Skip to main content
Download PDF

Long-term clinical prognosis of 335 infant single-gene positive FEVR cases

BMC Ophthalmology volume 22, Article number: 329 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and analyze the clinical prognosis of infants diagnosed of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) with single gene mutation in long-term follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective case study was conducted on 355 FEVR infants with single positive gene.

Result

Of the 335 single-gene positive infant FEVR cases (under 3 years old), 20% (n = 67) was diagnosed of strabismus at first visit. Staging of various genotypes was different (P < 0.001). Patients with NDP mutations presented the most severe clinical phenotypes and patients with ZNF408 mutations presented the mildest clinical phenotypes. Most infants underwent surgery under 1 year old (5th stage 75 of 108 [69.44%]). The axial length of different genotypes showed no significant difference (P = 0.2891). The 1st to 3rd stage cases were given intravitreal injection and/or retina photocoagulation with the last follow-up vision above 20/67. The 4th to 5th stage cases received the transcorneal vitrectomy with lensectomy or lens sparing vitrectomy (LSV), whose lens maintained transparent after LSV (11/14[78.58%]). After 2 to 10 years of follow-up, 37.96% (41/108) of post-surgery cases showed retinal funnel-like unfold and posterior pole unfold, 69.57% (16/ 23) of which received second surgery for closure of pupil with good prognosis. At the last follow-up, 20% (60/300) were with vision above 20/200.

Conclusion

LRP5 gene mutation was the most common mutation in FEVR patients. The severity of the clinical phenotype varied with different gene mutations. The main surgical methods for cases at Stage 4–5 were transcorneal vitrectomy with lensectomy or LSV. The earlier FEVR occurred, the worse prognosis would be. Active surgical intervention and lens sparing were necessary for cases at Stage 4–5.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) is a rare hereditary eye disease, with high prevalence of 13 ~ 16% in children blind-causing eye diseases [1], first described by Criswick and Schepens in 1969 [2]. According to the manifestation of retinal abnormalities, FEVR is classified into 5 stages, which was first proposed by Pendergast [3]. FEVR is predominantly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, as well as in autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive manner. At present, 6 acknowledged genes are responsible for the disorder, including FZD4, NDP, LRP5, TSPAN12, ZNF408 and KIF11. Typically, FEVR is regarded as a bilateral disease manifesting all the patterns of the Mendelian inheritance. There is also a certain proportion of unilateral FEVR, ranging from 3.22%-15% [4]. The underlying mechanisms of unilateral onset is elusive, possibly being related to epigenetics. The typical clinical features of FEVR are peripheral avascular retina, especially peripheral V-shaped avascular retina on the temporal side [5]. Retinal detachment (RD) is the most common complication of FEVR with a proportion of 21 ~ 64% [6]. The progressive tractional retinal detachment will finally develop into retinal fold, also called ‘falciform fold’, which is a typical manifestation of severe stage. The clinical features of FEVR include diverse characteristics, incomplete penetrance and asymmetry of disease [7]. Between probands and their other family members, there exists different severity of FEVR [8]. Combining previous studies with our massive clinical data, we have found that FEVR presents diverse clinical manifestations, pathological processes and genetic patterns. Therefore, we conduct a study to summarize relation between the clinical manifestations and genotypes in patients under 3 years old during long-term observation.

Methods

Study design

This study was conducted as a retrospective cases study in which the clinical manifestations of infant FEVR cases with different genotypes in a long-term follow-up was described and analyzed. This study critically complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines for specimen collection of human genetic diseases promulgated by the Ministry of Health of China. All guardians of minors signed an informed consent form.

Participants

Infant participants (N= 355, under 3 years old) with a diagnosis of FEVR and single positive gene were recruited from the Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University and Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University between January 2010 and December 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows. All the time of presentation of the patients were under 3 years old. Patients showed clinical features of FEVR that are confirmed by ultra-wide fundus fluorescein angiography, and had likely pathogenic or pathogenic mutations detected by genetic testing among 6 acknowledged pathogenic genes of FEVR (LRP5, FZD4, ZNF408, NDP, TSPAN12 and KIF11). The baseline data were collected, including chief complaints, sex, laterality, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, ophthalmic examination, family history, birth history, treatment history and so on. Other diseases that have similar clinical features with FEVR were excluded. Based on clinical features, imaging manifestations and gene testing results, the diagnosis was made by experienced doctors. All the patients were classified into 5 stages, including Stage 0–5, according to their clinical manifestations and severity. Our classification is based on the Pendergast’s classification [3]. Pendergast’s classification defined Stage 1 as ‘avascular retinal periphery without extraretinal vascularization’, Stage 2 as ‘avascular retinal periphery with extraretinal vascularization’, Stage 3 as ‘subtotal retinal detachment not involving fovea’, Stage 4 as ‘subtotal retinal detachment involving fovea’ and Stage 5 as ‘total retinal detachment’. Further, based on the severity of manifestation, we defined stages 1–3 as mild types and stage 4–5 as severe types [9]. The normal eyes were regarded as Stage 0. For better description and understanding, the patients were subdivided into several groups, including patients with monocular involvement (MI), of which fellow eyes have no areas of avascularity strictly based on the fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA), patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation (Stage 1–3) in both sides (BM), patients with binocular involvement and severe (Stage 4–5) manifestation in both sides (BS), and patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation in one eye and severe manifestation in the other eye (B[M + S]). All DNA samples were extracted from peripheral whole-blood samples (2 mL) collected from the participants, then the enrichment of the DNA fragments related to FEVR was performed on the DNA sales by using targeted-region capture. Then, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS; MyGenetics, China Beijing) was performed. Using Sanger sequencing, the samples of parents or other family members were validated. All the genetic data were analyzed to identify reported variants and estimate the pathogenicity. Family segregation was also assessed.

Interventions

All surgeries were performed by experienced surgeons. According to patients’ condition, different surgical methods were performed, including closed vitrectomy (Closed-V) with lensectomy, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with silicone oil or C3F8 injection, lens-sparing vitrectomy (LSV), scleral buckling (SB), intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) and strabotomy.

  • (1) Closed-V is a surgery procedure characterized by a limbus approach. The procedures included lensectomy combined with vitrectomy, and staged lensectomy and vitrectomy. Lensectomy is performed if the anterior chamber is shallow or flat with corneal edema and secondary glaucoma is complicated, or the lens is opaque and vitrectomy is performed if the fundus is visible and the conditions of fundus is stable. For lensectomy, a 20-gauge cannula was inserted to keep continuous infusion at the temporal limbus through the iris root instead of the pars plana to avoid damage to the retina. However, if the fundus is invisible because of corneal opacity or if preretinal vascular fibrovascular proliferation is in the active phase, which could cause severe vitreous hemorrhage, a second vitrectomy procedure is performed if corneal edema and corneal opacity are relieved several weeks after lensectomy during the follow-up period, which is called staged lensectomy and vitrectomy [10, 11].

  • (2) LSV consisted of standard 23-gauge three-port pars plana/plicata (incomplete development of the pars plana in infants) lens-sparing vitrectomy. In brief, after conjunctival peritomy, sclerotomies were performed 0.5 to 1 mm away from the limbus. To avoid lens damage, the direction of the sclerotomy was more vertical rather than toward the center of the eyeball. LSV is applicable for patients with a transparent lens and complete posterior vitreous detachment could not be performed for patients with only local fibrovascular proliferation [10,11,12,13].

  • (3) SB is applicable for patients without severe complications (corneal edema, corneal degeneration and cataract), such as local tractional retinal detachment (Stage 3) or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

  • (4) IVR is an adjuvant but significant treatment in surgical interventions and works by inhibiting vasoactivity. IVR 1 week before operation can inhibit the neovascularization and avoid the formation of retinal fibrovascular proliferation (one of complications of IVR), allowing the surgeon to perform the procedure in a relatively inactive or "quiet" eye. IVR is performed for patients with neovascularization at Stage 2–4, while subretinal injection of anti-VEGF could be performed for active retinal hemorrhage at Stage 5 [14, 15]. Laser coagulation and transscleral cryotherapy were also performed if appropriate. Laser coagulation, transscleral cryotherapy and IVR were not double-counted when these procedures were used as additional and necessary preoperative or intraoperative treatment.

  • (5) The patients that had strabotomy, had the surgery done elsewhere and the retinal abnormalities were identified upon referral to our center.

  • (6) PPV was performed to remove the epiretinal traction with complete posterior vitreous detachment, followed by silicone oil or C3F8 injection.

Laser coagulation and transscleral cryotherapy were also performed if appropriate. Laser coagulation, transscleral cryotherapy and IVR were not double-counted when these procedures were used as additional and necessary preoperative or intraoperative treatment. Routine anti-inflammatory and anti-infective treatments are performed after the operation. After the surgery, vision acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior segment, fundus and complications were first to observe, and detailed follow-up visits were recorded.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions, Version 25.0; IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA). The normally distributed measurement data was presented as (mean ± standard deviation), non-normally distributed measurement data was presented as median, minimum and maximum and the count data was presented bas percentage (%). The Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to investigate the correlation between gene mutations and clinical features. The χ2 tests were used for comparing the difference of gene mutations between FEVR patients and normal population and t tests for comparison of groups. The two-way ANOVA test to exclude the effect of clinical stage on the results. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical statistics of FEVR patients

There are 239 males and 96 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.48:1 (the male-to-female ratio was 1.99 :1 after eliminating 48 cases with NDP mutation) in 335 single gene positive FEVR infants (Figure 1a). All the patients were subdivided into 4 groups, including 32 patients (9.6%) with monocular involvement (MI), 66 patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation (BM), 95 patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation in one eye and severe manifestation in the other eye [B(M+S)] and 142 patients with binocular involvement and severe manifestation (BS). Therefore, in our study, patients with severe bilateral FEVR accounted for the majority, while patients with unilateral FEVR accounted for the minority (Figure 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical statistics of FEVR patients. Patients with monocular involvement (MI), patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation (Stage 1–3) in both sides (BM), patients with binocular involvement and severe (Stage 4–5) manifestation in both sides (BS), and patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation in one eye and severe manifestation in the other eye (B[M + S])

Full size image

Correlation between clinical phenotype and mutation

Probands with mutations of LRP5, FZD4, NDP, TSPAN12 and ZNF408 accounted for 28.3% (95 of 335), 22.4% (75 of 335), 14.3% (48 of 335), 13.7% (46 of 335) and 3.58% (12 of 335). LRP5 gene mutation was the most common mutation in FEVR patients. The severity of the clinical phenotype varied with different gene mutations. Patients with NDP mutations presented the most severe clinical phenotypes, and 38 of 48(79.2%) belonged to BS group. On the contrary, patients with ZNF408 mutations presented the mildest clinical phenotypes, and 6 of 12 (50%) belonged to BM group. Spontaneous mutation of KIF11 took over the majority, accompanied by microcephaly and choroidal atrophy. TSPAN12 had the highest familial hereditary ratio (Fig. 2, Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The correlation between clinical phenotype and mutant genes. Patients with monocular involvement (MI), patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation (Stage 1–3) in both sides (BM), patients with binocular involvement and severe (Stage 4–5) manifestation in both sides (BS), and patients with binocular involvement and mild manifestation in one eye and severe manifestation in the other eye [B(M + S)]

Full size image
Table 1 Clinical stages and severity in different single gene mutations
Full size table

Clinical prognosis in diverse genotypes

The characteristic of clinical stages in different single gene mutations

In MI group, 12 out of 95 patients in MI group having LRP5 mutation, patients with ZNF408 had the highest proportion (33.3, 4/12). The NDP mutation had the highest proportion of bilateral involvement. Staging of different genotypes was different (P < 0.001). In NDP genotype, the proportion of severe stage was the highest with a meaningful statistical difference (P < 0.05). Normal stage in ZNF408 genotypes showed the highest proportion (16.7%), followed by LRP5(6.3%), with a meaningful statistical difference (P = 0.029) compared with KIF11 genotype and no significant difference compared with other genotypes (P > 0.05). χ2 tests showed a significant difference among stages in different genotypes, which means proportions of different stages in different genotypes were not completely consistent. (Table 1).

Axial length of 335 single-gene infant FEVR cases with different genotypes

In order to analyze the correlation between the gene mutation and the axial length of the eye, we chose the eye with shorter length for statistical analysis, speculating that the shorter ones are the eyes that is mostly involved. Due to different genotypes correspond to different distribution of clinical stages, we apply two-way ANOVA test to find whether the type of gene mutation independently influences the axial length of the eye. There was no significant difference in the axial length of different genotypes (P = 0.2891) (Fig. 3, Table 2). Instead, clinical stage shows a significant relation with axial length (P < 0.0001). Statistical results showed that there was no significant correlation between genotype and axial length in patients with the same clinical stage. The genotypes more likely exerted influence on clinical phenotypes by affecting the distribution of clinical stage.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The relation between the length of optic axis and gene

Full size image
Table 2 The axial length in patients with different genotypes and stages
Full size table

Treatment for single-gene FEVR infants with different genotypes and stages

The difference among patients with different genotypes at different stages failed to reach the significant statistical difference. Surgeries including closed vitrectomy (Closed-V) with lensectomy, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with silicone oil or C3F8 injection, lens sparing vitrectomy (LSV), scleral buckling (SB), intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR), strabotomy, laser coagulation and cryotherapy were performed appropriately. The proportion of surgical treatment was much higher in patients under 1-year-old and 69.44% (75 of 108) of them were at Stage 5. 78.58% (11 of 14) of the lens of the affected eyes maintained transparent after the treatment of LSV. About 37.03% (40 of 108) of post-surgery patients showed prognosis of retinal funnel-like unfold and posterior pole unfold, which mostly received Closed-V. The earlier FEVR occurred, the worse the prognosis would be (Table 3).

Table 3 The treatment of FEVR
Full size table

Prognosis of 335 single-gene FEVR infant cases with different genotypes

The patients at Stage 1 visited biannually. The normal fellow eye (Stage 0) of the patients with monocular involvement and eyes at Stage 1 were not given any interventions in the follow-up period and remained in stable conditions (18.1%, 121 of 670). The patients at Stage 2-3 visited per 3 or 6 months, with an average follow-up time of 2-10 years. In these stable eyes, LRP5 mutation accounts for the highest percentage of 27.7% and NDP mutation accounts for the minority of 4.2%. Of total of 670 eyes, only 20.9% of affected eyes are mild types (Stage 2-3) and 32.8% of affected eyes were given interventions (laser coagulation, IVR and LSV). In follow-up, only 10% of infants evolved from Stage 2A to 2B, and then they were stabilized after laser treatment with no progression to Stage 4-5. However, there were 61% of patients with severe manifestation at presentation (Stage 4-5). At first visit, 56.2% of parents of infants with severe manifestation abandoned treatment because of the poor prognosis. By contrast, 37.96% of the rest infants receiving treatment showed resolution of funnel-like folding of retina involving posterior pole. The NDP mutations led to the worst prognosis (Table 4, Fig. 4). 37.96% (41 of 108) of post-surgery cases showed prognosis of retinal funnel-like unfold and posterior pole unfold, while could be accompanied by mild complications like closure of pupil and cornea dystrophy, severe complications like hyphema, secondary glaucoma, cholesterol crystallization, eyeball atrophy and so on. About 69.57% (16 of 23) of second surgery was performed because of pupil closure. At the last follow-up, 20% of infants at Stage 4 to 5 had vision above 20/200.

Table 4 The relation between prognosis and gene
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Picture A showed corneal degeneration and valgus collar of pupil. Picture B showed secondary glaucoma, becoming bigger and proptosis of the eyeball, mild corneal edema and disappearance of anterior chamber. Picture C1 showed obvious increase of IOP and orbital-celluitis-like change. Picture C2 showed smaller size of the right eye after high IOP for 3 days. Picture D showed closure of pupil and disappearance. Picture E showed corneal edema, anterior chamber disappearing with hemorrhage. Picture F showed plenty of cholesterol crystallization in the anterior chamber. Picture G showed flat posterior pole after surgery. Picture H showed funnel-shaped unfold after surgery. Picture I showed atrophy of the eyeball

Full size image

Discussion

FEVR is a hereditary disorder involving abnormal retinal vascular development and has various clinical manifestations [16]. Up to now, it is acknowledged that 6 pathogenic genes are associated with FEVR, including LRP5 (Autosomal recessive or scattered inheritance gene), FZD4 and TSPAN12 (Autosomal dominant or recessive gene), ZNF408 (Autosomal dominant gene), NDP (X-Linked recessive gene) and KIF11 which was found recently and was related to the microcephaly-lymphedema-chorioretinal dysplasia (MLCRD) syndrome. It was reported that 40 ~ 50% of FEVR cases were related to the mentioned genes [17].

Our study probably enrolled the biggest cohort of FEVR infant patients by clinical collection and genetic-screening technology. Based on the evidence of gene chip sequencing analysis and genotype–phenotype co-separation [18, 19], 335 infant cases were detected as positive single-gene. About 78.8% of probands carried genes that is affiliated to the family of Wnt/Norrin signaling pathway. About 17.61% (59 of 335) of probands carried KIF11 gene and only 3.58% (12 of 335) of probands carried ZNF408. The results showed that FEVR induced by NDP and TSPAN12 mutations had a better symmetry than that induced by LRP5 and FZD4. Patients with NDP mutations showed severer clinical manifestations, followed by patients with TSPAN12 mutations. These findings were similar with findings of Tang et al. [20] Tang et al.found that FEVR patients with TSPAN12 mutations showed severe manifestation and rapid progression. The young patients showed severer clinical manifestation than that of adult patients. In our study, 58.1% of FEVR infant patients were over Stage 4. In addition, FEVR was a progressive disease. As the age of probands getting older, the severity of FEVR would accordingly change, which contributed to the different stages of FEVR. The higher clinical stages and the shorter axial length were, the severer clinical manifestation would be.

The treatment of FEVR included clinical observation, laser coagulation, intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs and surgery [10, 12, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) is a significant examination for helping diagnosis and deciding treatment. Clinical observation is suitable for patients without symptoms or leakage point on FFA. Previous studies suggested that only close follow up was required for patients over 3 years old and whose affected eye was at stage 2A or milder. However, argon laser coagulation is actively used for the eyes that are at stage 2B, accompanied by intraretinal and subretinal exudation or retinal neovascularization [25]. Laser coagulation is appropriate for the eyes with leakage on FFA, which can enclose the leaking blood vessel ends, reduce exudation and prevent mechanical traction after development of fibrous membrane. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs is used for the eyes with broad exudation and neovascularization and the eyes that are hard to receive laser coagulation. Anti-VEGF drugs can reduce development of neovascularization and exudation, and suppress progression of FEVR. In our study, the cases at Stage 1 to 3 were mostly given intravitreal injection and/or retina photocoagulation with the last follow-up vision above 20/67. Surgery intervention is an important treatment for severe complications of progressive FEVR, such as vitreous hemorrhage, retinal tear or retinal detachment, secondary epiretinal membrane, secondary cataract or glaucoma and so on. In our study, appropriate surgery was chosen for different severity of FEVR patients, which was good for alleviating the complications of surgery. The patients under one year old accounted for the majority with a proportion of 69.44% for the patients at Stage 4 to 5, which demonstrated that the younger patients showed severer manifestation and close follow-up was necessary for patients under three years old. The stage 4th to 5thpatients were treated with the transcorneal vitrectomy with lensectomy or LSV, whose lens maintained transparent after LSV (11 of 14[78.58%]) corresponding to the previous study (74.1%) [11]. 37.03% of postoperative patients could achieve retinal unfold and partial retinal attachment after surgery. However, after long-term follow up and clinical observation, we comprehensively found that some patients might need to receive second surgery because of severe postoperative reaction, such as hemorrhage, exudation and fibrous membrane in pupil. 69.54% of them received second surgery owing to pupil closure. At the last follow-up, 20% (60 of 300) were with vision above 20/200 and under stable statement. Therefore, present study [10,11,12,13] recommended staged lensectomy and PPV are meaningful to alleviate the postoperative reaction and restore the depth of anterior chamber. For patients with occurrence of severe complications, we suggest that surgery is needed to maintain eyeball integrity, treat complications, prevent the occurrence of retinal detachment and maximize the restoration of visual function.

After analyzing the clinical features of 202 FEVR cases, Zhao et al. found that RD accounted for 33.6% in FEVR patients and 32.92% of affected eyes were misdiagnosed as simple RD. [32] The rate of correct diagnosis at first visit were 37.13% [27]. Our study dominantly focused on the infant FEVR patients that were under 3 years old. 20% (67 of 335) of infant cases were initially diagnosed as strabismus and ophthalmologists ignored the abnormalities of fundus. In addition to simple strabismus, a certain percentage of strabismus is caused by fundus diseases, such as persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous, X-linked retinoschisis, congenital macular hypoplasia, optic nerve hypoplasia, retinitis pigmentosa, incontinentia pigmenti achromians, Norrie disease, Coats’ disease and so on. These cases reminded ophthalmologists to examine patients’ fundus comprehensively when doctors meet the patients with a diagnosis of strabismus. If necessary, examining fundus of parents or gene testing is meaningful for avoiding misdiagnosis or late diagnosis resulting in severe FEVR. Early screening is an important way of early diagnosis for FEVR and treatment. If the progression of FEVR is stable and remain at Stage 1, the visual function can still be maintained. By contrast, if the progression of FEVR keep developing and causes damage to retina, the prognosis may not be optimistic. FEVR is a disease with extremely diverse manifestations, ranging from none of complaints or completely normal fundus to blindness and atrophy of the eyeball due to vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and RD. FEVR has a long time of development. The onset of FEVR happened when patients are in their infancy. The infant patients seldom showed obvious symptoms and manifestations in the early course of FEVR. At the late course, severe vision loss or even blindness happened due to VH or RD. Sometimes patients in the stationary phase could develop into active phase. Comprehensive fundus examination should be conducted on infants with strabismus. Long-time follow up or follow-up through life is consequently necessary for FEVR patients. The illness of some patients might intend to be active, even after they received treatments [33, 34]. Once the doctors perceive the advancement of the illness, patients should be given treatment immediately to avoid losing their visual function.

Considering the retrospective study, the limitations of our study are as follows. First, although our study enrolled a relatively large sample size, FEVR is a rare disease, and more patients probably provided strongly evidence-based clues. Second, due to FEVR is a disease that has a long development through life, the patients under 3 years that we enroll may introduce a selection bias and elder FEVR children should be observed in future. Likewise, the follow-up time ought to be extended. Third, due to the X-linked recessive manner of NDP mutation, there may exist potential bias in statistical analysis. Finally, cultural or social factors may affect family decision making, which may lead to unpredictable bias.

In conclusion, our long-term study suggested a correlation between clinical phenotypes and gene mutations in FEVR patients. Overall, we found LRP5 mutation accounted for the highest proportion. And the NDP mutation showed the severest clinical manifestation and KIF11 spontaneous mutation accounted for the majority. From the present evidence, we summarized that the main surgical methods for cases at Stage 4 to 5 were transcorneal vitrectomy with lensectomy or LSV and the proportion of surgical treatment was much higher in patients under 1 year old, indicating that the earlier FEVR occurred, the worse the prognosis would be. Consequently, active surgical intervention and lens sparing were necessary for the cases at Stage 4 to 5.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author P.Z on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FEVR:

Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy

Closed-V:

Closed vitrectomy

PPV:

Pars plana vitrectomy

RD:

Retinal detachment

LSV:

Lens-sparing vitrectomy

SB:

Scleral buckling

IVR:

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab

SPSS:

Statistical Product and Service Solutions

MI:

Monocular involvement

BM:

Binocular involvement and mild manifestation

BS:

Binocular involvement and severe manifestation

B(M + S):

Binocular involvement and mild manifestation in one eye and severe manifestation in the other eye

MLCRD:

Microcephaly-lymphedema-chorioretinal dysplasia

FFA:

Fundus fluorescein angiography

VH:

Vitreous hemorrhage

References

  1. Criswiek VG, Schepens CL. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(4):578–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li F. Chinese Ophthalmology [M] (3rd edition). Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2014. p. 24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pendergast SD, Trese MT. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Results of surgical management[J]. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(6):1015–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tian T, Chen C, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Zhao P. Clinical and Genetic Features of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy With Only-Unilateral Abnormalities in a Chinese Cohort. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(9):1054–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1493.

  5. van Nouhuys CE. Signs, complications, and platelet aggregation in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111(1):34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranchod TM, Ho LY, Drenser KA, et al. Clinical presentation of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(10):2070–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shukla D, Singh J, Sudheer G, et al. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR). Clinical profile and management[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:323–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collin RW, Nikopoulos K, Dona M, et al. ZNF408 is mutated in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy and is crucial for the development of zebrafish retinal vasculature[J]. Proc Natl AcadSci USA. 2013;110(24):9856–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CL, Zhao PQ, Li XR. Cohort study of genotype and clinical phenotype in 34 families with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis. 2020;36(3):184–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fei P, Yang W, Zhang Q, Jin H, Li J, Zhao P. Surgical management of advanced familial exudative vitreoretinopathy with complications. Retina. 2016;36:1480–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwahashi C, Tachibana K, Oga T, Kondo C, Kuniyoshi K, Kusaka S. Incidence and Factors of Postoperative Lens Opacity after Lens-Sparing Vitrectomy for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5:1139–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyu J, Zhang Q, Zhao P. Viscodelamination of Localized Retrolental Plaques During Lens-Sparing Vitrectomy in Eyes with Pediatric Tractional Vitreoretinopathy. Retina. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu WC, Lai CC, Lin RI, Wang NK, Chao AN, Chen KJ, Chen TL, Hwang YS. Modified 23-gauge vitrectomy system for stage 4 retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1326–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu AL, Wu WC. Anti-VEGF for ROP and Pediatric Retinal Diseases. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2018;7:145–51. https://doi.org/10.22608/apo.201837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng J, Liang T, Chen C, Zhang Q, Xu Y, Liu J, Zhao P. Subretinal injection of ranibizumab in advanced pediatric vasoproliferative disorders with total retinal detachments. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258:1005–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04600-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Toomes C, Bottomley HM, Scott S, et al. Spectrum and frequency of FZD4 mutations in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(7):2083–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fei P, Zhang Q, Huang L, et al. Identification of two novel LRP5 mutations in families with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Mol Vis. 2014;20:395–409.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Seo SH, Yu YS, Park SW, et al. Molecular characterization of FZD4, LRP5, and TSPAN12 in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:5143–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao FQ, Cai XB, Cheng FF, et al. Mutations in LRP5, FZD4, TSPAN12, NDP, ZNF408, or KIF11 genes account for 38.7% of Chinese patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(5):2623–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang M, Sun L, Hu A, et al. Mutation spectrum of the LRP5, NDP, and TSPAN12 genes in Chinese patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5949–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen SN, Hwang JF, Lin CJ. Clinical characteristics and surgical management of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Retina. 2012;32(2):220–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamane T, Yokoi T, Nakayama Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of progressive tractional retinal detachment associated with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(5):1049–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu LM, Xu YB, Sun Y, et al. Observation on the efficacy of scleral buckling in treating Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy FEVR associated with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment RRD. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis. 2015;31(4):384–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mammoto A, Connor KM, Mammoto T, et al. A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that control angiogenesis[J]. Nature. 2009;457(7233):1103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Trese MT. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy//Hartenett M. Pediatric retina. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &- Wilkins; 2005. p. 425–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pei-quan ZHAO, Ying-qing YU, Hai-dong SHAN, et al. Treatment for familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis. 2006;22(5):302–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan M, Ding X, Yang Y, et al. Clinical features of affected and undetached fellow eyes in patients with FEVR-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2017;37(3):585–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Laubichler AE, Laubichler P, Zapp D, et al. Familial Exsudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) in Childhood. Ophthalmologe. 2018;115:505–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Iwata A, Kusaka S, Ishimaru M, et al. Early Vitrectomy to Reverse Macular Dragging in a One-Month-Old Boy With Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2019;15:100493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen S-N, Hwang J-F, Lin C-J. Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Management of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy-Associated Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Retina. 2012;2(32):220–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leow SN, Bastion ML. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy presenting with unilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a Malay teenager. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2013009664. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009664.

  32. Qi Z, Peiquan Z, Xuan C, et al. Clinical features of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis. 2014;30(4):374–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen KJ, Wang NK, Wu WC. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy [J]. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(4):165487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Szmaz S, Yonekawa Y, Trese MT. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2015;45(4):164–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Thanks to support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101147) and (82171073), the Capital Health Research and Development of Special (No. SF-2018–2-1081) and Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Tongren Hospital Key Medical Development Plan (trzdyxzy201801). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chunli Chen and Yizhe Cheng contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Chunli Chen, Yizhe Cheng, Zhihan Zhang & Xiaoyan Peng

  2. Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Laboratory, Beijing, China

    Chunli Chen, Yizhe Cheng, Zhihan Zhang & Xiaoyan Peng

  3. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing, China

    Chunli Chen

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital, Medicine School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, People’s Republic of China

    Xiang Zhang, Jiakai Li & Peiquan Zhao

  5. Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Laboratory, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100005, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoyan Peng

Authors
  1. Chunli Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yizhe Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhihan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiakai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peiquan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaoyan Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Concept and design: PZ, XP. Data collection: JL, XZ and CC. Analysis and interpretation: CC and YC. Writing the article: CC and YC. Critical revision: XP and ZZ. Final approval: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peiquan Zhao or Xiaoyan Peng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted under the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all guardians of patients. All guardians of patients provided informed consent after a thorough description of the nature and consequences of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Z. et al. Long-term clinical prognosis of 335 infant single-gene positive FEVR cases. BMC Ophthalmol 22, 329 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02522-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02522-8

Keywords

  • FEVR
  • Gene
  • Clinical features
  • Relation between phenotypes and genotypes
  • Prognosis

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us