The majority of the prior studies regarding the association between glaucoma and depression used different kinds of self-report questionnaires to assess depression symptoms rather than a clinical diagnosis [4,5,6,7,8,9,10, 12, 13, 18], limiting comparisons between studies. In our study, diagnoses of glaucoma, depression, and systemic comorbidities were made by board-certificated doctors, increasing the validity of the results in the present study. Besides, the follow-up cohort design of our study could derive additional information about the incidence of depression. As noted in Table 1, during the 11-year follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of depression was 5.9% among glaucoma patients, which was significantly higher than the 3.2% in the control group.

According to the definition made by the World Health Organization, happiness/health is a dynamic state of complete physical, medical, social, and spiritual well-being. Therefore, systemic diseases, substance abuse, lack of social network such as family support or religion, all may have effects on depression risk. These variables are confounders and have to be adjusted when we investigate the relationship between glaucoma and depression. Table 1 compares these confounders between glaucoma and control groups. It is compatible with previous studies that the glaucoma group has a significantly higher severity of systemic diseases [5, 19]. Table 1 also shows the glaucoma group and the control group are matched well on age and gender, thus the two groups have the same distributions of age and gender. It is noteworthy that the mean glaucoma diagnostic age in our glaucoma group is 59.4 years, which is younger than the average glaucoma presenting age of 71.1 years in other country [20]. Besides, the diagnostic prevalence of glaucoma in the younger age categories was almost the same as that in the older age categories. One reason is that the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma (including normal tension glaucoma) has been higher than that of angle-closure glaucoma since 2005 [21], and patients with normal tension glaucoma generally have a younger age than those with angle-closure glaucoma [22], thus lowering the average age of glaucoma patients. Another reason is the high accessibility of healthcare achieved by the Taiwan NHI system [23], thus glaucoma can be diagnosed at an earlier age.

In addition, Table 1 shows that glaucoma subjects have a significantly higher insurance amount (income) as well as a significantly higher urbanization level of residence. The phenomenon can imply a higher chance of glaucoma to be identified in people with higher socioeconomic status (SES). The possible reason was that people with higher SES might have higher glaucoma awareness, and have more eye care seeking behavior because of increased prevalence myopia [24, 25]. Therefore they have more chances to be incidentally found to have glaucoma.

As shown in Table 2, the glaucoma group exhibited a significantly higher risk for developing depression than the control group (adjusted HR = 1.71). Similarly, a study conducted in the US by Wang et al., using the database of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found glaucoma was significantly associated with depression after adjusting for the impact of demographic factors and systemic comorbidities (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.01–1.52) [8]. Our cohort study design allowed an assessment of HR, providing more information than OR about subsequent risk of depression. We also found that lower income, living alone, and substance abuse were significant risk factors of depression, which were compatible with previous studies [26,27,28,29]. The possible explanation is the lack of financial or emotional support may predispose people to depression.

Among glaucoma patients in our study, older patients and female patients were at a greater risk of developing depression (Table 3). These results are consistent with previous studies [6, 10,11,12]. In addition, a lower income significantly increased the risk for depression, which implies that economic burden may predispose glaucoma patients to depression. Furthermore, living alone and substance abuse were associated with depression. Therefore, familial and social support were important for the psychological health among glaucoma patients. Our study revealed a consistent finding with previous studies that neither the number nor the types of glaucoma medications was a significant risk factor for depression among glaucoma patients [8, 30]. Also, we found the use of β-blocker eye drops was not an independent risk factors for depression. While systemic β-blockers are addressed to have side effects such as asthma, bradyarrhythmia, and depression [3, 31,32,33], the association between topical β-blocker eye drops and depression is still controversial. Topical β-blocker eye drops might be absorbed through nasal and pharyngeal mucosa and could cause depression in some studies [2, 34, 35] While drug manufactures label β-blockers with a possible risk of depression, the current study along with many prior studies [6, 8, 13, 36, 37] do not support this claim. The inconsistencies may be resulted from discrepancies in study design and case definition. Most of the studies supporting an association between β-blocker eye drops and depression used case series and case reports, whereas findings from cross-sectional or case-control studies were equivocal. Differences in case definition may also explain the inconsistencies. Studies using a diagnosis of depression mostly did not support the relationship. However, studies using depressive symptoms were about evenly split. Still another explanation of inconsistencies might be ethnicity. Most of previous literature revealed significant association were studies among Caucasians. Our study, with a cohort study design among an Asian population and used depression diagnosis as case definition, revealed no significant association between β-blocker eye drops and depression. Future studies will be needed to further investigate the issue using a comparable study design and case definition among different ethnicities.

The strengths of our study are a large sample size, a lengthy study period, disease confirmation through well-accepted ICD9-CM codes, and a statistical analysis that adjusted for confounders. However, studies based on claimed database may have the limitation that the diagnostic codes in the database are not as accurate as those in the clinical charts. Fortunately, in our health care system, the National health Administration (NHA) frequently checks the consistencies between the claimed data and the charts. NHA also checks whether the patient received a standard protocol of examinations to confirm the diagnoses. Therefore, the diagnoses in our database had high accuracies.

It is another limitation that NHIRD does not have the information regarding the detailed clinical characteristics of depression (e.g., Hamilton rating scale), or about visual quality. Besides, the NHIRD did not supply data about religion, which may have a protective effect on depression in previous studies [12, 38, 39]. Future studies combining the chart review will be conducted to consider and adjust these confounding effects. At present stage, we have adjusted many possible confounders, such as age, gender, CCI, income, urbanization level of residency, living alone, substance use, and number/types of glaucoma medications. Based on the significant risk factors of depression that were found in our study, early intervention to prevent or treat psychological problems could be considered among glaucoma patients with high risks.

Conclusion

In our study, glaucoma patients are at significantly greater risk of developing depression. Among glaucoma patients, age, female, and low income were significant risk factors for depression. The findings from our study have clinical and public health implications. Clinically, when treating glaucoma patients, ophthalmologists need to focus not only on the medical aspects of glaucoma, but must also provide psychological support to their patients. Glaucoma patients at a high risk for depression, such as older patients, female patients, and patients with a low income, should be referred to a psychiatrist if early signs of depression become apparent. From a public health perspective, policy makers are encouraged to enforce screening for depression risk in patients with glaucoma, and to provide more substantial and integrated care.

Abbreviations

ATC code:

Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical code

CCI:

Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)

CI:

Confidence interval

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICD-9-CM Codes:

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification Codes

LHID:

Longitudinal Health Insurance Database

NHA:

National health Administration

NHI:

National Health Insurance

NHIRD:

National Health Insurance Research Database

SES:

Socioeconomic status

Reference

  1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bali SJ, Parmar T, Arora V, Ichhpujani P, Sagar R, Dada T. Evaluation of major depressive disorder in patients receiving chronic treatment with topical timolol. Ophthalmologica Journal international d’ophtalmologie International journal of ophthalmology Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde. 2011;226(3):157–60.

  3. Frishman WH. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers. Adverse effects and drug interactions. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979. 1988;11(3 Pt 2):Ii21–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Erb C, Batra A, Bromer A, Bayer AU, Muller-Schaaf B, Thiel HJ. Psychiatric manifestations in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 1993;90(6):635–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin HC, Chien CW, Hu CC, Ho JD. Comparison of comorbid conditions between open-angle glaucoma patients and a control cohort: a case-control study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(11):2088–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mabuchi F, Yoshimura K, Kashiwagi K, Shioe K, Yamagata Z, Kanba S, Iijima H, Tsukahara S. High prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(7):552–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tastan S, Iyigun E, Bayer A, Acikel C. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in Turkish patients with glaucoma. Psychol Rep. 2010;106(2):343–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang SY, Singh K, Lin SC. Prevalence and predictors of depression among participants with glaucoma in a nationally representative population sample. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(3):436–444.e432.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cumurcu T, Cumurcu BE, Celikel FC, Etikan I. Depression and anxiety in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(6):509–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayawant SS, Bhosle MJ, Anderson RT, Balkrishnan R. Depressive symptomatology, medication persistence, and associated healthcare costs in older adults with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(6):513–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim NC, Fan CH, Yong MK, Wong EP, Yip LW. Assessment of depression, anxiety, and quality of life in Singaporean patients with Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(7):605–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Skalicky S, Goldberg I. Depression and quality of life in patients with glaucoma: a cross-sectional analysis using the geriatric depression Scale-15, assessment of function related to vision, and the Glaucoma quality of Life-15. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(7):546–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson MR, Coleman AL, Yu F, Fong Sasaki I, Bing EG, Kim MH. Depression in patients with glaucoma as measured by self-report surveys. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(5):1018–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou C, Qian S, Wu P, Qiu C. Anxiety and depression in Chinese patients with glaucoma: sociodemographic, clinical, and self-reported correlates. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75(1):75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Health Insurance Research Database [Background]. https://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/index.html. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  16. National Health Research Database [Data subsets]. https://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/Data_Subsets.html. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  17. Molto A, Dougados M. Comorbidity indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(5 Suppl 85):S131–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundmark PO, Trope GE, Shapiro CM, Flanagan JG. Depressive symptomatology in tertiary-care glaucoma patients. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology / Journal Canadien d’Ophtalmologie. 2009;44(2):198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen YY, Sheu SJ, Hu HY, Chu D, Chou P. Association between retinal vein occlusion and an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide population-based follow-up study. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma T, Salmon JF. Ten-year outcomes in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients: mortality and visual function. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(10):1282–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiu SL, Chu CL, Muo CH, Chen CL, Lan SJ. The prevalence and the incidence of diagnosed open-angle Glaucoma and diagnosed angle-closure Glaucoma: changes from 2001 to 2010. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(5):e514–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee MS, Kuo LL, Tan EC, Lee OK. Is normal-tension glaucoma a risk factor for stroke?-a 10-year follow-up study. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu TY, Majeed A, Kuo KN. An overview of the healthcare system in Taiwan. London journal of primary care. 2010;3(2):115–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Education, socioeconomic status, and ocular dimensions in Chinese adults: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(9):963–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee YY, Lo CT, Sheu SJ, Lin JL. What factors are associated with myopia in young adults? A survey study in Taiwan military conscripts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(2):1026–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cakici M, Gokce O, Babayigit A, Cakici E, Es A. Depression: point-prevalence and risk factors in a North Cyprus household adult cross-sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2017;17(1):387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu XB, Zhang Y, Wang XY, Hao W. The synergistic effect of dual use of amphetamine-type stimulants and ketamine on drug-induced psychotic symptoms in Chinese synthetic drug users. Oncotarget. 2017;8(39):66569–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee SB, Chung S, Lee H, Seo JS. The mutual relationship between Men’s drinking and depression: a 4-year longitudinal analysis. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Alcohol and alcoholism; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hu SH, Chuang YH: Prevalence of depressive symptoms in older nursing home residents with intact cognitive function in Taiwan. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Su CC, Chen JY, Wang TH, Huang JY, Yang CM, Wang IJ. Risk factors for depressive symptoms in glaucoma patients: a nationwide case-control study. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2015;253(8):1319–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Morales DR, Jackson C, Lipworth BJ, Donnan PT, Guthrie B. Adverse respiratory effect of acute beta-blocker exposure in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest. 2014;145(4):779–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Britt J, Moffett BS, Bronicki RA, Checchia PA. Incidence of adverse events requiring intervention after initiation of oral beta-blocker in pediatric cardiac intensive care patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(6):1062–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rathmann W, Haastert B, Roseman JM, Giani G. Cardiovascular drug prescriptions and risk of depression in diabetic patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(11):1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Duch S, Duch C, Pasto L, Ferrer P. Changes in depressive status associated with topical beta-blockers. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16(4–5):331–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shore JH, Fraunfelder FT, Meyer SM. Psychiatric side effects from topical ocular timolol, a beta-adrenergic blocker. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1987;7(4):264-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaiserman I, Kaiserman N, Elhayany A, Vinker S. Topical beta-blockers are not associated with an increased risk of treatment for depression. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1077–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ko DT, Hebert PR, Coffey CS, Sedrakyan A, Curtis JP, Krumholz HM. Beta-blocker therapy and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction. Jama. 2002;288(3):351–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vasegh S, Rosmarin DH, Koenig HG, Dew RE, Bonelli RM. Religious and spiritual factors in depression. Depression research and treatment. 2012;2012:298056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Milstein G, Bruce ML, Gargon N, Brown E, Raue PJ, McAvay G. Religious practice and depression among geriatric home care patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2003;33(1):71–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed during the current study are available from the Collaboration Center of Health Information Application, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan: Stcarolwu@mohw.gov.tw, adderss:4F., No.488, sec. 6.Zhongxiao E. RD., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 115, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Yu-Yen Chen, Yun-Ju Lai, Chun-Yuan Wang & Hsin-Hua Chen

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Yu-Yen Chen, Ying-Cheng Shen & Chun-Yuan Wang

  3. Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, 155, sec.2, Linong St, Taipei, 11221, Taiwan

    Yu-Yen Chen, Hsin-Hua Chen, Hsiao-Yun Hu & Pesus Chou

  4. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Puli Branch of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Nantou, Taiwan

    Yun-Ju Lai

  5. Department of Exercise Health Science, National Taiwan University of Sport, Taichung, Taiwan

    Yun-Ju Lai

  6. Bethel Psychiatric Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan

    Jen-Pang Wang

  7. Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Hsin-Hua Chen

  8. Institute of Biomedical Science and Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Hsin-Hua Chen

  9. Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Hsin-Hua Chen

  10. School of Medicine, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Hsin-Hua Chen

  11. Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    Hsiao-Yun Hu

Authors
  1. Yu-Yen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yun-Ju Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jen-Pang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ying-Cheng Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chun-Yuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hsin-Hua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hsiao-Yun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pesus Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: YYC, YJL, JPW, YCS, CYW, HHC, and PC; Formal analysis: YYC, YJL, HYH and PC; Investigation: YYC, JPW, HHC, and PC; Methodology: YYC, YJL, HHC, HYH, and PC; Validation: YYC, YJL, JPW, YCS, CYW, and PC; Writing the original draft: YYC, and PC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pesus Chou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethical committee of Yang-Ming University Hospital (2015A017). The informed consent was exempt according to the Institutional Review Board because each patient record was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YY., Lai, YJ., Wang, JP. et al. The association between glaucoma and risk of depression: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol 18, 146 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0811-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0811-5

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us