Skip to main content

Associations between matrix metalloproteinase gene polymorphisms and glaucoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) polymorphisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of glaucoma risk. However, the results were controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the precise associations between MMPs polymorphisms and glaucoma risk.

Methods

Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases within four databases. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between the most common polymorphisms of MMPs and glaucoma risk. Heterogeneity, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power.

Results

Overall, 11 selected articles involving 2,388 cases and 2,319 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Significant associations were only found between MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism (GA vs. GG: OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.67-0.97, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%), MMP-9 rs3918249 C > T polymorphism (TT vs. CC + CT: OR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.51-0.98, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%) and glaucoma risk in the general population. Subgroup analysis also suggested that MMP-9 rs17576 G > A was related to glaucoma in the Caucasian population (GA vs. GG: OR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.45-1.00, P = 0.05; GA + AA vs. GG: OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.45-0.97, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism might be a protective factor against the development of glaucoma in Caucasian population.

Peer Review reports

Background

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous disease of the eye characterized by the progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells and loss of vision associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) [1]. After cataracts, glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in the world [2]. In China, there were approximately 15.8 million patients with glaucoma in 2010 and the number of patients is projected to increase to 21.8 million by 2020 [3]. This visual disorder results in severe disability, a reduced quality of life, and a substantial economic burden for individuals and society.

As we know, ocular hypertension is the most important risk factor for glaucoma, but its etiology is still unclear. Many molecular epidemiological studies have suggested that glaucoma is a complex multifactorial disease. Various risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, lifestyle habits (e.g., smoking tobacco and drinking alcohol), age, and genetics play interacting roles in the development of glaucoma. Recently, certain genetic factors, including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), were found to be associated with glaucoma. MMPs are a group of zinc and calcium-dependent endopeptidases that are involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) homeostasis and remodeling [4, 5]. In glaucoma, pathological changes occur in the trabecular meshwork and the juxtacanalicular tissue of the chamber angle. Aqueous humor (AH) drainage is influenced by the ECM, which modulates AH outflow from the anterior chamber via the irido-corneal drainage angle to regulate IOP [6]. A recent study in animal models reported that the abnormal expression of MMPs in the AH of patients with glaucoma may influence the regulation of IOP [7]. These findings indicated that the aberrant expression of MMPs may be associated with both the development and prognosis of glaucoma.

Previous molecular research has demonstrated that genetic mutations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), can alter the level of gene expression or the function of gene products, thereby affecting the susceptibility of individuals to specific diseases [8, 9]. In 2006, Wang et al. [10] reported an association between SNPs in the MMP-9 gene and the risk of developing glaucoma, and suggested that the rs17576 G > A mutation maybe a risk factor in Taiwanese patients. Subsequently, considerable efforts have been made to elucidate the relationship between MMP gene polymorphisms and glaucoma risk worldwide, but conflicting results have been observed. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the association between MMP gene polymorphisms and glaucoma risk.

Methods

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [11, 12]. No ethical issues were involved in this study given that our data were based on published studies.

Search strategy

Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang) were used to search for case control studies evaluating the association between MMPs polymorphisms and glaucoma risk published up to February 1, 2016, with the following search terms: “glaucoma,” “MMP,” “matrix metalloproteinases,” “polymorphism,” and “variant”. Manual searches of references from original studies and review articles on this topic were conducted to identify other relevant studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for studies in our meta-analysis were as follows: (1) designed as a case control study, (2) reported an association between MMP polymorphism(s) and glaucoma risk,(3) sufficient genotype frequency to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and (4) no deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the genotype distribution of the control group. For results that were reported in multiple publications, only the largest or latest dataset was included. The exclusion criteria included: (1) review articles, (2) case reports, (3) results without sufficient genotype frequency data, and (4) animal model research.

Data extraction

Two reviewers (MYW and YW) independently reviewed the full articles and collected the following characteristics: the first author’s name, publication year, study country/region, ethnicity of participants (such as Asian or Caucasian), disease subtype, genotyping method, sources of controls, and frequencies of genotypes in glaucoma cases and controls. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was estimated based on the genotypes of the controls. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion between the 2 reviewers or by consulting with an expert in ophthalmology (ZY).

Statistical analysis

Crude ORs with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the strength of the association between each reported MMP polymorphism and glaucoma risk. For the MMP-9 rs17576G > A polymorphism, the pooled ORs were obtained for the allele contrast (A vs. G), co-dominant (GA vs. GG,AA vs. GG), dominant (GA + AA vs. GG), and recessive (AA vs. GG + GA) models. Subgroup analyses according to disease type, ethnicity, study design, and genotyping methods were also conducted. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the I2 method [13]. ORs estimation was calculated with a fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) when the P value was more than 0.10 or I2 was less than 50% [14]; otherwise, a random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method) was adopted [15, 16]. Cumulative meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the stability of the results by removing each study sequentially for each polymorphism. The potential publication bias of the literature was analyzed by Egger’s linear regression and Begg’s funnel plots. Similar genetic models were also assessed for the other MMP-1, 2, and 9 variants. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) with 2-sided P-values and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study characteristics

In total, 45 related articles were identified. Seventeen of these studies were excluded through title and duplicate screening. Subsequently, 1 study was excluded for not involving glaucoma research; 2 studies without related polymorphisms locus were excluded; 6 studies were excluded for fundamental molecular biology researches; and 8 studies were excluded because they were reviews. Finally, 11 articles involving 2,388 cases and 2,319 controls met the inclusion criteria [10, 1726] (Fig. 1). Among these included articles, 9 studies focused on associations between MMP-9 polymorphisms (rs17576 G > A, rs17577 G > A, rs3918249 C > T, rs3918242 C > T, rs3918254 C > T, rs3787268 G > A) and glaucoma [10, 1724] (Table 1), 4 articles on associations between an MMP-1 polymorphism (rs1799750 1G > 2G) and glaucoma [19, 22, 24, 25] (Table 2), and 2 articles on associations between an MMP-2 polymorphism (rs243865C > T) and glaucoma [19, 26] (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow diagram of the study selection process

Table 1 Characteristics of case–control studies on MMP-9 polymorphisms and glaucoma risk
Table 2 Characteristics of included studies on MMP-1 rs1799750 1G > 2G and MMP-2 rs243865C > T polymorphisms and glaucoma risk

Five studies involved Asian populations [10, 17, 18, 21, 23] and 6 studies involved Caucasian populations [19, 20, 22, 2426]. No study deviated from HWE. The detailed characteristics of the selected studies are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

Meta-analysis

Association between MMP-9 polymorphisms with glaucoma risk

With regards to MMP-9 gene polymorphisms and glaucoma risk, 9 articles (reporting a total of 11 case–control studies) involving 2,028 cases and 1,794 controls were included in our analyses of the 6 most commonly reported SNP loci. Overall, significant associations were only found between MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism (GA vs. GG: OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.67-0.97, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%), MMP-9 rs3918249 C > T polymorphism (TT vs. CC + CT: OR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.51-0.98, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%) and glaucoma risk. Furthermore, in the subsequent analyses based on disease type, ethnicity, control design and genotyping methods, a significant protective effect against glaucoma risk was observed for MMP-9 rs17576 G > A in Caucasian populations (GA vs. GG: OR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.45-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 0 (Fig. 2); GA + AA vs. GG: OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.45-0.97, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%) (Table 3). No significant association was found between other MMP-9 polymorphisms and glaucoma risk.

Fig. 2
figure2

Calculated OR and 95% CIs for the associations between MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism and glaucoma risk in the GA vs. GG model

Table 3 Summary ORs and 95% CI of MMP-9 polymorphisms and glaucoma risk

Sensitivity analyses were conducted by deleting each included study step by step in MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism. No single study qualitatively changed the pooled ORs when removed, indicating that the results of this meta-analysis are stable (Fig. 3 for GA vs. GG model). Cumulative analysis showed that the protective effect increased gradually with the increase of sample size by publication date in MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism (Fig. 4 for GA vs. GG model). Funnel plots were performed to assess the potential for publication bias, and no evidence of asymmetry was found (Fig. 5 for GA vs. GG model). This result was further supported by analysis using Egger’s test (A vs. G: P = 0.30; GA vs. GG: P = 0.57; AA vs. GG: P = 0.28; GA + AA vs. GG: P = 0.95; AA vs. GG + GA, P = 0.43), indicating that there was no detectable publication bias.

Fig. 3
figure3

Sensitivity analysis via deletion of each individual study reflects the relative influence of each individual dataset on the pooled ORs in the GA vs. GG model of MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism and glaucoma risk

Fig. 4
figure4

Cumulative meta-analyses according to publication year in the GA vs. GG model of MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism and glaucoma risk

Fig. 5
figure5

Funnel plot analysis to detect publication bias for GA vs. GG model of MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism and glaucoma risk. Circles represent the weight of the studies

Association between MMP-1 and MMP-2 polymorphisms with glaucoma risk

Four articles (reporting a total of 6 case control studies) involving 1,065 cases and 836 controls and 2 articles (reporting a total of 3 case control studies) with 792 cases and 559 controls were included in our meta-analysis of the MMP-1 rs1799750 1G > 2G and MMP-2 rs243865 C > T polymorphisms and glaucoma risk. No significant association was found for all models for these 2 SNP loci (Table 4). Subgroup analyses based on disease type and control design were also conducted, and no significant association was found.

Table 4 Summary ORs and 95% CI of MMP-1 rs1799750 1G > 2G and MMP-2 rs243865C > T polymorphisms and glaucoma risk

Discussion

MMPs are classified as a large family of zinc-containing proteases and have been suggested to be important mediators in the pathogenesis of various diseases. MMPs, which are antagonized by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), can degrade and remodel ECM molecules, thereby influencing cellular activities and maintaining the homeostasis of theepithelialbasementmembrane [27, 28]. The abnormal expression of MMPs can disturb the proteolytic balance and result in a number of pathologic conditions such as inflammatory diseases [29], oropharyngeal cancer [30], coronary heart disease [31], and respiratory abnormalities [32]. In the development of glaucoma, an imbalance between MMPs and TIMPs may impair ECM turnover in the trabecular meshwork and increase the resistance to AH outflow, which may eventually lead to raised IOP and glaucoma [33].

SNPs are the most common type of genetic mutation and have been associated with altered disease susceptibility through changes in gene transcription and expression as well as amino acid substitutions. In 2006, Wang et al. conducted the first case control study investigating the potential association between MMP-9 SNPs and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Significant differences in the frequencies of the MMP-9 rs17576 G > A SNP genotypes were found between the glaucoma and healthy control groups, which suggested an increased risk for glaucoma in the Chinese population according to a dominant model (OR = 2.84, 95%CI = 1.63-5.64, P = 0.03). Subsequently, more epidemiological studies were conducted, with inconsistent and even contradictory results.

In this meta-analysis, published research data were pooled and analyzed to investigate a specific research question. Pooling datasets reduces the random error that can occur with small sample sizes. This retrospective review indicated that an inadequate number of studies, small sample sizes and limited ethnic diversity, contributed to their conflicting findings. To evaluate the evidence for the potential association between MMPs and glaucoma susceptibility, we conducted this meta-analysis using 2,388 cases and 2,319 controls from 11 publications. Overall, our analysis indicated that MMP-9 polymorphisms (rs17576 G > A and rs3918249 C > T) conferred different significantly susceptibility to glaucoma. Stratified analysis by ethnicity, control design, and genotyping method were performed to estimate the association for each subgroup. The subgroup analysis according to ethnicity demonstrated a significant protective association between the MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism and glaucoma susceptibility in the Caucasian population. Thus, ethnic differences may be the most important factor underlying differences in glaucoma susceptibility between the Asian and Caucasian populations. MMP-9 rs17576 polymorphism is locate in exon 6 of MMP-9 gene with a nucleic acid substitution from G to A, and this mutation located fibronectin type II domains that presumably enhance substrate binding [34, 35]. Although no experimental research on this polymorphism was reported. The conversion from the positively charged amino acid arginine to uncharged glutamine may influence the activity of this enzyme and affect the glaucoma susceptibility [36, 37]. As we know, the pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG)、primary closure-angle glaucoma (PACG) and exfoliation syndrome (XFG) are not identical. PACG is characterized by the adhesion between the peripheral iris and trabecular meshwork, resulting in the inability of the aqueous fluid to flow out of the aqueous humor. POAG is thought to be a common glaucoma, accompanied with optic neuropathy and corresponding visual field progressive damage with an open situation of anterior chamber angle. The etiology of XFG is still unknown,which generally believed to be a systemic disorder of eye condition. They are caused by intermittent or persistent elevation of IOP, resulting in damage to the eye tissue and visual function. In this meta-analysis,subgroup analysis of POAG、PACG and XPF risk were conducted in only two polymorphism loci due to the small sample size of included studies. Regrettably, this study failed to find a direct correlation between the MMPs genetic polymorphisms and the three sub-diseases.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the potential association between MMP gene polymorphisms and glaucoma susceptibility. Some limitations of this meta-analysis were inevitable and should be addressed. First, the number of included studies and the amount of data available were limited, which constrained the statistical power. Second, heterogeneity was observed in the data for some SNP loci, which further hindered our ability to confidently identify any potential associations. Third, due to the deficiency of available data, it was not possible to study the interactions between MMP gene SNPs and glaucoma risk factors, such as haplotype, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.

Despite these limitations, the findings further enhance our understanding of the potential associations between MMP gene polymorphisms and glaucoma susceptibility. Positive aspects of the analysis were also identified. First, the distributions of genotypes in the control subjects for all of the investigated SNPs conformed to HWE. Second, evaluation using Egger’s test and Begg’s funnel plots did not show significant publication bias. Third, a large amount of heterogeneity was alleviated through subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that the MMP-9 rs17576 G > A polymorphism maybe an important protective factor against glaucoma, especially in the Caucasian population. Moreover, the present findings highlight the need for further investigations of the potential associations between MMP gene polymorphisms and glaucoma, which should ideally large sample sizes and multiple ethnic groups.

Abbreviations

95% CIs:

95% confidence intervals

AH:

Aqueous humor

CIs:

Confidence intervals

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

HWE:

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

IOP:

Intraocular pressure

MMPs:

Matrix metalloproteinases

ORs:

Odds ratios

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

TIMPs:

Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases

References

  1. 1.

    Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I. Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40:341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt JC, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1412–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wong TT, Sethi C, Daniels JT, Limb GA, Murphy G, Khaw PT. Matrix metalloproteinases in disease and repair processes in the anterior segment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:239–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Visse R, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry. Circ Res. 2003;92:827–39.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maatta M, Tervahartiala T, Harju M, Airaksinen J, Autio-Harmainen H, Sorsa T. Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in aqueous humor of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, exfoliation syndrome, and exfoliation glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Lommatzsch J, Kuchle M, Konstas AG, Naumann GO. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in aqueous humor of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1117–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Niu YM, Du XY, Lu MY, Xu QL, Luo J, Shen M. Significant association between functional microRNA polymorphisms and head and neck cancer susceptibility: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12972.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Niu Y, Yuan H, Shen M, Li H, Hu Y, Chen N. Association between cyclooxygenase-2 gene polymorphisms and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma risk. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wang IJ, Chiang TH, Shih YF, Lu SC, Lin LL, Shieh JW, et al. The association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MMP-9 genes with susceptibility to acute primary angle closure glaucoma in Taiwanese patients. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1223–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. W64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang L, Chen LM, Wang MN, Chen XJ, Li N, Huang YD, et al. The G894t, T-786c and 4b/a polymorphisms in Enos gene and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med. 2014;7:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Aung T, Yong VH, Lim MC, Venkataraman D, Toh JY, Chew PT, et al. Lack of association between the rs2664538 polymorphism in the MMP-9 gene and primary angle closure glaucoma in Singaporean subjects. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:257–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cong Y, Guo X, Liu X, Cao D, Jia X, Xiao X, et al. Association of the single nucleotide polymorphisms in the extracellular matrix metalloprotease-9 gene with PACG in southern China. Mol Vis. 2009;15:1412–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mossbock G, Weger M, Faschinger C, Zimmermann C, Schmut O, Renner W, et al. Role of functional single nucleotide polymorphisms of MMP1, MMP2, and MMP9 in open angle glaucomas. Mol Vis. 2010;16:1764–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Awadalla MS, Burdon KP, Kuot A, Hewitt AW, Craig JE. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 genetic variation and primary angle closure glaucoma in a Caucasian population. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1420–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shi H, Zhu R, Hu N, Shi J, Zhang J, Jiang L, et al. Association of frizzled-related protein (MFRP) and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) single nucleotide polymorphisms with primary angle closure in a Han Chinese population: Jiangsu Eye Study. Mol Vis. 2013;19:128–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Micheal S, Yousaf S, Khan MI, Akhtar F, Islam F, Khan WA, et al. Polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinases MMP1 and MMP9 are associated with primary open-angle and angle closure glaucoma in a Pakistani population. Mol Vis. 2013;19:441–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gao XJ, Hou SP, Li PH. The association between matrix metalloprotease-9 gene polymorphisms and primary angle-closure glaucoma in a Chinese Han population. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7:397–402.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Markiewicz L, Majsterek I, Przybylowska K, Dziki L, Waszczyk M, Gacek M, et al. Gene polymorphisms of the MMP1, MMP9, MMP12, IL-1beta and TIMP1 and the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:e516–23.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tsironi EE, Pefkianaki M, Tsezou A, Kotoula MG, Dardiotis E, Almpanidou P, et al. Evaluation of MMP1 and MMP3 gene polymorphisms in exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2890–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kaminska A, Banas-Lezanska P, Przybylowska K, Gacek M, Majsterek I, Szaflik J, et al. The protective role of the -735C/T and the -1306C/T polymorphisms of the MMP-2 gene in the development of primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genet. 2014;35:41–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Djordjevic-Jocic J, Zlatanovic G, Veselinovic D, Jovanovic P, Djordjevic V, Zvezdanovic L, et al. Transforming growth factor beta1, matrix-metalloproteinase-2 and its tissue inhibitor in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma/syndrome. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012;69:231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    De Groef L, Van Hove I, Dekeyster E, Stalmans I, Moons L. MMPs in the trabecular meshwork: promising targets for future glaucoma therapies? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:7756–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Matusiewicz M, Neubauer K, Mierzchala-Pasierb M, Gamian A, Krzystek-Korpacka M. Matrix metalloproteinase-9: its interplay with angiogenic factors in inflammatory bowel diseases. Dis Markers. 2014;2014:643645.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Burduk PK, Bodnar M, Sawicki P, Szylberg L, Wisniewska E, Kazmierczak W, et al. Expression of metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and tissue inhibitors 1 and 2 as predictors of lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2015;37:418–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liu R, Chen L, Wu W, Chen H, Zhang S. Extracellular matrix turnover in coronary artery ectasia patients. Heart Vessels. 2016;31:351–59.

  32. 32.

    Navratilova Z, Zatloukal J, Kriegova E, Kolek V, Petrek M. Simultaneous up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1, 4 in serum of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology. 2012;17:1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nga AD, Yap SL, Samsudin A, Abdul-Rahman PS, Hashim OH, Mimiwati Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in the aqueous humour of patients with primary angle closure glaucoma - a quantitative study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Allan JA, Docherty AJ, Barker PJ, Huskisson NS, Reynolds JJ, Murphy G. Binding of gelatinases A and B to type-I collagen and other matrix components. Biochem J. 1995;309(Pt 1):299–306.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shipley JM, Doyle GA, Fliszar CJ, Ye QZ, Johnson LL, Shapiro SD, et al. The structural basis for the elastolytic activity of the 92-kDa and 72-kDa gelatinases. Role of the fibronectin type II-like repeats. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:4335–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hu Z, Huo X, Lu D, Qian J, Zhou J, Chen Y, et al. Functional polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase-9 are associated with risk of occurrence and metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5433–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhang B, Henney A, Eriksson P, Hamsten A, Watkins H, Ye S. Genetic variation at the matrix metalloproteinase-9 locus on chromosome 20q12.2-13.1. Hum Genet. 1999;105:418–23.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81170993). The foundation had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting our findings is contained within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the study: M-YW, YW, and LZ; Acquisition of data: YZ and C-YL; Analysis and interpretation of data: C-YD and LP; Drafting the manuscript: M-YW and YW; Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: YZ and LZ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. No ethical issues were involved in this study given that our data were based on published studies. Written informed consent for participation and ethical approval has been provided by original studies. Thus, all investigations analyzed in this meta-analysis have been carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, M., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y. et al. Associations between matrix metalloproteinase gene polymorphisms and glaucoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 17, 48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0442-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Matrix metalloproteinases
  • Glaucoma
  • Polymorphism